Humaniplex

[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;4553413]FEC.

1. Velvet (formerly Apple in OC).

2. Fendi (formerly Gucci in OC).

You can seach find some reviews of both of these girls. One thing to note, is there is a new girl in OC calling herself Gucci, but she is new and not the same as Fendi (formerly called herself Gucci).[/QUOTE]Wendy used to be Vivi. I saw her about a year ago so I don't remember all of the details of our visit, but what I do remember is she has a cute face (pics are accurate) and smokin' hot body, petite, with nice man-made DD's, but was ruined by her horrible attitude. As someone mentioned about her on another post, she just tries to finish you off as quickly as possible. No passion or enthusiasm whatsoever, and a completely mechanical experience. I would highly not recommend.

[QUOTE=TootsieJoe;4553686]So is Alana the new name for Blaze? I did a quick search on Desi in both SD and OC and it seems to indicate that Desi is Blaze. All this name change is getting confusing![/QUOTE]Yup, those are definitely Desi's pictures that are being used to advertise Alana. Real pictures too so no complaining that these pics aren't representative of the actual provider.

Yeah, not sure what the reason is for the name change since she was "Blaze" for this same agency in San Diego. Maybe just to drum up more business?

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianCutieSD[/URL]

Am I missing something. This group never seems to get mentioned? Reason?

[QUOTE=OCRon;4554262]Yup, those are definitely Desi's pictures that are being used to advertise Alana. Real pictures too so no complaining that these pics aren't representative of the actual provider.
[/QUOTE]Is this really just non-stop name changing. Or is it using one girl's photos for someone else?

[QUOTE=IslandFan;4554144]Thanks Trusty for the review on Billie. Appreciate it. Do you think she resembles the girl in the photos? Also I think sdag only offers 40 min /1 hr. So it seems right that the short session extended past 30 mins.[/QUOTE]The pics are not Billie, but they are representative. Billie is young and eager and fun. She smiles and laughs and likes to kiss and is a great time. I recommend a visit.

I think you are right about the 40 min thing. I think I had it in my mind that I had 30 but really the session goes 40 minutes.

[QUOTE=Waab182;4554226]Wendy used to be Vivi. I saw her about a year ago so I don't remember all of the details of our visit, but what I do remember is she has a cute face (pics are accurate) and smokin' hot body, petite, with nice man-made DD's, but was ruined by her horrible attitude. As someone mentioned about her on another post, she just tries to finish you off as quickly as possible. No passion or enthusiasm whatsoever, and a completely mechanical experience. I would highly not recommend.[/QUOTE]That has been my experience with this group in general. Cartoon was similar in that she tries to finish you off quick and get you out of there (no MSOG).

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;4554350][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianCutieSD[/URL]

Am I missing something. This group never seems to get mentioned? Reason?[/QUOTE]My experience with AsianCutiesSD is that they use Asian IG models or JAV stars for all of their photos. The ladies are always really 40-50 yrs old Chinese ladies and generally not a great experience. I personally don't recommend anyone see them.

The exception was EmilySingaporean. She was a doll and we got a good report on her. Then the booker decided to bait and switch to an older provider when Emily moved on. Even Emily's photos were fake though. I only saw her because of a great review here.

So, I don't even consider this group and instead use SDAG, FEC and Sandra99.

I just reached out to them. They seem to have a fair / good amount of users who have verified them. I'll let you know what I find out.

[QUOTE=PussyPumper;4554350][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianCutieSD[/URL]

Am I missing something. This group never seems to get mentioned? Reason?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;4554621]My experience with AsianCutiesSD is that they use Asian IG models or JAV stars for all of their photos. The ladies are always really 40-50 yrs old Chinese ladies and generally not a great experience. I personally don't recommend anyone see them.

The exception was EmilySingaporean. She was a doll and we got a good report on her. Then the booker decided to bait and switch to an older provider when Emily moved on. Even Emily's photos were fake though. I only saw her because of a great review here.

So, I don't even consider this group and instead use SDAG, FEC and Sandra99.[/QUOTE]FYI. Emily's "private room" pictures were real.

