Agency Discussion and Reviews

[QUOTE=GSlinger007;7384271]Still waiting for real feedback for ssg from reputable member so I can make my first appt with ssg but so far I don't see any.[/QUOTE]I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, [b]LongLee[/b]. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7375861#post7375861]Karen[/URL] and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7188071#post7188071]FunUDF[/URL], and [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7288301&viewfull=1#post7288301]CCG right below your post[/URL] at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.

* In second place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7370488&viewfull=1#post7370488]Suede15[/URL][/b]. Member since 2020. Started out in California. While not an early adopter, he's got more CCG reviews than anyone else who crossed the fence. Tbh I thought this was going to be a setup because I know someone else who always asked about a rival agency and never went. But surprise surprise, he did.

* In third place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7343874&viewfull=1#post7343874]Hl123[/URL][/b]. He only has a single SSG review, so shouldn't really be placed this high, but you know what he also has? [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7105444#post7105444]A visit with CCG Baby Moon[/URL] so yet another one who has actually seen both sides. Does not appear to have FunUDF credit so loses to LongLee.

All of the top 3 are people [B]who had experience with CCG[/B]. Unfortunately, all of the ones below don't have verifiable CCG experience. So for [B]your[/B] standards, their words may mean nothing. But to others, it does.

* In fourth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7328243&viewfull=1#post7328243]DeltaGuy73[/URL][/b]. He fell off the map but he was key in establishing initial presence with Yaya and Viki. And unlike some people, his history goes back 5 years before either agency was present, so his experience counts more than even mine. He also may have ushered in the current notice of Nashville L3 AMP establishments.

* In fifth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7339059&viewfull=1#post7339059]SilverFox1117[/URL][/b]. Member since 2021. Various comments over escort threads at those times. Even tried to ask about CCG at one point. One of the semi early adopters for SSG with reviews on the OG Chinese girls.

* In sixth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7335532&viewfull=1#post7335532]MaskRider2000[/URL][/b]. Nothing super notable but history going back to 2023. Still prior to the first CCG comment BTW. Nothing I'd see as abnormal behavior in their post history.

* In seventh place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7355300&viewfull=1#post7355300]Vol16[/URL][/b]. Member since [B]2004.[/B] Minimal Nashville history but it is explained pretty clearly why he was here. Should not be questioned.

* In eighth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7330751#post7330751]BenTeddyBear[/URL][/b]. Broke a two year silence of nothing in public to chime in for SSG. A little weird sure, but he's got post history going back to 2016 and it was a year between his first and second post, so it isn't out of character.

* Rounding out last place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7324830#post7324830]LatinLvr90[/URL][/b]. He has a mere 5 posts. But considering his first post was in 2019, unless you are saying he was a plant that waited 6 years to prop up SSG, he's also a valid member. He did mention a visit to CCG but it isn't in his public post history, that's why he is granted a rank out of the top four.

So you've got 10 users, with a variety of history either crossing agencies, massage parlors, escorts, or just being really old accounts. None of whom have sought any fault with any agency that has passed through (well DeltaGuy73 did it a little bit but he's done more than enough to make up for that). None of these users can be seen pushing any individual agenda. And many of the reviews contain some sort of criticism, so no one treats it as an infallible agency. However, overall, the trend is positive. But somehow you seem to like to invalidate all their experiences just to push the point that doesn't matter.

[I]"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."[/I] - George Bernard Shaw.

Zero reason to mudsling on either side. Just out review the other. I'll even give you a freebie, one might say I'm on break with SSG for now. If we ignore the 502 commentary, this thread could have had 3 CCG reviews since my last SSG review. 2 from LeonardoDaRizy and one from BoneEm69. But instead, we have 1 review from LeonardoDaRizy, tech support, and mudslinging. I could have ignored your point, but I thought it helpful to everyone to highlight community contributions.

Well said Ayasaki!

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7384362]I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, [b]LongLee[/b]. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7375861#post7375861]Karen[/URL] and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7188071#post7188071]FunUDF[/URL], and [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7288301&viewfull=1#post7288301]CCG right below your post[/URL] at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7384362]I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, [b]LongLee[/b]. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7375861#post7375861]Karen[/URL] and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7188071#post7188071]FunUDF[/URL], and [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7288301&viewfull=1#post7288301]CCG right below your post[/URL] at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.

* In second place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7370488&viewfull=1#post7370488]Suede15[/URL][/b]. Member since 2020. Started out in California. While not an early adopter, he's got more CCG reviews than anyone else who crossed the fence. Tbh I thought this was going to be a setup because I know someone else who always asked about a rival agency and never went. But surprise surprise, he did.

