Agency Discussion and Reviews

Hey guys, it's been a while since I have been in DC. I dreamt about an asian from moon palace last time, do they still exist or is there something similar?

Thanks fellas.

Looking for the reviewer histories and the recent reviews all 8-9's. That sounds incredible like the best service queen kgirls that are also young. So either these are all white knights who are a little generous or fake. With AI now, I'd imagine it's pretty easy to hire someone to create dozens of positive reviews across the agencies. We've already concluded that Chu kgirl had dozens and maybe hundreds of totally fake reviews. She had good service but when I met her she was literally in her 40's and looks like one of my younger aunts. It's easy for an agency to push fake or paid reviews.

[QUOTE=Izumimuzi;7344624]While gsgw seems shady, the only reason I'm not trying them out is because their website is abysmal. While the review activity is somewhat odd and I don't recognize any of the usernames, I don't think it's possible for any agency to fake that many reviews. Also, none of these girls are being rated all that highly IMO. When you click into all of them, the majority of reviews is 7's and 8's, few 9's, one or two 10's if that.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PAGonzo420;7345498]Hey now! I'm coming to the dmv this weekend and was looking for something other than the usual PG county AMP's, I wanted to branch out. I was looking at the agencies and have always wanted to try that route. I saw several ladies that caught my eye but saw Shani was arriving today. I was reached out, was able to get verified and have an appt with her tomorrow. I'll give a good report shortly after. The ter reports seem to point to good looks but mediocre service. But, I can't wait to find out![/QUOTE]

Shani was really good to me with no service issues. Posted more details in the K girl board. Best of luck. BTW get approved at Kstar if you can as I have yet to have a bad appt with them.

Texted and ask a out about Juri I was told by the booker she is beautiful and very good service. All was lies.

I went there door was open by some men and then I went inside she was in the room with blue dress she looked good at first. I went it no hug no kiss just how long you wanted I say 30 min and then asked about option. All paper taking care of went to shower was a quick wash. Dry up and was on bed soon as I get there together asked me to get to bed I did and started licking my nipple for 1 minute then she went to licking ball for 20 second was good and I was hard then she BBBJ me for 1 minute and asked me you ready and was like ok got the lube and went it missionary guess what? She blocks me in missionary well that is the first I was never blocked before in miss position well I guess there is a first for everyone LOL. She dry as hell I try to get lube and she said too much wasting what? I just paid for shitty service she looked away in miss position hand close like she was hugging her self so I can not get close to her in miss I am like I am not going to cum like this so I told her to get in Doggy position soon as I get the position and put it in and pump one of 2 times she puts me out and stiff her back so I can't put it in any more this was an ongoing struggle we wasted 10 min like that then I told her to get on the edge of bed for missionary took her so long to get to the edge of bed I think she was trying to kill time. I get some lube and she get up and give me napkin to wipe my hand off what the hell is going on here why are you wasting my time and want to wipe my hand with baby wipe while I am having s*x. She is insane she should not be doing this. Ripping people off and think you can get away with this. Terrible terrible. On top of all this she told me be gentle LOL gentle for what you won't even get close to me. Then alarm ring and she said time up!! I was like what the f**k did I do here probably the worse agency experience ever. YOU HAVE BEEN Warned.

[QUOTE=JacobsPatrick;7345432]Negative reviews can be more telling than the positive reviews.[/QUOTE]I think the critical thing about reviewers is that they are consistent in their reviews. In others words, guys that get pissed off about something that occurs and then down play anything that was positive in the session (or could have been if they didn't fixate on some one disappointment) will have inconsistent reviews. Same for those that are overjoyed by some aspect of the session and then color everything else them might be average as really good. Neither will necessarily have a review about an escort that is that helpful for me because I will not know if the whole session, and everything that entrails, was as claimed or if one or two things in it colored the entire review.

A consistent reviewer, regardless of what grading scale they personally use is helpful to everyone because they can adjust the scoring, and text description, for their own use -- a lot like some use Celsius while others Fahrenheit, but it's simple to compare and get an accurate measure of temperature with either.

