Not-so-serious K-girl Metrics
[QUOTE=CreamInside;5492729]Check out how quickly Dana amassed 41 reviews between July and now.[/QUOTE]That's really impressive. I didn't realize [B][url=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/dana-3102638948-361139]Dana[/url][/B] was that popular.
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5492870]Judging a girl's workload by number of reviews I'd a bad idea imo.
If we were assured that all reviews were honest legit reviews by different people who actually saw the girl, that's one thing. But we can never have such assurance.
On many sites there's abundance of shil reviews.[/QUOTE]I agree that the data is questionable at best, but I didn't have any other data to work with. Definitely don't take these numbers too seriously. Treat it like a thought experiment.
[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5492909]Can you do my taxes?[/QUOTE]Heh. I've got my own tax problems to solve first.
Does she offer BBFS or is she strictly CFS?
[QUOTE=Kaamper;5475420]Haven't tried her this visit. But those pics were used a few years ago by a girl named Cherry. Pretty sure [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/cherry-2134109700-340930]<this>[/URL] was her. She was fun enough.[/QUOTE]I read the TER reviews that were attached to the link provided and all the reviewers said they used a jimmy. She is listed on SA as PSE. No up-charge was listed for BB unlike some of the other ladies on the website that explicitly say it.
ButterflyLovers Org. Emma
[QUOTE=MauiDiver;5480643]Anybody start sampling the offerings at [URL]ButterflyLovers.info[/URL] ?
Two girls listed on the web site: Emma and Elisha.[/QUOTE]Decided to check this one out myself. As luck would have it Emma is a past fav of mine, with new pics (yeah, pics aren't her). She was perky and energetic. Not a huge fan of her enhanced top but the rest of the package suits me perfectly. I'll be back. With so few new girls rolling through I'm sticking with girls I know and like.