Escort Reports

[QUOTE=LenovoX120;5496737]Scarlett looks hot. Who would you recommend for service though? It's been a while since I used one of the Brazilian orgs. They used to advertise on PD, E. G. Bellas of Brazil which had some nice ladies, but they have all vanished.[/QUOTE]Sorry, she's the only one I've seen in this batch. Ariana has really good reviews on TER. Hebe used to be one of my favorites but she hasn't been around. Seen a couple recently that were outstanding. But I find a lot has to do with chemistry.

I'd say Scarlett's service is good.

[QUOTE=Skullomoania;5489062]Facts. Even the ones who look attractive in person don't match their pics (especially PC). Before finding review sites I basically just blindly used PC because they were the easiest to screen with. Over the last few years I've seen close to 30 different girls and I can confidently say none of them match their pictures. Despite that I've had some really great experiences at PC but know you're absolutely not getting the girl in the pic.[/QUOTE]A few orgs happen to have reliable pics for just their top talent, but none make it a business priority as far as I can tell. (LSC maybe comes the closest, but they pretty much only hire top talent LOL. And still no shortage of cosmetic retouches on 3-8-year-old pics. As for PC / Alpaca, yeah, the website is basically only for getting the phone numbers and maybe a height statistic that could be within plus or minus 3 inches. The rest is a trove of eye candy and false promises, which I will confess I've gotten lost in for quite a few dreamy minutes of my life. Minutes I will never get back (but no regrets, right? Sometimes it ticks me off though. Let's take the case of sweet Laduree. ([URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=544[/URL]) Any of you who have visited the site, who hasn't gazed longingly at her pics there? With the doe-eyed, Euro-Asian baby face, the (now popular in porn, but she was first!) "Yes Daddy?" mini-tank-top from which she's practically exploding, and the *worthy "fuck me" panties below, just in case you hadn't yet completely lost your senses? Could that really be the girl waiting for my cock?? No, no, no, that's not what Laduree really looks like. I have come to terms with the fact that No K Girl looks like that. No K Girl Is Ever Going To Look Like That.

In reality, Laduree is unique and quite cute. Not a model. Face is average 7 sporty Korean chick, jaw-length haircut. The bod is a curvy 9 though, quarter-bouncin' firm, mid 20's, no babies, stacked and silky. Her skills are myriad, like she takes tips from US porn, and she was my instant new favorite. (review here: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/laduree-review-by-palo410-2236912[/URL]) I mentioned the lack of photo resemblance to Ms. Al, who can be chatty in text if she's bored I guess. Anyway, I said something like "I'm never going to meet that girl in the pics, right?" And she said, roughly, "Some of these girls live in USA. Would you want your real picture on a website? Even if, or maybe especially if, it is only part time? For privacy reasons most girls won't use their actual photo. ".

And while it's disappointing, I totally get that. I don't know a real solution, but that's not what kills me. It's this. Laduree went home like in November '20; I got to see her just once after the summer. But! To this very day, her listing on PC, the one I linked to above, regularly appears on or near Page 1 of the "Most Recent Listings" and it says:

"Laduree back today!!

Sweet Ladure Stays 7 days in Bay Area.

_Available now_.

Last updated 24 minutes ago".

Or 18 minutes, or 6, or 45. Whatever, it's pointless, yet continually refreshed in its pointlessness. Seriously, what is the deal with that? Why have and pay to maintain a site that just sets up disappointments?? At first Ms. Alpaca would say she's coming back in a few weeks, just check back, and here's today's staff. Laduree's listing would drift in the ensuing weeks to page 3 or 4 (always "available now" of course), but then pop back to page 1 and I would call and Ms Alpaca would say, oh sorry, she's coming back in a few weeks and here's today's staff. And so on, for months. Then she said "I will tell you when she's coming as I know you like her. " Eventually (and I mean just three days ago) she admitted Laduree is not returning soon, and in fact she is never coming back. Good to effing know that. I had mentioned the annoyance of the website being in error before, and so I mentioned it again (actually I should call it not "in error" but "a straight-up manipulative lie" LOL) and she said "Oh we don't control the website. " WTF kinda bull is that? This is the boss telling me that. Someone there absolutely controls the site. Clearly they can add new listings, change details, and even set them to "On Vacation" like the dozens that clearly say that. But something about those Laduree photos, that girl, something about the total effect is so, so good, so enchanting, that they must get most of their cold calls from naive horndogs like me that take the bait, and you know what? It was indeed _only_ to meet Laduree that I bothered first getting vetted there at all. I bet the truth is they can't afford to tell the real story. Or even half-truth it with the "On Vacation" treatment, without cutting into the "new suckers" count. Would it be so hard to just not always say "Available Now"? (Man, I wish all-caps was allowed. Dear reader, in your mind, put about a third of the last 50-60 words above in full-on shouting all-caps, ok? It will make more sense that way.) Just makes me not feel like giving that org any benefit of the doubt.

