Printable View
[QUOTE=PanthersFan777;5951277]Has anyone noticed there's been a alot of these one post wonders on the Wilmy board latel? Makes me curious it's Wilmy PD looking to make a few bucks to make a few bust for this elellon year? Let me know if anyone has noticed this too. Stay safe brothers.
HimOverThere93;5948597]Any updates on where to get the best bang for your buck here??[/QUOTE]Definitely not pd LOL long time reader first time poster.
[QUOTE=HeyItsMe68;5896152]They had some ass clown in Charlotte doing the same shit. The massage parlor vigilante. Search Facebook. I think what ge is doing is also illegal. Invasion of privacy. Taking liberties of exposing license plates without knowing if people are getting legitimate massage.[/QUOTE]Just an FYI on this. Taking pictures and video of anyone in public is covered by the First Amendment. When you are in the public eye all expectations of privacy are gone. They are still douchebags for doing it though.
Hey yall. Visiting topsail Friday for a week. I like AMP, and a good escort! Please let me know what wilmington is provoding these days!
[QUOTE=Skndvr;5962685]Just an FYI on this. Taking pictures and video of anyone in public is covered by the First Amendment. When you are in the public eye all expectations of privacy are gone. They are still douchebags for doing it though.[/QUOTE]1st Amendment would only cover "press" taking video or photos. I think you thinking of the 1st Amendment as it applies to 1st Amendment Auditors (Youtube Press), cramming cameras in Uncle's face so they can get a quick lawsuit settlement. There is no law against taking pictures or videos of anyone in public, you have no expectation of privacy in public.
Although it hasn't been an AMP for many months, since we leased it a couple months ago, the entertainment hasn't been lacking. Every couple of days I get a monger who walks up and tries the door, then ducks down, turns the corner and pretends like he didn't just do that. I'm going to miss it when they change the sign. Until then, guys, it's a shame, but the girls are gone. Kerr Ave, HaHa, the old Kings, you'll have better luck there. Happy hunting.
[QUOTE=ReviewDork;5964881]1st Amendment would only cover "press" taking video or photos.[/QUOTE]That's not true. The freedom granted by the press clause would be more clearly stated "freedom of press" rather than "freedom of the press". That is, the freedom of all people to disseminate information without prosecution rather special privileges of some ill defined body that today would be all but impossible to discern. There's countless court cases showing both ends, that is protecting an individual's right to perform press activities and courts ruling against granting dedicated press organizations special privileges. The ONLY somewhat special privilege they have is that the government can use them as a proxy for the general public to meet public access obligations. For some examples, see Richmond newspapers v. Virginia and New York Times v. Sullivan.
LEO told him to get on somewhere to stop harassing and loitering at this one spa. He was doing it to many spas in Charlotte and caused a few to shutdown.
[QUOTE=ReviewDork;5964881]1st Amendment would only cover "press" taking video or photos. I think you thinking of the 1st Amendment as it applies to 1st Amendment Auditors (Youtube Press), cramming cameras in Uncle's face so they can get a quick lawsuit settlement. There is no law against taking pictures or videos of anyone in public, you have no expectation of privacy in public.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=Asdine246;5980914]That's not true. The freedom granted by the press clause would be more clearly stated "freedom of press" rather than "freedom of the press". That is, the freedom of all people to disseminate information without prosecution rather special privileges of some ill defined body that today would be all but impossible to discern. There's countless court cases showing both ends, that is protecting an individual's right to perform press activities and courts ruling against granting dedicated press organizations special privileges. The ONLY somewhat special privilege they have is that the government can use them as a proxy for the general public to meet public access obligations. For some examples, see Richmond newspapers v. Virginia and New York Times v. Sullivan.[/QUOTE]Interesting cites from 1964 and 1980. One involves the right of public officials to sue for defamation and the other involves a closed trial. As my 1st year Law professor would say, "Try harder. ".
