[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5759320][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plMNOBc8zCM[/URL][/QUOTE]I think it is safe to say that 99% of the profiles have never watched this LOL.
Printable View
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5759320][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plMNOBc8zCM[/URL][/QUOTE]I think it is safe to say that 99% of the profiles have never watched this LOL.
[QUOTE=MaxKat;5759275]I have started looking at SA again and see a lot of these common patterns in names, like.
DreamyDuchess.
GorgeousMizz.
StunningGirl.
GorgeousMiss.
CheekyAphrodite.
BeautifulDreamer.
ClassyQueen.[/QUOTE]I am old fashioned. I was brought up to believe that you should leave it to others to provide praise of ones looks, etc.
So when I see all these profiles with usernames incorporating pretty, beautiful, gorgeous, stunning, etc. I tend to think that this is either or both of.
A. Compensation. Many of the women using these self-identifiers don't look particularly great to me, or.
B. It is a lead in / setup for GPS.
So that is a yellow flag to me right off the get go. If they then combine that with a content-free or cut-and-paste profile text, then it is red flag time.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5759789]I am old fashioned. I was brought up to believe that you should leave it to others to provide praise of ones looks, etc.
So when I see all these profiles with usernames incorporating pretty, beautiful, gorgeous, stunning, etc. I tend to think that this is either or both of.
A. Compensation. Many of the women using these self-identifiers don't look particularly great to me, or.
B. It is a lead in / setup for GPS.
So that is a yellow flag to me right off the get go. If they then combine that with a content-free or cut-and-paste profile text, then it is red flag time.[/QUOTE]I was texting w / a POT once and I asked about such a username. She said that the site suggested it to her. Getting a unique username can be a challenge on there, they may have a tool that helps people come up with something, and obviously, if they suggest something that seems OK to a girl, she may just go with it, thinking it isn't crucial. So, don't necessarily conclude that such names are only from bots.
[QUOTE=Dudeonthecouch;5759681]I think SA randomly generates those usernames.[/QUOTE]Oh duh right I had not thought of that. Unrelated, found one profile with this line:
"Before messaging me please know: I offer emotional support and would love to go on dates both in person or on video, but I don't do anything sexual with anyone. ".
Wow sign me up sweetie!
For you guys who go on SA.
[URL]https://youtu.be/S3W7g2puKY4?t=339[/URL]
"You've got your Walmart SBs, and you've got the Neiman Marcus SB".
I agree that SA is another way for prostitution, thoughts? And of course the law (courts see it if the the person is trading more than just sex, it's not prostitution), I disagree (Gray area though).
You have to be someone women find attractive.
Looks, power, confidence, success, being fun, being funny, being someone that they find attractive in some way.
Of course the pretty women will be attracted to handsome, confident guys, no surprise there. Few guys I know go looking for ugly women. But interestingly I meet a lot of ugly guys (not aimed at anyone in particular) who expect to have the beautiful women.
There is hope.
Walk through Walmart, Target, or any mall and you see all the average John's walking with their average Joan girlfriends and wives. Those guys found a woman.
Keep in mind, if you are not Tarzan, don't expect to be doing the deed with Jane.
As a man, you can 'be' someone they find attractive, or you can 'own' something valuable they find attractive.
I've seen a lot of average Johns with pretty women, so it is possible to get a girl out of your league. But most of us tend to date someone in our league. Many who seek professionals seek women out of their league. Young, cute, sexy, accommodating.
To attract and to seduce women communication is key. Looks matter, but communication is Key. This applies to online and in person.
Take a look at what the winners do to get the girl. And then do what they do.
From what I've seen and heard, it's the average guys who don't want average girls and expect the prom queens to come to them, who do most of the complaining.
The only thing worse is a woman who claims she can't get sex. When I hear that I tell them there must be something very wrong with you. Find out what it is and fix it.
[QUOTE=Holocaust;5758943]Another younger guy speaking. It is definitely getting very difficult finding someone even on the dating apps (Tinder / Bumble) for vanilla dating even though you have money and looks. I bet most of the younger guys are just here because they don't want to waste their time with unattractive women they match on dating apps and rather join SA where they can date attractive women. I know that comes with a cost but folks don't really mind it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5759320][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plMNOBc8zCM[/URL][/QUOTE]Watched the YouTube. More should watch it. Lots of good wisdom for SA, online dating, and even day to day encounters.
Thanks Dr.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5760632]You have to be someone women find attractive.
Looks, power, confidence, success, being fun, being funny, being someone that they find attractive in some way.
