I concur, and hope we can all get back to the business at hand
[QUOTE=SubCmdr; 1562513]One of the things that has always drawn me to this forum was a sense of civil discourse. All you have to do is review any of the more active forums in the major populations centers and you will be assaulted by some really mean commentary.
I see this forum treading towards uncivil discourse. And that is unfortunate. I would argue that useful info, bragging, horror stories, philosophical discussions, and words of wisdom all have a place within this forum.
SubCmdr out[/QUOTE]There is always knowledge to be gained. The majority of us are playing at a higher level, I believe, and so let us put aside our petty differences and re-commit ourselves to focusing on what makes this thread special. If anyone wants to fight, take that shit outside.
Scott
Back to business. The cost of exploring new worlds.
Ok so my ATF perfect little sb, got a bit possessive. You heard the story. And during that exploration trip of her. She found one (SD) she wanted toy meet. So I said "go ahead make my day" as you humans like to say.
The closer it came to the day, the less enthused she became, but she did meet him. End of the story was. She did not enjoy herself, but was happy with the amount of sugar she got, it was more for the 4 hours with him than she got from me in total for the last 7 months. This proves my previous quote. An ATF does not have to cost an arms and a leg, perhaps not even a rib.
What constitutes "Active"
Nando, I tend to agree with you on the 2-weeks timeframe, but decided to be a little generous. If we stick with the 2-week timeframe instead, the numbers (as of this morning) change to:
SB: 1013/124.
SD: 168/46.
This skews the "active / active" ratio a little more towards the babies.
I've also noticed a recent trend in the new profiles of younger ladies (under around 25 or so) from my area: more and more are plainly stating something to the effect of "absolutely no sex or intimacy. I just want you to take me out and spend money on me." My gut says these "ultimate GPS" girls aren't finding what they're looking for (I notice one that has been on over a year and has logged on every few days, so she appears to still be looking) but I could be wrong.
Congrats on the AM find. I've never found *anything* but fake profiles and shills there; it's good to hear confirmation that real ladies can be found there.
An Intellectual View on Pussy
Zomby,
My Man!
I know of no other place where I can have civil intellectual conversation on this subject.
The problem with the social sciences has always been the difficulty of measuring, defining and observing the actions within society. Your argument was eloquently stated and most appreciated.
I see all the activities of our forum and the entire board for that matter as simply individuals attempting to operate in areas defined by society as deviant. We are simply sharing methods to minimize our consequences while fulfilling our deepest sexual needs that lie outside of tightly defined parameters of our society. The providers may have different needs and desires but they are doing the exact same thing as we are. And there is no room for judgement in either case.
Thank you!
SubCmdr out
The intersection of intellectual honesty and GPS
Regular readers will recall that my ATF has been serving an indefinite suspension for treating me too much like an ATM. I have no problem with spoiling a girl, but I have to receive something of commensurate value in return. That, unfortunately, has not been the case with ATF for the past few months. So, a month ago, I decided to cease all contact and see what happens.
Almost a month to the day after I stopped communicating with her, she sent me a text. It sounds like her life continues to spiral out of control. She's been sick and was fired from her job at the strip club. (How one is fired from stripping is beyond me.)
Despite her lack of financial prospects, she is hoping to have some cosmetic surgery soon. The plan is for lipo on the legs, thighs, abdomen, and arms, and fat injections in the ass. Let's put aside for a moment that this girl is gorgeous and doesn't need any of this work; she clearly has body image issues.
The real problem here is that she wants to go ahead with this work even though she's out of a job. And she asked me if I wanted to front the money. She'd repay me, she said. The cost? $12, 500.
My response to her: silence. If there was any doubt that all I am to her is dollar signs, then this episode confirmed it. She'd never be able to repay me, and that's beside the point. I'm glad I finally understand that it's time to move on from this one. It was a nice year and a half while it lasted.
What to do or I do not loveGee
I have come across a bad one, I have known her for some time and even managed to get her to do a M&G. It never when any place as she demanded that I prove myself buy getting her something in advance of anything in the $250-400 range (It has changed over time) , I have always said sorry I don't work that way.
Well for some reason she has forwarded some emails from a guy who is 'working' her and once she left his email address on one of the messages. As you can see this and the fact that she is really just attempting to get things for nothing puts her in the 'bad SB' as far as I'm concerned but, what to do about it?
No good deed goes unpunished
Exchanged msgs with an attractive new lady on SA yesterday... she mentioned learning about the site after seeing a piece on the local TV news about Richmond being a "most promiscuous city". I never watch the local TV stations so I drew the Google gun and sure enough, last week SA published a study in which it ranked the 10 most-promiscuous cities, based on the percentage of SDs on their site reporting that they had at least 7 connections resulting in sex in the last 12 months. I think their measurement method is suspect, but the results are interesting nonetheless; Chicago was #1, which was expected, but several cities on the list were pretty surprising. RIC was #9. Birmingham beat Las Vegas? Really? (The most repressed societies are always the most promiscuous. Want proof? Spend a race weekend camped out at Talladega. :))
Unfortunately, this kind of publicity has negative aspects as well. Over the weekend, a new profile appeared of a pretty hot dark-haired young lady holding a DSLR camera... when I winked at her, I got back a reply flaming me that I should be worrying more about paying for my kids' college instead of spending my money on "sex with young girls."
It would *not* surprise me to learn that 5-O is trying to run some sort of sting. Not that they would succeed, but in bible-belt backwaters like this, the city fathers will be incensed that their city is getting such a reputation. Be careful out there, boys and girls...