[QUOTE=Asdine246;5980914]That's not true. The freedom granted by the press clause would be more clearly stated "freedom of press" rather than "freedom of the press". That is, the freedom of all people to disseminate information without prosecution rather special privileges of some ill defined body that today would be all but impossible to discern. There's countless court cases showing both ends, that is protecting an individual's right to perform press activities and courts ruling against granting dedicated press organizations special privileges. The ONLY somewhat special privilege they have is that the government can use them as a proxy for the general public to meet public access obligations. For some examples, see Richmond newspapers v. Virginia and New York Times v. Sullivan.[/QUOTE]A great example of this would be "video voyeurism" or "upskirts". Does the 1st Amendment protect this activity? What if the stated goal was information dissemination? "Legal" in some states and strictly prohibited in others.
[QUOTE=ReviewDork;5992868]A great example of this would be "video voyeurism" or "upskirts". Does the 1st Amendment protect this activity? What if the stated goal was information dissemination? "Legal" in some states and strictly prohibited in others.[/QUOTE]A great example of what exactly? It has nothing to do with what I said. My entire post was about the differentiation you made between "press" and the general public, when legally there is pretty much none. This is completely irrelevant. But to answer the question anyways: Yes. No. Maybe. Different municipalities have different laws because of their interpretation of how rights apply. Any one of them could be wrong in their interpretation, which is what a federal court would decide. Until then, though, separate courts will make separate rulings. If you went to law school, I really shouldn't have to explain the appellate court system to you.
[QUOTE=ReviewDork;5992834]Interesting cites from 1964 and 1980. One involves the right of public officials to sue for defamation and the other involves a closed trial. As my 1st year Law professor would say, "Try harder. ".[/QUOTE]Try harder indeed. If you actually took the time to understand the cases (which again you really should already know these if you went to law school) instead of skimming a Wikipedia article, I wouldn't have to hand feed you the relevance of the cases. But alas here we are. In the New York case, it wasn't just "press" being sued, it was also four other individuals. The ruling was a dismissal for all claims under the same reasoning. That is, the press clause explicitly protected the formal press organization as well as the individuals. In the Virginia case, while it was the Newspapers suing, the judge ultimately ruled in their favor under the reasoning that the PUBLIC has a constitutional right to observe trials under the press clause. QED press rights are public rights. I mean, in Pell v. Procunier it is outright stated by the Supreme Court that the media has no greater right of access than the general public.
This is a basic, long standing principle with countless examples. And all you have is a baseless assertion other, not ever bothering to try and provide any proof yourself. I really hope you didn't make it through law school.
Can we stop posting all this law shit. I come here for information on were to look to get laid not to read you guys interpretation of laws. If you get a hard on for laws look into getting this hobby legal.
[QUOTE=AllHandsOnDick;5995662]Can we stop posting all this law shit. I come here for information on were to look to get laid not to read you guys interpretation of laws. If you get a hard on for laws look into getting this hobby legal.[/QUOTE]I was beginning to think I had to go to law school to play. Thanks for getting us back on topic.
Stopped in there this week for the second time in a month. Nice clean spot and Mai is the lady to see. Removes her shirt to start our session and proceeds to rub her ample breast in my face for a good 10 minutes. So so massage but a does a nice finish. Will definitely recommend and repeat.
Stopped by Ha Ha Spa for the second time this week. They have a nice clean location. Rachel is the lady to see. Speaks good English, lots of OTC top and bottom UTC teasing for the top. The massage is OK but she has a nice set of D's and rubs my face in them for 5 minutes to start. Talks dirty and takes her time. She expects an $60 tip on top of price of the massage. Would recommend and will continue to repeat.
Went to Ha Ha again yesterday. Second time this week saw Rachel. Starts out by pulling her shirt up and rubbing her ample D cup breast in my face for 5 minutes. Lots of teasing, OTC top and bottom UTC. The Massage is ok I like that she talks dirty and takes her time for the happy ending. Clean place and cost was $80 for the house and $60 tip. Will continue to repeat and recommend.
