Printable View
Looks like our scene is cooked unless our economy gets better. Or at least gov opens up?
[QUOTE=Konichi1;7427978]Am I mistaken or did they just switch out the girls? I've seen Baby Cindy's pics before but I think they weaved in one of Ina's. Not sure what's going on since I wanted to visit Ina this weekend.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CigNWhiskey;7430949]Looks like our scene is cooked unless our economy gets better. Or at least gov opens up?[/QUOTE]Yeah I actually saw her last day here.
She told me she would be here for five more days but missed home (LA).
She actually kept telling me comeback and see her again but she left the next day lols.
Some girl that came here during summer also told me it was slow for here compare toast year.
Figured k girl scene cooked here since the j girl invasion here.
There a new girl (new to VA not the business) heard she is good service and cute at Discreet story Cici.
She should be starting soon.
[QUOTE=CigNWhiskey;7430949]Looks like our scene is cooked unless our economy gets better. Or at least gov opens up?[/QUOTE]I'm sure the inflated rates in this area have a lot to do with it. The same girls will charge 20% more here than say in Texas. I'd assume many are just tired of paying up and just go for cheaper alternatives.
US sex guide / DMV board #9945.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33082-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7432211&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7432211.
ATM - [URL]https://www.asiantopmodel.com/[/URL].
In reference to the disturbing account detailed in post #9945, the agency's conduct—specifically the threat to disclose a new client's personally identifiable information—is profoundly unacceptable and frankly alarming. Even if we acknowledge that the client bears partial responsibility for the scheduling mishap, including his failure to promptly reconfirm the appointment he initially intended to keep, such miscommunication does not justify an agency's attempt to weaponize confidential data. The adult-services industry is already fraught with inherent safety and privacy concerns, and agencies routinely emphasize discretion as a foundational component of their operations. For any agency to pivot from that standard and allegedly threaten to expose a client's PII over a relatively minor and common scheduling error is not merely unprofessional—it is unethical, retaliatory, and corrosive to the trust that holds the entire business model together.
If the client's account is accurate, the agency's response reveals a deeply troubling disregard for basic privacy obligations. The difference between blacklisting a client and actively threatening to disclose his private information is enormous. Blacklisting, while disappointing for the client, is at least within the realm of industry norms. But leveraging personal data as a form of intimidation is something else entirely. It signals that this agency is willing to escalate a simple administrative issue into a form of coercion, which should alarm both clients and providers. Even individuals who may believe the client handled his part imperfectly should be able to recognize the disproportionate nature of the agency's reaction. A business that is entrusted with sensitive information must demonstrate maturity, fairness, and professionalism when conflicts or misunderstandings arise—not resort to punitive threats that could expose someone to real-life harm.
If the claims in post #9945 hold true, then this agency has crossed a boundary that no reputable operation should ever approach. It is a breach of trust, of ethics, and of the most basic standards of client confidentiality. And frankly, it is behavior that should prompt serious reconsideration from anyone contemplating doing business with them.
[QUOTE=DMVAverageJoe;7432844]US sex guide / DMV board #9945.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33082-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7432211&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7432211.
ATM - [URL]https://www.asiantopmodel.com/[/URL].
In reference to the disturbing account detailed in post #9945, the agency's conductspecifically the threat to disclose a new client's personally identifiable informationis profoundly unacceptable and frankly alarming. Even if we acknowledge that the client bears partial responsibility for the scheduling mishap, including his failure to promptly reconfirm the appointment he initially intended to keep, such miscommunication does not justify an agency's attempt to weaponize confidential data. The adult-services industry is already fraught with inherent safety and privacy concerns, and agencies routinely emphasize discretion as a foundational component of their operations. For any agency to pivot from that standard and allegedly threaten to expose a client's PII over a relatively minor and common scheduling error is not merely unprofessionalit is unethical, retaliatory, and corrosive to the trust that holds the entire business model together.
If the client's account is accurate, the agency's response reveals a deeply troubling disregard for basic privacy obligations. The difference between blacklisting a client and actively threatening to disclose his private information is enormous. Blacklisting, while disappointing for the client, is at least within the realm of industry norms. But leveraging personal data as a form of intimidation is something else entirely. It signals that this agency is willing to escalate a simple administrative issue into a form of coercion, which should alarm both clients and providers. Even individuals who may believe the client handled his part imperfectly should be able to recognize the disproportionate nature of the agency's reaction. A business that is entrusted with sensitive information must demonstrate maturity, fairness, and professionalism when conflicts or misunderstandings arisenot resort to punitive threats that could expose someone to real-life harm.
If the claims in post #9945 hold true, then this agency has crossed a boundary that no reputable operation should ever approach. It is a breach of trust, of ethics, and of the most basic standards of client confidentiality. And frankly, it is behavior that should prompt serious reconsideration from anyone contemplating doing business with them.[/QUOTE]Last I checked, it is prostitution is illegal operation. What's more disturbing is that they keep and don't delete the personal information that WILL be used against THEM and us in the criminal trial.
[QUOTE=Hifly21;7431062]I'm sure the inflated rates in this area have a lot to do with it. The same girls will charge 20% more here than say in Texas. I'd assume many are just tired of paying up and just go for cheaper alternatives.[/QUOTE]I nearly choked when I moved here earlier this year from San Jose area. Prices here are nearly double for J-Girls and almost as much for K-Girls. Its ALMOST worth me getting in my fun when I am home 1-2 times a month, but usually my time there is so limited and making an excuse to disappear for a couple of hours would be much more difficult.
[QUOTE=JacobsPatrick;7433655]Last I checked, it is prostitution is illegal operation. What's more disturbing is that they keep and don't delete the personal information that WILL be used against THEM and us in the criminal trial.[/QUOTE]Prostitution is illegal and so is blackmail. One is a misdemeanor and another is a felony.
[QUOTE=JaySinn;7433927]Prostitution is illegal and so is blackmail. One is a misdemeanor and another is a felony.[/QUOTE]Just out of curiosity, how do you think they would have outed your personal information? This website? The other website? Reddit? LEO? What was your impression? Are you suggesting that they were asking for money (blackmail)?