[QUOTE=Toungsten;5602957]I get texted every day from M and Chanel hasn't been on any of them for months.[/QUOTE]Channel is back only a couple days per week. Also Cona is back.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5602957]I get texted every day from M and Chanel hasn't been on any of them for months.[/QUOTE]Channel is back only a couple days per week. Also Cona is back.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5602957]I get texted every day from M and Chanel hasn't been on any of them for months.[/QUOTE]Chanel is ON & OFF-she comes and goes quickly. I had few text from "M" on availability and Chanel was in few of those texts.
Cona pussy is available tomorrow for general public for massive CUM DUMP. Cona is ready to receive LOADS AFTER LOAD starting tomorrow. So, go enjoy guys.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5603160]Cona wasn't available yesterday and neither was Chanel last week. Sounds like someone is getting their phones hacked.[/QUOTE]Cona works on the low sometimes. I've been offered her as well and she was not listed. Either she has a stalker or keeping her working a secret from someone. The reason I say this is because a few months ago my buddy saw her under another name. Her reviews weren't favorable under this name. Just comes to show their name with reputation really are important.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5603157]I'll take a girl with average or even so so looks who is a great fuck any day. Names that come to mind are Lia and Katie among others. Sometimes if they're too hot they think their shit doesn't stink. Know what I mean?[/QUOTE]Agree with this. Some of my all time favorites weren't necessarily lookers but just work horses. A retired NorCal favorite named Scarlet wasn't a looker in the face but she had a nice fake booty and a sex drive out of this world. The legend Vivi of NorCal was a little ugly but booked solid constantly and was a certified freak.
We hobby with different tastes and fantasies. People who ask for recommendations should be more specific on the board. Asking who is the best or best features isn't really the best way to get the right answer. Your beauty might be a beast through my eyes. Asian vs brown vs black vs white, we all have different views on beauty. If you want it all it is what we NorCal mongers call a Unicorn. Those exist too, but are rare.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5603551]Agree with this. Some of my all time favorites weren't necessarily lookers but just work horses. A retired NorCal favorite named Scarlet wasn't a looker in the face but she had a nice fake booty and a sex drive out of this world. The legend Vivi of NorCal was a little ugly but booked solid constantly and was a certified freak.
We hobby with different tastes and fantasies. People who ask for recommendations should be more specific on the board. Asking who is the best or best features isn't really the best way to get the right answer. Your beauty might be a beast through my eyes. Asian vs brown vs black vs white, we all have different views on beauty. If you want it all it is what we NorCal mongers call a Unicorn. Those exist too, but are rare.[/QUOTE]Agreed. That's why I always said with looks it's always YMMV. As far as great sex or freakiness there is a gold standard that some of out favorites approach or exceed. Besides Lia and Katie I left out Moni and Jamie. And then you have some who give you the best of all worlds like Hana, Dana and Mini.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5603529]Cona works on the low sometimes. I've been offered her as well and she was not listed. Either she has a stalker or keeping her working a secret from someone. The reason I say this is because a few months ago my buddy saw her under another name. Her reviews weren't favorable under this name. Just comes to show their name with reputation really are important.[/QUOTE]A rose by any other name is still a rose. Cona would always be Cona regardless of the name. There is a true disconnect here. BTW in spite of a previous post Cona is not available today but maybe later this week or longer. She's not hiding behind another name. With her reputation for service it would be crazy to go by another name to hide and to give less than stellar service.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5603192]Chanel is ON & OFF-she comes and goes quickly. I had few text from "M" on availability and Chanel was in few of those texts.
Cona pussy is available tomorrow for general public for massive CUM DUMP. Cona is ready to receive LOADS AFTER LOAD starting tomorrow. So, go enjoy guys.[/QUOTE]Correction. Cona is not available today which was tomorrow when that post was written.
[QUOTE=Thud1;5603183]Channel is back only a couple days per week. Also Cona is back.[/QUOTE]Not according to M who texts me every day.
M. Nicole.
Newtopasian. [URL]http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/m....................[/URL].
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. (WLA) Jean, Saki, Daisy (MW).
