General Reports

Benchseats,

Elaborate on your comment, "even careful providers catch STD's" Do you know any providers who this happened to? Maybe someone who was ultra-carefull, but then caught something anyway?

I ask because of something I read on the internet. If actually TRULY carefull, the odds of provider catching something are the same as a surgeon catching something during surgery, meaning that surgeon's gloves are essentially nothing more than condoms for the hand.

This all assumes provider not make slamming genital-area to genital area contact, which happens alot of the time even when wearing condom. A provider would either have to control the stroke depth, or only do CBJ, etc.

Phillipe

Genital/anal warts are very EASILY contracted while "slamming your parts together", even while wearing a condom. If these warts are in remission, or have recently been removed (you can't see them), they are still easily passed on to the partner. Read about HPV/genital warts, & don't be stupid.

Is your post addressed at me? That's exactly what I said- "This all ASSUMES provider not make slamming genital-area to genital area contact"

[QUOTE=Captain Stiffy]Genital/anal warts are very EASILY contracted while "slamming your parts together", even while wearing a condom. If these warts are in remission, or have recently been removed (you can't see them), they are still easily passed on to the partner. Read about HPV/genital warts, & don't be stupid.[/QUOTE]If someone is "ultra carefull" as I put it, never made skin-to-skin contact, and never used old or vaseline-contaminated condoms, then I'd be curious how many of THESE providers still contract something. I say 99.99% never catch anything. And I just wanted to hear any stories he had about the merely "carefull" providers still catching something

[QUOTE=Phillippe]I say 99.99% never catch anything. And I just wanted to hear any stories he had about the merely "carefull" providers still catching something[/QUOTE]


The real statistics and information you want is on the STD thread and also on the CDC.gov site. If you really believe that 99.9% never catch anything, it is probably time for you to stop reading Anal Connoisseurs and start reading information from a health department - you'll live longer. I'm not telling you stories about how people I know have contracted anything - there is something about you that is anti-intellectual about a subject this serious that you'll either read the established medical literature or you won't. You'll either believe it and make smart choices or you won't, but I'm not going to encourage your proxy-pathological voyeurism.

Does anyone know how to read around here? If you can't very carefully read my post, then don't respond to it. I didn't say 99.9% never catch anything. I said 99.9% of the theoretical "ultra-carefull" never catch anything. And I don't even know if such "ultra-carefull" providers out there even exist.

I wanted to know if there is anyone out there who is ultra-carefull, as I described. And if so, are they disease-free? I'm a voyeur because I'm asking about STDs? For the love of god.

One thing I have noticed that annoys people the most on this website is when I chide people on the issue of safety. It really makes them mad. They don't want to hear this truth, to be reminded about the true reality of what it is they're doing. It's all psychological. From what I've read through these various forums, I am absolutely the safest most responsible person there is. And I have a pretty good feeling that the people who pooh-pooh this and get sloppy with their safety, do so because they don't care anymore, because they already have a couple diseases themselves. And I've extensively interviewed a couple people on this subject, and have analyzed the psychology of denial. And I think this applies to the most of you. And I've read Benchseat's previous reports to get a handle on his mindset as well. And I know that me saying this will probably annoy several of you and I'll get flamed or something. But I think most of you already have diseases like warts and stuff, because you didn't have the power of realization that you really CAN have fun AND be clean.

Interestingly, there is probably a wealth of research data right HERE on THIS website that the CDC can look to US for. So basically, I am conducting bona fide research that the CDC is unable to do because it would require the unethical behaviour of encouraging prostitution etc.

All medical, etc. research is like this. Eventually, at some level, some people just have to get their 'hands dirty' and do the trenchwork. For example, at some point during the developement of Viagra, at some point some of the test subjects just had to pop the pill and go get some pussy. In the name of science.

The CDC is just an office, nothing more. WE'RE the source of the data

[QUOTE=Phillippe]Does anyone know how to read around here? If you can't very carefully read my post, then don't respond to it. I didn't say 99.9% never catch anything. I said 99.9% of the theoretical "ultra-carefull" never catch anything. And I don't even know if such "ultra-carefull" providers out there even exist.

I wanted to know if there is anyone out there who is ultra-carefull, as I described. And if so, are they disease-free? I'm a voyeur because I'm asking about STDs? For the love of god.

