Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4517949]Not recommended.

I decided to try something different for a change. Big mistake and a regret. I never used this agency before, so decided to take a chance. No reviews on the girl, and only a few posts on the other board regarding this agency itself. No specifics on this girl. I went in only because I was told by the booker that BBFS was available and it was also posted on the girl's profile. I soon later found out it was a lie. The time before the session started to make this visit a bad sign. I didn't confirm early enough and ended up having to book later. Now in hindsight, I don't see why someone would go to this agency. Possibly because they can't get in with better ones and better with something than nothing. The location is in Ktown so traffic can be a ***** to get there. On the plus side, the girl was on time and I didn't have to wait. Upon opening up, I didn't quite like her looks. I give her a 6 with the makeup. When we got to the bedroom, payment had to be given right away. This is usually a bad sign, but I can see why they are doing it because I am new to them. Paid and she left the room. When business was done, I undressed. I told her I showered already, but she insisted on taking another one. (We will come back to this later). In the bathroom, she caresses you before the shower and in said shower, she just cleans the important bits but nothing fun or erotic in there. She was nice enough to dry me off.

For the main portion, she does a nuru massage which didn't get me turned on. She has oil by the bed and bathes herself with it, along with some dripped on you. The actual nuru part was decent with some fake moans. Expect her to rub her tits, then run her tongue along your backside with some very light rim. Though her menu says rimming, it's more like a light lick twice. Rimming should be an attack on your asshole or something along those lines. On the flip, she puts more oil on your front, rubs her front on you then moves onto a minor HJ + BBBJ combo. Her BBBJ was too aggressive and felt more painful than pleasure. Not to mention, it was rather short. Maybe 1 minute max to get you hard. Now, the shitty part. She puts on a condom and I'm here thinking the fuck? Both the website and the booker confirmed BBFS before the session and this was the only reason I booked this girl. I wanted P2 P and even that had to be covered. Ha, what a joke. Now I'm pissed because I was royally lied to with false advertising. She gets on top for CG, gets annoyed within a few seconds. She's now frustrated with me because I wasn't into it. I request more BBBJ (I want skin contact) and she starts to mumble something, but you can tell she's annoyed. Got more BBBJ, then onto another condom. We did one position on the entire time, with her making fake pleasure noises here and there when I pumped her. She occasionally checks during the session if the condom is on but placing her hand on your balls. This already tells me she is one of those anal retentive condom watchers. I finished in a few minutes since I wanted out. The only positive part was a decent massage and her positive demeanor post sex. No idea why the 180 on attitude. Did a solo dress up, and left.

This would be a first for me in getting boned not in a good way. I don't know if there was a miscommunication or it's intentional on their part to mislead guys into going. I am thinking it's the latter. Going to this 2nd or 3rd tier agency would be my first and last time here. If they are willing to do this to me now, I expect them to continue with this bullshit later. I'm doing this review and post for future reference so someone esle can find info when they do a search. I now know why I stick with M. Consistent service and there was very high chance the session will be good. After going to this session, I'm grateful I got access to M and don't have to book these places when the mood arises. I was pretty close into calling out the booker, but the damage was done and I doubt they give a shit.

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/nancynurumassage/[/URL]

Pictures are her but photoshopped as usual. Probably 30s, smaller sized B tits. Teeth could use work. Has heavy smoker's breath during the session.[/QUOTE]When you're Lewis & Clarking K puss, for every Nina the Sex Hyena and Juicy Jenny there will be at least five no no Nancy's. Live & learn my dude. Thanks for the warning.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4517949]Not recommended.

I decided to try something different for a change. Big mistake and a regret. I never used this agency before, so decided to take a chance. No reviews on the girl, and only a few posts on the other board regarding this agency itself. No specifics on this girl. I went in only because I was told by the booker that BBFS was available and it was also posted on the girl's profile. I soon later found out it was a lie. The time before the session started to make this visit a bad sign. I didn't confirm early enough and ended up having to book later. Now in hindsight, I don't see why someone would go to this agency. Possibly because they can't get in with better ones and better with something than nothing. The location is in Ktown so traffic can be a ***** to get there. On the plus side, the girl was on time and I didn't have to wait. Upon opening up, I didn't quite like her looks. I give her a 6 with the makeup. When we got to the bedroom, payment had to be given right away. This is usually a bad sign, but I can see why they are doing it because I am new to them. Paid and she left the room. When business was done, I undressed. I told her I showered already, but she insisted on taking another one. (We will come back to this later). In the bathroom, she caresses you before the shower and in said shower, she just cleans the important bits but nothing fun or erotic in there. She was nice enough to dry me off.