OK, rant over. Had to get that off my chest.

Epilogue: It's possible that Ms. A was also quite taken with the real Ms. L, like so many were. (Despite a handful of reviewers who be all like "who that? Wut? Nah", she was super popular with those in the know.) Ms. Alpaca was fond of the spunky Laduree, yes, but for different reasons. But nonetheless, Ms. A is simply hurting, saddened, and ultimately may be as traumatized and in denial as I am, about Laduree simply not ever coming back, despite the obvious appeal and logic in the views of everyone else considering her situation. Seeing them decommission the Laduree profile would mean to finally admit, as a more poetic soul than I once put it, "I cannot put my finger on it (or in it, or even near it, because it is in Korea! -ed) now. The child is grown, the dream is gone. I have become uncomfortably numb. ".

Hey,

Do you have links to Ariana's reviews? Thanks.

[QUOTE=MolluskMan;5497498]Sorry, she's the only one I've seen in this batch. Ariana has really good reviews on TER. Hebe used to be one of my favorites but she hasn't been around. Seen a couple recently that were outstanding. But I find a lot has to do with chemistry.

I'd say Scarlett's service is good.[/QUOTE]

Duuuuuuuuuude! First off that was a very entertaining read that hit close to home. I feel your pain brother I harbor the exact same bitterness with Ms. A for a similar situation with Mezmerizing. Only got to see her twice. I called one one day and they told m she went on vacay. Cool. Profile still up. Call a few weeks later. Still on vacay. Call several times every week or so when I was truly jonesing for her and finally a month and a half later the PO was saring to get short with the replies (No). If they had updated the profile to "On Vacation" or dropped it knowing she wasn't coming back then idiots like myself wouldn't keep calling. Finally they updated the profile presumably because they were tired of my texts (or others as well? The fact that there are so many on vacay meaning "inactive and likely not coming back" is telling of this orgs overall performance.

[QUOTE=Palo410;5499100]A few orgs happen to have reliable pics for just their top talent, but none make it a business priority as far as I can tell. (LSC maybe comes the closest, but they pretty much only hire top talent LOL. And still no shortage of cosmetic retouches on 3-8-year-old pics. As for PC / Alpaca, yeah, the website is basically only for getting the phone numbers and maybe a height statistic that could be within plus or minus 3 inches. The rest is a trove of eye candy and false promises, which I will confess I've gotten lost in for quite a few dreamy minutes of my life. Minutes I will never get back (but no regrets, right? Sometimes it ticks me off though. Let's take the case of sweet Laduree. ([URL]https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=544[/URL]) Any of you who have visited the site, who hasn't gazed longingly at her pics there? With the doe-eyed, Euro-Asian baby face, the (now popular in porn, but she was first!) "Yes Daddy?" mini-tank-top from which she's practically exploding, and the *worthy "fuck me" panties below, just in case you hadn't yet completely lost your senses? Could that really be the girl waiting for my cock?? No, no, no, that's not what Laduree really looks like. I have come to terms with the fact that No K Girl looks like that. No K Girl Is Ever Going To Look Like That.[/QUOTE]

Texting back and forth with this ad and got a location at a motel. Not sure if legit or not. Any advce?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/california/sanjose/65875792[/URL]

[QUOTE=SleepyWeb;5502348]Texting back and forth with this ad and got a location at a motel. Not sure if legit or not. Any advce?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/california/sanjose/65875792[/URL][/QUOTE]If you're lucky, you'll be greeted with someone in their early 40's.

Otherwise, good luck.

Most of the c-orgs I've encountered work out of the 2-star or lower motels.

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5501574]The fact that there are so many (PC girls are) on vacay meaning "inactive and likely not coming back" is telling of this orgs overall performance.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't be surprised if they purposely employ this advertising gimmick, just so guys keep coming back to their site, and end up booking someone else. Also, for people new to their site, at first glance it just takes them look busy.

