Wednesday Night on FIg (8 PM)
Was anybody here crusing Fig around that time? Something was going on because I stayed on the track till 10pm and I saw blacks and white every 5 minutes. They were on the strip and on side streets too. Sadly, I did not partake.
Too bad because I was really horny too and I saw some nice looking bws between Gage and 40ish Street.
Can anybody shed some light on what happened tonight?
WSW on King Bl near Western
I haven't posted here in quite a long while. I haven't been doing much mongering lately.
I spotted a WSW around midnight Monday. I wasn't out mongering but when I spotted her I became curious. You don't see many WSW in this area and it's a few blocks from the PD station.
I pulled up and asked her if she needed a ride. She said she was on her way to the liquor store to get a beer. Her name was Meg and up close it was obvious that she was in the 35+ yrs age bracket. No shoes, but walking alone in this area made me wonder if she was a decoy. She shook my hand and her hand had the feel of someone that has been living the rough life. She claimed that she had just got out of jail and needed a drink real bad.
The liquor store was only a few blocks away. Once she was inside the car and we had driven several blocks I asked if she was dating and she said yeah. I offered her 3 roses to show me her snatch. She countered with 5 roses. I agreed. WHOMP, there is was in all its glory! She wasn't wearing any panties and immediately pulled up her denim skirt. NICE looking box for an old rough girl just out of jail.
After eyeballing the box for a while I decided she wasn't a decoy and offered her 20 roses for a BBBJ. She had good skills and I blasted off in little or no time. She was so turned on by the experience that she wouldn't stop rubbing and fingering her own box.
Took the back streets and dropped her off back near King and Western. I will look for her again when I'm out to play and actually have some time on my hands.
State high court limits seizure of cars of prostitution and drug suspects
State high court limits seizure of cars of prostitution and drug suspects.
Justices toss out a Stockton ordinance that allowed confiscation upon arrest in such cases. L.A.'s city attorney was among the parties supporting such police powers.
By John Spano, Times Staff Writer
12:00 PM PDT, July 26, 2007
The California Supreme Court ruled this morning that police may not confiscate the cars of suspected prostitutes or drug dealers unless the owners are convicted first.
Over strong dissent, the high court threw out a Stockton ordinance that allowed seizure of cars used in drug and prostitution cases upon arrest.
The court ruled that state laws governing seizure — allowing seizure if drug suspects are convicted, and not allowing seizure in cases of prostitution — supersede all powers of cities.
The court ruled that they "are matters of statewide concern that our Legislature has comprehensively addressed ... leaving no room for further regulation at the local level."
Stockton, the California League of Cities and Los Angeles City Atty. Rocky Delgadillo had urged the high court to allow cities to seize vehicles used in suspected criminal activities. Stockton had declared the cars a nuisance and authorized their seizure and, after a hearing, sale.
The majority decision by Justice Joyce L. Kennard was met with an impassioned dissent from Justice Carol A. Corrigan, who wrote that citizens should not be forced "to share their neighborhoods with pimps, prostitutes and drug dealers who use their streets as a bazaar for illegal transactions.'
Corrigan said cities should have the authority to protect themselves from this form of urban blight.
"The aged homeowner who must shut herself inside while drug transactions are conducted in her front yard, and the parents who must walk their children to school while commercial sex acts are performed in cars parked at the curb, pay a heavy and local price," Corrigan wrote.
The majority recognized that cities have important concerns about the effects of vice on the quality of life but held that only the state Legislature could empower local police to seize automobiles.
