Printable View
[QUOTE=StarfishPrime;4577355]I'm not certain because I haven't seen Fina first hand but her photos look very similar to Nikki from M. Just wanted to throw that out there.
[URL]https://acektown.com/angel-2/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hahah. I think you're right. I saw nikki in August, and had to jog my memory on what she looked like.
It didn't even occur to me when I initially saw Fina's photos a couple days ago.
She used to work around k town and mid Wilshire.
Looked mid to late 30's but with good skin.
Thicc chick with light skin. Nice clean kitty and felt good inside. Bbfscip.
Great BBBJ and great fk for people who likes thicc Asian girls.
Not your typical gnd cute. More like thicc and bbfscip.
She’s absolutely not my type.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4576274][URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/nina-escort-los-angeles-704148[/URL]
[URL]http://sexyfunkgirls.escorts.biz/nina57/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kdolls.socal[/URL]
Got another good one here. Mid to early 30's look, if you're older and or non-asian you might see her as early to mid 20. C size cup that are perky, you can tell she was flat before she got them but beautifully done. Above average bbj, doesn't go deep so that was a downer. Nice legs and she got a little booty but her stomache can use some sit-up, no pooch but getting there. Happy and playful attitude, reminds me of glow where she would say stuff in korean and laugh, but not as much as Glow / Pink though. No english at all. She's a pleaser that did whatever I wanted. One nut in the mouth and second CIP. Well worth the time and money.
By the way, I know there's a list going around but it's not 100% guarantee. Everything is YMMV. It's begin to happen now much like up north where the girls are being listed as PSE but only 2 or 3 agency I know of are for sure BBFS in their use of PSE / BBFS. Other use PSE just to lure you in. Some like M do not list BBFS but are known so but the girl are hit or miss.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=StarfishPrime;4577355]I'm not certain because I haven't seen Fina first hand but her photos look very similar to Nikki from M. Just wanted to throw that out there.
[URL]https://acektown.com/angel-2/[/URL][/QUOTE]I saw Nikki a few times, it does look like her. She used fake pictures or heavily photoshopped ones. These actually look like her. When she was with M. Even a better chance of her because she's no longer with M.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4577581]New pics. She just gets better and better.[/QUOTE]How does Katie look in person? Skinny? Flat stomach? Age?
[QUOTE=Mmmmm00;4577945]How does Katie look in person? Skinny? Flat stomach? Age?[/QUOTE]Been some time since I saw her, she looks pretty good in person. She's lighter toned, not as skinny as Chanel from M, I would put her with some slight baby fat but nothing gross. Very light thickness is what I can best describe. I would put her 30's, even with the darkness and lighting, she would not pass for 20's. Service was very good, more PSE with some GFE thrown in. Of course BBFS.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4578084]Been some time since I saw her, she looks pretty good in person. She's lighter toned, not as skinny as Chanel from M, I would put her with some slight baby fat but nothing gross. Very light thickness is what I can best describe. I would put her 30's, even with the darkness and lighting, she would not pass for 20's. Service was very good, more PSE with some GFE thrown in. Of course BBFS.[/QUOTE]I agree. Not skinny like Chanel but certainly not fat. Just built big and with those big tits it always makes a girl look heavier than she really is. Actually she has lost some weight since she came here andhas a nice shape and is great at what she does.
[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4577876]She used to work around k town and mid Wilshire.
Looked mid to late 30's but with good skin.
Thicc chick with light skin. Nice clean kitty and felt good inside. Bbfscip.
Great BBBJ and great fk for people who likes thicc Asian girls.
Not your typical gnd cute. More like thicc and bbfscip.
Shes absolutely not my type.[/QUOTE]Are you sure we're talking about the same girl. Nina / Haven started with M a while ago and was real skinny. Then she went up north and came back with M. Twice and then to Sexy Angels and now with sexyfunkgirls. One of the things I remember about her was that she was so tiny and a perfect spinner. I'd be hard pressed to believe that she got pudgy.
[QUOTE=LonerRanger;4577727]The new pictures look nice but that is not what Katie looks like in person.
The pictures are either not her or heavy photo-shopped.
My original post on my visit with Katie.
She is about 5'5" - 5'6" so she taller than your typical petite / short K-Girl.
She has natural breasts about a "C" cup. I would say she is cute to average looking. She has " wider" hips but not much ass. Somebody compared Katie to a taller Cona, I think Cona is better looking with nicer tits and ass.