[QUOTE=SleepyWeb;5502348]Texting back and forth with this ad and got a location at a motel. Not sure if legit or not. Any advce?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/california/sanjose/65875792[/URL][/QUOTE]Pics are obviously not legit. You'll likely see a MILF / gilf and there might be some upcharges. I sometimes go to these low end MILF golf shops for some service or Greek, but if I were you I'd keep to those with numbers that at least have some reviews after you Google them.

Just doing my monthly check in to see if the KGirl ORGs are still asking for I'd and personal information when getting screened.

Are the South Bay KGirl ORGs still doing that?

The site indicates the whole org is on vacay. Some of the latest rotation just got there so it seems like something is up.

[URL]https://klovers.ch/[/URL]

This isn't your girl re-branded is it? He description is similar.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430[/URL]

[URL]https://k-seductress.escortbook.com/[/URL]

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5503908]The site indicates the whole org is on vacay. Some of the latest rotation just got there so it seems like something is up.

[URL]https://klovers.ch/[/URL][/QUOTE]So is EBK. There is definitely something up in the East Bay.

[QUOTE=StraightOmar;5504037]So is EBK. There is definitely something up in the East Bay.[/QUOTE]Ebk apparently got busted, and klovers followed suit by moving their asses out of e-ville. Beware.

How likely is that ill wind to blow into South Bay area?

[QUOTE=Loafy;5504981]Ebk apparently got busted, and klovers followed suit by moving their asses out of e-ville. Beware.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5503934]This isn't your girl re-branded is it? He description is similar.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/momo-6504999829-360430[/URL]

[URL]https://k-seductress.escortbook.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]Well, it is similar in description. Photos, who knows! Maybe worth a try to find out, and if not Laduree, then to console myself appropriately. Thanks!

Check your PMs brother.

[QUOTE=Palo410;5507273]Well, it is similar in description. Photos, who knows! Maybe worth a try to find out, and if not Laduree, then to console myself appropriately. Thanks![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Palo410;5507273]Well, it is similar in description. Photos, who knows! Maybe worth a try to find out, and if not Laduree, then to console myself appropriately. Thanks![/QUOTE]Laduree is using pictures of Chinese model Lin Mei Hui Zi.

[URL]https://hotgirl.asia/mistar-charm-club-vol-243-goddess-mieko-%e6%9e%97%e7%be%8e%e6%83%a0-%e5%ad%90-perspective-underwear-photo/[/URL]

[QUOTE=DaSmith;5508609]Laduree is using pictures of Chinese model Lin Mei Hui Zi.

[URL]https://hotgirl.asia/mistar-charm-club-vol-243-goddess-mieko-%e6%9e%97%e7%be%8e%e6%83%a0-%e5%ad%90-perspective-underwear-photo/[/URL][/QUOTE]Don't you mean that the Chinese model Lin Me Hui Zi is working as a hooker here, under the fake name Laduree? .

This was my 3rd visit with her. I saw her twice about a year ago when she was with SA. I got to the new location in the afternoon and had to wait 15 minutes for her to get ready. She is Mid to late 30's, great spinner body with nicely done bolt-ons.

Standard BT, long shower. Nice convo and catch-up, but still a long shower.

Moved to the bed for DFK, some P2 P, then CBJ. Moved to Mish where held me tight and she put her tongue in my ear with lots of moaning. I didn't last long and finished in the cover. She offered a nice Massage which I agreed. I asked for 2nd round halfway through, she said not enough time. I was really pissed at this point because I shouldn't even have to ask with 30 minutes left to go, and we only did 1 position. If I'm paying almost 300 for an hour, I should be getting a fucking hour, not a half hour. My previous visits with her were late night non-stop action, which she remembers. She reluctantly agreed which killed the mood for me and I said it will be quick to reassure her. We did CBJ, Mish, DS, Prone but I wasn't feeling it anymore. Tried HJ but couldn't finish. Took a Quick Shower then left. Not planning on repeating with her.

[QUOTE=ChocoNap;5510277]This was my 3rd visit with her. I saw her twice about a year ago when she was with SA. I got to the new location in the afternoon and had to wait 15 minutes for her to get ready. She is Mid to late 30's, great spinner body with nicely done bolt-ons.

