Printable View
[QUOTE=KisaHero;4046960]Got a date set with her next week. Hopefully it works out well. Asian girl I mentioned before probably can bump down to 3.[/QUOTE]You def will enjoy her!! Very nice girl in process of getting her own place too. Report back after your arrangement.
How do you guys get around the ban? Every time I try and pay for premium I get suspended. Do you guys use gift cards to pay?
[QUOTE=KisaHero;4046960]Got a date set with her next week. Hopefully it works out well. Asian girl I mentioned before probably can bump down to 3.[/QUOTE]Let us know how it goes with Froggie. I'm also trying to meet up with her.
[QUOTE=TrucksAre;4047983]How do you guys get around the ban? Every time I try and pay for premium I get suspended. Do you guys use gift cards to pay?[/QUOTE]Get yourself a Green Dot reloadable card and register it with a fake name.
[QUOTE=TrucksAre;4047983]How do you guys get around the ban? Every time I try and pay for premium I get suspended. Do you guys use gift cards to pay?[/QUOTE]I think I used a prepaid visa card the one time I signed up.
[QUOTE=KisaHero;4046242]Trying to talk to froggie, will see if we meet.
Meanwhile.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/f87503c4-9073-a5d9-cf81-533d60fda57c[/URL]
Asian cutie, looks nice but looking for $600 BBFS can't host no cip.[/QUOTE]She used to be a student just outside Cincinnati. She claimed I was her first. Beautiful girl who had lost a lot of weight so thrilled on the attention but jumped her rate quickly after the first time not asking and accepting my gift. We had a misunderstanding between what I thought was a monthly offer and she thought was per meet. We remained friends and she did try to meet up with me later at my gift. But those were just passing through town and horny moments. She's super smart and a lot of fun. Highly recommend if you can get her to compromise.
She stopped responded after a certain time, we had a disagreement on when to meet. Called me up last minute but I couldn't oblige. Afterwards radio silent. Shame, I was really looking forward to meeting her too.
[QUOTE=TrucksAre;4047983]How do you guys get around the ban? Every time I try and pay for premium I get suspended. Do you guys use gift cards to pay?[/QUOTE]I got banned for talking too much pay per meet in the chat section. I assume there is an algorithm designed to screen for that. I created a new profile with a completely separate email service and had no problems. I even used the same card to pay for premium.
Has anyone seen her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1c56b72b-76da-4d93-b9bc-8dccee3b98fd[/URL]
Any intel would be highly appreciated.
[QUOTE=Lbjitbpitw23;4050573]Has anyone seen her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1c56b72b-76da-4d93-b9bc-8dccee3b98fd[/URL]
Any intel would be highly appreciated.[/QUOTE]She's bigger than her pictures portray. Did BBBJCIM for 100 but I think I way overpaid. Didn't try for BBFS, too big.
[QUOTE=Lbjitbpitw23;4050573]Has anyone seen her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1c56b72b-76da-4d93-b9bc-8dccee3b98fd[/URL]
Any intel would be highly appreciated.[/QUOTE]Checked her out earlier in the year when she had another SA I'd. Not curvy but overweight, smoker, go to her room in basement of the house. Not a pleasant experience with her at all, YMMV just saying.
[QUOTE=Tony681;4050598]She's bigger than her pictures portray. Did BBBJCIM for 100 but I think I way overpaid. Didn't try for BBFS, too big.[/QUOTE]Thank you Tony!
I'll definitely avoid this one. Again thanks for the Intel.
Be safe.
[QUOTE=Dish1;4050675]Checked her out earlier in the year when she had another SA I'd. Not curvy but overweight, smoker, go to her room in basement of the house. Not a pleasant experience with her at all, YMMV just saying.[/QUOTE]I'm glad I avoided this one! You guys are the real heroes! And to think she wanted $$$ for a session.
Thanks homie!
Be safe.
Long shot for sure but has anybody ever run into a masseuse or something similar? Would love to find a decent massage that ends w / some head. The AMPs in Chicago are not great for BBBJs in my experience. Any info posted or dm'd would be awesome and welcome. Thanks!
Hi guys,
Has anyone met this Latina? Any info would be appreciated. I think her name is Jasmine.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e5f656fe-584e-4596-ae84-ccd43a099eef[/URL]
Anyone have any details?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/56d2d3fd-d707-4bd1-8eca-626ffdeaa54a[/URL]
Interesting SB sub-reddit.