Of course the pretty women will be attracted to handsome, confident guys, no surprise there. Few guys I know go looking for ugly women. But interestingly I meet a lot of ugly guys (not aimed at anyone in particular) who expect to have the beautiful women.
There is hope.
Walk through Walmart, Target, or any mall and you see all the average John's walking with their average Joan girlfriends and wives. Those guys found a woman.
Keep in mind, if you are not Tarzan, don't expect to be doing the deed with Jane.
As a man, you can 'be' someone they find attractive, or you can 'own' something valuable they find attractive.
I've seen a lot of average Johns with pretty women, so it is possible to get a girl out of your league. But most of us tend to date someone in our league. Many who seek professionals seek women out of their league. Young, cute, sexy, accommodating.
To attract and to seduce women communication is key. Looks matter, but communication is Key. This applies to online and in person.
Take a look at what the winners do to get the girl. And then do what they do.
From what I've seen and heard, it's the average guys who don't want average girls and expect the prom queens to come to them, who do most of the complaining.
The only thing worse is a woman who claims she can't get sex. When I hear that I tell them there must be something very wrong with you. Find out what it is and fix it.[/QUOTE]Skolnick didn't have money, but he got Betty because he can eat Pussy. "Jocks think about sports, Nerds think about sex" LOL.
But in all fairness, wouldn't women just gravitate to the US currency, heck most of the them are old men like us.
Benjamin Franklin was considered a ladies man.
Brandon Wade ain't no looker and he keeps insisting in all his interviews, his mom told him, make the money and the ladies will follow.
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5760686]Skolnick didn't have money, but he got Betty because he can eat Pussy. "Jocks think about sports, Nerds think about sex" LOL.
But in all fairness, wouldn't women just gravitate to the US currency, heck most of the them are old men like us.
Benjamin Franklin was considered a ladies man.
Brandon Wade ain't no looker and he keeps insisting in all his interviews, his mom told him, make the money and the ladies will follow.[/QUOTE]Always get the pussy!
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5760500]I agree that SA is another way for prostitution, thoughts? And of course the law (courts see it if the the person is trading more than just sex, it's not prostitution), I disagree (Gray area though).[/QUOTE]Approaching SA as prostitution:
- Leads to poor results.
- Drives the good / real SBs away, and.
- Raises rates.
[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5760479]I was texting w / a POT once and I asked about such a username. She said that the site suggested it to her. Getting a unique username can be a challenge on there, they may have a tool that helps people come up with something, and obviously, if they suggest something that seems OK to a girl, she may just go with it, thinking it isn't crucial. So, don't necessarily conclude that such names are only from bots.[/QUOTE]Interesting.
I have signed up multiple times over the years, and also changed user names multiple times, never noticed any auto generated username suggestions.
SA is a very clever business model. Its' promoted as a dating, or a companion finding applications. But even though they say it's all about finding that special person you connect with, ultimately the women expect to get gifts, that boils down to compensation. And guys in reality are looking for sex.
Some guys may be looking for a companion to share life and money with and not want sex, but the women still wants a pay day with or without sex.
If she don't get paid in her expected time line, and he don't get sex in his expected time line, people will move on.
Call is anything you want, but men are looking for the favor of a woman, and the sugar babies are looking for gifts and financial reward from the man.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5761174]Approaching SA as prostitution:
- Leads to poor results.
- Drives the good / real SBs away, and.
- Raises rates.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5762068]SA is a very clever business model. Its' promoted as a dating, or a companion finding applications. But even though they say it's all about finding that special person you connect with, ultimately the women expect to get gifts, that boils down to compensation. And guys in reality are looking for sex.
Some guys may be looking for a companion to share life and money with and not want sex, but the women still wants a pay day with or without sex.
If she don't get paid in her expected time line, and he don't get sex in his expected time line, people will move on.
Call is anything you want, but men are looking for the favor of a woman, and the sugar babies are looking for gifts and financial reward from the man.[/QUOTE]Yes, I agree it is prostitution. But I think the point OP is making is DO NOT [B]"Approach"[/B] girls like you approach prostitutes.
Many on SA are pros, but for the hot college aged girls, that most guys want to fuck, the girls don't want to be seen or have a self image as prostitutes. So APPROACH them like GFs (and yeah, you got to pay them.) But if you want success in the bowl, it just comes down to approach. But use a crude or degrading approach to SBs and the points OP makes all come true.
Just sayin'.