Pink Angels. [URL]https://pinkangels.site/...............................[/URL].
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] Jenny [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] .
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Nicole, Dana.
[URL]http://preciousklove.cuties-sites.com/home[/URL] Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. WLA. Jean, Saki, Daisy MW.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5603529]Cona works on the low sometimes. I've been offered her as well and she was not listed. Either she has a stalker or keeping her working a secret from someone. The reason I say this is because a few months ago my buddy saw her under another name. Her reviews weren't favorable under this name. Just comes to show their name with reputation really are important.[/QUOTE]100% correct Golddust. I saw her under another name too.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5603192]Chanel is ON & OFF-she comes and goes quickly. I had few text from "M" on availability and Chanel was in few of those texts.
Cona pussy is available tomorrow for general public for massive CUM DUMP. Cona is ready to receive LOADS AFTER LOAD starting tomorrow. So, go enjoy guys.[/QUOTE]I received the same info.
Pretty much solved your own riddle. Girls will tell bookers which customers they can't stand and so available to some but others have no clue she's around. Solved your own riddle.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5603529]Cona works on the low sometimes. I've been offered her as well and she was not listed. Either she has a stalker or keeping her working a secret from someone. The reason I say this is because a few months ago my buddy saw her under another name. Her reviews weren't favorable under this name. Just comes to show their name with reputation really are important.[/QUOTE]I would not be surprised if Cona reinvented herself and attempted to offer CFS as she is / was bit bitter about the numerous CIP's. But once a girl get reputation of BBFS / CIP, it will be hard for her to reinvent herself. Almost like adult star that want go main stream-it just does not happen.
Yes-Cona WAS HOT and still is for majority of the guys but I think she is defintely past the age that will be considered as PRIME MEAT.
[QUOTE=PlutoKiller;5602282]He ain't lying. I just saw her last week.[/QUOTE]M texted me on Oct. 12 that Chanel was back and Cona back on Fri Oct. 15.
Am I the only one that misses Adela / Elena? Been over a month since I've been inside her.
[QUOTE=GG1234;5535125]For reference, I found these posts that contained pics of Adela/Tia/Elena.
[B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5507038&viewfull=1#post5507038]#22496[/url][/B]
[B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5490580&viewfull=1#post5490580]#22269[/url][/B]
[URL]https://switter.at/@Loveangels/102798933208095007[/URL] (higher res Tia pic).
[B][url=https://www.candygirlla.com/%ED%95%91%ED%81%AC]Adela @ CandyGirlLA[/url][/B][/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=EasyPeasyDong;5603758]100% correct Golddust. I saw her under another name too.[/QUOTE]I find it odd that if Chanel and Cona are working even sporadically and UTR along with an alleged different name to keep Cona even more UTR then how is it that everyone on this board seems to know about it. That's with M indignant about the fact that they both haven't been working. This has become the most non UTR provider availability I have ever heard of. As for Cona being pissed off because of all the BBFS she was that since I met her in 2015 and loved every minute of it. Singles, doubles, you name it. The reality is that she has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more.
[QUOTE=Member#2210;5604245]M texted me on Oct. 12 that Chanel was back and Cona back on Fri Oct. 15.[/QUOTE]Exactly the same info. M Texted me on the 14th, said Channel available Monday and Wednesday. Which I was happy to partake in! Channel is not available this week however.
Hopefully T's Supply Chain of Intel has not hit a speed bump.
[QUOTE=EasyPeasyDong;5603761]I received the same info.[/QUOTE]What text?
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5596437]I'm sure no one wants to hear this, but some credit is due to the orgs that are thriving. It's is presumptuous to think that "the customer is always right" policy is applicable to the KAAMP world! None of us really know what the order flow looks like from their side. The good thing about a Zero Tolerance Policy is that it doesn't require the time to judge each cancellation on it's merits, which they don't have the time or inclination to do. A "no fault" cancellation policy would just lead to more cancellations.
