Dreamescortdc, big mistake
I keep using poor judgement despite seeing red flags for escort services. I was intrigued by Julie on dreamescortdc so decided to make an appointment. Nina had some terrible mixed and fake reviews but Julie had positives and possibly fake. She looked smoking hot on her pics and while I expected a fair amount of airbrushing etc. I thought that due to their high prices the girls in the pictures were real.
Boy was I wrong, she looked nothing like her picture. Caked on makeup revealed some bad skin, she looked to be at least 25 lbs heavier, and her face just didn't look right. An agency rep was with her and swiped my cc and even though I only wanted an hour for $3 I was told it was a 2 hr minimum for $5 Additionally Julie made up some bs that she works on tips and wanted an additional $3 I talked her down to $$ since she said I was "good looking and nice". I saw both of these come up in some oThER reviews but it was mostly for the other girl Nina. So basically I coughed up $7 for a really unattractive girl. In hindsight I should have just paid $$ and told her to leave and save myself some money. She was friendly at least but wanted to talk too much. When we got down to business I could not manage to stay erect because I was not attracted at all to her. To her credit she did give an effort but after awhile I told her its not going to happen tonight.
I don't think I'm cut out for this hobby nor can I afford it and this rate. Anyway thanks for reading and stay away from dreamescortdc.
The Economist reports on mongering and we come out looking OK
There have been posts a plenty about how the Washington DC market and NOVA is particular are high priced, particularly in terms of their services, however this week The Economist magazine, although they refer to themselves as a newspaper, did a tremendous cover story about the business of sex and how the Internet is an industry disrupt or making it easier and safer to work in the world's oldest profession.
The first eye opener is that, adjusting for inflation, we should be paying $395 for full service.
Although they did not mention it by name, I'm pretty sure the frequented The othER board for much of their research.
They also calculated the premium paid / earned for thinks like two girls, spanking or anal.
All told we may not have it so bad, but having mongered in Argentina, Singapore and Venezuela, I love getting at least a good half hour of more for under $100.
What a great time for a British mongered to be caught by his wife only to tell her" But lovie, I'm doing research for The Economist!
My rule on unknowns is worth repeating
[QUOTE=Ambidextrous;2272274]I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.
Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.
A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.
She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".
This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.[/QUOTE]You must be doing well to roll the dice at $300 on a pig in a poke. No reviews, fake pix, and there's a 5 behind Door #1, but you still laid down that coin? If we lived in the 1700's, we'd put you in the stocks and throw fruit at you to shame you into better behavior. At least you had the good sense to abort and walk out with $240, so we'll only keep you in the stocks for a few minutes.
My rule is worth repeating here: for an unknown, unreviewed provider, start with the shortest-available session. Don't pour your life savings into a speculative land deal before even seeing the soil test, LOL. Once you've seen her, and things are going well, you can always suggest extending, and I've rarely heard of a girl who refuses more money.
If things don't go well, you're only out $60-$120, leaving you more than enough for a make-up visit with someone else.
And why are you still messing around with the Asian ads which have been proven over and over and over to be fake pix? The girl in the room is ALWAYS 10+ years older, 3 points lower in appearance, and no better than a 5-6 in performance.
$300 is a lot of money, even in DC. If you're determined to drop $300, there are some well-reviewed, Grade-A girls around town that hit 9-10 on the civilian scale, and you're guaranteed an 8-9 experience. If I were going to spend that kind of $, I'd go see someone like Bedroom Barbie, a well-reviewed Roanoke girl who travels around the state. She's phenomenal looking, and has great reviews.
[URL]http://www.bedroombarbie.com/[/URL]
How to save yourself time + aggravation + $60
[QUOTE=Ambidextrous;2272274]I could not find any reviews on Miko but her ad looked OK so I decided to take a chance. In the ad she said she "provides an incredible GFE. " On the phone she quoted me 3 $/ h, a premium price that in this area gets you BBBJCIM. Arrived at her Tyson's Corner hotel, she was ready on time.
Miko said she is Japanese, maybe so but she speaks English like a native. Her ad says she is 27 but I would give her ten years more than that. She has also gained weight since the ad photos were taken (or they were photoshopped). While the ad photos might show a 7 or 8 in attractiveness, in person she is about a 5.
A provider of marginal attractiveness who charges 3 $/ h had better at least give good service. But I quickly ran into problems when she put a condom on me right away and refused DATY, saying it was for health reasons.