One thing I have noticed that annoys people the most on this website is when I chide people on the issue of safety. It really makes them mad. They don't want to hear this truth, to be reminded about the true reality of what it is they're doing. It's all psychological. From what I've read through these various forums, I am absolutely the safest most responsible person there is. And I have a pretty good feeling that the people who pooh-pooh this and get sloppy with their safety, do so because they don't care anymore, because they already have a couple diseases themselves. And I've extensively interviewed a couple people on this subject, and have analyzed the psychology of denial. And I think this applies to the most of you. And I've read Benchseat's previous reports to get a handle on his mindset as well. And I know that me saying this will probably annoy several of you and I'll get flamed or something. But I think most of you already have diseases like warts and stuff, because you didn't have the power of realization that you really CAN have fun AND be clean.

Interestingly, there is probably a wealth of research data right HERE on THIS website that the CDC can look to US for. So basically, I am conducting bona fide research that the CDC is unable to do because it would require the unethical behaviour of encouraging prostitution etc.

All medical, etc. research is like this. Eventually, at some level, some people just have to get their 'hands dirty' and do the trenchwork. For example, at some point during the developement of Viagra, at some point some of the test subjects just had to pop the pill and go get some pussy. In the name of science.

The CDC is just an office, nothing more. WE'RE the source of the data[/QUOTE]

Your post started out normal, but then it just got really, really strange.

-Shark-

The CDC isn't just an office. They do great amounts of field research in conjunction with NIH, and collect real data from health departments around the country. Even the CDC admits their data is unreliable, considering that many people with STD's don't know it and don't seek medical attention, but it is enough data to show trends in infection rates. I would trust the CDC long before I trust any claims made here.

Viagra was initally developed for use in treatment of angina and cardiovascular disease. It was found in test group studies to have no effect on cardiovascular health, but helped the male subjects (including those previously diagnosed as impotent) to be able to acheive and sustain erections. Phizer had no real intent to create an impotence pill, it was purely an accident.

[QUOTE=Phillippe]Does anyone know how to read around here? If you can't very carefully read my post, then don't respond to it. I didn't say 99.9% never catch anything. I said 99.9% of the theoretical "ultra-carefull" never catch anything. And I don't even know if such "ultra-carefull" providers out there even exist.

I wanted to know if there is anyone out there who is ultra-carefull, as I described. And if so, are they disease-free? I'm a voyeur because I'm asking about STDs? For the love of god.

One thing I have noticed that annoys people the most on this website is when I chide people on the issue of safety. It really makes them mad. They don't want to hear this truth, to be reminded about the true reality of what it is they're doing. It's all psychological. From what I've read through these various forums, I am absolutely the safest most responsible person there is. And I have a pretty good feeling that the people who pooh-pooh this and get sloppy with their safety, do so because they don't care anymore, because they already have a couple diseases themselves. And I've extensively interviewed a couple people on this subject, and have analyzed the psychology of denial. And I think this applies to the most of you. And I've read Benchseat's previous reports to get a handle on his mindset as well. And I know that me saying this will probably annoy several of you and I'll get flamed or something. But I think most of you already have diseases like warts and stuff, because you didn't have the power of realization that you really CAN have fun AND be clean.

Interestingly, there is probably a wealth of research data right HERE on THIS website that the CDC can look to US for. So basically, I am conducting bona fide research that the CDC is unable to do because it would require the unethical behaviour of encouraging prostitution etc.

All medical, etc. research is like this. Eventually, at some level, some people just have to get their 'hands dirty' and do the trenchwork. For example, at some point during the developement of Viagra, at some point some of the test subjects just had to pop the pill and go get some pussy. In the name of science.

The CDC is just an office, nothing more. WE'RE the source of the data[/QUOTE]Yes, the Ultra Careful Provider does exist. No it is not me. I don't go looking for bareback except for the handjob, but if BBBJ is initiated by the girl I just lie back and enjoy. The same goes for DATY. I would like to experience AR at least once but I doubt if I'd actively search out repititions. I haven't had a streetwalker in about 30 years - I think AMP girls are much safer. See the below quote for the ultra careful guy.

[QUOTE=Sticky]Count me out on the table shower. No offense guys, but who knows which one of you were on there last. No LOL since this is not a laughing matter. In our hobby, if you're not cafefull to a point of obsession, you can come down with some funky stuff. Just look at the photo section.

I'm proud to say I have never been blessed with and type of STD, not even crabs. Now I'm sure there are plenty of mongers out there with more than thier share of "combat wounds"

I don't wear the slippers or robe. I wear a towel. I stand while she uses her hands only (more erotic anyway) and liquid soap. I'm sure you've all seen short hairs on the soap. Standing lets you stick your dick close to her face anyway. Her reaction can be a good look ahead at what to expect.

