Stay off that site. You may get busted.
[QUOTE=LordNikon;3790147]BP may be down but another one comes right back up!
[URL]http://onebackpage.com[/URL][/QUOTE]
Printable View
Stay off that site. You may get busted.
[QUOTE=LordNikon;3790147]BP may be down but another one comes right back up!
[URL]http://onebackpage.com[/URL][/QUOTE]
Arrest were made. Be careful out there.
You are scholarly.
[QUOTE=JJFresh;3789967]Libs normally use unreasonable logic and go off (with) emotions. It's not easy to have a constructive discussion with such a person.
I personally don't care much for our two party system, but unfortunately it's all we got. Hopefully that changes.
Stay Fresh![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ObtMonger;3789645]It passed the senate 97-2 and the house 388-25. More Republicans voted against it than Democrats. Don't start a liberal / conservative battle.[/QUOTE]The Senate, House, Supreme Court, and Executive are all held by the Republican Party and you're saying that they somehow are not responsible for this?
I agree on the "don't start a liberal / conservative battle on a review thread so I moved this shit here, but the Republicans PROUDLY own this. Just listen to their sound bites. If you're a right leaning guy then you got to own this too.
Won't happen again.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3790822]The Senate, House, Supreme Court, and Executive are all held by the Republican Party and you're saying that they somehow are not responsible for this?
I agree on the "don't start a liberal / conservative battle on a review thread so I moved this shit here, but the Republicans PROUDLY own this. Just listen to their sound bites. If you're a right leaning guy then you got to own this too.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Admin2;3790822]The Senate, House, Supreme Court, and Executive are all held by the Republican Party and you're saying that they somehow are not responsible for this?
I agree on the "don't start a liberal / conservative battle on a review thread so I moved this shit here, but the Republicans PROUDLY own this. Just listen to their sound bites. If you're a right leaning guy then you got to own this too.[/QUOTE]It's part of the Washington game. If all the branches were controlled by democrats (uggghhhh) it would have passed with very similar margins. The Supreme Court has nothing to do with this yet. If there is any hope then it leans with the Republican control of the Court. If it was controlled by Liberal justices then there is no way to put a stop to it. Freedom of speech isn't necessarily a big deal with them unless it backs liberal agendas. The only hope is that Constitutionalists on the court will say it's going too far. Those are the conservative justices.
It's a stupid law that wasn't thought out but who in Washington can vote against a bill called "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act" or "Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" and think that they'd ever win another election in their lives.
It's a continuation of just giving bills cute names to make sure they pass. It's overwhelmingly proven that Head Start was a waste of money and we'll be stuck with it forever. It doesn't work but who can vote against it? It's at over 9 billion a year now and it will continue growing.
Net Neutrality had nothing to do with neutrality.
Congress should have their salaries tied to a percentage drop in the real deficit. Instead we're stuck with a system where the more money they bring back to their states the more likely it is that they'll get reelected.
The two party system is too fucked up. The only logical two party system would be one party on Friday night and one on Saturday night.
Now let's get back to sex topics. AlexLynn is hot!
Sounds to me like the good ol boys in the Bible Belt (who monger at Charlie sheen levels) didn't expect the "righteous" fight from Washington's "pure" elected officials. Ain't blaming anyone BUT if you voted 45 this is what was expected. A bible thumping hypocritical administration and got the main supply line for the push shut down. Back to those park bathrooms oogling women coming out of Walmart huh boys??
[BLUE]This is a just in case thing,
If you want to check out the best in Automotive reviews like our friends Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/bestautomotivereviews
If we ever need a place to post a link to a new address for the site we will do it there. If that moment never happens then enjoy some great automotive reviews
A2[/BLUE]
Nothing you said made sense. Liberals would not have brought this too th floor, but now everything is conservative and to please the base. It was passed. Hold up. OBT Monger and a conservative does not match you are broke as hell chasing rat pies.
