Reasonable minds can disagree here.
I'll push back on the accuracy of Valentina's pictures for CCG. Those pictures make her look pretty hot. She isn't in that kind of physical shape at all. She is super soft, as in not in good physical condition. She has a rounded over back posture-wise and generally doesn't look very healthy.
[QUOTE=OneRoadToWest;6792404]I haven't seen Suri, but 100% agree with Mr. Apples on Chloe, Elsie.
Just to add, CCG's Valentina is also 100% legit photo. It's not even photoshopped, really.
My friend did dreamt about Gina, said she's very much got an Asian face so depends if you are into like a more tanned version of Chinese girls.[/QUOTE]
Valentina Jade Photos Are Real
[QUOTE=OneRoadToWest;6793362]The photos are real. I don't know where you get the idea that she doesn't have that body shape.
Any one of us who has seen her can verify those are real photos. Your argument of posture doesn't float, because. Who humps their back in a photo?
I'm one that hates fake photos many agencies use (If you read my past comments I've called this out) so there is no reason for me to be any different this time around.[/QUOTE]I can personally attest that those photos of Valentina Jade are real. I've seen her multiple times and she's always been enthusiastic, attentive, and energetic. Valentina works out multiple times a week and her body is toned and slim. She's got a very sweet personality and responds to the energy you bring to the table. Valentina is going to command a higher rate soon so book her before prices go up.
Like I said, Reasonable minds can disagree
It sounds like you think I am making this up for some reason. When you say you don't know where I get the idea that she doesn't have that body shape are you assuming I am writing this opinion and I haven't seen her? I don't know about you, but I don't comment on someone I haven't seen. That's a waste of everyone's time in my view. Like I said, in my view she doesn't look anywhere near as good as those photos. I say that from seeing her in person (just to make that clear to you). There is no argument here that you don't agree, that's your right and your perspective. But I get that right to. Clearly you like whatever you see and I don't. Either way, I am sure we will both do what works for us. I just replied because your note infers that I would comment where I haven't actually seen someone and that anyone who actually saw her would not have my opinion. I saw her. Other than a nice ass, not impressive at at (to me). But that doesn't mean she doesn't do it for you. I think the universe is big enough to hold both of our opinions to be true (to us).
Have fun out there.
[QUOTE=OneRoadToWest;6793362]The photos are real. I don't know where you get the idea that she doesn't have that body shape.
Any one of us who has seen her can verify those are real photos. Your argument of posture doesn't float, because. Who humps their back in a photo?
I'm one that hates fake photos many agencies use (If you read my past comments I've called this out) so there is no reason for me to be any different this time around.[/QUOTE]
You sir have a good point LOL
Your note made me look at HIS note a little closer.
One post + She's perfect + you better book her before her rate goes up = Shill to me.
But hey, I'm just a guy right? What do I know.
I call it as I see it and I'm not trying to hurt anyone. I figure this should be a place where we can get a little accurate information (maybe?) and I try to give my perspective. I also understand what is a 10 for me may not work for others. It's always YMMV but I think things like fitness, posture etc should fall into the objective zone. But maybe not.
This is America baby, do what you like and who you like. Make America Great.
[QUOTE=Moejoo;6794755]Well your post has extra special relevance as its your first and you feel so strongly so it just be true.[/QUOTE]