For the main portion, she does a nuru massage which didn't get me turned on. She has oil by the bed and bathes herself with it, along with some dripped on you. The actual nuru part was decent with some fake moans. Expect her to rub her tits, then run her tongue along your backside with some very light rim. Though her menu says rimming, it's more like a light lick twice. Rimming should be an attack on your asshole or something along those lines. On the flip, she puts more oil on your front, rubs her front on you then moves onto a minor HJ + BBBJ combo. Her BBBJ was too aggressive and felt more painful than pleasure. Not to mention, it was rather short. Maybe 1 minute max to get you hard. Now, the shitty part. She puts on a condom and I'm here thinking the fuck? Both the website and the booker confirmed BBFS before the session and this was the only reason I booked this girl. I wanted P2 P and even that had to be covered. Ha, what a joke. Now I'm pissed because I was royally lied to with false advertising. She gets on top for CG, gets annoyed within a few seconds. She's now frustrated with me because I wasn't into it. I request more BBBJ (I want skin contact) and she starts to mumble something, but you can tell she's annoyed. Got more BBBJ, then onto another condom. We did one position on the entire time, with her making fake pleasure noises here and there when I pumped her. She occasionally checks during the session if the condom is on but placing her hand on your balls. This already tells me she is one of those anal retentive condom watchers. I finished in a few minutes since I wanted out. The only positive part was a decent massage and her positive demeanor post sex. No idea why the 180 on attitude. Did a solo dress up, and left.

This would be a first for me in getting boned not in a good way. I don't know if there was a miscommunication or it's intentional on their part to mislead guys into going. I am thinking it's the latter. Going to this 2nd or 3rd tier agency would be my first and last time here. If they are willing to do this to me now, I expect them to continue with this bullshit later. I'm doing this review and post for future reference so someone esle can find info when they do a search. I now know why I stick with M. Consistent service and there was very high chance the session will be good. After going to this session, I'm grateful I got access to M and don't have to book these places when the mood arises. I was pretty close into calling out the booker, but the damage was done and I doubt they give a shit.

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/nancynurumassage/[/URL]

Pictures are her but photoshopped as usual. Probably 30s, smaller sized B tits. Teeth could use work. Has heavy smoker's breath during the session.[/QUOTE]I'm surprised that you did not get bb from her. She is very easy one.

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/katie-escort-los-angeles-424251[/URL]

She is about 5'5" - 5'6" so she taller than your typical petite / short K-Girl.

She has natural breasts about a "C" cup. I would say she is cute to average looking. She has " wider" hips but not much ass. Somebody compared Katie to a taller Cona, I think Cona is better looking with nicer tits and ass.

Katie provides good service and really tries to please you. It was go time from the minute I walked in the door. Dfk at the door and grabbing my goods. DFK, ass grabbing and dry humping to get things started. The usual list of activities BBBJ, daty, 69, BBFS in several positions. She doesn't seem to enjoy fiv. She is either a good actress or really enjoys the action. It ended with a quick exit shower and a kiss good bye.

She tried very hard to get a second pop out if me but those days are in my past. I left with weak legs. She doesn't speak much English and was saying things in Korean, I speak zero Korean. She might of been saying I am a great lover or an ugly idiot. LOL.

I will probably try Niki next unless Cona makes a return very soon.

[QUOTE=KimchiPowerJP;4518030]I'm surprised that you did not get bb from her. She is very easy one.[/QUOTE]Yeah, no clue why I got denied. Immediately stuck on a condom. Either way, I'm unhappy. Just got unlucky. Maybe there was something she didn't like.

Finally decided to try Ruby based on others' reviews of her and she did not disappoint.

Her body is insane. She has an amazing ass, great breasts, and is very passionate. Great preview BBBJ in shower and even better when we got on the bed. She gives one of the best BBBJ's I've had. She takes her time, lots of eye contact, gives attention to the boys, and gives some good DT. But you can't forget her ass. It's so good when she does doggy and RCG. No BBFS, but she was cool with MSOG. Def recommend.