[QUOTE=SSB69;7345833]Looking for the reviewer histories and the recent reviews all 8-9's. That sounds incredible like the best service queen kgirls that are also young. So either these are all white knights who are a little generous or fake. With AI now, I'd imagine it's pretty easy to hire someone to create dozens of positive reviews across the agencies. We've already concluded that Chu kgirl had dozens and maybe hundreds of totally fake reviews. She had good service but when I met her she was literally in her 40's and looks like one of my younger aunts. It's easy for an agency to push fake or paid reviews.[/QUOTE]Well, you're talking about Coco's reviews which is only 1 girl of the 10+ that have been reviewed there. But yeah, I see your point and also think there's something weird going on with the reviews.

I really have only looked into Mimi because I kept seeing her name pop up but her reviews are all over the place. Some say she's 40+, 5'8 with D's, some say she's late 20's 5'4 with B's. Some say she's 350/ hr, some say they paid 450? Some say it's 200/ hr. I checked her very first review on the other review site and it's Destello who I recognize. We've seen the same girls, rate them similarly, have similar experiences. Mimi's the only girl he ever gave a 6 to for looks, service was 8 though. Read the review and thought I'd rather not see Mimi. I'm thinking 2 or 3 girls share "Mimi"s profile and the booker just makes sure each person see's the same "Mimi" on rebooks. The difference in physical descriptions / experiences is way too far off for them to all be talking about the same girl.

From what I can see, there's like 3 websites that list the same girls plus ads scattered around random escort sites. Like this is an ad with a different number but the location is the old one? And they're using Coco's pics? My thought process is that a few bookers must've come together to masquerade as an agency with the idea to eventually become a legit one.

[URL]https://nova.bedpage.com/Escorts/herndon-fairfax-woodbridge-tysons/13209178.html[/URL]

On GSG, I agree something definitely is going on. Ok both sites; there are either paid reviews, white knight shills, or straight up fake AI review activities. Business is down a lot and I imagine faking activity would draw attention to glowing reviews. I'll give you guys a positive one I had a while back.

Maple CP.

Cute kgirl, guessing late 20's. Met her on last visit and she seemed new to the US but somewhat of a pro. Face was a 7 ish and body was 5'5 ish bigger legs, flat ass, soft skin, natural B or C's. Amazing unlimited DFK and service. Very easy to talk to between rounds. She'd be an ATF if her body matched my preferences a bit more. The clock at CP is running 10 minutes ahead, so she had me out in 50 minutes which was a turn off.

[QUOTE=Izumimuzi;7346523]Well, you're talking about Coco's reviews which is only 1 girl of the 10+ that have been reviewed there. But yeah, I see your point and also think there's something weird going on with the reviews.

I really have only looked into Mimi because I kept seeing her name pop up but her reviews are all over the place. Some say she's 40+, 5'8 with D's, some say she's late 20's 5'4 with B's. Some say she's 350/ hr, some say they paid 450? Some say it's 200/ hr. I checked her very first review on the other review site and it's Destello who I recognize. We've seen the same girls, rate them similarly, have similar experiences. Mimi's the only girl he ever gave a 6 to for looks, service was 8 though. Read the review and thought I'd rather not see Mimi. I'm thinking 2 or 3 girls share "Mimi"s profile and the booker just makes sure each person see's the same "Mimi" on rebooks. The difference in physical descriptions / experiences is way too far off for them to all be talking about the same girl.

From what I can see, there's like 3 websites that list the same girls plus ads scattered around random escort sites. Like this is an ad with a different number but the location is the old one? And they're using Coco's pics? My thought process is that a few bookers must've come together to masquerade as an agency with the idea to eventually become a legit one.