Figuring out how many distinct orgs there are would be helpful in decision making process. If they are plentiful, just move on. If not, "charge it to the game" and amortize the fee over total number of visits. But, I'm still not sure how the fee paying process would work. It would be interesting to engage the booker on this subject right before getting shut down![/QUOTE]I actually think most people WANT to hear such policy stated explicitly beforehand, so they know what they're getting into. Forget "customer is always right", it's more like "supplier is always right". And if so, this should be stated clearly. And currently this board is one of the few places it can be stated on.
I agree zero tolerance policy is easier (and lazier) approach. But wherr is zero tolerance on the other side? When a girl or booker cancels you, do you get full compensation? An airline cancellation gives passengers vouchers that are higher in value. No such thing in this biz. This creates very assymetric relationships.
At the very least, people could report it publicly so others know, that agency X will demand full price for canceling on a prebook, even in emergency situation.
Charging it to the game is a fine concept, but only if it applies to both sides. Mongers lose money=time every time we're canceled on.
Again this creates a dichotomy of "we do what we want (cancel at any time for any reason with no reimbursement) and you do what you can (can't cancel at any time for any reason without reimbursement). OK, sure. Shit practice but sure. Then let's see the list of all orgs who engage in such practice, it's only right that we enumerate them publicly.
"What it is, is what it is!" - James Brown.
I totally agree with the philosophical underpinnings and theory of your arguments, except the part about symmetry. I think the orgs are taking a much bigger risk than the mongers. This is such a base and basic market that I don't think there is room for a lot of subtleties, or consideration. Also, I don't think there are too many "subtle" people involved at any level of the orgs, or the "girls".
Time for another of my favorite sayings: "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!
If I get burned by my dealer, I don't go running to the BBB (but I would run to the BBFS). I try to find another dealer. I guess the question in this instance is exactly how many dealers are there? If we were to draw up a heirarchical chart of the booker's and orgs, would we find out that in fact that there are not that many players, and their relationships to each could effectively blackball one right out of the game? If so, I think it is fair to consider what is likely to be the most productive course of action, and not just stand on principal!
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5604487]Again this creates a dichotomy of "we do what we want (cancel at any time for any reason with no reimbursement) and you do what you can (can't cancel at any time for any reason without reimbursement). OK, sure. Shit practice but sure. Then let's see the list of all orgs who engage in such practice, it's only right that we enumerate them publicly.[/QUOTE]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[QUOTE=Thud1;5604455]Exactly the same info. M Texted me on the 14th, said Channel available Monday and Wednesday. Which I was happy to partake in! Channel is not available this week however.
Hopefully T's Supply Chain of Intel has not hit a speed bump.[/QUOTE]Just received my daily text from with the daily lineup and she insisted that Chanel and Cona are not and have not been available. If everyone here is talking about it here then it doesn't sound like a well kept secret from the masses or even UTR. I'm sure that those saying they were offered appointments would have been told not to broadcast it if it was UTR. Don't shoot the messenger.
M. Nicole, Allie.
Newtopasian. [URL]http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/m..................[/URL].
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. (WLA) Jean, Saki, Daisy (MW).
Pink Angels. [URL]https://pinkangels.site/................................[/URL].
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] Jenny [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] .
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Nicole, Dana.
[URL]http://preciousklove.cuties-sites.com/home[/URL] Cutie, Tiny, Eunji, Pink. WLA. Jean, Saki, Daisy MW.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5604395]I find it odd that if Chanel and Cona are working even sporadically and UTR along with an alleged different name to keep Cona even more UTR then how is it that everyone on this board seems to know about it. That's with M indignant about the fact that they both haven't been working. This has become the most non UTR provider availability I have ever heard of. As for Cona being pissed off because of all the BBFS she was that since I met her in 2015 and loved every minute of it. Singles, doubles, you name it. The reality is that she has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more.[/QUOTE]Cona's a smart and savvy investor.
Did quite well with stocks last yr and so far this yr.
I share / exchange stocks info with her quite a bit. Cona's unavailable bec she's not working not UTR.
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5604543]"What it is, is what it is!" - James Brown.
I totally agree with the philosophical underpinnings and theory of your arguments, except the part about symmetry. I think the orgs are taking a much bigger risk than the mongers. This is such a base and basic market that I don't think there is room for a lot of subtleties, or consideration. Also, I don't think there are too many "subtle" people involved at any level of the orgs, or the "girls".