* In third place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7343874&viewfull=1#post7343874]Hl123[/URL][/b]. He only has a single SSG review, so shouldn't really be placed this high, but you know what he also has? [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7105444#post7105444]A visit with CCG Baby Moon[/URL] so yet another one who has actually seen both sides. Does not appear to have FunUDF credit so loses to LongLee.

All of the top 3 are people [B]who had experience with CCG[/B]. Unfortunately, all of the ones below don't have verifiable CCG experience. So for [B]your[/B] standards, their words may mean nothing. But to others, it does.

* In fourth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7328243&viewfull=1#post7328243]DeltaGuy73[/URL][/b]. He fell off the map but he was key in establishing initial presence with Yaya and Viki. And unlike some people, his history goes back 5 years before either agency was present, so his experience counts more than even mine. He also may have ushered in the current notice of Nashville L3 AMP establishments.

* In fifth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7339059&viewfull=1#post7339059]SilverFox1117[/URL][/b]. Member since 2021. Various comments over escort threads at those times. Even tried to ask about CCG at one point. One of the semi early adopters for SSG with reviews on the OG Chinese girls.

* In sixth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7335532&viewfull=1#post7335532]MaskRider2000[/URL][/b]. Nothing super notable but history going back to 2023. Still prior to the first CCG comment BTW. Nothing I'd see as abnormal behavior in their post history.

* In seventh place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7355300&viewfull=1#post7355300]Vol16[/URL][/b]. Member since [B]2004.[/B] Minimal Nashville history but it is explained pretty clearly why he was here. Should not be questioned.

* In eighth place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7330751#post7330751]BenTeddyBear[/URL][/b]. Broke a two year silence of nothing in public to chime in for SSG. A little weird sure, but he's got post history going back to 2016 and it was a year between his first and second post, so it isn't out of character.

* Rounding out last place, we have [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7324830#post7324830]LatinLvr90[/URL][/b]. He has a mere 5 posts. But considering his first post was in 2019, unless you are saying he was a plant that waited 6 years to prop up SSG, he's also a valid member. He did mention a visit to CCG but it isn't in his public post history, that's why he is granted a rank out of the top four.

So you've got 10 users, with a variety of history either crossing agencies, massage parlors, escorts, or just being really old accounts. None of whom have sought any fault with any agency that has passed through (well DeltaGuy73 did it a little bit but he's done more than enough to make up for that). None of these users can be seen pushing any individual agenda. And many of the reviews contain some sort of criticism, so no one treats it as an infallible agency. However, overall, the trend is positive. But somehow you seem to like to invalidate all their experiences just to push the point that doesn't matter.

[I]"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."[/I] - George Bernard Shaw.

Zero reason to mudsling on either side. Just out review the other. I'll even give you a freebie, one might say I'm on break with SSG for now. If we ignore the 502 commentary, this thread could have had 3 CCG reviews since my last SSG review. 2 from LeonardoDaRizy and one from BoneEm69. But instead, we have 1 review from LeonardoDaRizy, tech support, and mudslinging. I could have ignored your point, but I thought it helpful to everyone to highlight community contributions.[/QUOTE]Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?

[QUOTE=GSlinger007;7384522]Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?[/QUOTE]You are both probably burner accounts.

The majority of your post history (like 99%) is around CCG. In addition, you mysteriously had start and end dates to providers before they were up on the site.

You even said they get tested for STDs every two weeks. Amazingly, your first post was about CCG offering BBFS!

You also attacked FUND immediately using the same tactic.

This is SO MYSTERIOUS! I have no idea what this could possibly be (insert sarcasm). If you post here again with your stupidity, I will report you. Also, I will not discriminate; I will report both accounts: the SSG shill and CCG shill.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7120820&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7120820.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7141216&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7141216.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7117570&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7117570.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7109884&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7109884.

[QUOTE=SilverFox1117;7384628]You are both probably burner accounts.

The majority of your post history (like 99%) is around CCG. In addition, you mysteriously had start and end dates to providers before they were up on the site.

You even said they get tested for STDs every two weeks. Amazingly, your first post was about CCG offering BBFS!

You also attacked FUND immediately using the same tactic.

