[BLUE]I have a lot of respect for these guys I honestly do, I just disagree with how they think our least favorite uncle works.
New MP opens, they suspect, they watch MP, if nothing but guys go in, they send an undercover. If the chick gives them a handie then it's busted.
NOTHING anybody ever writes here will contribute to that. The reason? Because it's uncorroborated hearsay. Yes, I know the argument. Cops read this and then they go there based on this intel. It sounds good on paper, the only problem is it's not true. We have a couple retired cops that live down here and are mongers and without exception they say the same thing. No, they don't use the internet because there's too much bullshit.
Pilot and Jim, by continuing to push and explain over and over why you are doing what you are doing you are effectively discouraging members from what they otherwise might post. Post what you wish, but the convo about this is over. If it continues then I have to put you guys on moderation.
At the end of the day how do I know I'm right? 16 years and still nothing that has ever been written here has ever been used in court. Not one single time.
A2
By the way, I killed Jimmy Hoffa.
And I shot Kennedy, Oswald was my patsy
Plus I got a blowjob from a hooker at FF in Chantilly during a layover at Dullas. I gave her 50 bucks.
See what I mean?
Yeah and that hooker named Candy at FF, she gave me a body cavity search. It was great.[/BLUE]
[QUOTE=PilotAviator;2519642]Useless. Hmmmmm. I disagree.
Yes, Krakatoa missed the clue.
Many of us do not explicitly identify locations or providers. Why? -- out of respect for those places / ladies that don't want the direct exposure of this forum (such as my ATF location and provider -- but MMS and Provider frequently remind the customers "no internet" -- and to maintain some discretion from Uncles (who admittedly know all. See all) and monger-trolls who manifest abusive demeanor in writing or in their lack of manners.
I've been to the location reviewed -- I agree with the reviewer -- a nice place, but better massage available nearby (in fact, several locations within the same half-mile.).
Always be nice to the ladies.
PA.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2522758]When it comes to posting reports in the forum, there's only so much a hobbyist can do to protect the AMP or indie provider, the rest is up to them. FWIW, I operate under the assumption that Uncle LEO pretty much knows which MPs are legit and which provide extras. And, if a new place opens up, I'm guessing they believe the worst about it until proven otherwise.
So when it comes to giving the name of a place, I personally don't feel any need to talk in riddles or cryptic clues. Besides, a LEO who works the AMP beat can probably decipher any code better than most mongers. My preference is to discuss service levels and prices (std NOVA, NOVA+, or other) and my general level of satisfaction, but to only discuss specifics of the masseuse via PM with trusted members.
IMHO, it's the nature of the biz that all AMPs will attract unwanted LEO attention at some point. It's the responsibility of the AMP itself, and the individual girls, to be cautious about stings and there's only so much a hobbyist can do. By keeping some specifics on the down-low, Uncle will still have to do their own homework and figure things out on their own.
BTW, whenever I encounter an AMP girl who doesn't do enough to make sure I'm not Uncle LEO, I make sure to have a talk with her (after the end of the session, of course) and I try to give her with a few tips so she can hopefully avoid problems.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RoaminRoman;2526996]By not providing levels of detail akin to a body orifice search, the Pilot, JmSuttr, and I are basically employing a level of circumspection but also encouraging others (whose interest might be piqued by our reports) to follow up with PMs [U]that enquire with [b]meaningful[/b] questions[/U]. I emphasize this because it's unlikely that any of us have the luxury of answering a lot of trivial questions or providing information that other can find or determine on their own. In this way, the intent of the forum doesn't suffer, but certain information remains more discrete. As JmSuttr says, "[I]There's only so much a monger can do[/I]. " However, if any given monger (such as yourself, I'd say) has built up sufficient "board cred," then there's probably little reason to fret about sending a back-channel message.
Roman.[/QUOTE]