[URL]https://bit.ly/2EeBZBN[/URL]
[QUOTE=GWheaton;4051263]Hi guys,
Has anyone met this Latina? Any info would be appreciated. I think her name is Jasmine.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e5f656fe-584e-4596-ae84-ccd43a099eef[/URL][/QUOTE]Nothing came of it.
[QUOTE=Roctiggers;4029690]Any info on her. She is ready to meet tomorrow. I will appreciate. Thank you.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/69acdf80-8d6f-4a71-ac6d-e1773752ef89[/URL][/QUOTE]She hmu right after my profile went live. Chatted via snap, she's anxious to meet. We agreed on 200. Can't host, north sider, too inconvenient for me, as I'm southwest. Seems nice, though.
[QUOTE=GoodVibesAll;4051911]She hmu right after my profile went live. Chatted via snap, she's anxious to meet. We agreed on 200. Can't host, north sider, too inconvenient for me, as I'm southwest. Seems nice, though.[/QUOTE]She is willing to go for 150 seems pushy.
[QUOTE=KisaHero;4049749]She stopped responded after a certain time, we had a disagreement on when to meet. Called me up last minute but I couldn't oblige. Afterwards radio silent. Shame, I was really looking forward to meeting her too.[/QUOTE]Howd she sound on phone? Anything seem fishy besides the radio silence? I feel like with SA girls sometimes its cause they flakey and othertimes cause they fake, always hard to figure out.
So SA in Milwaukee is like shooting fish in a barrel. Racine too. I love it when the conversation goes like this:
Me: I'd love to see you $$ if backdoor is included.
Them:. No, sorry, I've never done that before.
Me: have a good one.
Them: I mean, if you threw in another $ I'd try it.
Me: no, I'd consider $0.5 if you let me CIA.
Them: OK let's do it.
Like, I'm a virgin, there's no way I'd ever do anal, unless it's either a perfect stranger offering me $0.5, sure sweet tits I go slow since I believe you.
Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6350606c-44f7-acdb-537e-c096643b738d[/URL]
To me, total GPS. Text only. Was expecting KKKK monthly. Yea right!
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6e24e11e-4287-4f86-8274-d4a10aa6bada[/URL]
In oswego. Awful communicator. Radio silence for days. Erratic schedule. Worth the headache if one likes her type. See photos 300.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4a922a33-c1e0-4485-bcdc-17632f52e3d8[/URL]
Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4acf3c-8d7f-4a1e-a8b4-9090e1e725fd[/URL]
Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54ffb-87c4-49b8-a8e5-9d51e9e99985[/URL]
I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.
I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.
Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.
Get that sex.
SDX.
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;4053786]I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.
I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.
Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.
Get that sex.
SDX.[/QUOTE]That's not it at all. Google can't access the profiles on [URL]seeking.com[/URL], so that's why it doesn't have the photos in its search database. It used to be, for you newbies, that you had to go through a captcha to log on to [URL]seeking.com[/URL]. Some might have found that annoying, I liked it b / c it was extra security. It seems to be removed now though. They change their procedures periodically, without announcement and explanation. If you have a SO, as I do, this is a reason to use seeking. No other site does this. I am also very circumspect about putting real pix of myself on the site, or sharing them w / girls by other means (text, kik, snap). I don't ever use any image that has been out on the web of me IRL, this is the way that we get exposed.
[QUOTE=DaneCummings;4027166]Before Craigslist shut down I was taking to an early 40's woman who went by the code name Jennifer Wildmeadow based out of Woodstock. Nothing materialized, fast forward a couple months, I found her again on SA under the name Jen. So I started talking to her again and everything stayed consistent even the pictures she sent me. Does anyone have any experience with her? I love everything other than she only wants you to travel to her. Let me know if you have made contact and what you think.
Jen.
Mid 40's.
Blonde.
Asking for 200-300 per session very open minded.[/QUOTE]I have spoken to her as well but not pulled the trigger. I would love to verify that she is legit. Has anyone seen her?
Been in touch with this one. Might have a meet soon. Anyone have any interactions?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/92c9c909-9375-4ad5-9625-09584cb625b3[/URL]
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;4053786]I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.