Time for another of my favorite sayings: "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!
If I get burned by my dealer, I don't go running to the BBB (but I would run to the BBFS). I try to find another dealer. I guess the question in this instance is exactly how many dealers are there? If we were to draw up a heirarchical chart of the booker's and orgs, would we find out that in fact that there are not that many players, and their relationships to each could effectively blackball one right out of the game? If so, I think it is fair to consider what is likely to be the most productive course of action, and not just stand on principal![/QUOTE]Assymetric risk is inherent to any business; in the example of airlines they always have higher risk than individual flyers.
I don't agree with the inherent risk justifying bad practices.
I'd assume if you get burned by your dealer, you'd warn all your friends and others to not deal with that dealer anymore. Well, this board is the equivalent of this. If people are afraid of bullying where orgs will blacklist you for even mentioning their practices. As you seem to imply. Well that sucks. But there are solutions. They could for example forward their grievances or instances of bad practices to someone who aren't afraid to pound on issues and they'd compile an anonymous list. Will there be false positives? Sure.
I don't agree with the concept of because the orgs run it and are all networked, it's ok to be bullied and stay quiet and treated like dumb atm machine Johns instead of like long-term customers. Just my 2 c.
Got a text from HGV about new Mimi. Booked a 11 am and I was shocked to see Kimi. It was so nice to see her still looking cute at and innocent. Blonde hair and looking good. Had an hour, her first customer in a while LOL. If you guys miss Kimi she is available for limited hours.
[URL]https://honeyguavagirls.escortbook.com/[/URL]
[QUOTE=KCowGirl69;5480229]Saw her last week. She delivered. Great head. Loved watching her ride and the reflection of her expressions from hitting it from behind in front of the big closet mirrors. Excellent service, good pussy.[/QUOTE]
Got a text from M on Thursday 10/21 saying "Cona back tomorrow". I texted back that I would probably book for Monday and got a reply "Text me anytime ". I just texted M about 10 minutes ago today (aka Monday) and got the reply "We have Nicole and allie today" "Cona not here". When I asked when she'll be back I got the reply "not sure".
I'm confused as hell. How can they be booking Cona for one day and then not be sure of when she'll be back four days later? Is her schedule that erratic, or was there a falling out over the weekend?
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5604395]I find it odd that if Chanel and Cona are working even sporadically and UTR along with an alleged different name to keep Cona even more UTR then how is it that everyone on this board seems to know about it. That's with M indignant about the fact that they both haven't been working. This has become the most non UTR provider availability I have ever heard of. As for Cona being pissed off because of all the BBFS she was that since I met her in 2015 and loved every minute of it. Singles, doubles, you name it. The reality is that she has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more.[/QUOTE]You wrote: "The reality is that Cona has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more."
Very true- she does have decent stock portfolio and she is doing it because she does enjoy the sex part. At least that is what she told me.
[QUOTE=TDLeafs;5605012]Cona's a smart and savvy investor.
Did quite well with stocks last yr and so far this yr.
I share / exchange stocks info with her quite a bit. Cona's unavailable bec she's not working not UTR.[/QUOTE]Thank you for helping to quell the rumors.
[QUOTE=JrueArtist;5604369]Am I the only one that misses Adela / Elena? Been over a month since I've been inside her.
.[/QUOTE]Yes! And her shitty bouncing from one org to another gets on my nerves. Stay at one place and work so I can see you are more often. Maybe I should just give in and buy her purse so I get secret access to her.
She was in SJ as Tia at SweetAngels for one day just last week. Some guys think it was a lie she was there but it was not. She was there and she was only doing GFE for 280, no BBFS. I am not sure of her reasoning for that and I hope she doesn't come back to LA with that idea. Her CG skills with a cover, no thank you.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5605507]Her CG skills with a cover, no thank you.[/QUOTE]Exactly. Part of what makes her CG so hot is knowing she's trying to furiously milk your load right into her pussy. Into the condom? . nah. Pass.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5605403]You wrote: "The reality is that Cona has invested her money wisely and doesn't really need to provide any more."