Also, The booker has used real pictures in the past. You can tell because they are NOT of Asian super models (BebeBustyAsian's pictures were also real).

For the most part, the girls at this agency are hit or miss, and the providers are typically older (but most are still attractive. Asian ladies age well), and "Add On" services (BBFS) can often be negotiated for a reasonable rate. These ladies are often horny as hell. Combined with a low donation rate, sometimes you can find a diamond in the rough.

[QUOTE=Gbrand;4554995]FYI. Emily's "private room" pictures were real.

Also, The booker has used real pictures in the past. You can tell because they are NOT of Asian super models (BebeBustyAsian's pictures were also real).

For the most part, the girls at this agency are hit or miss, and the providers are typically older (but most are still attractive. Asian ladies age well), and "Add On" services (BBFS) can often be negotiated for a reasonable rate. These ladies are often horny as hell. Combined with a low donation rate, sometimes you can find a diamond in the rough.[/QUOTE]Gbrand, I'll let you find our diamonds then.

[QUOTE=OCRon;4554262]Yup, those are definitely Desi's pictures that are being used to advertise Alana. Real pictures too so no complaining that these pics aren't representative of the actual provider.

Yeah, not sure what the reason is for the name change since she was "Blaze" for this same agency in San Diego. Maybe just to drum up more business?[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info. Not sure why they keep changing the name of the provider. Is it because she weren't getting enough business the last time she was here?

Anyway, anyone tried 99 yet? Was thinking of TOFTT but just want to check first. Also, I believe I've seen the pics for 99 before at one of the LA agencies a while back. Can't remember which one though.

Elly at FEC looks good.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/FarEastCuties/52171/[/URL]

He guys, TOFTT and saw Ms. 99 tonight. Not sure if pics are of her, but if not then very close except she has black hair (she has a tattoo on her arm that I don't see in pics but could have been photoshopped). Also has a large tattoo on her lower back which didn't bother me. Body is very nice and petite with fake C's. Overall, I would give Face: 8 and Body: 9. English is very limited. Said she come from Korea to SD about one month ago, but that's about all I could get out of her. She even tried to use a translation app to answer my questions (LOL).

Service: 9 - At arrival she was not shy about DFK. Told her I already showered so she went straight to a short preview BBBJ, which was good while it lasted. Then we laid down on the bed for some more DFK, and I went down to DATY. Cleanly-shaven down there and tasted great. She asked if I wanted 69 and I gladly obliged. Stopped her before I popped and she put on the cover and started riding me in CG. Nice and tight. Then we went to standing CG, then mish. She could see I was fading so she told me to lay down and gave some more BBBJ, then switched to 69 as I popped in her mouth and she sucked me dry. Finished off with massage and shower.

Overall, she's not an ATF but she was still very good. Gives the GFE with passion and enthusiasm. I would definitely consider repeating.

[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;4555762]Elly at FEC looks good.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/FarEastCuties/52171/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yes she does. Anyone know if she has gone by a different name up north?

[QUOTE=GdAloha;4556103]Yes she does. Anyone know if she has gone by a different name up north?[/QUOTE]I ran a [URL=https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZis3rxatxIpQsLJve867adHTuPF9C_1NvqHQRwLQdQvXlcu6ZEgEOsXv4WZDuab4dxvQdq24I3550yI1c5DR7qwOqyggzONgX8X_1OVBgyiDNx-Mv2JXapljbwO_1vwLe1AvxCm0eky3avI5faoXGaxwk43maVVs3W4AmpUIvz0GNq5_1yn62Eld6reLC3WEyEnzl8mCAtbYbKNxra0CbyoAXYMknNCLZf8_1-g2_1Khy4DUoeFDrORjHg07TdFec8lLAqzJyaDSfyDgCbxOeOOWTMckHMo2DdLbGWEVm9qwziHYXWD2sH9FsRZS5DcASkMutrAPK8vQxSOcX3GpsbgrdfilJi28nIVQ]reverse image search[/URL] on her pictures they pull up listings in Bellevue, San Jose, and San Mateo.