Well that sucked. Been to her stable before but not with the girls they have right now, I saw Niki a few months back with January and she was a damn good fuck, really Young, tight fit body with a nice ass, she's gone to sk months ago. So I know that they've had hidden gems before, just got to be lucky. I won't count them out solely on this experience.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4517949]Not recommended.

I decided to try something different for a change. Big mistake and a regret. I never used this agency before, so decided to take a chance. No reviews on the girl, and only a few posts on the other board regarding this agency itself. No specifics on this girl. I went in only because I was told by the booker that BBFS was available and it was also posted on the girl's profile. I soon later found out it was a lie. The time before the session started to make this visit a bad sign. I didn't confirm early enough and ended up having to book later. Now in hindsight, I don't see why someone would go to this agency. Possibly because they can't get in with better ones and better with something than nothing. The location is in Ktown so traffic can be a ***** to get there. On the plus side, the girl was on time and I didn't have to wait. Upon opening up, I didn't quite like her looks. I give her a 6 with the makeup. When we got to the bedroom, payment had to be given right away. This is usually a bad sign, but I can see why they are doing it because I am new to them. Paid and she left the room. When business was done, I undressed. I told her I showered already, but she insisted on taking another one. (We will come back to this later). In the bathroom, she caresses you before the shower and in said shower, she just cleans the important bits but nothing fun or erotic in there. She was nice enough to dry me off.

For the main portion, she does a nuru massage which didn't get me turned on. She has oil by the bed and bathes herself with it, along with some dripped on you. The actual nuru part was decent with some fake moans. Expect her to rub her tits, then run her tongue along your backside with some very light rim. Though her menu says rimming, it's more like a light lick twice. Rimming should be an attack on your asshole or something along those lines. On the flip, she puts more oil on your front, rubs her front on you then moves onto a minor HJ + BBBJ combo. Her BBBJ was too aggressive and felt more painful than pleasure. Not to mention, it was rather short. Maybe 1 minute max to get you hard. Now, the shitty part. She puts on a condom and I'm here thinking the fuck? Both the website and the booker confirmed BBFS before the session and this was the only reason I booked this girl. I wanted P2 P and even that had to be covered. Ha, what a joke. Now I'm pissed because I was royally lied to with false advertising. She gets on top for CG, gets annoyed within a few seconds. She's now frustrated with me because I wasn't into it. I request more BBBJ (I want skin contact) and she starts to mumble something, but you can tell she's annoyed. Got more BBBJ, then onto another condom. We did one position on the entire time, with her making fake pleasure noises here and there when I pumped her. She occasionally checks during the session if the condom is on but placing her hand on your balls. This already tells me she is one of those anal retentive condom watchers. I finished in a few minutes since I wanted out. The only positive part was a decent massage and her positive demeanor post sex. No idea why the 180 on attitude. Did a solo dress up, and left.

This would be a first for me in getting boned not in a good way. I don't know if there was a miscommunication or it's intentional on their part to mislead guys into going. I am thinking it's the latter. Going to this 2nd or 3rd tier agency would be my first and last time here. If they are willing to do this to me now, I expect them to continue with this bullshit later. I'm doing this review and post for future reference so someone esle can find info when they do a search. I now know why I stick with M. Consistent service and there was very high chance the session will be good. After going to this session, I'm grateful I got access to M and don't have to book these places when the mood arises. I was pretty close into calling out the booker, but the damage was done and I doubt they give a shit.

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/nancynurumassage/[/URL]

Pictures are her but photoshopped as usual. Probably 30s, smaller sized B tits. Teeth could use work. Has heavy smoker's breath during the session.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4517949]Not recommended.

I decided to try something different for a change. Big mistake and a regret. I never used this agency before, so decided to take a chance. No reviews on the girl, and only a few posts on the other board regarding this agency itself. No specifics on this girl. I went in only because I was told by the booker that BBFS was available and it was also posted on the girl's profile. I soon later found out it was a lie. The time before the session started to make this visit a bad sign. I didn't confirm early enough and ended up having to book later. Now in hindsight, I don't see why someone would go to this agency. Possibly because they can't get in with better ones and better with something than nothing. The location is in Ktown so traffic can be a ***** to get there. On the plus side, the girl was on time and I didn't have to wait. Upon opening up, I didn't quite like her looks. I give her a 6 with the makeup. When we got to the bedroom, payment had to be given right away. This is usually a bad sign, but I can see why they are doing it because I am new to them. Paid and she left the room. When business was done, I undressed. I told her I showered already, but she insisted on taking another one. (We will come back to this later). In the bathroom, she caresses you before the shower and in said shower, she just cleans the important bits but nothing fun or erotic in there. She was nice enough to dry me off.