[QUOTE=Shampoo55;5762384]Yes, I agree it is prostitution. But I think the point OP is making is DO NOT [B]"Approach"[/B] girls like you approach prostitutes.
Many on SA are pros, but for the hot college aged girls, that most guys want to fuck, the girls don't want to be seen or have a self image as prostitutes. So APPROACH them like GFs (and yeah, you got to pay them.) But if you want success in the bowl, it just comes down to approach. But use a crude or degrading approach to SBs and the points OP makes all come true.
Just sayin'.[/QUOTE]I realize you can't just come and tell them the truth, because they [B]REALLY[/B] have convinced themselves they aren't hookers. The moment there's a direct financial incentive or transaction that has the expected outcome of me sticking my prick inside them, it's prostitution. They hang out on the subreddit sugarlifestyle and convince themselves they aren't though.
Strangely, if you head over to the sexworker subreddit, you'll see them talking about how they go back and forth from sugaring to hooking. It's the same thing.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?20576-San-Diego-Bare&p=5762749&viewfull=1[/URL]#post5762749.
There's some sugar daddies that can afford 5 k-10 k / month on SBs.
[URL]https://youtu.be/EkUoSzWS7cM?t=300[/URL]
The reality: sex for money is. _fill in the blank (c'Mon.).
Companionships my ass.
I wish I had 120 k disposable income for that pussy.
Brandon Wade, takes your subscription fees and supports his women addiction.
Not bad for the economy, he creates jobs.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ1UdydzF0U[/URL]
I wish I had thought about the idea.
Networking is another word for pimping.
Long before SA.
They have a name for a SB / SD type relationship - "compensated dating".
It is considered dating, not prostitution.
But compensated.
So compensated dating.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5762491]I realize you can't just come and tell them the truth, because they [B]REALLY[/B] have convinced themselves they aren't hookers. The moment there's a direct financial incentive or transaction that has the expected outcome of me sticking my prick inside them, it's prostitution. They hang out on the subreddit sugarlifestyle and convince themselves they aren't though.
Strangely, if you head over to the sexworker subreddit, you'll see them talking about how they go back and forth from sugaring to hooking. It's the same thing.[/QUOTE]Isn't there a financial aspect to almost all M-F dating? Maybe half or more of the women in the country are probably prostitutes by the above standard. A former GF of mine married my then roommate because his wallet was thicker than mine, even though she didn't much like him. Was that prostitution? Don't women look for "providers"?
The SBs you mention who hang out on subreddits are the ones to avoid. The good ones join SA for reasons such as:
- A sorority dare.
- Their friends told them it was great / they heard good things.
- They want excitement and adventure.
- They want someone better then the jerks they usually date.
- And so on and on.
Not to say that financial help doesn't play a role, but the better gals are not prostitutes in the classic mold, and thinking of them as such is self-defeating.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5762844]Long before SA.
They have a name for a SB / SD type relationship - "compensated dating".
It is considered dating, not prostitution.
But compensated.
So compensated dating.[/QUOTE]Agreed. I have used this exact term in discussing what sort of arrangement I have had / am looking for, most often at the M&G. You need sufficient appreciation for the person to spend any time w / them. No matter how much money / sex were involved, if you don't have that respect, you wouldn't be seeing them.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5762873]Isn't there a financial aspect to almost all M-F dating? Maybe half or more of the women in the country are probably prostitutes by the above standard. A former GF of mine married my then roommate because his wallet was thicker than mine, even though she didn't much like him. Was that prostitution? Don't women look for "providers"?
The SBs you mention who hang out on subreddits are the ones to avoid. The good ones join SA for reasons such as:
- A sorority dare.
- Their friends told them it was great / they heard good things.
- They want excitement and adventure.
- They want someone better then the jerks they usually date.
- And so on and on.
Not to say that financial help doesn't play a role, but the better gals are not prostitutes in the classic mold, and thinking of them as such is self-defeating.[/QUOTE]That's certainly an opinion I've noticed many on here have. I don't share it, and that's fine. However, I'd assert it's self-defeating to lose sight of the fact that if the girls aren't paid, they won't fuck you. Don't get me wrong; I'm good with that. But if you start letting yourself believe it's not about the money, then you're deluding yourself.
The women love to believe they are not prostitutes despite offering sex for money.
The mongers like to believe the young sexy women would fuck us even if we didn't pay them.
And when they do fuck us (or let us fuck them) we like to believe we are the best fuck they ever had, and their multiple orgasms were real and unique to our actions.
And that they really mean it when they compliment our looks, body, performance, and cock size.