She had asked me for payment when I disrobed and I put the envelope containing 3 $ on the dresser. When she declined DATY and seemed intent on following her own agenda I lost the little enthusiasm I had and decided to abort the mission. I told her that her limitations were a turnoff, put my clothes back on, and said I wanted my money back. She said she doesn't give money back, but I picked the envelope up from where I left it, took out $60 and put it on the dresser, and left. I said I felt $60 was more than fair for the ten minutes I had been there. She was angry and said nothing as I left, although I said "Sorry about that. ".
This should have been a wakeup call for her. This kind of provider might be worth $. 5/ h at the most. Buyer beware.[/QUOTE]First, I'm assuming this is the (incredible GFE) Miko to whom you're referring:
[URL]http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/520423.htm[/URL]
I heartily concur with the sage advice posted by BB and in addition I would like to offer the observation that a simple google search of the number would have led you to an ad using the EXACT same wording (except for the name) even including the way the text in the ad is underlined, which should have been a red flag.
[URL]http://www.eros.com/us/washington_dc/files/509655.htm[/URL]
The second ad, even without doing a search on the photos (which come back to porn sites, BTW), would have clued you in to the fact you weren't dealing with an independent and would at least have put you more on your guard.
Also, 646 is a NYC prefix and while there are a number of great, legit providers who visit from NYC there are also plenty of scam agencies and individual scam providers who prey on gullible and horny hobbyists. At a minimum, IMHO, a NYC phone prefix is an indicator that extra homework is warranted.
And the fact the girl who opened the door was a 5 instead of the advertised 8+ should have been the final red flag to make you walk away. Here's why: when a low-to-med priced BP girl doesn't match her pics that's not ideal but not altogether unexpected. But it's much more unusual when a supposedly top-notch, high-end, sophisticated provider (who advertises herself in superlative terms) is so far off the mark. A true high-end provider is generally very concerned about her reputation and is less likely to misrepresent herself or her services. The minute you saw a 5 on the other side of the door it meant there was absolutely nothing about the ad you could trust.
If you're in the mood for a $300 girl, then do a search on the oThER site, or Eros or BP with the price as your search parameter and then do some homework on those search results. Or, if you're in the mood for Asian providers, search specifically for them and let those results guide your homework efforts.
No matter what process you use, a little homework is absolutely a better way to save yourself the time, aggravation and $ you waste when you wing it and hope for the best.
P.S. Extremely lucky for you she didn't have a "manager" nearby when you decided to take back part of the fee. If she had, that situation could have gone sideways in a hurry, and not in a good way.
P. P.S. All the EROS ads look good, including (or maybe, especially) the scam ones.
Bridgett Goulart / Stephanie
Hello everyone, new member here.
Does anyone know anything about Bridgett Goulart / Stephanie? Here is her website:
[URL]http://www.jetsetbridgett.net/about.html[/URL]
Her other website I'd is 161996.
She's got a lot of reviews, but almost all of them are from 2012, except for 2 recent ones.
Fairfax, Vienna, Falls Church, Orange Line No Va
I have been on USA for a while but have not posted much. Mostly interested in Ladies who are wutr (way under the radar). GFE or close and worth the price. Roxanna on BP is all she says and can be more. Maybe hard to find but go for the early special. I know a couple ladies who like to have a good time with gentlemen if they like you and your compensation for innocent companionship. Asian 30's. Very nice to talk to and Cambodian 20's very sweet to be with.
I am willing to trade info for ladies in the area. I like older ladies and really looking for a friend my age that likes to talk and have some fun.
Thanks for looking out, but I have gotten some real responses.
[QUOTE=RoaminRoman;2360076]Interesting, that your first three posts (one in the NoVa board, one in the DC board, and one in the Richmond board) have [U]all[/U] been to ask about other members' experiences with [B]Xkittenx[/B]. On the Richmond board, you even recommend that others avoid her.
Aside from this "broad" query, the fact that you've not shared any of your own experience with her is not something that will incline others to share theirs. Additionally, the fact that you have no other posting history, yet expect others to supply private details with someone who is basically a stranger, is another thing that will disincline others from sharing. Further, there is a possibility that you might be LEO posing as a legitimate monger. It's rumored that LEO does that on various sites, from time to time.
Please bear in mind: If you do not receive any responses, it's not because other members are stingy and unwilling to share. Instead, it's probably because you, being a new member, have not shared anything with the community first. Information is the "coin of the realm" here. Those who share information on these boards obtained that info via expenditure of [B](a)[/B] their hard-earned dollars and [B](b)[/B] their limited and generally valuable personal free time. Asking for that information, gratis, is thus bad form.
As ol' Desert Pete once said: "[I]You've got to give before you get.[/I]" Just an observation and a small bit of (hopefully) helpful advice.
- Roman.[/QUOTE]I was not looking for general information. I have been in the rodeo a while now. Just did not want my senior account tied to anything with her name.