BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b][blue]This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a [u]Sexually Transmitted Disease[/u], this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.

STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.

Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

[QUOTE=LBrad52;3449262]3rd floor over a bar?[/QUOTE]The apartment is not above a bar.

[QUOTE=Ruiner21;3449559]Let us know how it goes.[/QUOTE]I have not seen her, but if she's the woman in Cranston I believe she has been reviewed in the past. Her number used to lead right to her Facebook page. Reviews were generally positive as I recall, particularly about her chest.

[QUOTE=Banjomania;3451401]I have not seen her, but if she's the woman in Cranston I believe she has been reviewed in the past. Her number used to lead right to her Facebook page. Reviews were generally positive as I recall, particularly about her chest.[/QUOTE]Thank you very much for the feedback. Very much appreciated! I'll set something up this week and post the details.

Just to clarify here (because I've already gotten PMs about it), I was merely quoting the post where Andrew70 made an allegation. I was NOT making any allegation myself (quite the opposite, the allegation made is completely unfounded). Unfortunately the way this was deleted makes it look like I may have been saying something that I didn't say.

[QUOTE=SteveInRI;3449041]Thinking of taking the plunge with this MILF tomorrow. Can't find any reviews or other info out there. Thanks!

[URL]http://providence.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/are-you-ready-for-the-best/6748578[/URL][/QUOTE]The picture in that ad looks VERY much like a lady in East Greenwich that used CE, whose real initials are CT. If that is who it is, she's been discussed on USASG before, and she's a passionate GFE and absolutely slam dunk CIP. I and many others inseminated CT easily about a year ago.

But I can't be sure that is her! I saved the images in that ad, though, and I have my own pics of CT, as well as facebook pics of her that I can send to those who are curious, assuming that you have a significant board presence on here--I will NEVER send her pics to non-contributers or sporaradic contributers--so if you can't establish credibiity, PLEASE don't clog my inbox! But those that have previously seen CT and know who I'm talking about, may wish to contact me by PM or email, so that we can try to determine whether this ad is really by CT.

It looks like she has a birthmark on the small of her lower back that should make her easily identifiable if you have any other reference photos.

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;3451793]The picture in that ad looks VERY much like a lady in East Greenwich that used CE, whose real initials are CT. If that is who it is, she's been discussed on USASG before, and she's a passionate GFE and absolutely slam dunk CIP. I and many others inseminated CT easily about a year ago.

But I can't be sure that is her! I saved the images in that ad, though, and I have my own pics of CT, as well as facebook pics of her that I can send to those who are curious, assuming that you have a significant board presence on here--I will NEVER send her pics to non-contributers or sporaradic contributers--so if you can't establish credibiity, PLEASE don't clog my inbox! But those that have previously seen CT and know who I'm talking about, may wish to contact me by PM or email, so that we can try to determine whether this ad is really by CT.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DoctorNikon;3451808]It looks like she has a birthmark on the small of her lower back that should make her easily identifiable if you have any other reference photos.[/QUOTE]I am new to the board and definitely am curious / interested in CT, CE, or whoever she is, but I don't want to clog up anyone's inbox so I hope someone is able to confirm or clarify. Thanks.

[QUOTE=JWilson317BP;3452234]I am new to the board and definitely am curious / interested in CT, CE, or whoever she is, but I don't want to clog up anyone's inbox so I hope someone is able to confirm or clarify. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Tool that ride to visit the MILF to see what's it all about, Cranston location nice area up to a big house / apartment. Call to let her know I was there and proceeded to her door and let me in, a little messy lookin but not bad. Well she is in Old Lookin sweats and tee and was suppose to be ready in a dress and heels, Not even close I asked what happen to her look that said she would be in and she mention in Laundry. Her hair in unmanageable style and from what I could make out body was of a thick being in butt. Anyway I said sorry and not what you said you would be in etc etc. No time for drama and games, I left and said have a good day. Curious to see if anyone else acn follow up.

[QUOTE=DoctorNikon;3451808]It looks like she has a birthmark on the small of her lower back that should make her easily identifiable if you have any other reference photos.[/QUOTE]I checked privately with some guys who saw CT more recently, and received two reports that the girl in the ad in question is NOT CT. Those that have seen CT very recently, and who have seen both sets of pics have confirmed this. I thought initially that there was a strong resemblance, but those that have been with her more often than I and more recently than I, say that it is NOT CT. So I therefore know nothing about the girl in that ad.