[URL]https://nova.bedpage.com/Escorts/herndon-fairfax-woodbridge-tysons/13209178.html[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Noworth;7346479]I think the critical thing about reviewers is that they are consistent in their reviews. In others words, guys that get pissed off about something that occurs and then down play anything that was positive in the session (or could have been if they didn't fixate on some one disappointment) will have inconsistent reviews. Same for those that are overjoyed by some aspect of the session and then color everything else them might be average as really good. Neither will necessarily have a review about an escort that is that helpful for me because I will not know if the whole session, and everything that entrails, was as claimed or if one or two things in it colored the entire review.

A consistent reviewer, regardless of what grading scale they personally use is helpful to everyone because they can adjust the scoring, and text description, for their own use -- a lot like some use Celsius while others Fahrenheit, but it's simple to compare and get an accurate measure of temperature with either.[/QUOTE]

Agreed, I've read over 10,000 reviews in 20 years including a ton of TER reviews. Negative reviews are just as dishonest as positive ones. It's often too obvious. For example, saying they liked the girl and there was nothing wrong but giving a low score because the booker was rude. Dumb stuff like that is common. Even more common is guys will add 1-2 points for MILFs "looks rating" because their service was good. I can't even blame them, if a woman makes you feel good and special you are going to go soft on her. You might not even realize it. But the conclusion is the same, there is a review accuracy problem.

I don't want MILFs, so I don't even read reviews by MILF lovers. That's step one. I only reviews by other people who consistently reviewed HYA in the past.

The first thing to do on TER is to read the actual words of the review and ignore the score. By far, the most common problem with a review is the review not matching its own score. Probably because the reviewer was too lazy to assign the correct score. For example, a "Good and would repeat" review got a 6 - 6 while another "Okay and probably won't repeat" got an 8 - 8 by a reviewer. This is simply lazy reviewing. It is [I]extremely common[/I] on TER. People just want to get it over with. But when I get to know a reviewer it is usually clear they are at least writing a reasonable review, even if the score they give is verifiably BS.

It's even worse when kgirls are being reviewed by guys who like White girls or TS providers. Why would any of us care what they think about kgirls? Yet TER treats their reviews as equally valid:

[QUOTE=Download X;7119792]Some guys just give 6/6 by default to finish the review. You can click on their name and see the 6 / 6 reviewer gave Hani, Abba, Jane a 6 / 6. But if you read the words of their review, they're talking 7-9. So it's just laziness. We've all done it at some point.

Hani is really a 9 in service, so the moment I see he gave her a 6 I just ignore the rest of his numbers. Everyone should just read TER reviews and ignore the number, people at least put effort into the words. This is the last line of his review on Jane "We spent the rest of the session chatting and getting to know each other. [B]I cant wait to fuck her again[/B]" That is not a 6. If you read his whole review, you'd probably assign an 8.

He has one more review, a 10/10. It was for Spencer Scott. [B]100% unedited photos of Spencer Scott attached[/B]. She is a 3 to me at best, but I totally understand other guys have different taste. But a 10? This is why I only use USAG and follow a couple of people with the same taste as me. If you like retired white porn stars, cool, but why would I use your intel on kgirls? So I don't go rubbing my hands expecting things out of high review numbers, because then the door opens with Spencer Scott on the other side.

There are are also guys that give mostly 10s. 4 out of 7 girls are perfect 10's:
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=gburn[/URL]

Excerpted from:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=7117818&viewfull=1#post7117818[/URL][/QUOTE]

If a reviewer likes fat old white women (see the photos and judge for yourself), I do not want to see their kgirl reviews. But that's what you get on TER, you see he gave 100% of the kgirls he saw 6-6 which is basically just rushing the review. If you read his review text though, he said they were wonderful. If USAG forced people to give numbers in a dropdown (and a popup if you gave a high review), we'd have the same problem. By the way, TER's popup instructs you that a 10 is reserved for things like anal. TER is telling us what we are allowed to consider good service, and it's wrong. A girl offering video provides way better service than a girl who offers anal. Anal is worthless to me.