This is SO MYSTERIOUS! I have no idea what this could possibly be (insert sarcasm). If you post here again with your stupidity, I will report you. Also, I will not discriminate; I will report both accounts: the SSG shill and CCG shill..[/QUOTE]I've been away from the hobby the majority of this year due to health problems but hope to be back soon. Anyways, props to you for catching on to this. After reading his posts it does seem so carry a strong bias towards CCG. I've only visited CCG and FUNUDF (only saw yuhee there) and never had issues with either of them other than having trouble entering the building. It seems that his posts do try to discourage people from visiting other agencies (like in one posts he says he is "happy to have more variety in Nashville" but then throws a low blow by saying that CCG has had great providers (implying there's no need for another agency). It does sound like shilling to me.

[QUOTE=GSlinger007;7384522]Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?[/QUOTE]Probably so, again just like you probably are. None of the real members have been aggressive towards either agency. Nobody cares, they just want a good session. Nobody on my list has ever said anything negative about CCG. Either they went themselves, said nothing, or admit they can't go.

Post count doesn't give legitimacy either. For example, [b][URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=6893572&viewfull=1#post6893572]this user was called out[/URL][/b] and ceased posting (not banned that I can see) by the admin. Over 100 posts. Mostly CCG related, but some were not.

FunUDF had shills, SSG has shills. But I have no doubt that CCG had / has shills that slipped through because they were in first. My point being, feel free to report them if you like. I leave such assessments to the admin to deal with. I'm not particularly interested in reporting any minor nuisance. But the thread temperature had almost returned to normal since you went off to create your safe space and I ceased posting my longest descriptions in here (posted to escorts instead because no one cares over there and I've seen other agency folks cross post as well).

This "conflict" that isn't an actual conflict, is better dealt with by reviewing more here. CCG has at least 3 times as many people who will visit them. There should at least be twice as many reviews. It should not be possible for one person to out review the other organization. And by trying to semi abandon the thread, you've got me in the awkward position of getting PMs asking about CCG vs SSG (examples attached). But you can see that I maintain a neutral stance despite my irritation with it. There is very little reason to cross lines. Those who enjoy CCG should stay there. Those looking for something different, [B]or don't have a choice in the matter[/B], come to SSG. If SSG packs up, CCG won't get a single extra dollar from that group.

I already gave you the freebie. I'm on break with SSG, so there is no review I can counter. If, instead of this nonsense, 5 CCG members posted anything about Hu, Pika-Chu, or Maya, there would be 5 reviews with nothing in between. I don't actually care if you are or aren't legit. I can't tell you what to do nor can I tell AceCreamer, but I have told you what I've noticed if you keep trying to drag things down. And my only ask of you is that you stick to reviewing your girls. And leave the rest for the admin.

This is just too ridiculous. I merely posted a mild comment about SSG, and I got inexplicably attacked? The only thing I can think of is that SSG's emergence has threatened CCG's turf. Last night, I went through a bunch of old records and found that CCG has a ton of burner accounts and a pile of fake reviews.

Let me put it this way: since 2019, I've been moving frequently for work. In 2019, I lived in Dallas, and people in Texas don't use this platform—they use ECCIE World. In 2021, I moved to Seattle, where I wasn't familiar with this platform either because we mostly used TNA. By the end of 2022, I moved to DC, and that's when I learned about this platform. I tried registering back then using my email, but I never received the activation email. It wasn't until a few months ago, after moving to Nashville, that SSG's booker asked me to provide some feedback. I had to go on Reddit to find a solution, contact the admin, and finally activate my account.

I've met plenty of Korean girls on both the East and West Coasts, and I can say bluntly: there are almost no Korean girls under 30 on the East Coast. The younger ones are mostly in California. If you're looking for girls under 30, you're better off with Japanese girls. CCG's burner accounts actually described Pika Chu as a "late 20's" girl—WTF? Do they dare let Pika Chu show her ID, or maybe turn the room's lights up a bit brighter? Also, Chu getting people to post fake reviews has already been exposed by the big shot Download X in California. You can still find posts about Korean girls faking reviews on the North VA forum. I originally thought this forum was a place to share authentic information, but it seems it's been completely infiltrated.

[QUOTE=SilverFox1117;7384628]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7120820&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7120820.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7141216&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7141216.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7117570&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7117570.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7109884&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7109884.[/QUOTE][URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7120820&viewfull=1#post7120820[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7141216&viewfull=1#post7141216[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7117570&viewfull=1#post7117570[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7109884&viewfull=1#post7109884[/URL]

[QUOTE=SilverFox1117;7384728][URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7120820&viewfull=1#post7120820[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7141216&viewfull=1#post7141216[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7117570&viewfull=1#post7117570[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7109884&viewfull=1#post7109884[/URL][/QUOTE]Did you get blacklisted by ccg? Its obvious from your past report.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7143150[/URL]#post7143150.

