Something seems fishy to me on TER. What do you think?
Before I found this board, I had lived by TER and Big Doggie. I always new that anyone could post a review there, which is why I almost always wait for more than one review, or that the one person who reviewed her, has reviewed others that I know to be cool.
Now, everybody remember about a month or 2 back when that family got raided for the pay-at-the-door parties? Last word that I heard was that they were in collaboration to try to get some charges dismissed. It makes sense, but realistically, is not a felony, and if Jonny Law was gonna set that up, they wouldn't have let the "Big Raid of Sin" hit the news like it did.
Either way, I'm choosing to stay far away from there, because anything could be going on, and I just don't want any part of it, regardless of how nice an ass she has, or how great the service may be.
Anyways, I was on TER and ran into a New Review of Tiny, who just so happens to be the young one of the two girls. Normally I wouldn't think anything of it, but it bothers me that the reviewer chose those two off of CL, when there is plenty more, as his first review from this area. A couple reviews from Canada, Dallas, and one from Carolina, and it just so happens to be these two.
Of course, who am I to say who someone can meet up with, and I don't suggest that this person can't pick whomever he wants, as I will make my own decisions also, but I have a funny feeling about this one. Something seems outta whack to me. Could it be possible that LE has penetrated my beloved TER.
I know that many of us that also use TER, have reviews from many cities, whether it be from business trips, vacations, or just plain moving to another area. However. Most true mongers, won't go into a new city and TOFTT right off the bat, and try something new. Not to mention the fact that info about their run-in with LE was posted on CL and everywhere else. And one last thing. The reviewer, posted 5 reviews from DEC 05 to APR 06, then had a 2 year break. Then 3 reviews in SEP 08 (all unverified) and then came here and posts about these two.
Maybe it's possible that I'm being paranoid. Maybe I shouldn't worry about it, being that I'm moving to someplace warmer in a month. I just want to put that info out there, and let you all make your own decisions.
Remember, you never can be too safe when it comes to this hobby. Nothing is worth your life. Well, somethings are. Like a ten hooker orgy in Thailand, but you get the point.
Sometimes crowds and LEO concentration is a good thing
[QUOTE=Derf]Cruised around the Oakwood area last evening and saw several WSW out and about. One blonde in a short skirt, another in a pair of capri jeans and third dark haired in tight jeans and another with her pimp by the store in Idlewild. ALSO saw a ton of folks out and about as well as LEO. Think I passed no less than five squad cars, so I decided to leave the area and live to play another day.[/QUOTE]
There was some event going on at St Augustines Uni, that's why all the people... or at least that's the way I saw it... so I figured LEO was on the "serve and protect" track and it was time to play unobstructed!
And Friday night there were mobs of revelling students on Hillsboro St so I didn't see any LEO covereage in the usuall mongering sites!
For what its worth
Roamer
Blond WSW at Capital ABS?
Had a dream where I was hanging around the Capital Supercenter ABS on Friday afternoon and ran across a petite, blond working girl. Never before seen on inside the video stores before, but she was hanging out in the arcade section. I asked to join her in a booth, then asked if she was there for work or play. She was there to work. Alas I had nothing to donate for her time. But she was extraordinarily friendly. Teeth slightly jacked, but nice tight-looking bod, and great personality. Next time I'll know to bring some extra. Anyone know anything about her? I remarked I hadn't seen her there before, and she said maybe next time. So she must come around a bit? Just didn't know if it was worth it, and if I would be taking anything home with me. Feel free to PM or post? That was an unbelieveably hot potential encounter. I'd love to tap it in one of the big movie rooms (or the buddy booth, but preferably the former.) Do working girls commonly hang there, and I just miss them?
Oh well , ho's, back to the streets (CL Ban)?
NC is up on the list of the story below. Jen and many other former SW on CL sure not gonna pay 10$ to post on Raleigh (each post) CL!
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Under the watchful eye of law enforcement in 40 states, Craigslist pledged Thursday to crack down on ads for prostitution on its Web sites.
As part of Craigslist's agreement with attorneys general around the country, anyone who posts an "erotic services" ad will be required to provide a working phone number and pay a fee with a valid credit card. The Web site will provide that information to law enforcement if subpoenaed.
Jim Buckmaster, Craigslist's CEO, said the deal will allow legitimate escort services to continue advertising, while providing a strong disincentive to companies that are conducting illegal business.
"We don't view it as a penalty, we view it as raising the accountability," he said. "A legitimate business should have no problem with that. They should have no problem providing a phone number or credit card credentials."
Craigslist filed lawsuits this week against 14 software and Internet companies that help people who post erotic service ads to circumvent the Web site's defenses against inappropriate content and illegal activity.
Craigslist, which posts 30 million ads every month for everything from apartment rentals to jobs in hundreds of cities, will also begin using new search technology in an effort to help authorities find missing children and victims of human trafficking.
Police across the country have been arresting people for using Web sites like Craigslist to advertise the sexual services of women and children.
Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who brokered the agreement, said his office contacted Craigslist after receiving several complaints from users late in 2007 about photographs depicting nudity on the site. He said Craigslist cooperated fully and there was never a need to threaten legal action against the company.
"The dark side of the Internet must be stopped from eclipsing its immense potential for good," Blumenthal said.
He added: "I am fully convinced that Craigslist wants to stop this activity as much as we do."
Buckmaster said the agreement does not cover Craigslist's personal ads, where prostitutes have been found advertising for "dates." But he said the San Francisco-based company has been working with authorities on that issue and on cutting down on the sale of stolen merchandise on its sites.
"We are experimenting with telephone verification in those sections," he said. "We don't have any plans to use credit card verification in that section currently. But this partnership is going to be active in that area as well, anywhere where crime does or could occur."
The agreement was joined by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
"The criminals engaged in the sexual trafficking of children no longer parade them on the streets of America's cities," said the center's chief executive, Ernie Allen. "Today, they market them via the Internet."
The states that signed the agreement are Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Washington, D.C., the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam also joined.