If everyone is happy with these delusions, I'd say the system works.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5765030]The women love to believe they are not prostitutes despite offering sex for money.
The mongers like to believe the young sexy women would fuck us even if we didn't pay them.
And when they do fuck us (or let us fuck them) we like to believe we are the best fuck they ever had, and their multiple orgasms were real and unique to our actions.
And that they really mean it when they compliment our looks, body, performance, and cock size.
If everyone is happy with these delusions, I'd say the system works.[/QUOTE]Everyone gets the bowl they want. You may want to feel the same as if you were with a SW or escort.
That's not my experience, or that of many others.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ae9ca620-7199-4550-a4f3-03d1d2441636[/URL]
Well sign me up gorgeous!
[QUOTE=MaxKat;5769993][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ae9ca620-7199-4550-a4f3-03d1d2441636[/URL]
Well sign me up gorgeous![/QUOTE]There have always been profiles like that.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/11/technology/airtags-gps-surveillance.html[/URL]
The transition to the new Seeking has happened.
Only mention of arrangements is in the potted company history, under "About Us".
My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5781229]My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. [b]Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line[/b]. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.[/QUOTE]I have to say, "runaway" does not sound like an adult. But even assuming that she was, I just don't see a person in that spot having the level of consent that I'd want. Desperation at that level? There's really no possibility of a fair playing field, imo.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5781229]My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.[/QUOTE]To somewhat echo RO, I think what you are describing here is even worse than what he says, in that both of these arrangements were with desperate, vulnerable women.
Precisely the sort of situation I strive to avoid in my arrangements.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5781821]To somewhat echo RO, I think what you are describing here is even worse than what he says, in that both of these arrangements were with desperate, vulnerable women.
Precisely the sort of situation I strive to avoid in my arrangements.[/QUOTE]There is always a danger when I don't provide "details" to help paint a clear and accurate picture of the situation. People naturally draw conclusions and assume they understand the situation. In these cases I think you drew the wrong conclusion.
First, the Runaway, was 20, so lets get that understood right away. I was 29 at the time. Runaway was perhaps the wrong phrase, lets say she left home abruptly without all the proper means to fully support herself. At the time I jokingly called her the "runaway" and that is how I described her in my post. My error.
Secondly, both were in need of counseling and friendship when they were in a tough situation, and we became friends. Our relationship in both cases blossomed from there. In the process I provided some assistance, when they needed a little financial help now and then, because I had it, and wanted too.
Neither was, desperate, forced, coerced, or under any other negative powers to do anything they didn't want to do. I am a firm believer that women have the right to say "no" when ever they want for what ever reason they want. I'm all about consent, I like them wanting to be with me as much as I want to be with them. Any that don't want to be with me, don't have to be.
It is good to see that you mongers do have a moral compass. Glad you spoke up otherwise others may have drawn other negative conclusions that were not accurate to the situations.
My own fault for not providing enough of the details to give you an accurate picture.
My point still stands, I believe that a SB / SD relationship should be organic where you naturally like each other. Not a business arrangement like a Independent provider.
To take this further. If I wanted to fully support a Fuck Buddy, I'll get a Mistress and have exclusive access to her not be another guy in line waiting for his time with her.
MXK.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5762844]Long before SA.
They have a name for a SB / SD type relationship - "compensated dating".
It is considered dating, not prostitution.
But compensated.
So compensated dating.[/QUOTE]I saw (I think) was an episode of Real Sex where they featured Love Hotels. The husband would fuck another woman and pay her, while is wife went and got paid to fuck. Money out and money in, I don't know at the end of the month if the couple was in the black, I guess it all depends who spent more or gained more.
[QUOTE=MaximusKahn;5781229]My two experiences as an official SugarDaddy were both organic experiences. First was a neighbor who was a young single mom needing help surviving. Second was a runaway needing help getting life back on line. Without going into detail I simply assisted both with bills, and the challengers of life to get them through some tough times. Our connections were genuine and the sex was given freely without attachment to specific payments, allowances, stipends, or gifts. Although they were free to have sex with anyone they wanted, I felt their sex with me was exclusive while we were connected.
I'm not sure how this "professional" sugar baby situation works, as I simply see them as "independents" working as many guys as they can to establish a steady income. There is nothing wrong with this, but I would not pay to be number 2, 3, or 4 Sugar daddy on their roster, having to wait for my time like a time share.
My impression is, that it would be easier and cheaper to simply find a great independent you can establish chemistry with and go with that. MXK.[/QUOTE]Some of these episodes of 60 min have SB stating they date 4-5 SD at a time.
