Printable View
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5431157]She was in OC earlier this year and there's a few reports on her in the OC section already.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=5254542&viewfull=1#post5254542[/URL][/QUOTE]She's not very attractive, older and heavier than the pics. Service was decent but I'd recommend a pass when compared to what's out there at sdag.
[QUOTE=Baller55;5432446]She's not very attractive, older and heavier than the pics. Service was decent but I'd recommend a pass when compared to what's out there at sdag.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the post, Baller! Definitely a hard pass!
Any one at sdag you would recommend from the current lineup? Thank you.
[QUOTE=Baller55;5432446]She's not very attractive, older and heavier than the pics. Service was decent but I'd recommend a pass when compared to what's out there at sdag.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kroditpakshi;5432514]Any one at sdag you would recommend from the current lineup? Thank you.[/QUOTE]I second this! I am finding it hard to believe not a single review on any site about the new talent in town at sdag. Please PM if you've seen one of the new girls. I'm looking at hitting up the agency or heading to TJ! Are these girls gold and no one wants to say anything. Haha.
[QUOTE=GdAloha;5433585]I second this! I am finding it hard to believe not a single review on any site about the new talent in town at sdag. Please PM if you've seen one of the new girls. I'm looking at hitting up the agency or heading to TJ! Are these girls gold and no one wants to say anything. Haha.[/QUOTE]The good ones usually seem to generate "hype" so I'm taking no reports as a bad sign. Like you said usually if there's something good to say someone would have probably said it by now. At this point I'd rather repeat with either Tatum or Kiko where I know I'll at least have a solid session than try one of the new girls over at SDAG or FEC. The silence is deafening IMO.
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5433604]The good ones usually seem to generate "hype" so I'm taking no reports as a bad sign. Like you said usually if there's something good to say someone would have probably said it by now. At this point I'd rather repeat with either Tatum or Kiko where I know I'll at least have a solid session than try one of the new girls over at SDAG or FEC. The silence is deafening IMO.[/QUOTE]I agree; can't go wrong with Tatum.
[URL]https://sandiego.rubratings.com/233461[/URL]
To sum it up at the beginning: AVOID! This was my worst experience with one of Cris's girls by far. She is older (probably late 40's at best) with bad teeth, has a thin frame with a pudgy belly and no tits or ass, and had hair on her Bush that was longer than the hair on my head. Service was poor. No hint of a massage, no BJ at all, and she made super fake annoying moaning noises the whole time. I couldn't finish while fucking her so I asked her to finish me with her hand. It was a straight jackhammer and I really struggled to pop. I've had good to great experiences with Cris's girls before, but this one was just plain bad. I highly recommend either seeing Cris herself or waiting for a new rotation. I'm still kicking myself for not walking when she greeted me at the door.
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5433604]The good ones usually seem to generate "hype" so I'm taking no reports as a bad sign. Like you said usually if there's something good to say someone would have probably said it by now. At this point I'd rather repeat with either Tatum or Kiko where I know I'll at least have a solid session than try one of the new girls over at SDAG or FEC. The silence is deafening IMO.[/QUOTE]Couldn't agree more. I think some guys don't want to report bad or mediocre experiences with the agencies out of fear of reprisal or maybe being blacklisted. If the experiences were positive there would be hype. Fake pics and new names aren't unusual, but no hype + fake pics + new names = big risk of a bad experience IMO.
New names in general I take as a red flag. It is counterproductive to change a girl's name if there is a positive rep associated with that name.
I see my friends here craving a review of the new girls on SDAG. I met with Mila yesterday and she was super cute and fun. I would say she is at a B cup, short, energetic, super friendly and likes to DFK. I would say she is thin but a little soft. I would repeat and recommend.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5433612]I agree; can't go wrong with Tatum.[/QUOTE]I've mentioned this before, but even though I had mixed results w / Tatum, I'd still vouch for her. At the peaks of the session, she was fantastic. Just make sure to eat your wheaties & take your vitamins before you go. Hygiene & respect are big with her, which shouldn't have to be said.
