"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[QUOTE=Lono1;5554945]I was a senior member (Lono) but dropped the account and now I'm back. I did a little digging into woodstkcpl and she says she has been married to the grey haired guy in her private pics for three years. Then I searched her number found her name and the guy (her age) who's name her number is registered too. A little FB search and he has an anniversary post for thier 9 year wedding anniversary. It was dated 9/15/2020. She claims she has been married to the older guy for three years this October. The guy on FB has his status as separated so I guess she is not with him but I found it curious. She wants an allowance for a guy to sleep with her with her husband taking turns. I guess he is straight but likes to share? I'm going to try and meet them just to talk because now I'm intrigued.

Do what you will with the info.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1a661fce-9ca5-44c7-9c5e-0aaa02786990[/URL][/QUOTE]I'm straight, if he's straight, this could be fun. A DP with a "normal" woman (not a high volume pro) can be a lot of fun. I may give it a shot.

I've asked before but to no avail. Anyone had any experience with this one:

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/70982636-3f81-4c72-81b4-f56be7f5659b[/URL]

[QUOTE=TooHotForYou;5556448]Some weird things on her obit too. She dies in the future.[/QUOTE]She messaged me yesterday, told me she was a truck driver, and lived in Ohio. She had stayed the night inn Atlanta with a friend, and made the profile then. I was pretty sure she was fake, now the dead lady picture confirms it for me.

[QUOTE=TooHotForYou;5556448]Some weird things on her obit too. She dies in the future.[/QUOTE]Last time I checked we all die in the future.

I sent you some info the last time you asked in January. Did you miss the PM?

And why are you still asking about the same girl 8 months later? If it hasn't worked out by now maybe you should consider other options LOL.

[QUOTE=fatherland;5556762]I've asked before but to no avail. Anyone had any experience with this one:

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/70982636-3f81-4c72-81b4-f56be7f5659b[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Eslide3;5557340]Last time I checked we all die in the future.[/QUOTE]I was mistaken. She died last year. That would've been crazy if it was a fake obit. My apologies. Got to wonder who would want to use her pic to scam people though.

[QUOTE=VirgilToole;5555632]Blood antibody tests are extremely inaccurate[/QUOTE]I'm not sure that's a fair characterization. Most of the data I've seen indicates that the IgG test is better than 90% accurate. Sure, it's not as good as a PCR test, but what else can an asymptomatic individual do to check their status? That's why most of the STD testing services recommend two tests if you think you've been exposed to HSV-2; the first at 30-45 days post exposure, the second at 90 days. If both tests produce the same result, the confidence is that result is very high.

[QUOTE]The real kicker is that condoms don't prevent you from contracting HSV-2. You could be having covered sex with a woman who is showing no signs of an outbreak, and you can still end up contracting it if her body is shedding the virus.[/QUOTE]Eh, I have to take issue with this one too because you're creating the impression that condoms offer no protection against HSV-2. That is obviously not true. Condoms are very effective at preventing the transmission of HSV-2 from men to women, but are less effective at protecting men from transmission from a HSV-2 positive female partner. This is because the male is typically exposed to a substantial amount of fluid / vaginal secretions from the female partner that contact areas of the male not covered by the condom. I did a quick google search and saw one study that indicated a 95% protection rate for women vs. 65% for men. So the difference is significant. But condoms definitely do offer a substantial protection benefit vs unprotected sex. Still, I'm sure that stat is eye opening for a lot of people because 65% really isn't that good when you're talking about exposure to an incurable disease that has considerable social stigma attached.

Overall, that was a helpful post and shed some good light on the risks associated with HSV-2. You guys stay safe out there.

[QUOTE=MatteoRusso;5554854]Wow ..! I merely shared some important information that may have been helpful. You know what. Screw it. Have at it Dude.[/QUOTE]Whoah there, I think you took that entirely the wrong way. He wasn't attacking you, he was obviously implying he got a BJ from the girl and was concerned he was at risk. No reason to get all upset LOL.

