Truthful reviews & unbiased rating
I knew you saw Nali and Yuffie was your ATF based on your posts, so I wanted to see if you think I am being fair. I think you are fair based on your POV. It seems we also agreed on Yuffie's looks. I thought I might be horny and her juicy ass and tits in the pics might have nudged a 5 to a 6.
Like you, I tend to grade or rank based on comparison of ALL girls I saw. If I care about service, I would never rate an HYA higher than an MILF if her service is not actually equivalent. Since I only care about the happiness meter, Nali's performance score ended up being high, and an MILF performance score might end up very low, like a 3 or a 2.
My big issue is the clear biases and exaggeration BB MILFs had, false intel, and lack of intel for any girl besides BB MILFs. So I joined this forum and tried to be nice and focused on only reviewing and answering questions. Yet people accused me of overrating girls on looks, or criticized their service not as good as MILF. From my POV, nobody complained about BB MILFs for their looks and age. Some people also exaggerated the service of MILFs.
That caused me to go full Boner and started the HYA movement. I completely agree that we should have truthful reviews to help everyone make better decisions. I bolded the text I complete agreed. Main problem to me is still that HYAs don't get reviewed much and MILFs have the most exaggerated reviews.
I am surprised you saw people saying "to keep hot girls we must write reviews that give them good service grades". I thought everyone was gatekeeping hot girls LOL.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;7119085]...
[b]My point was that if the focus on keeping and bringing more hyas here, inevitably and irrevocably mongers will care about keeping the girls happy by any means.[/b] Which, as noble and chivalrous it may appear, [b]will misrepresent and mislead mongers.[/b] And that's against my religion. [b]Being truthful and straightforward is way more important[/b] than pussy supply of hyas / milfs / whatever your preference is...
Hence my position is quite simple. [b]Write the truth and don't have any ulterior motives for reviews. The only motive should be next brother here getting truthful information of what to be expected.[/b] It shouldn't be buttering up the hya supply in Korea.
It doesn't matter what the assumption is, if I give a looker a 9 in service it means she's on the level of a 9 service queen. And it's not like looks where it's subjective. A lot of service is very skill dependent...
I do agree with Boner that it goes both ways. Service milfs shouldn't get passes in their looks either. But hot young girls shouldn't be given great service grades simply because you don't care about service much and want to keep them around.
And BTW I never said that this was about Boner. I've heard it on forums, like ter forums, someone literally said to keep hot girls we must write reviews that give them good service grades even if it wasn't good service. Especially in comparison.
Boner, as far as Yuffie and Nali / Joah not sure why you brought those specific girls up.
I've seen both in the bay area. I gave Joah 5 for her service and I gave Yuffie 6 for looks which was probably a bit generous in 2020.
The problem arises when you want to compare services and if you look at my reviews for example it's easy to see who I think are top service girls. And who I think are lookers. The Vienn diagram for this is pretty much two circles with no union. With few exceptions here and there.
The problem here is that neither of my review would be considered purely "positive" or would contribute to girls staying or going. And yet both of those reviews kinda are! One of them is an atf and another one of the best looking kgirls I've seen.[/QUOTE]