Printable View
[QUOTE=Lexx1;6920789]She looks good. I like the tall ones and super petite honeys. Was it really that much of a difference? Then either old pics or photoshopped. My Ukrainian model is 5'11" and slender. Great ass but small tits which is all good.[/QUOTE]I like em tiny!
Combined with tall, any amount of thickness doesn't work for me.
She's totally good, that's why I gave her a good review.
[QUOTE=RanManCan;6920846]I like em tiny!
Combined with tall, any amount of thickness doesn't work for me.
She's totally good, that's why I gave her a good review.[/QUOTE]Right on. I feel you on the tall and thick. When they're tall for me they need to be slender. Don't mind a little thickness on a shorter girl sometimes.
[QUOTE=RanManCan;6920706]Scarlettfoxxx is a lovely sweetheart.
A touch thicker than her pics reveal. Still thin, just an ounce too thick for me, and quite tall at 5'11". Lives in southbay.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8c23a6ff-a665-43f7-833b-739358dd3ad4[/URL][/QUOTE]How much is she asking for?
The below is a message I received from 5 (at best).
"Weekly allowance $1500/ week, no romance or physical interactions, simply more like a spontaneous friendship with a young, pretty, college girl. If that's not doable then you're seeking out the wrong girl. I know what I want from a sugar daddy and have firm boundaries. You won't see me in person a lot because I am a busy person right now and will get busier as I start a new demanding job in my industry. Most of our relationship will be virtual until I see fit otherwise. Thanks. "
The sugar bowl is really going downhill.
[QUOTE=LightHouseMan;6921061]The below is a message I received from 5 (at best).
"Weekly allowance $1500/ week, no romance or physical interactions, simply more like a spontaneous friendship with a young, pretty, college girl. If that's not doable then you're seeking out the wrong girl. I know what I want from a sugar daddy and have firm boundaries. You won't see me in person a lot because I am a busy person right now and will get busier as I start a new demanding job in my industry. Most of our relationship will be virtual until I see fit otherwise. Thanks. "
The sugar bowl is really going downhill.[/QUOTE]It's been downhill for a while. Nothing new there.
What you're dealing with here is a scammer. "Virtual relationship" is straight up scam and bs. And they've been around for a very long time. Even before it started going downhill.
[QUOTE=LightHouseMan;6921061]The below is a message I received from 5 (at best).
"Weekly allowance $1500/ week, no romance or physical interactions, simply more like a spontaneous friendship with a young, pretty, college girl. If that's not doable then you're seeking out the wrong girl. I know what I want from a sugar daddy and have firm boundaries. You won't see me in person a lot because I am a busy person right now and will get busier as I start a new demanding job in my industry. Most of our relationship will be virtual until I see fit otherwise. Thanks. "
The sugar bowl is really going downhill.[/QUOTE]I see these profiles that say similar things:
Platonic only.
Online only.
Not looking for intimacy, but you never know (this means you'll be told no while you pay till one day you give up and she probably accuses you of treating her like a *****, which she is).
What I'm offering is to be a great listener.
And I always wonder. Who the hell is talking to these girls? Are any guys so simpy that they'll pay an allowance for a penpal?
[QUOTE=Murrican;6921234]And I always wonder. Who the hell is talking to these girls? Are any guys so simpy that they'll pay an allowance for a penpal?[/QUOTE]Yep, simps. The same type who subscribe to OnlyFans and donate to Twitch streamers that will never give them the time of day.
[QUOTE=Murrican;6921234]I see these profiles that say similar things:
Platonic only.
Online only.
Not looking for intimacy, but you never know (this means you'll be told no while you pay till one day you give up and she probably accuses you of treating her like a *****, which she is).
What I'm offering is to be a great listener.
And I always wonder. Who the hell is talking to these girls? Are any guys so simpy that they'll pay an allowance for a penpal?[/QUOTE]I think you have three kinds of girls here: girls selling pics, girls advertising their OnlyFans, and delusional women who think they are so special that think men will throw money at them just for being pretty girls. I would guess the first two types make money on maybe 1% of their messages on SA tops. So it's a numbers game for them. The third type is probably closer to 0. 1% and most are off the site once they realize it's not happening for them.
[QUOTE=LightHouseMan;6921061]The below is a message I received from 5 (at best).
"Weekly allowance $1500/ week, no romance or physical interactions, simply more like a spontaneous friendship with a young, pretty, college girl. If that's not doable then you're seeking out the wrong girl. I know what I want from a sugar daddy and have firm boundaries. You won't see me in person a lot because I am a busy person right now and will get busier as I start a new demanding job in my industry. Most of our relationship will be virtual until I see fit otherwise. Thanks. "
The sugar bowl is really going downhill.[/QUOTE]Never seen anything like this in 6, 7+ years. You must be choosing different POTs than me. IDK what I do really to avoid them, but I do.