[QUOTE=VirgilToole;5555516]I saw her in June of this year. She doesn't like to host but will come to you. She came to my place when she got off work but was still clean, fresh, and smelling nice. She has her own car. Everything is bare if you want it. The subject of a cover was never brought up. She allows and even requests cip. Decent blowjob, but nothing spectacular. The kitty was clean, shaved smooth, and had no odor. Her tits are tiny but her ass is big, round, and firm. The no tits and big ass give off the perception that she's chubby, but her stomach is flat with no gut. Not really GFE, but not a pro either. She's definitely experienced and has been around for a while, but she doesn't rush or seem not into it. Mentally stable and works two regular jobs. She just does this for the extra cash. Damage was 200.[/QUOTE]Virgil. You are spot on with her description and experience I have seen her numerous time's over the years. Before she was married and after she was married. But 200 is good. I always gave 3! Good to know she can do it for less!

[QUOTE=JoyDrop;5557912]I'm not sure that's a fair characterization. Most of the data I've seen indicates that the IgG test is better than 90% accurate. Sure, it's not as good as a PCR test, but what else can an asymptomatic individual do to check their status? That's why most of the STD testing services recommend two tests if you think you've been exposed to HSV-2; the first at 30-45 days post exposure, the second at 90 days. If both tests produce the same result, the confidence is that result is very high.

Eh, I have to take issue with this one too because you're creating the impression that condoms offer no protection against HSV-2. That is obviously not true. Condoms are very effective at preventing the transmission of HSV-2 from men to women, but are less effective at protecting men from transmission from a HSV-2 positive female partner. This is because the male is typically exposed to a substantial amount of fluid / vaginal secretions from the female partner that contact areas of the male not covered by the condom. I did a quick google search and saw one study that indicated a 95% protection rate for women vs. 65% for men. So the difference is significant. But condoms definitely do offer a substantial protection benefit vs unprotected sex. Still, I'm sure that stat is eye opening for a lot of people because 65% really isn't that good when you're talking about exposure to an incurable disease that has considerable social stigma attached.

Overall, that was a helpful post and shed some good light on the risks associated with HSV-2. You guys stay safe out there.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the clarifications and added info. A great corollary to my post. I guess the point I was trying to make with the IgG test is that if you test positive consistently more than once, then you most like have herpes, but just because you test negatively consistently doesn't mean that you don't have it. The antibody test has a 19% false positive rate and a 38% false negative rate (from what I'm seeing), so you can still be infected but test negative for it a third of the time. The swab test is still the most accurate, but then again you need a blister to appear, which doesn't happen with most people who have the virus. I just don't want people to think they're clean if they test negative on the IgG test.

As to your second point, you're right as well. It's still safer to use a condom, and it reduces your risk, even if it's only by 65%. I don't want people to think, "I'm going to get herpes whether I wear a condom or not, so I might as well not wear one. " It still helps lessen your odds of catching it. My point on that one was just that condoms aren't going to completely prevent something that spreads by skin-to-skin contact. Whereas an infection like chlamydia infects you through your urethral opening, so using a condom will protect you against that more than it will against herpes.

Thanks again for the additional info.

Clear your inbox bro but wanted to also say I appreciate it and will let you know what I find.

For my brothers that like PAWGs, here's a nice "athletic" thick one for you. Let me preface we did not meet. Her price tag is 400 and I've found value for less. But when we've spoken she's stated being open to a lot. Whatever that means. She was up to meet right away for the deed and is on the site frequently, take that however you see it but sharing an easy target for you guys with a little extra change in the pockets.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/feb661f3-563a-42a9-8b27-a014b2a4761a[/URL]

[QUOTE=MeatDumper;5560286]Clear your inbox bro but wanted to also say I appreciate it and will let you know what I find.[/QUOTE]Done. Sorry about that.

[QUOTE=MeatDumper;5560299]For my brothers that like PAWGs, here's a nice "athletic" thick one for you. Let me preface we did not meet. Her price tag is 400 and I've found value for less. But when we've spoken she's stated being open to a lot. Whatever that means. She was up to meet right away for the deed and is on the site frequently, take that however you see it but sharing an easy target for you guys with a little extra change in the pockets.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/feb661f3-563a-42a9-8b27-a014b2a4761a[/URL][/QUOTE]Been on the site awhile and pops up a lot. She's never replied to me so I guess I'm not her type. But I don't do those amounts of coins either.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/140298fa-28ce-4299-8485-f7ac921d88df[/URL]

Wanted me to send her money as "trust".