TER is useful for getting a general idea about a girl's service level, as long as you assume some a few of them are wrong or lying. You will see a pattern and figure it out. Some really obvious examples of a wrong review is when they mix up the girl's name and review the wrong girl. I know because the girl is not even working, and the description is completely wrong [I]including the race[/I]. The more reviews you read, the more you realize that the only thing that really matters is the reviewer. Beyond that, best you can do is hope that after pages and pages of reviews it averages out the lies.

If you are looking for HYA, TER actually misleads you. I am literally worse off after reading TER than after I started. After a decade of that, I stopped using TER entirely and relied only on people I knew including friends in private. My success rate skyrocketed. I literally know how a girl looks when I walk in the door.

For example, I knew how Daisy looked like head to toe before seeing her, because several people described her to me in detail:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7158966&viewfull=1#post7158966[/URL]

I then made the above review and photo guide. She is a premium 600/hr kgirl, S-Tier HYA. In conclusion, know who is reviewing a girl or rely on "lots of reviews combined"

I had plans for another provider fall through because of booking issues (it happens sometime) I looked to see if Yuki was available and saw on the site that she's gone temporarily. Anyone know when she'll be back? Feel free to DM me too.

I'm surprised no one has reported on this girl yet. She's got a good history on TER and for the most part, pretty accurate. I'd say she's early 30's but looks good enough and any argument about actual age is kind of moot. The video of her on her profile is clearly filmed in a typical kgirl apt and fuck me, legit 8-10 on a scale of 10. Hey tits are MM, nothing to complain about but it's actually her ass that I'll remember her by. K girls may have an ass but rarely if ever like big and jiggly.

The only regret is that she's GFE only. The BBBJ makes up for it since she puts in work and her eye contact while trying to fit both of my nuts in her mouth before going back to the shaft would've been reason enough to repeat TBH. I recommend bringing your own condom if you want it lubed so she doesn't have to apply if you don't do foreplay.

She has a fit bod so it makes it seem like an instagram girl is riding you and again, doggy style is a must to truly enjoy her. She is open to dfk but because I had her turned around and focused on her ass, I didn't get as much as I would've preferred. I unfortunately didn't last long but she let me have a MSOG for the normal fee of $40. I got some leeway to spank her too but you got to whip that hand, not slap through her as many ladies have let me know. Easily one of the hotter girls available atm so I'll repeat before she leaves.

Here’s her rates since I always get DM’s about pricing since these websites usually don’t list them. $300 for the half, $360 for the hour plus $200 for the video option which I may take come next time since I know what I’m getting now.
[URL]https://www.dmvgirlsva.com/scarlett[/URL]

[QUOTE=Konichi1;7347183]I had plans for another provider fall through because of booking issues (it happens sometime) I looked to see if Yuki was available and saw on the site that she's gone temporarily. Anyone know when she'll be back? Feel free to DM me too.[/QUOTE]She does a tour in VA / NY every 6 months to a year for around 1-2 months. Unless she decides to come back earlier, if at all, it'll probably be this Nov. At the earliest or around this time next year at the latest.

[URL]https://asiansensation99.com/view/22632[/URL]

Yuria pops out from behind the door and is all smiles. She's 5'1. Makup on. Died hair below her shoulders. Red dress with black, flowery top that comes down in an inverted V. She has rashes on both inner elbow, from a lot of showering. Black and pink bra and panties. Slim. Flat stomach. B cups with sensitive brown eraser nips. Meaty ass. Brown innie pussy.

She has me sit down to exchange introductions and handle documents.

BT. Shower. In the shower, she heavily tongues both of my ears. She presses her body against mines to wash my back. She then kneels down to wash the goods. She holds the shaft and licks the balls a little.

Daty. Her hand instantly reaches for my hand to grab a hold of it. Medium moans with her body twitching around. Her eyes closed but would open for a little.

She doesn't know how to dfk. She just opens her mouth. So I had to give her some guidance. But she wrapped her hands around my neck. Her neck tickles easily, when I went in to kiss, suck and lick. She moans and jolts when I went in to suck and feather her nips.

