Very promising image--but why microscopic???
I keep wondering why more and more posters put up some really fine looking pictures which are smaller than a postage stamp:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=25914[/url]
Such a promise from the thumbnail on the Photo Gallery, and then the actual image is miniscule! I am grateful for the tease (to an extent, just like I would be grateful for a tease from a hot woman), but when that's all the further it goes, the let down is a bummer.
Is there a reason posters put up such tiny images? Why not take advantage of the full dimensions which are allowed? Maybe there is an understandable reason, but what would that be? Is it the best you camera phone can do?
Make no mistake, your tiny image of her is welcome, but only makes me want more of it!
[QUOTE=Dr Diiver]Just cruised Colonial West of OBT and saw a little hottie HSW. She was in a white T and jean skirt. Due to LE I looped and parked at for a bit to see what she was up to. Was acting like I was reading and she saw me and came over to the passenger side of the car and asked for a ride. I said sure and off we headed. We got the hell out of the area heading west on 50. Ended up at her room and got a great BBBJCIM w/ Spit for .20. The whole time she looked up at me and sucked like a Hoover. She was an 8 of 10 for looks and performance. She let me take her pic, great lips and mouth.
DD[/QUOTE]
Now how did THAT happen? Postal rates went up???
Some how, the postage stamp sized image I alluded to the other day has disappeared from the site, and a larger, much more pixillated version (with a different attachment number) has appeared in its place... The original poster is listed as a regular member, so I presume he does not have editing privilages on his previous posts?
Empty magnification does us no good. I HOPE these tiny pictures are not merely copied from other sites and posted as one's own--I still am hoping for a reasonable explanation, and now, also an explanation of how the image magically got blown up. Here is the newer (empty magnnified) version of the image:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=25943[/url]
[QUOTE=Giani]I keep wondering why more and more posters put up some really fine looking pictures which are smaller than a postage stamp:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=25914[/url]
Such a promise from the thumbnail on the Photo Gallery, and then the actual image is miniscule! I am grateful for the tease (to an extent, just like I would be grateful for a tease from a hot woman), but when that's all the further it goes, the let down is a bummer.
Is there a reason posters put up such tiny images? Why not take advantage of the full dimensions which are allowed? Maybe there is an understandable reason, but what would that be? Is it the best you camera phone can do?
Make no mistake, your tiny image of her is welcome, but only makes me want more of it![/QUOTE]