[QUOTE=CGLover;7384680]I've been away from the hobby the majority of this year due to health problems but hope to be back soon. Anyways, props to you for catching on to this. After reading his posts it does seem so carry a strong bias towards CCG. I've only visited CCG and FUNUDF (only saw yuhee there) and never had issues with either of them other than having trouble entering the building. It seems that his posts do try to discourage people from visiting other agencies (like in one posts he says he is "happy to have more variety in Nashville" but then throws a low blow by saying that CCG has had great providers (implying there's no need for another agency). It does sound like shilling to me.[/QUOTE]They essentially serve as tech / customer support. They announce new websites, state the website is down for maintenance, provide start and end dates for providers, and declare that the girls are regularly tested for STDs.

It's hard to notice when you just see their post pop up randomly in a thread, but it's quite obvious when you look at their post history.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?37848-CCG-Discreet-Info-Reviews&p=7357058&viewfull=1#post7357058[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7338324&viewfull=1#post7338324[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7260905&viewfull=1#post7260905[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?35949-Agency-Discussion-and-Reviews&p=7159735&viewfull=1#post7159735[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4167-Escort-Reports&p=6719752&viewfull=1#post6719752[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4167-Escort-Reports&p=6709008&viewfull=1#post6709008[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?22207-BBBJ-and-BBFS&p=6698469&viewfull=1#post6698469[/URL]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4227-Safe-Sex-Information-and-Advice&p=6919379&viewfull=1#post6919379[/URL]

I am not surprised by any of this. Especially, with the industry. I can validate the CA girls are younger and it less expensive. They are everywhere out there and my buddy goes all the time. We share about TN to CA.

People are always playing silly games on forums.

[QUOTE=AceCreamer;7384719]This is just too ridiculous. I merely posted a mild comment about SSG, and I got inexplicably attacked? The only thing I can think of is that SSG's emergence has threatened CCG's turf. Last night, I went through a bunch of old records and found that CCG has a ton of burner accounts and a pile of fake reviews.

Let me put it this way: since 2019, I've been moving frequently for work. In 2019, I lived in Dallas, and people in Texas don't use this platformthey use ECCIE World. In 2021, I moved to Seattle, where I wasn't familiar with this platform either because we mostly used TNA. By the end of 2022, I moved to DC, and that's when I learned about this platform. I tried registering back then using my email, but I never received the activation email. It wasn't until a few months ago, after moving to Nashville, that SSG's booker asked me to provide some feedback. I had to go on Reddit to find a solution, contact the admin, and finally activate my account.

I've met plenty of Korean girls on both the East and West Coasts, and I can say bluntly: there are almost no Korean girls under 30 on the East Coast. The younger ones are mostly in California. If you're looking for girls under 30, you're better off with Japanese girls. CCG's burner accounts actually described Pika Chu as a "late 20's" girlWTF?.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Stim69;7384836]I am not surprised by any of this. Especially, with the industry. I can validate the CA girls are younger and it less expensive. They are everywhere out there and my buddy goes all the time. We share about TN to CA.

People are always playing silly games on forums.[/QUOTE]I warned them. A2 always says to report crap, so I did. Both were reported, and both accounts were taken care of and have been labeled as "shill" accounts.

I'm sure they will make new accounts or get an account transferred to them, so be mindful of any accounts posting praise of both agencies for awhile.

Thank you, A2!

Going to move past what happened, so for one time only, I'll be hyping up both sides. Naturally since I'm only reviewing one that is going to be longer but I'll post the other one after this so it's the first thing someone reads top to bottom. But please if you reply to this don't full quote me, delete most of it haha...

[B]Aona[/B](407709). She did a stint in Virginia like most. There was decent debate on whether she is or isn't the girl in the photos. Well as usual, I say the 80% rule holds. But a little more loosely this time. Surprisingly this makes it difficult to choose the representative picture this time. I've gone with the studio photo because that one is a bit closer to where she is today. More mature and refined than outright babyface. Smile isn't perfect but along the same lines with Karen. I'm terrible with the breast size qualifications if you've noticed I leave that out a lot, but others have said natural B to C so I think that's right. Good enough to grab. She does have some impressive large nipples if you're a fan of that.

