Arrangement Reports

She ghosted me too. Several times actually. Strangest part was after the first time i never contacted her again it was she that kept contacting me to meet. Once that day to meet would come she’d go silent. Then she’d resurface a couple weeks later like nothing happened and do it all over again.

Obviously a pattern with her.

[QUOTE=Esidia;5202045]AllyLotti3 ghosted me after we scheduled something too. Weird.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Dddubs2;5104133]She bailed on me after scheduling for dinner & more. Was super confused because she sounded nice and comms was good. Maybe she was new to this and chickened out. Oh well.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Osyus;5102182]
AllyLotti - [URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e17fa445-2fa5-45ff-ba49-3e1d03691f48[/URL].

Probably won't repeat, she gave this speech about having a high paying sd before but finally agreed to 3. On the skinnier side for my preference but pretty, was also fun and stayed the night.
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=OnlyDreams;5202236]So I was texting back and forth with this girl, she seems to be legit and among other things she tells me she works doing deliveries for some app and stuff and complaints she's not making that much money. She even send me pics of the stuff she had to deliver. She was willing to meet up tonight and told me she can drive anywhere at any time. I also told her I don't give any money in advance, everything is done in person and she agreed. Everything was going smooth. We talked about different things, I wanted to make sure she's real. I believe she's real and she wasn't selling content either. Anyway, She quoted me $600, I counter-offered her $200 and she got upset and blocked (site and phone) . She makes around $100-150 a day delivering stuff. She has to drive all over the city for about 8 hours or more to make that money. She complains she doesn't make that much money but when I offered her $200 for just a moment of fun she gets upset. I don't know how these women do math. But if it was me, I'd take a job where I can make more money in shorter time. Hard to understand them![/QUOTE]Are you willing to share what her profile name is? It isn't really just her but in general most of those on Seeking won't take $200/ meet, assuming you mentioned per meet, and many are at the $300 amount as a minimum. If they agree to the lower amount they are STG types, seeing multiple men or the 1 HR type that aren't into the whole chemistry / connection aspect. I'm not trying to say how much, what or how to do this but just explaining how they may be looking at it.

[QUOTE=Bigbouy911;5202329]Any info on this one? I thought I saw her in Evanston a few years ago but she had dark hair.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b5d7a217-947b-d302-d68d-d97070b914ea[/URL][/QUOTE]Have spoken with, haven't met. Sent some more pix which were hot, seems reasonable. I don't think we discussed price, but everything seemed reasonable, except location. She's not in Schaumburg, that's how far she's willing to come in from? Crystal Lake?

Too far, so I didn't proceed.

Was that she is a time waster.

We texted for a while, got a couple nondescript photos set a time for me to come over then that morning I text to confirm. A few times. And nothing.

She's probably just playing games.

Randolph.

[QUOTE=Gregu696;5201781]Any info on this one?

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0ef96e24-62ff-402d-8551-d33132ff6c81[/URL]

Have you guys meet her?[/QUOTE]

I usually roll my eyes when guys complain about girls using in-accurate descriptions on their tags, which in turn makes it difficult to search based on body type. Just because its unrealistic for these girls to describe themselves as "super dumpy!" or "kinda gross! And its all part of the game. But. That said, this one made me actually stop and think for a little bit. She isn't even trying to hide anything with the photos. No angles, no edits, she's straight up. She legitimately thinks of herself as petite and assumes we all will agree. I love SA.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ceb3195d-fc5b-4790-9fed-0738c8640198[/URL]

Just posting this one for fun. Not sure what to think of these photos but found it entertaining LOL.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/5e0b9de8-f0b1-4f2f-bec8-5c7f8512a4fa[/URL]

[QUOTE=OnlyDreams;5202236]So I was texting back and forth with this girl, she seems to be legit and among other things she tells me she works doing deliveries for some app and stuff and complaints she's not making that much money. She even send me pics of the stuff she had to deliver. She was willing to meet up tonight and told me she can drive anywhere at any time. I also told her I don't give any money in advance, everything is done in person and she agreed. Everything was going smooth. We talked about different things, I wanted to make sure she's real. I believe she's real and she wasn't selling content either. Anyway, She quoted me $600, I counter-offered her $200 and she got upset and blocked (site and phone) . She makes around $100-150 a day delivering stuff. She has to drive all over the city for about 8 hours or more to make that money. She complains she doesn't make that much money but when I offered her $200 for just a moment of fun she gets upset. I don't know how these women do math. But if it was me, I'd take a job where I can make more money in shorter time. Hard to understand them![/QUOTE]When you got guys on here paying $400 plus for a girl, she's going to turn down $200.