Getting her clothes wet is also a good excuse to talk her into getting NEKKID! Always working the angles for the ultimate results.

If I'm Sticky - I'm usually Happy[/QUOTE]

Here's a better example I thought of. The Taco Bell E-Coli breakout. When several people in a cluster were admitted to hospitals with serious illness due to E-Coli, the doctors didn't call the CDC and got current information on the E-Coli outbreak. Mostly, it was the DOCTORS TELLING THE CDC. This after the CDC shrugged their shoulders and were saying "We don't know... you tell US! Are you experiencing some E-Coli cases?" You get the picture. I know, I know, the CDC does this and that, but I'm making an important point about the limitations of nature of the CDC

Before Viagra could be approved for treatment for ED, it had to be tested for that purpose, i.e. the boning by test subjects that I mentioned. So what exactly is your point? Are you just trying to show off your medical knowlege?

[QUOTE=Baltimonger]The CDC isn't just an office. They do great amounts of field research in conjunction with NIH, and collect real data from health departments around the country. Even the CDC admits their data is unreliable, considering that many people with STD's don't know it and don't seek medical attention, but it is enough data to show trends in infection rates. I would trust the CDC long before I trust any claims made here.

Viagra was initally developed for use in treatment of angina and cardiovascular disease. It was found in test group studies to have no effect on cardiovascular health, but helped the male subjects (including those previously diagnosed as impotent) to be able to acheive and sustain erections. Phizer had no real intent to create an impotence pill, it was purely an accident.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Phillippe]Here's a better example I thought of. The Taco Bell E-Coli breakout. When several people in a cluster were admitted to hospitals with serious illness due to E-Coli, the doctors didn't call the CDC and got current information on the E-Coli outbreak. Mostly, it was the DOCTORS TELLING THE CDC. This after the CDC shrugged their shoulders and were saying "We don't know... you tell US! Are you experiencing some E-Coli cases?" You get the picture. I know, I know, the CDC does this and that, but I'm making an important point about the limitations of nature of the CDC

Before Viagra could be approved for treatment for ED, it had to be tested for that purpose, i.e. the boning by test subjects that I mentioned. So what exactly is your point? Are you just trying to show off your medical knowlege?[/QUOTE]

How could the CDC give out info on a newly occurring E-coli outbreak? There must be proof of an oubreak before they can call it an "outbreak". Doctors already know how to treat E-coli, they don't need the CDC for that much. The CDC did collect hard data on the bacteria strain (O157) most occurring in the known cases, and other important information. This helped the CDC to isolate the exact, or at least highest probability, cause of the outbreak. This in turn, helps the CDC, and other government agencies to solve the problem. They do the exact same thing for STD/STI's, and a host of other diseases.

Back to Viagra. Yes they did that kind of testing. The really necessary testing was not hard-ons. It was the potential for serious short and long-term health problems. It is a long, drawn-out process for approval that all meds must go through before being approved by the FDA.

I'm not trying to show off medical knowledge, I'm just stating that this site is not the place to be looking for real health data.

[QUOTE=Baltimonger]How could the CDC give out info on a newly occurring E-coli outbreak? There must be proof of an oubreak before they can call it an "outbreak". Doctors already know how to treat E-coli, they don't need the CDC for that much. The CDC did collect hard data on the bacteria strain (O157) most occurring in the known cases, and other important information. This helped the CDC to isolate the exact, or at least highest probability, cause of the outbreak. This in turn, helps the CDC, and other government agencies to solve the problem. They do the exact same thing for STD/STI's, and a host of other diseases.

Back to Viagra. Yes they did that kind of testing. The really necessary testing was not hard-ons. It was the potential for serious short and long-term health problems. It is a long, drawn-out process for approval that all meds must go through before being approved by the FDA.

I'm not trying to show off medical knowledge, I'm just stating that this site is not the place to be looking for real health data.[/QUOTE]

Welcome to the anal-bashing thread., where the risks of anal sex are discussed, condom or no condom.

Back to our regularly scheduled programming - piledriving some sl*t's ass.

About a month ago, a wh*re I've seen a few times, Julie, called me up. This is unusual (for me) and set off some major warning bells. But, she said that she was trying to drum up some business before Christmas and that made some sense. I love it when these professional fuckers have a good business sense!