Opened door. White dress with some flower design of various colors. Kiss and hug greeting. Menu offered quickly, typical pricing. Didn't ask about all services but video, deepthroat (unclear), and BBFS available. I picked what worked for me. Her English is pretty good so you should have little trouble communicating. Mouthwash, shower. It wasn't as huge of a focus on a deep clean of me (except the part that matters the most haha). But she's really into kissing you in there and gives a decent length preview. Instead of turning me around to wash my back, she turned around to rub her hips against junior for a while. Dry off, onto bed.

No massage warm up. I didn't explicitly ask. So immediate flip over. She kisses her way down and gives probably the longest BBBJ since Grace. She got in there and even gave the balls some licks as well. Does make me wonder about the deepthroat option but this was good enough. Swap to a cowgirl option, she needed a bit to adjust, but she had warned in advance so I had no problem with that. But unfortunately I got in my own head again. Switched to missionary to save the day. Sucked the nips a bit more, kissed her to get strength back, and built back up to a nice finish. She gave some nice moans to accompany the ending. Afterwards, she had her own unique thing. While she didn't quite wrap her legs around me, after like 30 seconds when I realized I was staying inside too long and started to pull away she said that I didn't have to leave her yet. So we stayed like that a little longer than normal.

Afterwards, usual cleanup. Usual time waster chat from my end. I wasn't as successful with my usual story haha but she did open up when we got to food. She was honestly just fine with me lying there and she sort of rubbed me in various places to see if anything was going to wake up again. Some more kisses in between. Eventually, she suggests going for a shower and that's mostly that. Kiss goodbye, goes to get my shoes in the hallway. Aona didn't give an end date, just she's there as long as she's doing well. And that's the end.

Or it would be. I made an odd request before my session. I wanted to at least glimpse [B]Hana[/B]. Cleaner bro approved it after session (kind of wish it happened first, Aona was probably thinking she didn't do enough). So anyway, there will still be no Hana review of any sort from me. But I don't think she needs it, someone was there in and out between my session with Aona haha. And someone was on the couch downstairs as I was leaving (though I can't say who he was there for). So what I can say is a photo that was included in her New York listing is actually real. Only had about 30 seconds exchange. It probably did nothing whatsoever but I still want to be a good representative anyway. Due to recent knowledge, I'd assume this info is too late if she's meant to leave on the third but I got a hint she could return in February.

I don't want to make this double post a triple post so use the filenames to understand which girl is which.

[b]Vivian[/b] (398215). Seems to be a normal K-girl. Mostly positive reviews, seeing spinner and vixen and extras available. A listing for her over on a Vegas site includes: GFE, DFK, BBBJ, CIM, Rimm
BBFS, CIP. Seemingly very thorough in her process (massage, folding your clothes, the works).

A bit vague where she's coming from as Vivian isn't exactly the most uncommon name for the search bar. But I believe over in [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?36976-Wonderful-Days&p=7339798&viewfull=1#post7339798]Saint Louis[/URL] could be one source of information. Can't verify anything the usual way since their site is previous customers only. But she has more than enough on TER so you should be good. Others more familiar with her can add their additions.

[QUOTE=Ayasaki;7385936][b]Vivian[/b] (398215). Seems to be a normal K-girl. Mostly positive reviews, seeing spinner and vixen and extras available. A listing for her over on a Vegas site includes: GFE, DFK, BBBJ, CIM, Rimm
BBFS, CIP. Seemingly very thorough in her process (massage, folding your clothes, the works).

A bit vague where she's coming from as Vivian isn't exactly the most uncommon name for the search bar. But I believe over in [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?36976-Wonderful-Days&p=7339798&viewfull=1#post7339798]Saint Louis[/URL] could be one source of information. Can't verify anything the usual way since their site is previous customers only. But she has more than enough on TER so you should be good. Others more familiar with her can add their additions.[/QUOTE]Saw her recently and she was amazing. But not much reviews about her on the forums but has a ton on TER. Quick and fast booking with Cora booker.

Vivian is a pretty spinner, high energy vibe, GFE through out the whole session, naturals C boobies.

Quick kiss and hug to warm things up. Took off my clothes and off to the shower. My hands were roaming around her nice petite body while she scrubs me and got a nice BBBJ preview before we hop out. She told me to lay down while she give me a little massage and cat bath and went down on me for a BBBJ. Covered on, position Vivian for some nice mish while DFK at the same time, turn her over for a nice doggy and little spanking. I took off the cover and let her finish me off with CIM.

Go check her out while she's still here guys, you won't be disappointment.