[QUOTE=SeekAndDestroy;5203144]I usually roll my eyes when guys complain about girls using in-accurate descriptions on their tags, which in turn makes it difficult to search based on body type. Just because its unrealistic for these girls to describe themselves as "super dumpy!" or "kinda gross! And its all part of the game. But. That said, this one made me actually stop and think for a little bit. She isn't even trying to hide anything with the photos. No angles, no edits, she's straight up. She legitimately thinks of herself as petite and assumes we all will agree. I love SA.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ceb3195d-fc5b-4790-9fed-0738c8640198[/URL][/QUOTE]Some girls seem to think "short" = "petite".

That is not so.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/465bdc05-3fde-4a16-a4cc-b538de804c05[/URL]

She is crazy. Not exactly sure why she in on the site. Within 10 minutes of messaging, we were video sexting each other. Exchanged a lot of snaps of pleasuring ourselves. Said she wants to meet up but also works crazy hours and the our schedules never aligned. I think she is not interested. But boy I did have fun during our free video session.

[QUOTE=ScottWeir;5203596][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/465bdc05-3fde-4a16-a4cc-b538de804c05[/URL]

She is crazy. Not exactly sure why she in on the site. Within 10 minutes of messaging, we were video sexting each other. Exchanged a lot of snaps of pleasuring ourselves. Said she wants to meet up but also works crazy hours and the our schedules never aligned. I think she is not interested. But boy I did have fun during our free video session.[/QUOTE]I have an inkling that SwimmerNikki's inbox is about to be flooded with a pool full of messages from members of this board!

[QUOTE=SeekAndDestroy;5203144]I usually roll my eyes when guys complain about girls using in-accurate descriptions on their tags, which in turn makes it difficult to search based on body type. Just because its unrealistic for these girls to describe themselves as "super dumpy!" or "kinda gross! And its all part of the game. But. That said, this one made me actually stop and think for a little bit. She isn't even trying to hide anything with the photos. No angles, no edits, she's straight up. She legitimately thinks of herself as petite and assumes we all will agree. I love SA.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ceb3195d-fc5b-4790-9fed-0738c8640198[/URL][/QUOTE]She has "average" as her body type, which looks pretty accurate to me. Short girls sometimes look larger than they are if they have big tits.

[QUOTE=Jinurso;5203465]Some girls seem to think "short" = "petite".

That is not so.[/QUOTE]Petite refers to stature not weight. You can wish it to mean something else, but a 5'0" person describing themselves as "petite" is using the term correctly.

Any Intel on this one? Says she can hosts $250.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/5d6f6b3d-de18-4444-8da2-1f893e5b5d19[/URL]

Sent me a bunch of nudes. Looks semipro.

[QUOTE=Chicago41;5204385]She has "average" as her body type, which looks pretty accurate to me. Short girls sometimes look larger than they are if they have big tits.[/QUOTE]Look at her tagline. The first word you see when looking at her profile is "petite". She is 50 lbs overweight! When I'm fucking a petite girl I want to see my dick moving in her stomach LOL, not what looks to be a small child or a thanksgiving dinner for a family.

[QUOTE=ScottWeir;5204467]Any Intel on this one? Says she can hosts $250.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/5d6f6b3d-de18-4444-8da2-1f893e5b5d19[/URL]

Sent me a bunch of nudes. Looks semipro.[/QUOTE]I talked to her before, she's definitely eager to meet. Agreed with $200, but I backed out.

Let me know how it goes and report back.