For the main portion, she does a nuru massage which didn't get me turned on. She has oil by the bed and bathes herself with it, along with some dripped on you. The actual nuru part was decent with some fake moans. Expect her to rub her tits, then run her tongue along your backside with some very light rim. Though her menu says rimming, it's more like a light lick twice. Rimming should be an attack on your asshole or something along those lines. On the flip, she puts more oil on your front, rubs her front on you then moves onto a minor HJ + BBBJ combo. Her BBBJ was too aggressive and felt more painful than pleasure. Not to mention, it was rather short. Maybe 1 minute max to get you hard. Now, the shitty part. She puts on a condom and I'm here thinking the fuck? Both the website and the booker confirmed BBFS before the session and this was the only reason I booked this girl. I wanted P2 P and even that had to be covered. Ha, what a joke. Now I'm pissed because I was royally lied to with false advertising. She gets on top for CG, gets annoyed within a few seconds. She's now frustrated with me because I wasn't into it. I request more BBBJ (I want skin contact) and she starts to mumble something, but you can tell she's annoyed. Got more BBBJ, then onto another condom. We did one position on the entire time, with her making fake pleasure noises here and there when I pumped her. She occasionally checks during the session if the condom is on but placing her hand on your balls. This already tells me she is one of those anal retentive condom watchers. I finished in a few minutes since I wanted out. The only positive part was a decent massage and her positive demeanor post sex. No idea why the 180 on attitude. Did a solo dress up, and left.

This would be a first for me in getting boned not in a good way. I don't know if there was a miscommunication or it's intentional on their part to mislead guys into going. I am thinking it's the latter. Going to this 2nd or 3rd tier agency would be my first and last time here. If they are willing to do this to me now, I expect them to continue with this bullshit later. I'm doing this review and post for future reference so someone esle can find info when they do a search. I now know why I stick with M. Consistent service and there was very high chance the session will be good. After going to this session, I'm grateful I got access to M and don't have to book these places when the mood arises. I was pretty close into calling out the booker, but the damage was done and I doubt they give a shit.

[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/nancynurumassage/[/URL]

Pictures are her but photoshopped as usual. Probably 30s, smaller sized B tits. Teeth could use work. Has heavy smoker's breath during the session.[/QUOTE]Thanks for toftt and the warning!

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4518262]Well that sucked. Been to her stable before but not with the girls they have right now, I saw Niki a few months back with January and she was a damn good fuck, really Young, tight fit body with a nice ass, she's gone to sk months ago. So I know that they've had hidden gems before, just got to be lucky. I won't count them out solely on this experience.[/QUOTE]I don't see why I should not count them out. It's one thing to be entitled or expect BB when it's not posted then *****. That's wrong. But it was publicly posted and confirmed by the booker and I didn't get it. That's a disrespect and shows they don't care about the customer. This is on them and I choose to not patronize their business and write this review. I deleted their number and moved on. First time was a miss and I was testing the waters. I just wanted to get this off my chest. Been in the business for awhile so this is nothing new. Alot of bad agencies around.

M.
Chanel....................... PV.
Lucia, Katie........................... WLA.

Saw Siu from jennyinktown agency. Advertised BBFS. $$$ donation. Short with nice c cup tits (enhanced I think). Nice body and cute face. Greeted with no hug or kiss. Got to bedroom and still cold and business like. No preview in shower. Back in bedroom had me lay back. She lubed me up and did light rimming. She did prostate massage using little vibrator. Felt nice while she did cock stroking, BBBJ / bls. We did 69 which was nice. Had her lay back for DATY. She O'd several times. She was super sensitive after cumming so much. Had to wait a minute before entering her bb mish. After I did, she enjoyed slow, deep penetration. Told me not to cum inside. Laid back and she did BBBJ until I blew CIM. Straight to shower. Dressed and finally a kiss on lips at door 50 minutes after session started. Rushed, no DFK, no GFE, no return.