Standard BT, long shower. Nice convo and catch-up, but still a long shower.

Moved to the bed for DFK, some P2 P, then CBJ. Moved to Mish where held me tight and she put her tongue in my ear with lots of moaning. I didn't last long and finished in the cover. She offered a nice Massage which I agreed. I asked for 2nd round halfway through, she said not enough time. I was really pissed at this point because I shouldn't even have to ask with 30 minutes left to go, and we only did 1 position. If I'm paying almost 300 for an hour, I should be getting a fucking hour, not a half hour. My previous visits with her were late night non-stop action, which she remembers. She reluctantly agreed which killed the mood for me and I said it will be quick to reassure her. We did CBJ, Mish, DS, Prone but I wasn't feeling it anymore. Tried HJ but couldn't finish. Took a Quick Shower then left. Not planning on repeating with her.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the heads up on Pink. She was on my to-do list when I'm up there next week. Definitely a pass.

Klovers (Emeryville) and Kpleasures (sj) are linked, but KP has been on vacay for a while now.

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5505781]How likely is that ill wind to blow into South Bay area?[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/profile/Sabrinaaaa[/URL]

0 Reviews, but I was looking for a change, so decided to see if she was worth the TOFTT experience.

Reached out to her for outcall and her first response to me was "Incall or outcall"?

So not a good start.

Texted again, but the timing seemed to indicate it was a scammer.

Sure enough. I was asked for a deposit to confirm appointment.

I asked if incall still required a deposit and got the same response, so I decided to pass.

So no verdict on whether its a scam or not, as I didn't take the plunge on provided a deposit, as I never do that anymore with unverified ladies.

Reviewed plenty of times on PD but thought I'd share here as I had a great experience. Visited Stacey recently and had a blast. [URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/MistressStaceyB[/URL].

She's super laid back. Great talker. Super interesting lady, if she looks like your type, book some extra time to get to know her, it's worth it. I just did a quick visit but I wish I had ponied up more. Bigger but fit and toned girl. She has very friendly dogs, not something I'd typically highlight but we had great conversation about them. Great BBBJ, great mouth. Light GFE. Tight kitty. Definitely worth it.

She is moving to Arizona at some point but will be visiting the Bay, but she's here for now at least.

Looking for a a c / k org that provides good service, won't short you on time. Pm me please. Thanks.

[QUOTE=LeftRight;5514808]Looking for a a c / k org that provides good service, won't short you on time. Pm me please. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Plenty of stories here that already provide the information you're looking for.

I recommend LSC and BGC. I haven't had any issues with any of my choices with them and lately.

I would say the only issue is they tend to book up fast, so they rarely can be the answer if I suddenly find myself with free time.

Anybody know any good Colombian / Brazilian or any Latina orgs? PM me please.

Saw Hera this week for the first time. Cute girl, good visit. This was one of the few that I really can't nail down an age. She's not 18 for sure, but could be anywhere from mid 20's to 40, I have no idea. Don't care really, I just noticed it. She's cute and fun, but needs a break.

She's been here for months and nobody has taken her out yet? One of you single guys needs to show her the city. She seems like the type that would appreciate and reward that investment. If she was in LA I'd do it.

[QUOTE=Vitvix;5511856]Reviewed plenty of times on PD but thought I'd share here as I had a great experience. Visited Stacey recently and had a blast. [URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/MistressStaceyB[/URL].

She's super laid back. Great talker. Super interesting lady, if she looks like your type, book some extra time to get to know her, it's worth it. I just did a quick visit but I wish I had ponied up more. Bigger but fit and toned girl. She has very friendly dogs, not something I'd typically highlight but we had great conversation about them. Great BBBJ, great mouth. Light GFE. Tight kitty. Definitely worth it.

She is moving to Arizona at some point but will be visiting the Bay, but she's here for now at least.[/QUOTE]She's pretty cool -- goth like incall. She also has flying squirrels as pets!

Haven't been to LSC in probably two years. Who's the best looking girl? Don't care about performance, just want eye candy. I heard the stable is all closer to 30's or early 40's. Kinda sucks. Looking for young and pretty.

Are there any other orgs besides LSC that provide consistent BBFS with youngish good looking girls? Or is LSC still my best bet?

By the way, I noticed in Vegas and LA they openly list BBFS / CIP. In the bay they don't. Wish they would.

