I Understand Where You're Coming From
[QUOTE=RogerOver;3334484]I know I'm not in the greater majority here, but when I find one (or a few) I like, I tend to stick with them. I've never fucked most of the flavor of the week around here. As soon as I see "air mattress" or "basement" or anything like it I cross it out.
I know it sounds like a humble brag, but I'm a middle aged, fairly wealthy guy. I'm not fucking on a goddamn air mattress. Just saying, and I don't judge.[/QUOTE]But I will put up with quite a bit for a cute young thing. A few years ago when I had my hands on Vanessa's tight 19 year old ass, I pretty much forgot about the trashed kitchen I saw on my way to her bed.
There's one provider I saw 5 times and a few I saw 4 times. Otherwise, mostly 1-3 dreams per provider here. Sometimes that's because they've dropped out of the hobby or they had a rapid decline, sometimes it's because I want get with as many women as I can before I'm too old.
Section 230 Communications Decency Act
A new bill introduced by Rep. Ann * (not sure if I can use her last name) has the potential to erode the protections of Section 230 afforded to sites like this. It has the title "Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017". Hard to disagree with that. The thing is that it will open up the possibility of websites being charged criminally for the content posted by users. Think of any websites that may have a problem with that? If you are interested in following this a good starting point is [URL]http://www.vocativ.com/417954/sex-trafficking-law-free-speech-online/[/URL] Be safe.
Pretty much my take as well
In my younger years, I could get just about any cutie I set my mind to. That was 3 decades ago. Now, if I want to bang young hotties, I pay for the pleasure.
I'll pay for a BJ in a car but I'm not a contortionist, so sex in a car is behind me.
I'll put up with more than most to get close to the hotness that I have my sights set on. If they prove worth it, I'll see them repeatedly. If not, I banged a hot piece of ass and I move onto the next focal point.
[QUOTE=Raider1687;3336884]Just wanted to let you know that there is another side of the coin. Some of us can't understand why you care where you are fucking her, she is letting you fuck her. I would certainly show up to the local frozen pond to watch Wayne Gretzky play hockey again and I would eat a Tony's steak in my car. Some of us are there to bang the girls because that is what we are there to do, not judge them.[/QUOTE]
What about offshore sites
[QUOTE=ILikeWatch;3338101]A new bill introduced by Rep. Ann * (not sure if I can use her last name) has the potential to erode the protections of Section 230 afforded to sites like this. It has the title "Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017". Hard to disagree with that. The thing is that it will open up the possibility of websites being charged criminally for the content posted by users. Think of any websites that may have a problem with that? If you are interested in following this a good starting point is [URL]http://www.vocativ.com/417954/sex-trafficking-law-free-speech-online/[/URL] Be safe.[/QUOTE]I am under the impression that this site operates outside the jurisdiction of the USA.