[QUOTE=ObtMonger;3790985]It's part of the Washington game. If all the branches were controlled by democrats (uggghhhh) it would have passed with very similar margins. The Supreme Court has nothing to do with this yet. If there is any hope then it leans with the Republican control of the Court. If it was controlled by Liberal justices then there is no way to put a stop to it. Freedom of speech isn't necessarily a big deal with them unless it backs liberal agendas. The only hope is that Constitutionalists on the court will say it's going too far. Those are the conservative justices.
It's a stupid law that wasn't thought out but who in Washington can vote against a bill called "Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act" or "Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act" and think that they'd ever win another election in their lives.
It's a continuation of just giving bills cute names to make sure they pass. It's overwhelmingly proven that Head Start was a waste of money and we'll be stuck with it forever. It doesn't work but who can vote against it? It's at over 9 billion a year now and it will continue growing.
Net Neutrality had nothing to do with neutrality.
Congress should have their salaries tied to a percentage drop in the real deficit. Instead we're stuck with a system where the more money they bring back to their states the more likely it is that they'll get reelected.
The two party system is too fucked up. The only logical two party system would be one party on Friday night and one on Saturday night.
Now let's get back to sex topics. AlexLynn is hot![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JohnDagger;3792647]Nothing you said made sense. Liberals would not have brought this too th floor, but now everything is conservative and to please the base. It was passed. Hold up. OBT Monger and a conservative does not match you are broke as hell chasing rat pies.[/QUOTE]I don't support the law, but it's your response that doesn't make sense.
Kamala Harris a cosponsor of Sesta and leading dem for 2020 twisted all logic as California Attorney General to charge the founders and CEO of backpage with felony charges of pimping, pimping a minor and conspiracy to commit pimping even though they were obviously protected by section 230 of the law before it was changed for SESTA. Her case was quickly thrown out by even the liberal California courts Do you really think she wouldn't have brought it up for a vote? She violated her oath of office to bring changes that she knew could not stand to try and take them down. She was probably the most vocal instigator to start the process.
Chris Murphy, Cory Booker, Kristen Gillibrand and Sherrod Brown the other leaders for 2020 were also cosponsors of SESTA.
What you said doesn't make sense. Why wouldn't the liberals have brought it to the floor when it was their golden girls starting the initiative.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3791389][BLUE]This is a just in case thing,
If you want to check out the best in Automotive reviews like our friends Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/bestautomotivereviews
If we ever need a place to post a link to a new address for the site we will do it there. If that moment never happens then enjoy some great automotive reviews
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]Thanks for heads up. Always a pleasure to have an alternative source of checking out the newest and hot chassis around.
Senator Rob Portman OH Republican. You posted alternative facts aka fakes new just like that 45 caliber asshole. I see you are nit educated like a typical Trump voter.
[QUOTE=ObtMonger;3792916]I don't support the law, but it's your response that doesn't make sense.
Kamala Harris a cosponsor of Sesta and leading dem for 2020 twisted all logic as California Attorney General to charge the founders and CEO of backpage with felony charges of pimping, pimping a minor and conspiracy to commit pimping even though they were obviously protected by section 230 of the law before it was changed for SESTA. Her case was quickly thrown out by even the liberal California courts Do you really think she wouldn't have brought it up for a vote? She violated her oath of office to bring changes that she knew could not stand to try and take them down. She was probably the most vocal instigator to start the process.
Chris Murphy, Cory Booker, Kristen Gillibrand and Sherrod Brown the other leaders for 2020 were also cosponsors of SESTA.
What you said doesn't make sense. Why wouldn't the liberals have brought it to the floor when it was their golden girls starting the initiative.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JohnDagger;3793769]Senator Rob Portman OH Republican. You posted alternative facts aka fakes new just like that 45 caliber asshole. I see you are nit educated like a typical Trump voter.[/QUOTE]
You're post is nonsense, but I removed my comments. This site should be about sex.
Ran you back to your Conservative LaLa land of $10.00 obt skanks. Enjoy and play safe.
[QUOTE=ObtMonger;3793900]You're post is nonsense, but I removed my comments. This site should be about sex.[/QUOTE]