Visiting this area this weekend. Pulled into where this place is according to Google. Parked near hemp shop to watch for a few minutes as I always do. Noticed a decked out charger with darker windows with a shaved head gentlemen sitting in it. He was close enough to see but far enough away to not be noticed if you didn't turn in by the hemp shop. May be nothing. But I did not partake.
[QUOTE=AverageJon;6008090]Went to Ha Ha again yesterday. Second time this week saw Rachel. Starts out by pulling her shirt up and rubbing her ample D cup breast in my face for 5 minutes. Lots of teasing, OTC top and bottom UTC. The Massage is ok I like that she talks dirty and takes her time for the happy ending. Clean place and cost was $80 for the house and $60 tip. Will continue to repeat and recommend.[/QUOTE]Interesting series of reports there.
[QUOTE=ReviewDork;6010511]Interesting series of reports there.[/QUOTE]The poster has only 3 posts to his name and they are repeats of this same post.
[QUOTE=NCHobbyist69;6010845]The poster has only 3 posts to his name and they are repeats of this same post.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I used to frequent haha. NEVER got that treatment. LOL.
[QUOTE=Caster1;6010922]Yeah, I used to frequent haha. NEVER got that treatment. LOL.[/QUOTE]I saw that the other day. I did not buy it LOL. I know a guy that is very honest great guy. That told me about the first time they open the lady working the from had very big tits. She fucked him. He said it was very odd because he didn't see it going that way. He said he felt like she just had a urge to do it. I tried and didn't get anything from her. He went back and didn't get anything either so maybe he was just lucky. But as of them post I would not believe it.
Girl working was tall and as flat as an ironing board. Did not partake.
[QUOTE=ChrisRockSlaps;6016574]Anyone ever have any luck at spots besides the usual AMPs? Not comfortable with incalls / outcalls. Would rather have something utr at a less suspicious place than a AMP.[/QUOTE]There used to be a Nail Shop on Oleander that also did massage. Haven't been down that way in a while to see if they're still there.
Any new updates on Kerr AMP? Looking to go there in the near future.
[QUOTE=Bijimnc;6023285]Any new updates on Kerr AMP? Looking to go there in the near future.[/QUOTE]I tried yesterday day. I saw a older woman I didn't go in. I use to go there all the time when I last lived here always saw sunny. Nice tits on that one I would like to know if she is still there.
[QUOTE=AllHandsOnDick;6025293]I tried yesterday day. I saw a older woman I didn't go in. I use to go there all the time when I last lived here always saw sunny. Nice tits on that one I would like to know if she is still there.[/QUOTE]Why didn't you go in? Older women or something else?
[QUOTE=Bijimnc;6025495]Why didn't you go in? Older women or something else?[/QUOTE]Went there yesterday. Good time all the way around. Fairly good massage, touching. Good flip.
[QUOTE=Bijimnc;6035373]Went there yesterday. Good time all the way around. Fairly good massage, touching. Good flip.[/QUOTE]Yeah I did go in was not my thing. Who did you get, name. What she look like.
[QUOTE=AllHandsOnDick;6035933]Yeah I did go in was not my thing. Who did you get, name. What she look like.[/QUOTE]I believe it was Monica. Middle age. Some meat on her, but not heavy at all. It was a good experience.
I was in town and decided to indulge in some fun, but I didn't want to deal with the annoyance of trying to figure an escort so I decided to get an old fashioned at an AMP. I originally wanted to go for 120 minute massage but Mamasan pushed me to a 1 hour 4 hand instead. I opted for the table shower first and had a bit of teasing there but it was mostly business. The 4 had a lot of roaming / teasing from one girl and just a tad bit from the other but the massage itself was great. On the flip the teaser finished me off and they even continued with a foot / head massage. Was 1. 2 for the HR and I tipped both 40, a bit pricey but it was very worth it LOL.
Is Angela's still open? It has been a few months since I have been there and have not seen any recent posts.
[QUOTE=Bubba777;6052223]Is Angela's still open? It has been a few months since I have been there and have not seen any recent posts.[/QUOTE]Went today. Nice older but good bodied lady. Massage was not the best. She was very nice. Talked most of the time. Utc boods, books, and beav. Flip was worth the trip. I'll be back.