[QUOTE=Apharmd;5433604]The good ones usually seem to generate "hype" so I'm taking no reports as a bad sign. Like you said usually if there's something good to say someone would have probably said it by now. At this point I'd rather repeat with either Tatum or Kiko where I know I'll at least have a solid session than try one of the new girls over at SDAG or FEC. The silence is deafening IMO.[/QUOTE]Can't go wrong with Tatum or Kiko, unless either:
A) kiko can get a little chatty, if that bugs you, skip.
B) you're one of these guys who actually for some insane reason prefers some extra meat on the bones, belly, gigantic ass, etc. Both of these girls are quite slim, toned, and excellent manmades. Soooooooo tough to find these days. I'd wager if you DO like the bigger girls, you're not exactly searching to find someone that fits your taste. Seems chubbier girls are getting more and more rampant these days. Sad face.
100% agree, very energrtic, great BJ skills, bit of fat around the the middle but no more than an average woman. Definitely will repeat, she says she's here for a long time.
[QUOTE=Pete8911;5434436]I see my friends here craving a review of the new girls on SDAG. I met with Mila yesterday and she was super cute and fun. I would say she is at a B cup, short, energetic, super friendly and likes to DFK. I would say she is thin but a little soft. I would repeat and recommend.[/QUOTE]
Anybody in SDAG or FEC that's as short as Ash and has good service? I've got a thing for the fun sized and I'm feeling an itch. Sadly Ash hasn't come back down here.
[QUOTE=Dolan85;5435292]100% agree, very energrtic, great BJ skills, bit of fat around the the middle but no more than an average woman. Definitely will repeat, she says she's here for a long time.[/QUOTE]I agree as well. Natural soft young bod! She gets into the session and her head skills are really good! Others from SDAG are better in certain areas, but she is better than average all around. My new ATF in SD.
[QUOTE=AcuraTL32;5435971]I agree as well. Natural soft young bod! She gets into the session and her head skills are really good! Others from SDAG are better in certain areas, but she is better than average all around. My new ATF in SD.[/QUOTE]What about the pics for Mila? Are they at all accurate?
[QUOTE=Waab182;5436148]What about the pics for Mila? Are they at all accurate?[/QUOTE]No. But she didn't disappoint.
Sonya is back. She's actually really pretty.
She gave a really good BBBJCIM. I arrived showered. I told her what I wanted. Unbreakable eye contact with me as she dropped to her knees to undo my pants. Good times!
Beautiful skin, too. Very kissable. She was only in town for a week last time. I wonder how long she will be here this time around?
[QUOTE=ArrogantBstrd;5437485]Sonya is back. She's actually really pretty.
She gave a really good BBBJCIM. I arrived showered. I told her what I wanted. Unbreakable eye contact with me as she dropped to her knees to undo my pants. Good times!
Beautiful skin, too. Very kissable. She was only in town for a week last time. I wonder how long she will be here this time around?[/QUOTE]How is her body? Petite? Toned? Does she give GFE? Sandra99 is not exactly know for that.
[QUOTE=NorthSDasian;5435382]Anybody in SDAG or FEC that's as short as Ash and has good service? I've got a thing for the fun sized and I'm feeling an itch. Sadly Ash hasn't come back down here.[/QUOTE]Keep your fingers crossed. Ash's last day in OC is this Saturday so my guess is that the San Diego / UTC area is next on her tour dates.
To the gents below. Mila is a breath of fresh air to the SD kgirl scene that has been experiencing a prolonged dry spell. Maybe travel is easing up.
Flynn (Petra) is back from her hiatus so hopefully we will see her here soon.
[QUOTE=Dolan85;5435292]100% agree, very energrtic, great BJ skills, bit of fat around the the middle but no more than an average woman. Definitely will repeat, she says she's here for a long time.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=AcuraTL32;5435971]I agree as well. Natural soft young bod! She gets into the session and her head skills are really good! Others from SDAG are better in certain areas, but she is better than average all around. My new ATF in SD.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Pete8911;5434436]I see my friends here craving a review of the new girls on SDAG. I met with Mila yesterday and she was super cute and fun. I would say she is at a B cup, short, energetic, super friendly and likes to DFK. I would say she is thin but a little soft. I would repeat and recommend.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kroditpakshi;5438672]To the gents below. Mila is a breath of fresh air to the SD kgirl scene that has been experiencing a prolonged dry spell. Maybe travel is easing up.