[QUOTE=Mastov;5521017]Haven't been to LSC in probably two years. Who's the best looking girl? Don't care about performance, just want eye candy. I heard the stable is all closer to 30's or early 40's. Kinda sucks. Looking for young and pretty.

Are there any other orgs besides LSC that provide consistent BBFS with youngish good looking girls? Or is LSC still my best bet?

By the way, I noticed in Vegas and LA they openly list BBFS / CIP. In the bay they don't. Wish they would.[/QUOTE]In the bay they advertise it as PSE. Can't think of any young eye candy at the moment.

[QUOTE=Mastov;5521017]Haven't been to LSC in probably two years. Who's the best looking girl? Don't care about performance, just want eye candy. I heard the stable is all closer to 30's or early 40's. Kinda sucks. Looking for young and pretty.

Are there any other orgs besides LSC that provide consistent BBFS with youngish good looking girls? Or is LSC still my best bet?

By the way, I noticed in Vegas and LA they openly list BBFS / CIP. In the bay they don't. Wish they would.[/QUOTE]Kim and Tia from SA has a different item on her listing (not listed as PSE).

I asked about it and it was a much higher upcharge to get PSE level.

Not sure if she is doing it to minimize how often she has to participate or if she's really young and warrants the price point.

They don't list the ages and the pictures didn't look like the actual lady.

Currently, Tia is still listed, but on vacation and Kim is not listed anymore.

However, if you feel like gambling, you can see if the extra $. 2 is due to their youth and leave a report for the rest of us.

I'll happily stay with LSC and BGC, since the rate they asked for Tia / Kim, I would want them to speak greek.

[QUOTE=NuttyLoon;5521824]Kim and Tia from SA has a different item on her listing (not listed as PSE).

I asked about it and it was a much higher upcharge to get PSE level.

Not sure if she is doing it to minimize how often she has to participate or if she's really young and warrants the price point.

They don't list the ages and the pictures didn't look like the actual lady.

Currently, Tia is still listed, but on vacation and Kim is not listed anymore.

However, if you feel like gambling, you can see if the extra $. 2 is due to their youth and leave a report for the rest of us.

I'll happily stay with LSC and BGC, since the rate they asked for Tia / Kim, I would want them to speak greek.[/QUOTE]Kim aka Pristine / Purple from ebk aka Jane / Jana from LovelyAngels / sexyangels aka Hera from M in LA has awful service / attitude. She asks you to cum a minute into penetration. Shitty storefront level service. One of few times I cut my losses and left with blue balls.

Tia is a fun fuck. Good luck catching her tho, she's back in LA.

Not much more to add to the abundance of available intel on one of LSC's premier candies. Her look reminds me of JAV Natsuki Maron. Nothing against Cora, but I prefer Ciara / Hera's bodies personally. As beautiful -dare I say DDG- as she is, it ain't hard to tell she's past her 20's. Still her silhouette can be mistaken for that of a pyramid-topping HS cheerleader. I did expect more from her head game, as it seemed more for show than actual legit service. Her best tricks shined through with her Kegels, which emptied my sack like an American embassy in Kabul.

Also, usually girls are either happy to meet me, could care less and are just cordial to get it over with, or sometimes oscillate somewhere in between. Cora tho had a look of dread before I removed my mask and hat, followed by a look of relief when she saw who I was. Made me question who tf saw her previously that day, and, put into context her compliments which seemed appropriate and not over-the-top.

[QUOTE=NuttyLoon;5521824]Kim and Tia from SA has a different item on her listing (not listed as PSE).

I asked about it and it was a much higher upcharge to get PSE level.

Not sure if she is doing it to minimize how often she has to participate or if she's really young and warrants the price point.

They don't list the ages and the pictures didn't look like the actual lady.

Currently, Tia is still listed, but on vacation and Kim is not listed anymore.

However, if you feel like gambling, you can see if the extra $. 2 is due to their youth and leave a report for the rest of us.

I'll happily stay with LSC and BGC, since the rate they asked for Tia / Kim, I would want them to speak greek.[/QUOTE]I think I'm happy to take a gamble. A few questions:

1) Did you ask the PO or in apartment? Would prefer a guaranteed thing, rather than arriving, asking, getting declined.

2) I assume Tiana is Tia? Or do I have this wrong?

3) Looks like both Kim and Tiana are available on site. Is it wrong?

