Printable View
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6934182]Sweet Angel has me blocked. Enough said.
This one is another big time dud. Been discussed here before.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/37a5a4bc-818b-4d3f-8ab5-cec24cb99254[/URL][/QUOTE]I'm not a paid member of the site. I don't message girls, I have 1 photo. i just look at what you guys post I'm blocked also.
Women sure have strong agendas.
Any girl that blocks me is surely not my type. Because I don't give them much of a reason to block me. And I also never block anyone. I'd rather be able to see what antics they're up to so I can learn from it and you need to be able to see their profile in order to warn others -- so blocking is pointless.
[QUOTE=MaxWalker86;6934369]I'm not a paid member of the site. I don't message girls, I have 1 photo. i just look at what you guys post I'm blocked also.
Women sure have strong agendas.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6934182]Sweet Angel has me blocked. Enough said.
This one is another big time dud. Been discussed here before.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/37a5a4bc-818b-4d3f-8ab5-cec24cb99254[/URL][/QUOTE]Super dud. Currently like six months pregnant too. Got a lot of her content though but was taken for a ride overall.
[QUOTE=Wockser;6934602]Super dud. Currently like six months pregnant too. Got a lot of her content though but was taken for a ride overall.[/QUOTE]There seems to be a few preggos on the site. Mostly in NH though. And very limited to meet ups. Most want to sell their content. Good damn internet.
I had what I thought was a great beginning conversation, to finally set something up w / this chick. Share had Favorited me, like what I said in my profile.
She seemed interested, however, shut off any form of "sexual conduct", but will be there "emotionally," – will be available to go to dinners and be arm candy.
Typically, I would have moved on. But I started to put one of my new ideas in motion. I'll be explaining this in a later post.
So, I went along & responded what I can offer and what I'm focused on. Which was building trust, friendship and going out. Essentially, I saw her just a person to hang out with, going out to dinners, grabbing drinks (after she mentioned the non-sexual stuff). I did NOT mention or even acknowledge her statement about no sexual conduct. I related all of my statements to the building connections, mentoring & to the concept of emotional well-being.
For work, she's does the random babysitting, waitressing, and bartending jobs. She's still in school, and has a few years left.
We had very long conversation, and I thought we hit it off, and soon I was going to pull the trigger to do one of these dinner dates.
Her message to me then stated.
"Your Net Worth is not that High. What do you normally give sugar babies? This was preferaced by talking about paying off student loans.
Overall, her looks are above average. Tall, Modelesque physique, she can communicate & responds fairly quickly.
I have not responded yet. How would you all respond to this statement?
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6935122]I had what I thought was a great beginning conversation, to finally set something up w / this chick. Share had Favorited me, like what I said in my profile.
She seemed interested, however, shut off any form of "sexual conduct", but will be there "emotionally," will be available to go to dinners and be arm candy.
Typically, I would have moved on. But I started to put one of my new ideas in motion. I'll be explaining this in a later post.
So, I went along & responded what I can offer and what I'm focused on. Which was building trust, friendship and going out. Essentially, I saw her just a person to hang out with, going out to dinners, grabbing drinks (after she mentioned the non-sexual stuff). I did NOT mention or even acknowledge her statement about no sexual conduct. I related all of my statements to the building connections, mentoring & to the concept of emotional well-being.
For work, she's does the random babysitting, waitressing, and bartending jobs. She's still in school, and has a few years left.
We had very long conversation, and I thought we hit it off, and soon I was going to pull the trigger to do one of these dinner dates.
Her message to me then stated.
"Your Net Worth is not that High. What do you normally give sugar babies? This was preferaced by talking about paying off student loans.
Overall, her looks are above average. Tall, Modelesque physique, she can communicate & responds fairly quickly.
I have not responded yet. How would you all respond to this statement?[/QUOTE]I think you should stop wasting your time with this one unless you are looking for some personal project / experiment. If so, I would respond with you put in a low amount to ward of gold diggers. LOL.
[QUOTE=Spill;6935131]I think you should stop wasting your time with this one unless you are looking for some personal project / experiment. If so, I would respond with you put in a low amount to ward of gold diggers. LOL.[/QUOTE]The thing is, sometimes, it seems they may be chiding, and goading for a reaction or response. Maybe it could be a Test, of what we're going to say.
