Massage Parlor Reports

Well, I ended up going here today. I won't bury the lead. You start the massage face up and covered with a towel. The only part of you that is uncovered is the part that is being massaged. She absolutely didn't get close to the boys at all. Very professional and good massage if that's what you want. I was truly looking for just a massage as my neck and back have been hurting me lately. Everything looks brand new and nice. Every room seems to have a shower. Asian lady took me money at the desk. Open lobby, windows are open to the outside.

The thing I thought was interesting is that there is kind of a curve in the hallway and as I followed the mammasan to the room, she hollered for Jess. That seemed to be an atypical Asian name but whatever. I come around the corner and there was a young black lady who turned out to be my masseuse.

Jess was a fairly new massage school graduate but she said that she has been learning from the owner who has been a masseuse for 10 years but now wants to just manage her own business. She stated that they have three therapist so far and it seems like they are looking for some more.

Fifth massage is 1/2 price, 10th is free with the punch card that they give you.

Bottom line though, no extras but you will get a good if not great massage.

When I left, two Asian ladies said goodbye and smiled and waved. One was the same one who walked me back to the room.

Feel free to pm if you have questions.

While cruising thru the western side of town, I decided to give 899 Waycross a try. I was greeted and massaged by a thin Asian female named Lulu. She didn't talk much but she was generous with her technique especially near the sports equipment. Bat and balls! Her overall massage skills were fair; however, after the turnover she didn't think I needed a cover. The final 5 minutes of the massage was exhilarating due to her oral communication. She deserved a large gratuity and she got one. Told her I'll be back in one week. Wow!

[QUOTE=TopRooster;4563115]While cruising thru the western side of town, I decided to give 899 Waycross a try. I was greeted and massaged by a thin Asian female named Lulu. She didn't talk much but she was generous with her technique especially near the sports equipment. Bat and balls! Her overall massage skills were fair; however, after the turnover she didn't think I needed a cover. The final 5 minutes of the massage was exhilarating due to her oral communication. She deserved a large gratuity and she got one. Told her I'll be back in one week. Wow![/QUOTE]Reviews like this is what gets them shut down.

[QUOTE=TopRooster;4563115]While cruising thru the western side of town, I decided to give 899 Waycross a try. I was greeted and massaged by a thin Asian female named Lulu. She didn't talk much but she was generous with her technique especially near the sports equipment. Bat and balls! Her overall massage skills were fair; however, after the turnover she didn't think I needed a cover. The final 5 minutes of the massage was exhilarating due to her oral communication. She deserved a large gratuity and she got one. Told her I'll be back in one week. Wow![/QUOTE]Google shows 899 Waycross to be in a residential area between Northland Blvd and Winton Road. Is this not the correct place?

Does anyone have info on Wooster since they got busted. You can PM me. Thanks.

[QUOTE=TopCat440;4563340]Reviews like this is what gets them shut down.[/QUOTE]I try to be careful about the amount of detail that I post in reviews here, just in case. However, I think that LE has a pretty good idea of what goes on in the parlors. When they take action is a function of local social / political dynamics.

[QUOTE=TopCat440;4563340]Reviews like this is what gets them shut down.[/QUOTE]I think neighborhood complaints get them shut down. Cops don't give a rat's ass until they have to. Once taxpayers start griping about it, they come make a presence.

Reviews like that may increase the traffic into the place and therefore increase community awareness which may lead to a raid eventually, but law enforcement is not using this forum as a guideline for who to pinch. If they were, I can name a few places in town that they have been mysteriously allowing to stay open for years.

[QUOTE=Golden3;4563764]I try to be careful about the amount of detail that I post in reviews here, just in case. However, I think that LE has a pretty good idea of what goes on in the parlors. When they take action is a function of local social / political dynamics.[/QUOTE][BLUE]Post what you want, nothing here has ever nor will ever be used as evidence, it's hearsay. Cops get clued in when they apply for a permit, then they check them out and if hooker types work there they wait until they are told then they bust them, nothing you write will ever change that.

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=MarblesKyle;4563847]I think neighborhood complaints get them shut down. Cops don't give a rat's ass until they have to. Once taxpayers start griping about it, they come make a presence.

Reviews like that may increase the traffic into the place and therefore increase community awareness which may lead to a raid eventually, but law enforcement is not using this forum as a guideline for who to pinch. If they were, I can name a few places in town that they have been mysteriously allowing to stay open for years.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Admin2;4564044][BLUE]Post what you want, nothing here has ever nor will ever be used as evidence, it's hearsay. Cops get clued in when they apply for a permit, then they check them out and if hooker types work there they wait until they are told then they bust them, nothing you write will ever change that.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]That's absolutely correct. Nothing being written here can be or would be used to make a bust. Now it possibly might make them aware of the place but LE is pretty much alerted to all AMP's. It takes an undercover to go in, get solicited in some fashion for them to either make an arrest at that time or for PC to get an arrest warrant and or search warrant. Nothing written here in regards to what may or may not happen in an AMP could be used as PC because yes, its hearsay because it didn't come from a undercover reliable source (which wouldn't post on here) and that it all may be bullshit. I'm keenly aware of what criteria needs to be met in order to make a case against an AMP.