She crawls and lays on top of me, moving in to dfk. She then tongues my ear again. Neck. Nip sucking. Bls. Licks the head and shaft. Puts the head in her mouth. Licks the shaft again. HJ while nip sucking. She crawls up to dfk me while stroking me.

Cg. She gets on top and gently rides while dfking. She tongues my other ear.

Missionary. Her hands reaches for mines. Eyes closed. Her medium moans fill the air. She throws her arms around my neck when I go in to dfk or suck on her nips. Her body's squirming around.

Doggie. Heavy moaning. Meaty ass. Nice asshole to look at.

Missionary again. She's pulling me in more to dfk her. She ended up cumming twice. Her hair is a mess at this point.

Chatter at the end. She's a college student. Her friend, aurora / maho ppc got her into this. She's on a 1 month tour. She's a flat out newbie and she's only has about a week of providing under her belt. I picked her because I wanted that new car feel and smell and Yuria was that. She's so new she doesn't know how to dfk or blow.

[QUOTE=HouseBlend;7347218]I'm surprised no one has reported on this girl yet. She's got a good history on TER and for the most part, pretty accurate. I'd say she's early 30's but looks good enough and any argument about actual age is kind of moot. The video of her on her profile is clearly filmed in a typical kgirl apt and fuck me, legit 8-10 on a scale of 10. Hey tits are MM, nothing to complain about but it's actually her ass that I'll remember her by. K girls may have an ass but rarely if ever like big and jiggly.
[/QUOTE]If it's some booty you like and BB you might give YeJi at KStar a try. She could lose 10 lbs but not really a big gut. Nice breast (might have had some work done but if so it's really good as the look and move as if they are natural). And she definitely has some booty that will giggle for you. Cute. She won't pass for 21 but really doesn't look much over 30 -- but that's my take so take that with a grain of salt as Asian's a notoriously difficult the put an age on.

Seems like late 20's J Girl, girl is not the pictures. Good ish English. Face prob a 6. 5 cute, but fucked up teeth and minimal makeup. 5'3 ish and natural large B or small C, cute small ass.

YMMV but good sorta DFK, sloppy BBBJ, decent service. All business at the pop and cleanup tho. Some GFE cuddling and talking then I gave a massage which warmed me up for Round 2 with 10 minutes left, good CG and doggy again. Alarm rings at 55 min for shower and she asks if I'm going to finish. I gave it up, knowing I can't force it.

Basically a solo shower out oddly, awkward ending but she was sweet and hugs and kisses at the door. Prob won't repeat but I'm sure some of you guys would like her.

(Please Check with Bookers for More Current and Accurate Option Info).

[URL]http://rentry.org/kgirls#dmv-dc-maryland-virginia[/URL]

C-org / Asian Hot Girl / Asian Sensation: Jgirl Lala (BB), Jgirl Miya (BB), Jgirl Aona (BB duo w Uraua), Jgirl Urara (BB duo w Aona), Jgirl Yuria (BB).

C-org / Joyful Bay: Jgirl Mei (BB), Jgirl Naho (BB), Jgirl Yuka (BB).

C-org / Firefox: Jgirl Airi (BB Video), Latin Zujhin (BB).

C-org / Sweet Baby: JAV Kosaka Aya (BB Video), Rin (BB Video).

C-org / GSGDWW123: Cgirl Tian (no), Cgirl Mimi (BB), Cgirl Wan (no), Cgirl Yike (no), Cgirl Coco (no), Latin Kli (no).

K-org / Discreet Story: Spring (no).

K-org / Club Paradise: Fiancee (no), Shani (BB).

K-org / Asian Top Model: Baby Cindy (TBD), Kimmy (BB).

K-org / DMV Girls: Vgirl Scarlett (Video).

K-org / Asian Gem: Jgirl Mari (BB Video), White (no), Coco (no).

K-org / K-Star: Yeji K (BB).