[QUOTE=Kreota;6921239]Yep, simps. The same type who subscribe to OnlyFans and donate to Twitch streamers that will never give them the time of day.[/QUOTE]I want to strangle them. Do all men a favor and if you know one, shame him relentlessly until he stops. Take him to TJ or something. Anything but enabling lazy ******.
[QUOTE=Sipping;6921250]I think you have three kinds of girls here: girls selling pics, girls advertising their OnlyFans, and delusional women who think they are so special that think men will throw money at them just for being pretty girls. I would guess the first two types make money on maybe 1% of their messages on SA tops. So it's a numbers game for them. The third type is probably closer to 0. 1% and most are off the site once they realize it's not happening for them.[/QUOTE]Another one: girls whose profile says "I get a lot of messages. Stand out and buy something off my wishlist. ".
Do any guys actually think to themselves, " I know how I can stand out from the crowd. She told me. I'll just buy a total stranger a prize off her wish list. " I almost can't think of a worse way to start a relationship, no matter how shallow and financial, than paying someone to take notice of you.
[QUOTE=RanManCan;6920846]I like em tiny! [/QUOTE]I like them tiny too. No thicker than a Snickers for me.
So much overlap between Hx, PD, OF, and SA. These girls post on as many sources of revenue as possible. Just much easier to creampie an 18-19 yo girl like teeny tiny Brooke below thru HX or PD rather than SA or SB. But of course, if you truly want an extremely low volume girl that almost feels exclusive to you only, can't beat the Ivy League pimp's app LOL. Be prepared to apply a ton of elbow grease before getting your dick wet. On Hx it would be 1-2 internal PM, followed by 2-3 texts, then you be knocking on some strange girl's room in Irvine, your heart pounding with excitement to seeak in the hot young girl who will open the door. You folks have no idea how many girls activate their Hx account one day, and literally within 4 hours or less I am doing 69 with her in Room 212 of the Hyatt. You can't do it that quick on SA.
There ain't no platonic online sugaring with massive allowance scammers on Hx. You either put out or get out. In fact the chicks who join and only offer all-covered no GFE service soon realize they wasted $25 signing up. I check their profiles a few months later and still zero network. Yeah baby why don't you go to Seeking and advertise your BS there? I hear they got lots of Homer Simps who will throw money at your feets just for breathing the same oxygen in the air LOL.
[QUOTE=AceMcNasty;6921709]I like them tiny too. No thicker than a Snickers for me.
So much overlap between Hx, PD, OF, and SA. These girls post on as many sources of revenue as possible. Just much easier to creampie an 18-19 yo girl like teeny tiny Brooke below thru HX or PD rather than SA or SB. But of course, if you truly want an extremely low volume girl that almost feels exclusive to you only, can't beat the Ivy League pimp's app LOL. Be prepared to apply a ton of elbow grease before getting your dick wet. On Hx it would be 1-2 internal PM, followed by 2-3 texts, then you be knocking on some strange girl's room in Irvine, your heart pounding with excitement to seeak in the hot young girl who will open the door. You folks have no idea how many girls activate their Hx account one day, and literally within 4 hours or less I am doing 69 with her in Room 212 of the Hyatt. You can't do it that quick on SA.
There ain't no platonic online sugaring with massive allowance scammers on Hx. You either put out or get out. In fact the chicks who join and only offer all-covered no GFE service soon realize they wasted $25 signing up. I check their profiles a few months later and still zero network. Yeah baby why don't you go to Seeking and advertise your BS there? I hear they got lots of Homer Simps who will throw money at your feets just for breathing the same oxygen in the air LOL.[/QUOTE]Your posts are always so entertaining to read LOL. They are so true too. You are the goat of finding the newest girl and fucking her immediately. Finding a girl that's on SA and HX and just getting straight to the point. Those are the best.
[QUOTE=Kreota;6921239]Yep, simps. The same type who subscribe to OnlyFans and donate to Twitch streamers that will never give them the time of day.[/QUOTE]Yep, SIMPS have truly poisoned the pool.
An SA regular, very active for years, and used to post videos almost daily, but now her profile has been dormant for 5 months.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2e29ec36-a2c6-442a-84bf-55176d7d031a[/URL]
Well, there is a reason for that.
Her pastor hubby plead guilty in May to multiple counts of raping his 8 year old sister, and is facing up to 30 years in the big house at a sentencing hearing later this month.