We shouldn't need luck if more guys write legit reviews. Got to say with Nina / Haven and the new agency, I am surprised you would want to try another agency first.

Many agencies and girls don't really care about the customers these days. The only effect of FOSTA is way more liars appear and the customers are more easily screwed and not in a good way LOL. Anyway, I also thought Nancy / Vixen or whatever names she used when she was with the Palace, Eukgirls, SAG, etc should be easy BB. In that sense, booker wasn't lying but I guess it would still be YMMV unless booker quoted extra for it.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4518749]I don't see why I should not count them out. It's one thing to be entitled or expect BB when it's not posted then *****. That's wrong. But it was publicly posted and confirmed by the booker and I didn't get it. That's a disrespect and shows they don't care about the customer. This is on them and I choose to not patronize their business and write this review. I deleted their number and moved on. First time was a miss and I was testing the waters. I just wanted to get this off my chest. Been in the business for awhile so this is nothing new. Alot of bad agencies around.[/QUOTE]

I also saw Haven when she was flat chest with darker skin tone. I remember her face very well. I said she was cute and also recommended her way back when. She has always been great. Her enhancements are so well done now some may think it's natural.

I think this pic is when she was still 20 something: [URL=https://s1.eroticmonkey.ch/uploads/escorts/419490/main_5b689bfc393d4.jpg]Old pic[/URL].

Most recent accurate pic: [URL=https://s3.eroticmonkey.ch/uploads/escorts/419490/main_5bae7c8ce7a34.jpg]New pic[/URL].

[QUOTE=KeneBahl;4514541]I could be wrong but.

From what I recall, I never really thought Haven looked like her pics. Or at least not the ones that M had posted.

I DO agree that Nina looks like the pics listed in the EMonkey review.

Nina is NOT Sasha. Sasha has a pretty defining tat across her lower belly.

I personally do not think that Haven is Nina but like I said, I could be wrong.

I saw Haven both before and after her bolt ons. She was a tiny spinner thing and was if I recall correctly, maybe even a hair under 5 feet tall. I felt Nina was a bit taller and maybe a bit heavier than what Haven was the last time I saw her. I also kinda have this impression of Haven's skin tone being a tad darker than what I recall Nina to be.

Again, in this world of plastic surgery and Korean cosmetic voodoo, who knows what might have happened in the interim?

-K.[/QUOTE]

I usually recognize the BB girls from pics but just want to try girls I don't recognize first. The BB girls will still BB and earn more money from upsell or more customers. They also change name or pics and switch bookers or book by multiple bookers. It only seems more prevalent because of the lack of accurate intel since FOSTA.

The other girls will still be YMMV. I have known girls who don't even want to be busy and they are always young and more attractive than average to me. Less girls are coming than before FOSTA but it can get better if more legit guys share. I am more surprised by the lack of reviews or why not even more BB girls come to SoCal.

[QUOTE=DanJanson;4509710]Is it because these kgirl doors are closed now (to general public) and so the girls are less careful because most customers are familiar faces now?

Or is it because there are less customers and they have to attract more business. That would be overall worse for the industry as less girls will be coming to the states.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4518935]We shouldn't need luck if more guys write legit reviews. Got to say with Nina / Haven and the new agency, I am surprised you would want to try another agency first.

Many agencies and girls don't really care about the customers these days. The only effect of FOSTA is way more liars appear and the customers are more easily screwed and not in a good way LOL. Anyway, I also thought Nancy / Vixen or whatever names she used when she was with the Palace, Eukgirls, SAG, etc should be easy BB. In that sense, booker wasn't lying but I guess it would still be YMMV unless booker quoted extra for it.[/QUOTE]The way it worked was that it was pretty much 100%, that is the intention that I got. No YMMV or cannot say or something ambiguous. It was offered and the normal price. It was pretty clear on what they were doing. I'm probably the minority that posts on here and went here. Who knows how many other guys got screwed that don't post. The only reason I tried another one was again, the certainty as well as I wanted something new. If M had weekly new girls, I'd probably would stay with her and never gamble. I don't see too many new reviews of people attempting new places or girls as much. It seems only after someone credible posts a solid choice, then everyone flocks to that girl.

I now know why business is so good in san jose.

They have over 3:1 ratio of men to women, so it's super hard to find a girl to fuck, and kgirls fill that need.