I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.
Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.
Get that sex.
SDX.[/QUOTE]The girls that I have banged, only about 10% come up in google images. I think it is either SA doing something to the pictures or the girls maybe cropping part of the picture before uploading and google images does not recognize the partial pic. I hope someone has a better way to check these girls out before seeing them.
Stay safe out there.
I think most of the images are reversed. I saw one girl on the train home from work who was reading messages on SA on her phone with a girlfriend one day, and I found her on there. Things like tattoos, piercings, etc. Were backwards on SA.
[QUOTE=Skrause74;4053773]Anyone ever meet Marchewka? Have something set up. Will report back.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ebf54ffb-87c4-49b8-a8e5-9d51e9e99985[/URL][/QUOTE]Was dreaming of her a month ago. Lives in lombard. Had a roomie. Polish. Divorced. Started as total GPS. KKK per month. Came down to 3 for initial meet. . Pm for details.
[QUOTE=Matts1975;4053706]Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6350606c-44f7-acdb-537e-c096643b738d[/URL][/QUOTE]Thats pretty darn old. Have seen her a bunch of times on POF, to be had for free if anyone should ever so choose.
[QUOTE=Matts1975;4053734]Weird one this. Was willing to meet immediately. At midnight. Stays in far burbs. Seems to be high all the time. Passed.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ef4acf3c-8d7f-4a1e-a8b4-9090e1e725fd[/URL][/QUOTE]The back of her thighs has big pot tattoos on the back of both of them. Have to fly your freak flag high!! LOL.
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;4053786]I'm convinced SA somehow alters images so they will not pick up hits in Google Image Search. Either that, or Google Image Search and Tineye just suck at matching images. Let me explain.
I was banging a girl over the weekend whose 10 photos turned up no hits on Google Image Search. She was arguably the hottest chick I've been with in the 8 years I've been on the site. When she went to the washroom, between bangs, I started going through her purse. I quickly pulled her wallet and memorized the name on the driver's license. I put everything back before she got out of the washroom. We resume our amazing evening together.
Later that night after she goes home, I put her name into Google and easily come up with alot of good info. One of the top results is her Instagram page. Was I surprised when I learned she is a model. All of the 10 photos on her SA profile are also on her Instagram, so that is why I am convinced SA might be doing something to the images uploaded on their site.
Get that sex.
SDX.[/QUOTE]I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.
[QUOTE=Matts1975;4053706]Older 50+ in Chicago. 300. Safe. Need to get room too. Good attitude.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6350606c-44f7-acdb-537e-c096643b738d[/URL][/QUOTE]I corresponded and talked with her months ago. With me at least she was quite b*why during negotiations The newly added full-face pic looks to be about two decades newer than a couple of the others.
Yeah, what others said.
Google can only index images that are publicly and openly on the internet. That's why your FB pics that are not set to public aren't crawled, but your FB profile pic is. Same with Twitter, if your tweets are protected they can't be indexed but your profile pic is public so that will show up. SA is not public so those don't get crawled. Not sure exactly why IG's that are public aren't fully captured. I've had hits and misses on public IG's, maybe just a function of Google Image Search not being as black and white as it is crawling regular text.
Between image search and Hiya reverse phone search I get at least something about 40-50% of the time. One nugget can lead to something else, to something else that eventually gets you a name or social media profile. Those IG scraper sites can turn up their IG name if you dig in enough. Don't forget to simply google their SA username, I've had that turn up hits elsewhere too.
No method is automatic or easy, it usually takes a multitude of resources as well as some elbow grease.
[QUOTE=OlderGuy1954;4054509]I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=OlderGuy1954;4054509]I think the issue here is that a Google image search will not find an Instagram-hosted pic because you have to actively "follow" the person, after which you can see their pics. The same for a hashtage search. In other words, I don't think it concerns something SA is doing to the pics to prevent an image search.[/QUOTE]Her Instagram was public, so no following was necessary to see any of her pictures. Several years ago, Google Image Search was very helpful, but that has not been the case more recently in my experience. Tonight, I just ran 100 images from about 25 different SA ladies through the tool via upload, and did not get a hit on a single one. Similarly, Facebook used to be a great resource for running phone numbers (I had 30-35% success), but Facebook seemed to change this feature a while back.
Get that sex.
SDX.