4) Do you have ballpark idea of upcharge? You can DM me if you want.

[QUOTE=SixDNine;5521440]In the bay they advertise it as PSE. Can't think of any young eye candy at the moment.[/QUOTE]I've never played in the LA scene, but in the Bay it seems to have always been 30's and 40's. At leas this is what I remember for the last 5 years. I only hit a young 20 something once, but that was AMP instead of AAMP no BBFS. Does the LA scene have younger pussy? Seems to be the Kdoll capital whereas even the bay plays second fiddle.

[QUOTE=Mastov;5522288]I think I'm happy to take a gamble. A few questions:

1) Did you ask the PO or in apartment? Would prefer a guaranteed thing, rather than arriving, asking, getting declined.
Come on man... you have PLENTY of information around that lets you answer this for yourself.

2) I assume Tiana is Tia? Or do I have this wrong?
RocketManP responded with more information.
However, Tiana and Tia are two different people.

3) Looks like both Kim and Tiana are available on site. Is it wrong?
Seems like they updated the page and neither Tia nor Kim show up anymore.

4) Do you have ballpark idea of upcharge? You can DM me if you want.[/QUOTE]I could DM you, but I won't.

You should just reach out to the org.

They'll happily let you know what you need to bring once you pass their screening and book.

[QUOTE=Mastov;5521017]Haven't been to LSC in probably two years. Who's the best looking girl? Don't care about performance, just want eye candy. I heard the stable is all closer to 30's or early 40's. Kinda sucks. Looking for young and pretty.

Are there any other orgs besides LSC that provide consistent BBFS with youngish good looking girls? Or is LSC still my best bet?

By the way, I noticed in Vegas and LA they openly list BBFS / CIP. In the bay they don't. Wish they would.[/QUOTE]I'd say Cora / Tina at LSC is closest to young and "eye candy". HAvn't seen Hera, Ciara, or Niki so can't really say too much for them but Cora / Tina are definitely on the younger side and on the prettier GND. Both I believe were okay with BBFS but YMMV.

BGC is the other org that usually has the younger girls. I'd say closet to young / eye candy there would be nixie and jennie.

All of these girls are probably late 20's early 30's at the most so theyre definitely on the younger / prettier side of girls. As for service I'd say nixie is more GFE, calmer while the other 3 would probably be more at it. (especially Tina's routine in the shower, I do recommend it once I think.

Lmk if you have any questions.

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;5523349]I'd say Cora / Tina at LSC is closest to young and "eye candy". HAvn't seen Hera, Ciara, or Niki so can't really say too much for them but Cora / Tina are definitely on the younger side and on the prettier GND. Both I believe were okay with BBFS but YMMV.

BGC is the other org that usually has the younger girls. I'd say closet to young / eye candy there would be nixie and jennie.

All of these girls are probably late 20's early 30's at the most so theyre definitely on the younger / prettier side of girls. As for service I'd say nixie is more GFE, calmer while the other 3 would probably be more at it. (especially Tina's routine in the shower, I do recommend it once I think.

Lmk if you have any questions.[/QUOTE]Niki isn't eye candy.

She came across as mid 30's for me.

Still had a good time and was able to get three out of me.

Not super talkative, but then again, I was a bit tired that day and didn't make much of an effort to chat.

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;5523349]I'd say Cora / Tina at LSC is closest to young and "eye candy". HAvn't seen Hera, Ciara, or Niki so can't really say too much for them but Cora / Tina are definitely on the younger side and on the prettier GND. Both I believe were okay with BBFS but YMMV.

BGC is the other org that usually has the younger girls. I'd say closet to young / eye candy there would be nixie and jennie.

All of these girls are probably late 20's early 30's at the most so theyre definitely on the younger / prettier side of girls. As for service I'd say nixie is more GFE, calmer while the other 3 would probably be more at it. (especially Tina's routine in the shower, I do recommend it once I think.

Lmk if you have any questions.[/QUOTE]Thanks a bunch man. I think I will check out BGC.

A question: I've never done BGC before. At LSC there's no upcharge for BBFS. But I see BGC says "PSE Services Available", does that mean there's an upcharge? Also in your experience is BBFS at BGE CIP also? Or YMMV?

[QUOTE=LenovoX120;5518761]She's pretty cool -- goth like incall. She also has flying squirrels as pets![/QUOTE]Shit, I might book with her to just see the squirrels!