And I do like experimenting and pushing the limits a little. Sometimes, they could be experimenting with us too. Hahaha!
And yes, one of the things I'm going to be posting later on today, is about a New Experiment I aim to start doing -- in regards to "Platonic", No Sex, and "online" bunnies. I'll be letting ya'll know of the idea & what I plan to be doing.
But yeah, that is a very good line. Low Amount to Ward off Gold Diggers. LOL.
[QUOTE=DarkClouds;6934383]Any girl that blocks me is surely not my type. Because I don't give them much of a reason to block me. And I also never block anyone. I'd rather be able to see what antics they're up to so I can learn from it and you need to be able to see their profile in order to warn others -- so blocking is pointless.[/QUOTE]I thought it would be worth replying to this. I've also noticed in my life if a girl is my type but isn't really interested she won't get annoyed by me. If they aren't my type meaning I don't like them either just look at them than they may take offense by it.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d68b3168-a3e4-46af-bb62-0fa90bc2f763[/URL]
I've seen this pair a couple times. I think they're pretty cool. They have a few rules which vary for each of them, but deliver what they promise and are quite reasonable (400) for two of them. A bit far from me or I'd see them more.
Let me know if you have questions.
[QUOTE=DreplyNow;6935183]The thing is, sometimes, it seems they may be chiding, and goading for a reaction or response. Maybe it could be a Test, of what we're going to say.
And I do like experimenting and pushing the limits a little. Sometimes, they could be experimenting with us too. Hahaha!
And yes, one of the things I'm going to be posting later on today, is about a New Experiment I aim to start doing -- in regards to "Platonic", No Sex, and "online" bunnies. I'll be letting ya'll know of the idea & what I plan to be doing.
But yeah, that is a very good line. Low Amount to Ward off Gold Diggers. LOL.[/QUOTE]Can also just try walking away man. Keep the same outcome you want but in a week or month or two LOL you'll get that question of how you been? As long as you leave on good terms. The money will dry up for them sooner and later and will go down their contact list to who they messaged before and cold text to see if they can get that steady income again. I would phrase it as: I hear you and I wish I could justify more for you to be my arm candy or be there emotionally but I can't hun. If that's a deal breaker I understand and wish you luck on your search. Feel free to reach out whenever.
[QUOTE=MarkPowers;6935329][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d68b3168-a3e4-46af-bb62-0fa90bc2f763[/URL]
I've seen this pair a couple times. I think they're pretty cool. They have a few rules which vary for each of them, but deliver what they promise and are quite reasonable (400) for two of them. A bit far from me or I'd see them more.
Let me know if you have questions.[/QUOTE]Interesting! I have avoided pairs who advertise together, for fear of the typical dangers. Instead I've had very good luck over the years with bi SBs who then find other women for us to see together.
A bit far for me too but not for a one-off if it's decent fun.
[QUOTE=Bran2025;6935418]Interesting! I have avoided pairs who advertise together, for fear of the typical dangers. Instead I've had very good luck over the years with bi SBs who then find other women for us to see together.
A bit far for me too but not for a one-off if it's decent fun.[/QUOTE]These two are a couple that lives together. I haven't had any problems.
In a related note, I'm seeing two different girls regularly and separately and I've thought about asking them if they'd be up for getting all of us together. What do people think? Too risky? How would you ask?
[QUOTE=MarkPowers;6935474]These two are a couple that lives together. I haven't had any problems.
In a related note, I'm seeing two different girls regularly and separately and I've thought about asking them if they'd be up for getting all of us together. What do people think? Too risky? How would you ask?[/QUOTE]I just ask if they "like women" and if they do then I just ask straight out. In my experience, high sex drive women who are bi go for it way more than not.
Plan on paying them each what you usually pay them. Get permission from each to share pics with the other.
Again, in my experience, it is Easy to make this happen if you have a bi SB.
Have others been getting outrageous proposals lately? I've had 4 different girls state they get $2 K per meet in the past 24 hours. I wonder if some high priced escorts were in town for the NBA finals or something.
Nuts!
[QUOTE=Bran2025;6935672]I just ask if they "like women" and if they do then I just ask straight out. In my experience, high sex drive women who are bi go for it way more than not.
Plan on paying them each what you usually pay them. Get permission from each to share pics with the other.
Again, in my experience, it is Easy to make this happen if you have a bi SB.[/QUOTE]I like the approach! Thanks.