You even stated, "They were free to have sex with anyone they wanted".
No one checks. I have seen vids where a guy creampies women and some of them say.
Their boyfriend knows.
[URL]https://www.peppahub.com/babe-porn/1352-compilation---unwanted-creampies-compila.html[/URL]
Time 4:59.
Funny ones time 4:04, time 11:30.
I'll have to disagree that it will be cheaper to find an independent with establish chemistry. Not unless you look like an "A-lister celebrity".
Brandon Wade couldn't get a date without paying for it.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5781341]I have to say, "runaway" does not sound like an adult. But even assuming that she was, I just don't see a person in that spot having the level of consent that I'd want. Desperation at that level? There's really no possibility of a fair playing field, imo.[/QUOTE]I think the OP used the wrong words to describe the girl. 4-5 years ago, I knew one girl who disagreed with her parents and just wanted to move out ASAP. She was 20 years old. She asked me for any spare room.
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5784175]Some of these episodes of 60 min have SB stating they date 4-5 SD at a time.[/QUOTE]And the SDs are all dating 4-5 SBs at a time also. So hard to complain.
One thing driving SB assistance levels higher is the crazy cost of college these days. And as a single SD probably won't / can't cover those costs, hence multiple daddies.
[QUOTE=PussyPumper;5785760]And the SDs are all dating 4-5 SBs at a time also. So hard to complain.
One thing driving SB assistance levels higher is the crazy cost of college these days. And as a single SD probably won't / can't cover those costs, hence multiple daddies.[/QUOTE]Agee completely. Also, the best SBs I had are those that are into this for supplemental financing support and not those who are career SBs who thrive on this as the ways to live or their lifestyle. I had multiple SBs at the same time who appreciate what is given to them more because it helps them here and there. At the same time I had more complaints from those lifestyle SBs who always are wanting more. It's definitely more cost effective to have multiple of the former than multiple of the latter.
I understand there are more factors than cost. I'm only speaking of my experience on what is satisfying or fulfills my need. Had a perfect scenario for a few years with 3-5 pretty, hot, great in bed SBs with awesome personalities at the same time. While being affordable 😂 I do have SB entertainment annual allowance I grant myself to indulge in.
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;5784139]I saw (I think) was an episode of Real Sex where they featured Love Hotels. The husband would fuck another woman and pay her, while is wife went and got paid to fuck. Money out and money in, I don't know at the end of the month if the couple was in the black, I guess it all depends who spent more or gained more.[/QUOTE]These are a very cool Japanese phenomenon. They are sexual rendezvous spots for the sexually active to have affairs, or for swingers to share or swap wives and girlfriends, but they are also legitimate get away places for average couples or to give Mom and Dad a private place to do the wild thing.
Many Japanese families live in multi-generational homes, with small living spaces that offer very little privacy. Thus is very difficult to get your freak on with grandma and grandpa or the kids very close by. So mom and dad go to the discrete "love hotel" to fuck like bunnies in private.
Some of these hotels have themes for fantasies or host a special décor to stimulate sexual desires and sex play, but many are just private places to have sex and are very legitimate and respectable businesses. You can arrange to never see any of the staff if you really need discretion or are shy, and if you request it, they will put a sign over your car's license place to hide it from curious eyes.
When I was living there, I took my Japanese "wife" to them, for the expected fun.
On a side note, privacy for sex is so difficult in Japan that I can't tell you how many couples I caught having sex in their cars or vans when I was mountain biking through parks and areas infrequently traveled. Sometimes they would even put on a show, fully knowing I was watching. Exhibitionism and Voyeurism are alive and well, even in Japan.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ef744014-1dca-40bc-86c8-db8a4762f28f[/URL]
I'm very particular but wondering if anyone has seen and met this? I can't see her face but requested to see her private pics. Daddy is looking to re-engage in the bowl. 😂128514;128514;.
Love Hotels in Japanese are perfect places to take your Sugar Babies.
Many Japanese men take their fuck buddies, professional providers, and even their office girls to love hotels during the day for frisky fun.
Just about anything goes, and it's safe and discrete. We need clean places like that here in USA!
Pretty transparent.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/971e2f1b-597d-4e1e-90f5-7e7db335d4db[/URL]
Links to your messages. It happens.
[QUOTE=MaxKat;5823239]Pretty transparent.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/971e2f1b-597d-4e1e-90f5-7e7db335d4db[/URL][/QUOTE]