Flynn (Petra) is back from her hiatus so hopefully we will see her here soon.[/QUOTE]Does Mila provide BBFS?
[QUOTE=BrtinJoker;5438701]Does Mila provide BBFS?[/QUOTE]The website says Mila is "open minded" (not guaranteed) for an extra benji.
Looks like Amanda and Ren from SDAG cut their stay here short. Did no one really go see them? I didn't have any free time last week to check anyone out.
This is a k agency provider in OC, but I'm in SD so I'm posting it here.
I asked for Scarlett but the booker offered me Apple. And said: "She is getting great reviews. " It was my first time with this booker, so I agreed and kept low expectations. Apple exceeded my expectations. The pictures were not entirely accurate. She is definitely older and heavier, but in no way unattractive. In fact, she had a very "girl next door" look and attitude about her. She spoke english well. She is based in LA unfortunately, and it is unlikely she will come down to SD (although she said she likes it here).
Service-wise she was very dependable. Super sexy shower scene -- lots of build up, Russian with soap, etc. I busted in her mouth after a decent BBBJ. I'm that age, where if it's coming, I don't let it stop. But I imagine FS would have been quite nice, and I'll look forward to trying that out. She actually apologized for me ending so soon! How sweet she is to say that. We had 15 minutes or so and she gave me a great massage. (I'm that age, where a good massage sometimes is all I need.).
Overall, a very solid provider, esp if your favorites are not available.
In SD for business and I saw that a familiar face was here. Mint. I saw her in vegas and want to see her here what is verification like at CA-kdolls? She is awesome and you guys are lucky to have her treat her well.
[QUOTE=VegasAsianKing;5440119]In SD for business and I saw that a familiar face was here. Mint. I saw her in vegas and want to see her here what is verification like at CA-kdolls? She is awesome and you guys are lucky to have her treat her well.[/QUOTE]Organization called FarEastCuties is the easiest way. The other option is to go throught the Ca-Kdolls site and provide the information they request.
Cheers.
Easy if you have a decent hx network. Otherwise, be prepared for some invasive rigorous screening. There is also the infamous gate issue to contend with.
[QUOTE=VegasAsianKing;5440119]In SD for business and I saw that a familiar face was here. Mint. I saw her in vegas and want to see her here what is verification like at CA-kdolls? She is awesome and you guys are lucky to have her treat her well.[/QUOTE]
After a 5 year falling out with my ATF Bora, it was time to move on and check out some new girls. I decided to go with this groups current lineup and see Kiko. Kiko is late 20's and obviously works out as she has a great tight body. She greeted me wearing a red lacy see through piece nighty. A nice hug and a kiss on the lips. Went to the bedroom and she said "smell good". I had showered 10 minutes before so we went right at it. She dropped to her knees for a nice BBBJ and cupped my balls. Felt so good. I pulled her up and asked her to get on the bed with me. 69 was amazing as she has this beautiful tight kitty that tasted squeeky clean. Shortly after some of this she slid down RCG and started sliding that warm wet pussy on me. I was getting close to cumming so asked for the condom. She then got on top for some CG and eased down to take it all the way inside her. Super tight and to watch this beautiful lady ride was an amazing sight. After 5 minutes of her riding, I rolled her off and asked for doggie. Holding her tiny butt and the feeling of her tightness pushed me over the finish line and I filled up the cover. Gave me a nice massage after and we showered up and I was on my way. Definitely will repeat with Kiko and her English is decent enough. Highly recommend!
Cheers.
Anyone try the bb option with her yet? Looks like she is open to that now.