As for those who expressed interest in seeing my own pics of the real CT and getting her contact info: As I said, that info will be provided ONLY to those who have already convinced me that they are safe to share that kind of info with. CT was TOTALLY UTR (And still is, now that I know that the girl in that ad is NOT CT!) And CT is a straight-up, no-negotiations needed, bareback CIP girl. Just an ordinary, normal, and attractive and horny MILF soccer mom trying to make a bit of extra cash-- she's NOT a professional wh0 re nor a druggie! In other words, I'll provide pics and contact info for her ONLY to those with both a substantial track record on a major public board like this one, PLUS a need to know. If you do not understand the reasons for this at this point, then you CLEARLY do NOT have a need to know!

[QUOTE=KingOfFours;3452591]I checked privately with some guys who saw CT more recently, and received two reports that the girl in the ad in question is NOT CT. Those that have seen CT very recently, and who have seen both sets of pics have confirmed this. I thought initially that there was a strong resemblance, but those that have been with her more often than I and more recently than I, say that it is NOT CT. So I therefore know nothing about the girl in that ad.

As for those who expressed interest in seeing my own pics of the real CT and getting her contact info: As I said, that info will be provided ONLY to those who have already convinced me that they are safe to share that kind of info with. CT was TOTALLY UTR (And still is, now that I know that the girl in that ad is NOT CT!) And CT is a straight-up, no-negotiations needed, bareback CIP girl. Just an ordinary, normal, and attractive and horny MILF soccer mom trying to make a bit of extra cash-- she's NOT a professional wh0 re nor a druggie! In other words, I'll provide pics and contact info for her ONLY to those with both a substantial track record on a major public board like this one, PLUS a need to know. If you do not understand the reasons for this at this point, then you CLEARLY do NOT have a need to know![/QUOTE]I saw her 2 or 3 times a couple of years ago, and that's just how she looked then. Real nice titties, but didn't show much energy at all in her BBBJ. She went by Lisa. Question to guys who have seen her lately- -is her face pic accurate?" I don't seem to remember her face too well. I do remember her tits though, one with a tat (someone's name?) .

[QUOTE=Lumbarman;3452427]Tool that ride to visit the MILF to see what's it all about, Cranston location nice area up to a big house / apartment. Call to let her know I was there and proceeded to her door and let me in, a little messy lookin but not bad. Well she is in Old Lookin sweats and tee and was suppose to be ready in a dress and heels, Not even close I asked what happen to her look that said she would be in and she mention in Laundry. Her hair in unmanageable style and from what I could make out body was of a thick being in butt. Anyway I said sorry and not what you said you would be in etc etc. No time for drama and games, I left and said have a good day. Curious to see if anyone else acn follow up.[/QUOTE]Thanks Lumbarman.

[QUOTE=Lumbarman;3452427]Tool that ride to visit the MILF to see what's it all about, Cranston location nice area up to a big house / apartment. Call to let her know I was there and proceeded to her door and let me in, a little messy lookin but not bad. Well she is in Old Lookin sweats and tee and was suppose to be ready in a dress and heels, Not even close I asked what happen to her look that said she would be in and she mention in Laundry. Her hair in unmanageable style and from what I could make out body was of a thick being in butt. Anyway I said sorry and not what you said you would be in etc etc. No time for drama and games, I left and said have a good day. Curious to see if anyone else acn follow up.[/QUOTE]I decided to take the plunge as well. Showed up and she was wearing nothing but a bath robe. I can confirm as GrafDog1 stated that the name Jonathan is tattooed over her left breast. She seems much heavier now than her photos used on BP. That's about all I can confirm. The overwhelming stench of her body odor literally gagged me. It was just too much to handle. I just threw a couple of 20's down, apologized and left. The smell was so bad that it literally made my eyes water.

Gents, thanks for all the correspondance! But my inbox filled up and I missed some of them! I just cleaned my inbox out so please resend! Thanks!

Anyone seen her?

Texts quick and the pix she sends look good, not sure though.

Address she sent looks shady.

[URL]http://providence.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/juciy-chocolate/7513523[/URL]