Tanya Delight is Amazing!
I saw Tanya's listing on Tryst earlier in the year but missed her visit to Cincinnati. When I saw that she was returning, I quickly reached out and scheduled a session. All I say is WOW. Tanya is amazing! After one meeting, she is now my ATF. I met her at her incall during her visit to Cincinnati. It was quick and painless to schedule the visit. She is very responsible via e-mail and it was easy to schedule a time that worked for both of us. Once I arrived at her place, we spent some time talking and getting to know each other before the fun began. She has a great body, great attitude and really knows to how to please you.
I will definitely see her when she returns to Cincinnati again.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/tanya-delight[/URL]
[URL]https://www.tanyadelight.com/[/URL]
Cincinnati business many moons ago and age debates
[QUOTE=WarlockKy;7437508]In the day of the large canine board quite a few of the providers that were older than 25 used to complain that Cinci was a slow town for touring, I still remember being at a social and Callia saying a lot of the guys in Cinci were "closet pedophiles" because they mostly wanted 18-20 year old.
Not sure if that still applies or if the sugar sites have put that much of a dent in the business.[/QUOTE]I frequented that forum, too. Most of the women making that complaint were not "over 25", but borderline menopausal (over 40). Shar Archer was particularly vocal as I recall.
I'm just not interested in older providers.
I can also see the case for avoiding "barely legal" 18-year-olds. But I can't remember the last time an 18-year-old showed up on the scene. Shelly19 was more than a decade ago.
I think it's kind of a straw man argument. Why does it have to be a binary choice between "barely legal" (and mostly nonexistent) or old enough to be the mother of an 18-year-old? What's wrong with women in the 23 to 32 age range, who are significantly younger than almost all of us, but well beyond "barely legal"?