[QUOTE=Waab182;5437866]How is her body? Petite? Toned? Does she give GFE? Sandra99 is not exactly know for that.[/QUOTE]She's pretty lean. I can pick her up over my head. Soft lips. She does give GFE. She's definitely a giver. Submissive, soft-spoken, and very willing.
The pictures of her are accurate, but she is a little older. High-30's / Low-40's.
I saw her again yesterday. BBBJCIM. I came after about 15 minutes. She edged me out. Good release. I was still hard after CIM. She said I had more time left. I grabbed the bag, then fucked her in missionary. She's flexible. She has a nice leg spread. I almost came in the bag. I pulled out, then came in her mouth again for #2. Her lips, tongue, and throat does wonders to me. LOL.
I stole a picture of her on my first meet. I asked if I could take a video, but she declined.
She leaves on July 14th. Might be back in October.
[QUOTE=TheDudeInSd;5441567]After a 5 year falling out with my ATF Bora, it was time to move on and check out some new girls. I decided to go with this groups current lineup and see Kiko. Kiko is late 20's and obviously works out as she has a great tight body. She greeted me wearing a red lacy see through piece nighty. A nice hug and a kiss on the lips. Went to the bedroom and she said "smell good". I had showered 10 minutes before so we went right at it. She dropped to her knees for a nice BBBJ and cupped my balls. Felt so good. I pulled her up and asked her to get on the bed with me. 69 was amazing as she has this beautiful tight kitty that tasted squeeky clean. Shortly after some of this she slid down RCG and started sliding that warm wet pussy on me. I was getting close to cumming so asked for the condom. She then got on top for some CG and eased down to take it all the way inside her. Super tight and to watch this beautiful lady ride was an amazing sight. After 5 minutes of her riding, I rolled her off and asked for doggie. Holding her tiny butt and the feeling of her tightness pushed me over the finish line and I filled up the cover. Gave me a nice massage after and we showered up and I was on my way. Definitely will repeat with Kiko and her English is decent enough. Highly recommend!
Cheers.[/QUOTE]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]
Hey DragonWolf!
I appreciate you pointing out her possible age. Even the ad on HX indicates she's 31 and we all know that most girls shed at least 3-5 years off their actual age in this industry. Now if reviewers would just state something along the line of, she LOOKS like she's in her 20's/late 20s instead of provider being in her late 20's that would be helpful for someone like me who prefers "younger" providers. Well, maybe not in their early 20's, but late 20's to mid 30's is ideal. LOL.
If she was in her 30s when you saw her a decade a go, then she is probably in her 40s. Which is okay if she looks like she’s in her late 20s or early 30s, has a pretty face, banging body and has great service. I keep hearing good things about, and have her on my list. Maybe one day. Lol
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]These women re-use names such as Coco, Kiko, Kiki, Cece, Yoyo, etc. Sometimes you'll get an Anna, or Brooke (LOL), most of them look exactly the same, it's the attitude that differs and the sexperience of course. If mainstream actresses and porn actresses can act it out so can they, it's all a facade and we pay for it. It's the fantasy that draws us. We do get sick and tired of the monotonous enjoyment. 'Variety's the very spice of life, That gives it all its flavour. " - William Cowper, 1785.
We try to experience the same provider, kinda like going for a test drive. Each model will always be different, and most times we get bored.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5442242]Hey DragonWolf!
I appreciate you pointing out her possible age. Even the ad on HX indicates she's 31 and we all know that most girls shed at least 3-5 years off their actual age in this industry. Now if reviewers would just state something along the line of, she LOOKS like she's in her 20's/late 20s instead of provider being in her late 20's that would be helpful for someone like me who prefers "younger" providers. Well, maybe not in their early 20's, but late 20's to mid 30's is ideal. LOL.
