Printable View
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
[QUOTE=Gorex;5356476]Karma? I would post my honest review of them all the time. All this just seems that they got to popular and their competition started going after them. Even after all the drama here with that agency and TER I still go to them first and will for a while because they have earn my money.[/QUOTE]I did post my honest reviews as well, but if the competition wanted to play dirty why post amazing reviews? Doesn't make any sense at all, if that was the case they'll post bad reviews, and you talk exactly like one of the infamous members here LOL.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5351437]Little Tokyo is legit. Saw both Star & Chanel. Liked Chanel more. Check the other agencies (see list in one of my previous posts). You will need to get reference checked in advance. Normal price cfs is 300.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I was worried because a bunch of review on little Tokyo said that they are bait and switch, and the pictures are all false etc. About the screening process so just DL? Should I indent anything? Any other tips or things I should know for a first time out of Townes? Thanks.
[QUOTE=TywinN;5356401]Wow VAC has gone significantly downhill. I just tried Mihyo and she looked about 40% like the pictures. Service was terrible and booker sucks even more.[/QUOTE]Not my experience with Mihyo at all.
[QUOTE=Vegas1357;5362658]Not my experience with Mihyo at all.[/QUOTE]What was your experience with Mihyo?
[QUOTE=JackHolly;5362764]What was your experience with Mihyo?[/QUOTE]I thought the pictures were at least a fairly accurate representation and had no complaints about her physical appearance. Service was good (really good BBBJ) but felt like she was going through the motions a bit; may be a YMMV / chemistry issue. Doesn't speak much English.
[QUOTE=Vegas1357;5362829]I thought the pictures were at least a fairly accurate representation and had no complaints about her physical appearance. Service was good (really good BBBJ) but felt like she was going through the motions a bit; may be a YMMV / chemistry issue. Doesn't speak much English.[/QUOTE]My experience with her was just fine. Saw her couple of months ago. Left her a review on TER as well. YMMV. Happy mongering.
[QUOTE=Pooka85;5358794]I did post my honest reviews as well, but if the competition wanted to play dirty why post amazing reviews? Doesn't make any sense at all, if that was the case they'll post bad reviews, and you talk exactly like one of the infamous members here LOL.[/QUOTE]If you read a super good review then you see the girl and it's not like the review you think maybe she don't like you and not come back.
If you see too many really high scores and they not actually a model or good service you leave bad review to let others know.
Texted to schedule an appointment with Ruby at the place we aren't suppossed to talk about. Scheduler texted back MSOG? I asked why she texted that and she said it was extra. I have been a regular for over two years and they are going to charge extra now! I texted back that I was going somewhere else.
[QUOTE=OkaJohn;5373173]Texted to schedule an appointment with Ruby at the place we aren't suppossed to talk about. Scheduler texted back MSOG? I asked why she texted that and she said it was extra. I have been a regular for over two years and they are going to charge extra now! I texted back that I was going somewhere else.[/QUOTE]Sounds like they are going the way of the LA upcharge for every little thing. The nonupcharge agencies in LA are the only ones not slow. Seems that they are trying to make up for slow business.
[QUOTE=OkaJohn;5373173]Texted to schedule an appointment with Ruby at the place we aren't suppossed to talk about. Scheduler texted back MSOG? I asked why she texted that and she said it was extra. I have been a regular for over two years and they are going to charge extra now! I texted back that I was going somewhere else.[/QUOTE]The justification for the high price was, msog, BBFS. They upped the price for BBFS and now extra for msog. Good riddance.
[QUOTE=OkaJohn;5373173]Texted to schedule an appointment with Ruby at the place we aren't suppossed to talk about. Scheduler texted back MSOG? I asked why she texted that and she said it was extra. I have been a regular for over two years and they are going to charge extra now! I texted back that I was going somewhere else.[/QUOTE]I wasn't told about the fee till I was there already naked, was a huge turned down, another disappointing.
Saw her in LA at sexy angels. Much bigger than the photos.
[QUOTE=LvJanGun;5373731]Saw her in LA at sexy angels. Much bigger than the photos.[/QUOTE]I was first to review her on TER go check 🥇.
She is young AF and amazing service but I can partially agree with you but she is 90% like the photos in my opinion.
Quite a few rated her 9 and 10 looks
[QUOTE=OkaJohn;5373173]Texted to schedule an appointment with Ruby at the place we aren't suppossed to talk about. Scheduler texted back MSOG? I asked why she texted that and she said it was extra. I have been a regular for over two years and they are going to charge extra now! I texted back that I was going somewhere else.[/QUOTE]I tried as well. Seems like Ruby is the only one that does this. All the other girls are cool with MSOG without the upcharge.