To cut to the chase, I go over to her place (where we always do our business) and start to makeout. I told her I would make her Christmas extra special if she'd let me in that ass of hers.

Julie is in her early to mid 40s, white, with brown hair down to her shoulders. Whenever I see her, she has on quite a bit of makeup, which I like. She's a little overweight with big, fat funbags that I love to work over.

She agrees to the anal, but tells me she seldom does that. I assure her I'll go slow, which I do. I make sure she's worked up (vibrator on her clit for a long time) and that everything is well-lubed (and covered). She gets on her knees and I tell her to flip over onto her back - I want to see her face when I push little Bend It's head into her ass. She says that's nasty and immediately flips over. I hold one of her legs up, and with the other hand, put the head up against her ass, slowly push it in until I get that pleasant "pop" sensation and stop. Her eyes are wide and she starts going "Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus!" in a soft voice. It was sexy/hilarious/nasty.

After she gets used to it, I start to slowly move in and out of her. When she's used to that, I take both of her legs, put them on my shoulders and pound her ass. At this point she got really loud, calling me a "motherfucker" over and over.

When I was ready to come, with her legs still on my shoulders, I performed a maneuver I've patented and call the "Electroshock". It has three elements:

- full throttle, balls deep ass pounding with the big-tittied wh*re on her back
- as I come, I pull the b*tch’s nipples up as hard as I can, stretching out her fat boobs
- the b*tch goes into a seizure, screams, calls me names, and arches her back to try to relieve the pain in her nips, as I unload in her ass

Look, I know I’m freaky, but I love this. And this particular wh*re doesn’t mind it, because she’s a submissive b*tch. She knows she’s being dominated when my cock is pounding her ass at light speed and I’m pulling her nipples off her goddamned titties as I blow my load in her.

Feel free to use this maneuver, just remember to tell the wh*re that its copyright protected (LOL!)

Bend It

[QUOTE=Bend It]Back to our regularly scheduled programming - piledriving some sl*t's ass.

About a month ago, a wh*re I've seen a few times, Julie, called me up. This is unusual (for me) and set off some major warning bells. But, she said that she was trying to drum up some business before Christmas and that made some sense. I love it when these professional fuckers have a good business sense!

To cut to the chase, I go over to her place (where we always do our business) and start to makeout. I told her I would make her Christmas extra special if she'd let me in that ass of hers.

Julie is in her early to mid 40s, white, with brown hair down to her shoulders. Whenever I see her, she has on quite a bit of makeup, which I like. She's a little overweight with big, fat funbags that I love to work over.

She agrees to the anal, but tells me she seldom does that. I assure her I'll go slow, which I do. I make sure she's worked up (vibrator on her clit for a long time) and that everything is well-lubed (and covered). She gets on her knees and I tell her to flip over onto her back - I want to see her face when I push little Bend It's head into her ass. She says that's nasty and immediately flips over. I hold one of her legs up, and with the other hand, put the head up against her ass, slowly push it in until I get that pleasant "pop" sensation and stop. Her eyes are wide and she starts going "Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus!" in a soft voice. It was sexy/hilarious/nasty.

After she gets used to it, I start to slowly move in and out of her. When she's used to that, I take both of her legs, put them on my shoulders and pound her ass. At this point she got really loud, calling me a "motherfucker" over and over.

When I was ready to come, with her legs still on my shoulders, I performed a maneuver I've patented and call the "Electroshock". It has three elements:

- full throttle, balls deep ass pounding with the big-tittied wh*re on her back
- as I come, I pull the b*tch’s nipples up as hard as I can, stretching out her fat boobs
- the b*tch goes into a seizure, screams, calls me names, and arches her back to try to relieve the pain in her nips, as I unload in her ass

Look, I know I’m freaky, but I love this. And this particular wh*re doesn’t mind it, because she’s a submissive b*tch. She knows she’s being dominated when my cock is pounding her ass at light speed and I’m pulling her nipples off her goddamned titties as I blow my load in her.

Feel free to use this maneuver, just remember to tell the wh*re that its copyright protected (LOL!)

Bend It[/QUOTE]

Sure you don't want to add a CDC statistic to your report?

Good One!