[QUOTE=JoeBogus;4563607]Google shows 899 Waycross to be in a residential area between Northland Blvd and Winton Road. Is this not the correct place?[/QUOTE]Nope, that's the place. Very residential.

[QUOTE=TopCat440;4563340]Reviews like this is what gets them shut down.[/QUOTE]No, reviews like that just drives business there and you can't get in anymore! Just like at Assol. There was a monger arriving there every 15 minutes. But that's okay, at least now we know.

[QUOTE=TopRooster;4563115]While cruising thru the western side of town, I decided to give 899 Waycross a try. I was greeted and massaged by a thin Asian female named Lulu. She didn't talk much but she was generous with her technique especially near the sports equipment. Bat and balls! Her overall massage skills were fair; however, after the turnover she didn't think I needed a cover. The final 5 minutes of the massage was exhilarating due to her oral communication. She deserved a large gratuity and she got one. Told her I'll be back in one week. Wow![/QUOTE]I have not been inspired to venture out since RELAX in the Kroger complex off Winton closed down. I was struck by Rooster's review of 899 though. So, I saddled up and drove nearly 40 minutes to check things out for myself. No doubt, it is a very "residential" neighborhood. If you pull into the driveway and keep going, you will see that they have a parking area behind the house. This was somewhat comforting to me since my car was not visible from Waycross.

Went in the back door. Met by a fairly attractive, slender Asian lady, fully dressed, and totally WITHOUT English Language skills. She relies on a cell phone translation app for nearly all communication. This became an issue since I was asking specifically for "Lulu" who Rooster mentioned in his review. The lady with whom I was dealing just nodded her head and repeated. "Lulu. Lulu" which I interpreted to mean SHE was Lulu.

Well I can tell you, "She was NOT Lulu!" At least she was not the Lulu that Rooster described. I suspect that this may be one of these AMPs where ALL the girls are Lulu when Lulu is the hot commodity. I will never know. Although there was a solid door leading into the massage room, it remained open during the entire massage. There were times I saw Mamasan and various others passing by the open door which was mildly disconcerting to me. Ninety percent of the massage was covered. The only time I was fully naked was on the occasion when the towel slipped off and "Lulu" was on the other side of the table. To her credit, "Lulu" did tolerate some very moderate below-the-waist and above-the- waist touching ALL on top of her clothing. Nothing even close to sensual tease with "Waylon and the boys. " It was absolutely devoid of any erotic, sensual stimulation. Another thing what was a first for me was: after the oil portion of the massage, "Lulu" cleaned off the oil with paper towels. Almost every AMP I have visited microwaves a damp towel for this. Not here. Scratchy paper towels.

The massage was just "adequate". Definitely NOT worth $60 per hour. I would pay, maybe, $35 per hour for this level of rubbing. Needless to say, the ending of my massage was anticlimactic. "Lulu" hung around in the room after the massage straightening the sheets on the massage table, arranging her oils, powder, and paper towels. Waiting for her tip I suppose. If I had had a ten dollar bill, THAT would have been my tip. Alas, all I had were twenties. So, "Lulu" got a more than generous tip for mediocre service. I gave it up but NOT graciously with my best "NO SOUP FOR YOU" look.

I congratulate Top Rooster on his good fortune. I am jealous. My experience was nowhere near what he described. It is sad to note all the AMPs going down or going straight-O-potato. Soon the only way to get a "happy ending" will be to DIY. Incidentally, not even DIY was offered at 899. What ever happened to all those compliant, Asian women? Sigh.

Proceed at you own peril. I have the score as 1 good review and 1 horrible review. Should be interesting to see if anybody else chimes in.

Be safe, my friends.

[QUOTE=Chillfip;4565848]I have not been inspired to venture out since RELAX in the Kroger complex off Winton closed down. I was struck by Rooster's review of 899 though. So, I saddled up and drove nearly 40 minutes to check things out for myself. No doubt, it is a very "residential" neighborhood. If you pull into the driveway and keep going, you will see that they have a parking area behind the house. This was somewhat comforting to me since my car was not visible from Waycross.

Went in the back door. Met by a fairly attractive, slender Asian lady, fully dressed, and totally WITHOUT English Language skills. She relies on a cell phone translation app for nearly all communication. This became an issue since I was asking specifically for "Lulu" who Rooster mentioned in his review. The lady with whom I was dealing just nodded her head and repeated. "Lulu. Lulu" which I interpreted to mean SHE was Lulu.