Want to say thanks to everyone for the info they have provided on here, as it has helped me, and start sharing some info in return.
I stopped at Kerr to try it out earlier. No one was available when I went in and had to wait 20-30 minutes. Candy was the one I got and she was in her late 30's, early 40's with a nice body. Went with 30 minutes, since was short on time. There was no massage and she wanted to get right to work. She did take her top down before she started and let me play with her top, which were C size. She spoke and understood my instructions on what I liked and she did comply. It was OTC on the bottom, but she did let me in for a quick sample. Was 6 and 6. It was OK and would go again if it was a convenient option, but would want to try other choices first.
[QUOTE=ChrisRockSlaps;6058044]Anybody ever have any luck at rejuvenate? They're pretty loose with how much they cover you up but besides that everything seems to b straight forward. Is all Asian people but I think they're legit. Also wondering about the 1 on Racine?[/QUOTE]The one on Racine is legit massage. I went there few years ago. Went in the back room got undressed and laid on the table. A young girl came in and I thought I was good. I tired to rub her a few times but she kept out the way. She kept me covered. During the roll over she left and got some scent oil. Came back and I was laying upright uncovered. She covered me. She rubbed my thighs and got close to the boy so I roll a little so her hands brush up on them. She stop and left 5 minutes later a guy came in to finish the body rub. So don't try it there. I have got back many times a got more legit runs from women.
[QUOTE=FrankForFun;6055434]Want to say thanks to everyone for the info they have provided on here, as it has helped me, and start sharing some info in return.
I stopped at Kerr to try it out earlier. No one was available when I went in and had to wait 20-30 minutes. Candy was the one I got and she was in her late 30's, early 40's with a nice body. Went with 30 minutes, since was short on time. There was no massage and she wanted to get right to work. She did take her top down before she started and let me play with her top, which were C size. She spoke and understood my instructions on what I liked and she did comply. It was OTC on the bottom, but she did let me in for a quick sample. Was 6 and 6. It was OK and would go again if it was a convenient option, but would want to try other choices first.[/QUOTE]I went to Kerr over the weekend, 60 minutes. I had a nearly identical experience with Candy. Nice massage, top came down on the flip OTC on the bottom. Not sure of her age because she wore a mask. Ended massage with some stretching. I will probably go back.
[QUOTE=Bubba777;6060501]I went to Kerr over the weekend, 60 minutes. I had a nearly identical experience with Candy. Nice massage, top came down on the flip OTC on the bottom. Not sure of her age because she wore a mask. Ended massage with some stretching. I will probably go back.[/QUOTE]Interesting, as she didn't have a mask on when she answered the door and never wore one in the room with me.
[QUOTE=FrankForFun;6061716]Interesting, as she didn't have a mask on when she answered the door and never wore one in the room with me.[/QUOTE]She wore the entire time with me.
Is Kerr the best now for a rub and tug and where is it located?
[QUOTE=Bjbj57;6064517]Is Kerr the best now for a rub and tug and where is it located?[/QUOTE]I don't know if it's the best, but it's in a small plaza that is between Kerr and College where Taqueria Los Portales is and the plaza is also right next to Buff Masters car wash. There have been other AMPs with reviews in here if you search through this forum.
[QUOTE=ChrisRockSlaps;6058044]Anybody ever have any luck at rejuvenate? They're pretty loose with how much they cover you up but besides that everything seems to b straight forward. Is all Asian people but I think they're legit. Also wondering about the 1 on Racine?[/QUOTE]If there are no confirmed reports I'd stay covered up. This is the mistake Deshaun Watson made.
As far as who is the best? I wouldn't say Kerr, but Haha and Summer are the same business so they operate the same if you've been to one of those.
Of course one of these shops could get a hidden gem it does happen, so DYOR.
Went there the other day. Nice new gal named Yuyu. She seemed young and slim and cute. Pretty much the standard / standard. I would like to see her again.