Katie provides good service and really tries to please you. It was go time from the minute I walked in the door. Dfk at the door and grabbing my goods. DFK, ass grabbing and dry humping to get things started. The usual list of activities DFK, BBBJ, DATY, 69, BBFS in several positions. She doesn't seem to enjoy FIV. She is either a good actress or really enjoys the action. It ended with a quick exit shower and a kiss good bye.
She tried very hard to get a second pop out if me but those days are in my past. I left with weak legs. She doesn't speak much English and was saying things in Korean, I speak zero Korean. She might of been saying I am a great lover or an ugly idiot. LOL.[/QUOTE]The pics are obviously P.S. But there is a fair resemblance to Katie. No matter who you visit there is always the difference between the P.S. And the real thing. Cona's prettier but her tits are too big for her body unless you like that. Katie is better proportioned and for passion it's Katie hands down. Sounds like it was that way for you as well. I would say pic #1 is most representative of her.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4578180]Are you sure we're talking about the same girl. Nina / Haven started with M a while ago and was real skinny. Then she went up north and came back with M. Twice and then to Sexy Angels and now with sexyfunkgirls. One of the things I remember about her was that she was so tiny and a perfect spinner. I'd be hard pressed to believe that she got pudgy.[/QUOTE]If you try to click on the link from junglefun, you will see the photo of a girl with a mole on her nose. That's the girl I'm referring to.
It’s a different Nina.
[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4578206]If you try to click on the link from junglefun, you will see the photo of a girl with a mole on her nose. That's the girl I'm referring to.
Its a different Nina.[/QUOTE]Oh that was I was asking.
[QUOTE=Slkid82;4577782]Hello,
I'm new to this forum and looking for some recs.
I recently moved down from the sf Bay Area and have had very good experiences up there in San Mateo and San Jose.
Since moving I've used Euk Girl and walked away with an average experience. Melody, prob let 30's to early 40's. Decent body but has black teeth, assuming from smoking. This was a turn off and couldn't really enjoy my time. Can't remember the first girls name but similar experience. Somewhat older with smokers breathe.
I was hoping to find girls on the younger side, spinner and great attitude. Also hoping to get links to some providers. Going through the forum, I found kte, sexy angels, ca kdolls and sexy funky girl.[/QUOTE]Just start scrolling backwards in this thread and you'll see all the reports and links.
[QUOTE=LonerRanger;4577727]The new pictures look nice but that is not what Katie looks like in person.
The pictures are either not her or heavy photo-shopped. She is about 5'5" - 5'6" so she taller than your typical petite / short K-Girl. She has natural breasts about a "C" cup.
I would say she is cute to average looking. She has " wider" hips but not much ass. Somebody compared Katie to a taller Cona, I think Cona is better looking with nicer tits and ass.
Katie provides good service and really tries to please you. It was go time from the minute I walked in the door. Dfk at the door and grabbing my goods. DFK, ass grabbing and dry humping to get things started. The usual list of activities DFK, BBBJ, DATY, 69, BBFS in several positions. She doesn't seem to enjoy FIV. She is either a good actress or really enjoys the action. It ended with a quick exit shower and a kiss good bye. [/QUOTE]
Indeed a very accurate description of Katie-Cute to average looking is about right for Katie. She is not DDG or super attractive but a GND with decent body who will fuck you bare on first visit.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;4577936]I saw Nikki a few times, it does look like her. She used fake pictures or heavily photoshopped ones. These actually look like her. When she was with M. Even a better chance of her because she's no longer with M.[/QUOTE]I think that Fina is also Nikki-the physical description matches to Nikki for sure.
No offense to anybody here but the girls I think are BBFS would be like a stroll in my own backyard. I normally try to BB girls who make me afraid of getting a black list. If my attention was to turn to girls I believe are BBFS I can easily blow this forum up with reviews. I like to see good looking girls now so I don't have much intel to share here.
I always try to recommend girls so guys won't get disappointed.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4576274]By the way, I know there's a list going around but it's not 100% guarantee. Everything is YMMV. It's begin to happen now much like up north where the girls are being listed as PSE but only 2 or 3 agency I know of are for sure BBFS in their use of PSE / BBFS. Other use PSE just to lure you in. Some like M do not list BBFS but are known so but the girl are hit or miss.[/QUOTE]
I recognized her pics from somewhere and thought she would be easy BBFS. However, I didn't want to put her on the list yet because I haven't confirmed.
Anyway, looks like I wasn't wrong because she advertises PSE as Clover now on SAG.
[QUOTE=QuestBMuffin;4574469]I have been informed that Nina's roommate Alli at (sexy Funk girls LOL) is also BBFS, can anyone verify?[/QUOTE]