Well I can tell you, "She was NOT Lulu!" At least she was not the Lulu that Rooster described. I suspect that this may be one of these AMPs where ALL the girls are Lulu when Lulu is the hot commodity. I will never know. Although there was a solid door leading into the massage room, it remained open during the entire massage. There were times I saw Mamasan and various others passing by the open door which was mildly disconcerting to me. Ninety percent of the massage was covered. The only time I was fully naked was on the occasion when the towel slipped off and "Lulu" was on the other side of the table. To her credit, "Lulu" did tolerate some very moderate below-the-waist and above-the- waist touching ALL on top of her clothing. Nothing even close to sensual tease with "Waylon and the boys. " It was absolutely devoid of any erotic, sensual stimulation. Another thing what was a first for me was: after the oil portion of the massage, "Lulu" cleaned off the oil with paper towels. Almost every AMP I have visited microwaves a damp towel for this. Not here. Scratchy paper towels..[/QUOTE]You trusted a review from a guy with 1 post. I was just waiting on someone to say that they went there and got nothing. I didn't know it would happen this quickly. Also I don't see what compliance has to do with it. They are scared off due to the lared number of busts. They all know obviously when another gets busted. They realize how serious it is around here and are much less likely to do the thing that got their 'friends' busted. Again, places like that make money on the expectation of extras and you've already paid before you find out that there are none.

As an aside if you must have Asian there's FS options out there. Why spend 80 on the mere chance of an he when the full thing can be had for not much more.

[QUOTE=Chillfip;4565848]I have not been inspired to venture out since RELAX in the Kroger complex off Winton closed down. I was struck by Rooster's review of 899 though. So, I saddled up and drove nearly 40 minutes to check things out for myself. No doubt, it is a very "residential" neighborhood. If you pull into the driveway and keep going, you will see that they have a parking area behind the house. This was somewhat comforting to me since my car was not visible from Waycross.

Went in the back door. Met by a fairly attractive, slender Asian lady, fully dressed, and totally WITHOUT English Language skills. She relies on a cell phone translation app for nearly all communication. This became an issue since I was asking specifically for "Lulu" who Rooster mentioned in his review. The lady with whom I was dealing just nodded her head and repeated. "Lulu. Lulu" which I interpreted to mean SHE was Lulu.

Well I can tell you, "She was NOT Lulu!" At least she was not the Lulu that Rooster described. I suspect that this may be one of these AMPs where ALL the girls are Lulu when Lulu is the hot commodity. I will never know. Although there was a solid door leading into the massage room, it remained open during the entire massage. There were times I saw Mamasan and various others passing by the open door which was mildly disconcerting to me. Ninety percent of the massage was covered. The only time I was fully naked was on the occasion when the towel slipped off and "Lulu" was on the other side of the table. To her credit, "Lulu" did tolerate some very moderate below-the-waist and above-the- waist touching ALL on top of her clothing. Nothing even close to sensual tease with "Waylon and the boys. " It was absolutely devoid of any erotic, sensual stimulation. Another thing what was a first for me was: after the oil portion of the massage, "Lulu" cleaned off the oil with paper towels. Almost every AMP I have visited microwaves a damp towel for this. Not here. Scratchy paper towels.

The massage was just "adequate". Definitely NOT worth $60 per hour. I would pay, maybe, $35 per hour for this level of rubbing. Needless to say, the ending of my massage was anticlimactic. "Lulu" hung around in the room after the massage straightening the sheets on the massage table, arranging her oils, powder, and paper towels. Waiting for her tip I suppose. If I had had a ten dollar bill, THAT would have been my tip. Alas, all I had were twenties. So, "Lulu" got a more than generous tip for mediocre service. I gave it up but NOT graciously with my best "NO SOUP FOR YOU" look.

I congratulate Top Rooster on his good fortune. I am jealous. My experience was nowhere near what he described. It is sad to note all the AMPs going down or going straight-O-potato. Soon the only way to get a "happy ending" will be to DIY. Incidentally, not even DIY was offered at 899. What ever happened to all those compliant, Asian women? Sigh.

Proceed at you own peril. I have the score as 1 good review and 1 horrible review. Should be interesting to see if anybody else chimes in.

Be safe, my friends.[/QUOTE]I have had mixed results at this place. I've had mixed results with Lulu. She has been there for a long time and she is the manager. My best times were with new girls but the turnover is swift. I would give the place a "C" for a grade.

On my visits to Sakura, I have mostly seen Lisa but sometimes Sunny. I had heard some negative reports about Sunny, so, once when Lisa was unavailable, I was apprehensive about seeing Sunny, and I considered walking out, but I did no do so, and I was pleasantly surprised. I have been curious about seeing Sunny again, but, when I have walked into the parlor, it has usually been Lisa who has greeted me and taken me to a room. I have not wanted to interfere in workplace politics. However, today, Lisa was not there, so I saw Sunny. Here are some comparisons:

1. Lisa is short and chubby, built something like a dumpling. Sunny is taller, relatively tall for a Chinese woman. Sunny has more shapely thighs and midsection, but, overall, I think that Lisa is cuter.

2. Both give adequate massages, but I think that Lisa's massage is better. I don't care so much for Sunny's rapid, short, hand motions. However, Sunny pays more attention to pressure points.

3. Lisa is a more active flirt, but both ladies have made me very happy.