If she was in her 30s when you saw her a decade a go, then she is probably in her 40s. Which is okay if she looks like shes in her late 20s or early 30s, has a pretty face, banging body and has great service. I keep hearing good things about, and have her on my list. Maybe one day. Lol[/QUOTE]Kiko is 40, but her face looks early 30's at the latest IMO, and her body looks and feels like a young 20-something year old.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]Kiko is my favorite provider here in San Diego, hands down! She's definitely in her late 40's, if not 50. She has the body of a 20 year old, in fact a better body than most. She was my first agency provider I met and I've been seeing her ever since. I did notice she's now advertising BBFS with the additional tip, she's probably been giving it away to most of her regulars, but now with the upcharge.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]Yes I apologize guys. That was a typo. I meant to type late 30's. But you are correct her body does look like she's in her twenties.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5442214]If Kiko is still the new name for an old favorite (animal that rhymes w / honey), then she's definitely not in her late 20's. I could be wrong, but my understanding was that "Kiko" was this provider's new name, for whatever reason. Said provider was my first experience w / this agency nearly a decade ago, and she was at least in her 30's then. She was fantastic then, and from everything I've heard, she's managed to keep fit, and her looks, and service at a high level, but I'd hate for anyone specifically looking for someone younger to go a be disappointed on that front. That's one of those bait & switches that tarnishes the experience, no matter how good it is.[/QUOTE]Kiko has had many names over the years and she is the same girl that you're thinking of. Definitely nowhere close to 20's and I agree with you that she's probably in her 40's. Her body is the most fit out of the SDAG girls imo, almost 0 body fat. Tatum has a nicer ass but I prefer Kiko's tits even though they're both sporting manmades. She's also one of the only girls at SDAG that still uses real pictures (the topless pic on the website, all others are fake). I've always gotten good service from her but she does have a tendency to get chatty at times. Just keep her mouth occupied with something else, LOL. She was quite popular in LA and still gets talked about on the LA boards.
[URL=https://www.foxylists.com/glow]Old Pics[/URL] - photoshopped some to enhance her T&A but she really is that thin.
[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/bunny---glow-348246]San Diego reviews[/URL]
[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/tomi---pink-264622]Orange County reviews[/URL]
[URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/glow-2133787971-337889]Los Angeles reviews[/URL]
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5442242]Hey DragonWolf!
I appreciate you pointing out her possible age. Even the ad on HX indicates she's 31 and we all know that most girls shed at least 3-5 years off their actual age in this industry. Now if reviewers would just state something along the line of, she LOOKS like she's in her 20's/late 20s instead of provider being in her late 20's that would be helpful for someone like me who prefers "younger" providers. Well, maybe not in their early 20's, but late 20's to mid 30's is ideal. LOL.
If she was in her 30s when you saw her a decade a go, then she is probably in her 40s. Which is okay if she looks like shes in her late 20s or early 30s, has a pretty face, banging body and has great service. I keep hearing good things about, and have her on my list. Maybe one day. Lol[/QUOTE]I'm with you on that. The age can be so misleading, so what's more important is the appearance / how well they've maintained themselves, along with personality. Sometimes a super fit, veteran, who's maintained their looks, can suffer on the personality side, just from having been in the scene for however long.
Sometimes people want someone on the younger side to avoid that jaded personality from the veterans.
So it's all about accurate representation. Back in the day I questioned the alleged age, and gave her a 7 for look, but an 9 for service and a a yes for the repeat. It would've been my first review, but it got denied since I think I submitted it after she left SD, so she'd been taken off the site.
New girl at FEC. She was in OC last month and Boston (as Cora) a couple months ago. Sounds like 30's with a decent face, not a spinner, big boobs, average service.
OC reviews - [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/violet-7146441854-360584]review1[/URL] [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/violet-7148642886-360653]review2[/URL].
Boston review - [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?32529-Boston-Top-Ten&p=5330960&viewfull=1#post5330960]here[/URL].
[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5442486]Kiko is my favorite provider here in San Diego, hands down! She's definitely in her late 40's, if not 50. She has the body of a 20 year old, in fact a better body than most. She was my first agency provider I met and I've been seeing her ever since. I did notice she's now advertising BBFS with the additional tip, she's probably been giving it away to most of her regulars, but now with the upcharge.[/QUOTE]She's definitely not *late* 40's. She was 29 when I first met her in 2010 going by the name Kandy at a now defunct (I assume) agency called SD Suite Dreams.