Very true- she does have decent stock portfolio and she is doing it because she does enjoy the sex part. At least that is what she told me.[/QUOTE]The first time I saw her, maybe 2 or 3 months ago, we talked about crypto and she told me she also invested in bitcoin.
[QUOTE=TDLeafs;5605012]Cona's a smart and savvy investor.
Did quite well with stocks last yr and so far this yr.
I share / exchange stocks info with her quite a bit. Cona's unavailable bec she's not working not UTR.[/QUOTE]Cona knows good amount about stock market-she should have saved a lot and made a good amount of money. Last time, I saw her she was talking to me about Delta Airline stock. She made good $$$ on that one.
[QUOTE=Member#2210;5605600]The first time I saw her, maybe 2 or 3 months ago, we talked about crypto and she told me she also invested in bitcoin.[/QUOTE]I wish I knew five years ago that Cona was investing in the market. That was the time I bought an IPO at 27 that in four years went to 900 and is still on the list of stocks to never sell. She would have been running her own agency by now.
[QUOTE=Midway13;5605392]Got a text from M on Thursday 10/21 saying "Cona back tomorrow". I texted back that I would probably book for Monday and got a reply "Text me anytime ". I just texted M about 10 minutes ago today (aka Monday) and got the reply "We have Nicole and allie today" "Cona not here". When I asked when she'll be back I got the reply "not sure".
I'm confused as hell. How can they be booking Cona for one day and then not be sure of when she'll be back four days later? Is her schedule that erratic, or was there a falling out over the weekend?[/QUOTE]The answer to that question is that she's not back and your experience is the perfect example of that.
M has told a few of her best clients that Cona is here. Some of us have seen her in the past week. Some of us have also seen her UTR in the past when she was supposed to be on vacation.
Just because Yve blacklisted me many years ago because she said: "your dick is way too fucking big" doesn't mean that others are not still seeing her from time to time. I don't claim that she is not here just because I can't see her anymore.
I accept it and move on. Thousand of other girls out there to see.
For those newbies out there, when you hobby everyday and are good money to the bookers, they treat you well and give you quick access to the VIP stars. Unless the VIP star doesn't really want to see you.
She is on and off and good chance she comes back for all soon.
Hey there, visiting LA for a few days and started browsing this thread. Damn, there are way too many agencies and discussions here. I've browsed this thread and many of the mentioned sites but it's info overload.
For sheer # of girls, would I be safe just calling Candygirls? Looks like they have the most models.
I'll be looking for something tomorrow, (Tues.) night.
FWIW I have club / mp experience in FL and LV, but not LA. Looks like their all next door to each other in this magical land called "mid-wilshire".
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5605852]The answer to that question is that she's not back and your experience is the perfect example of that.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I figured. She's my ATF among the BB providers so I'm willing to wait, but I hate getting head faked. Is Nicole over at M worth the trouble?
[QUOTE=EasyPeasyDong;5606093]M has told a few of her best clients that Cona is here. Some of us have seen her in the past week. Some of us have also seen her UTR in the past when she was supposed to be on vacation.
Just because Yve blacklisted me many years ago because she said: "your dick is way too fucking big" doesn't mean that others are not still seeing her from time to time. I don't claim that she is not here just because I can't see her anymore.
I accept it and move on. Thousand of other girls out there to see.
For those newbies out there, when you hobby everyday and are good money to the bookers, they treat you well and give you quick access to the VIP stars. Unless the VIP star doesn't really want to see you.
She is on and off and good chance she comes back for all soon.[/QUOTE]If M has told a few of her "best" clients that Cona is available and UTR then why are those "best" clients blowing her UTR cover on this board. If that's what her "best" clients are doing to her then what would her "worst" clients be doing to her? And what does this have to do with Lyn and an alleged big dick blackball? We just had a post that one of those "best" clients was told Cona was available but when it came to making an appointment she wasn't.
[QUOTE=Midway13;5606145]Yeah, I figured. She's my ATF among the BB providers so I'm willing to wait, but I hate getting head faked. Is Nicole over at M worth the trouble?[/QUOTE]She's no Cona but definitely worth it.