-Shark-

[QUOTE=Benchseats Rock]I didn't wish you dead, at least not intentionally. I would never wish anyone dead - on or off of the forum, and now that I am rereading my quip I see how it could be taken that way - and I apologize. If I could go back and edit I would be more than happy to do it; I'm sorry it came out that way, all I meant to say was that anal bareback is one of the riskiest activities there is in a world with HIV and no one should forego using a condom for any activity if they want to monger with better odds than if they were playing Russian Roulette. I didn't mean to attack your integrity in your reporting - but I would rather think that someone is lying than going bareback with a provider - it's easier to redact a statement than it is to line up at a pharmacy once a month.

Clearly we have a difference of opinion/comfort level/risk analysis when it comes to personal health and safety - and while the med student in me is screaming inside, I will trust that you have assessed your own risks and kept up to date with the current STD and Sexual Health guidelines instead of redacting them here. I don't know the provider you are talking about, and the chances are rare that I ever will - even careful providers catch STD's, and high risk behaviour is defined by behaviour itself and then only to be compounded by who it's being done with and how.

I've done far stupider things than anal bareback, sometimes realizing it was dangerous and not slowing down and changing course, sometimes completely unaware until after the fact. I have put my cock places I wouldn't have dared to put a gloved and disinfected finger. I have fucked people in places that can only be described as the microbial polar opposite to a sterile Operating Room - The fact that I am alive at all, not to mention that I am healthy is nothing less than a miracle, or for the less faithful, maybe it is the biggest statistical anomaly in recent history. If I come off sort of preachy I apologize - I spent many, many years in the seminary and I guess sometimes it percolates to the surface - but more than that, I work in medicine and I live in and monger in Baltimore. We are more aware of drugs and disease than most other places in the world, not because we want to be, but because we have to be.


In Boca Lupo,

Benchseats Rock[/QUOTE]


Well I accept your apology, I also see your point of view being in the field of medicine. Yes, I do get tested on a regular basis & the only thing I have caught to date is Chlamydia. Which I had to line up at a pharmacy & get taken care of. I know I may come off as a BareBack-aholic but 75% of the time I do use a raincoat on junior. The other 25% of the time I only bang girls I know & trust the ol' fashion way (amp girls only). That being said I hope we can go back to reporting on good anal sex, we have grown to love so much.


Shark, thanks for support dude.


Crepi il lupo,

Misfit

Bend It, you're a sick bastard, but in a good way!
Got a number for Julie?
[QUOTE=Bend It]Back to our regularly scheduled programming - piledriving some sl*t's ass.

About a month ago, a wh*re I've seen a few times, Julie, called me up. This is unusual (for me) and set off some major warning bells. But, she said that she was trying to drum up some business before Christmas and that made some sense. I love it when these professional fuckers have a good business sense!

To cut to the chase, I go over to her place (where we always do our business) and start to makeout. I told her I would make her Christmas extra special if she'd let me in that ass of hers.

Julie is in her early to mid 40s, white, with brown hair down to her shoulders. Whenever I see her, she has on quite a bit of makeup, which I like. She's a little overweight with big, fat funbags that I love to work over.

She agrees to the anal, but tells me she seldom does that. I assure her I'll go slow, which I do. I make sure she's worked up (vibrator on her clit for a long time) and that everything is well-lubed (and covered). She gets on her knees and I tell her to flip over onto her back - I want to see her face when I push little Bend It's head into her ass. She says that's nasty and immediately flips over. I hold one of her legs up, and with the other hand, put the head up against her ass, slowly push it in until I get that pleasant "pop" sensation and stop. Her eyes are wide and she starts going "Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus!" in a soft voice. It was sexy/hilarious/nasty.

After she gets used to it, I start to slowly move in and out of her. When she's used to that, I take both of her legs, put them on my shoulders and pound her ass. At this point she got really loud, calling me a "motherfucker" over and over.

When I was ready to come, with her legs still on my shoulders, I performed a maneuver I've patented and call the "Electroshock". It has three elements:

- full throttle, balls deep ass pounding with the big-tittied wh*re on her back
- as I come, I pull the b*tch’s nipples up as hard as I can, stretching out her fat boobs
- the b*tch goes into a seizure, screams, calls me names, and arches her back to try to relieve the pain in her nips, as I unload in her ass

Look, I know I’m freaky, but I love this. And this particular wh*re doesn’t mind it, because she’s a submissive b*tch. She knows she’s being dominated when my cock is pounding her ass at light speed and I’m pulling her nipples off her goddamned titties as I blow my load in her.

Feel free to use this maneuver, just remember to tell the wh*re that its copyright protected (LOL!)

Bend It[/QUOTE]