Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

[QUOTE=TMeister;3225075]Trump all about free trade? Yes, I'm sure all of us will enjoy paying 50% more for basic goods once all those wonderful tariffs kick in LOL.

And I'm pretty sure the BP girls will readily accept Chinese and Russian dollars if they can be exchanged for American dollars.

Maybe you need to remove your nose from Trump's butt crack and take an economics class?[/QUOTE]I will. As soon as you put down your Obama phone and look up the definition of Communism. Or maybe your in fear that your government assistance will be cut. In turn affecting your hooker budget.

[QUOTE=KeyLow;3225137]I will. As soon as you put down your Obama phone and look up the definition of Communism. Or maybe your in fear that your government assistance will be cut. In turn affecting your hooker budget.[/QUOTE]I already know the definition of Communism. When a President-elect encourages a foreign dictator to hack our elections and steal our national secrets, but then snuggle up to him like a doe-eyed lover because he might give him some cash.

Gotcha again, dumbo.

[QUOTE=TMeister;3224934]I guess the Pussy Grabber-In-Chief and his Russian cronies gets to grope and fondle any woman within grabbing distance. The rest of us regular Joes are stuck with PornHub?

Sounds fair in a typical Communist regime LOL.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=KeyLow;3225058]So not true. You sound like CNN. Trump all about free trade. It's those liberal left tree huggers that did this before Obama left. ,. Fox news today said first Trump was building the wall. Than he was turning back on the Backpage. He just wants only American women to get American money.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TMeister;3225075]Trump all about free trade? Yes, I'm sure all of us will enjoy paying 50% more for basic goods once all those wonderful tariffs kick in LOL.

And I'm pretty sure the BP girls will readily accept Chinese and Russian dollars if they can be exchanged for American dollars.

Maybe you need to remove your nose from Trump's butt crack and take an economics class?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=KeyLow;3225137]I will. As soon as you put down your Obama phone and look up the definition of Communism. Or maybe your in fear that your government assistance will be cut. In turn affecting your hooker budget.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TMeister;3225169]I already know the definition of Communism. When a President-elect encourages a foreign dictator to hack our elections and steal our national secrets, but then snuggle up to him like a doe-eyed lover because he might give him some cash.

Gotcha again, dumbo.[/QUOTE]This should get pretty good.

A2 must be a busy man today, I've never so many new girls at one time, thanks BP for the fresh meat available. Unfortunately it brings so many fake adds with it. Next few days there's going to be so many, has anybody seen, LOL. Be safe OBR.

I can not believe that the BP shutdown was not on this evenings news. I guess they are on take also.

[QUOTE=RogerOver;3225237]This should get pretty good.[/QUOTE]Hillary Clinton conspiring with CNN to cheat at debates is a National Secret?

[QUOTE=TMeister;3225169]I already know the definition of Communism. When a President-elect encourages a foreign dictator to hack our elections and steal our national secrets, but then snuggle up to him like a doe-eyed lover because he might give him some cash.

Gotcha again, dumbo.[/QUOTE]This just goes to show how most are snowed by mainstream media. What he actually said was "IF" the Russians (or anyone else) were hacking maybe they could find the 30,000 emails that Hillary washed. He said nothing about national security, neither encouraged any one to hack emails.
LOL. Reminds me of the game we did as kids; whisper a story into ones ear and let it be passed around the room, then the last one told, bears all. Once the actual story told for all to hear, the laughter subsides, the last one that had the story, if he wises up, realizes what a fool and puppet he has been. He was had. Stay safe and utr.

KT.

Moving this from the Backpage forum because it is largely argumentative.

[QUOTE=****Guy82;3196063]I haven't seen an ad from Natti since October. Does anyone know if she is still seeing customers. I've texted the last # (5410) I had for her but nothing but crickets. Does anyone have current digits or intel.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;3226286]I thought I saw a post where she got a real job. The woman hadn't posted on here in months that ought to tell you something. She is probably out the game if not permanently at least for a little while, why text her? I'm sure if she's out the game and you give her a random text she would say it isn't her. As much as we hate random text why give her a random text if and when she ever wants to get back in the game she's been doing this long enough to know how to get back in she will post an ad. Damn guys give the young lady a break again if she's not posting ads why text her and question why you can't get in touch with her. There are other women out here. JMHO. HL29.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ktom13;3226307]Well said JL29, I couldn't have said it any better myself. I was wondering why these bozos kept pressing the issue. Natti was a special lady and an ATF of mine. If she is well and has changed occupation, then more power to her for it. I commend her and wish her well. Will miss her and thankful to have met her acquaintance. Now gents, let her be. Stay safe and utr. KT.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=****Guy82;3226327]Bozo?? Pressing the issue??? Hmm, ok. I posted one time regarding Natti and replied to another mongers reply. I didnt know one post was pressing an issue. If thats the case we are pressing issues everyday on this forum. Your logic is so stupid. In any of my messages did I say WHEN I texted Natti or how many times I may have done so. Seems to me you might be the BOZO for jumping the gun and just spouting off at the mouth. Yes, I did text Natti onetime after her last post in Oct. Nobody said the text was recent you clown. You might want to get your facts straight pal before you start the childish name calling like you're some big shot. I'm glad to hear she got a real job and could possibly be doing well. I would wish her nothing but the best.[/QUOTE]I am not going to take sides on this, but I do have an opinion. But that I will just keep to myself. However, I will address the question, ""Nobody said the text was recent. ". Actually, BMCOV did.

[QUOTE=Bmcov;3226034]I have also been texting that number. She actually responded the other day ...[/QUOTE]Posted yesterday, at 23:01 BST (Board Standard Time).

"Have also been. ". That's the present perfect tense, meaning currently ongoing. "She responded the other day", meaning it was recent, 2-3 days ago, unless you want to claim you texted her in October, and she only responded 3 months later.

Regardless of whether what Bmcov said is true or accurate, the straight facts are that he said it was recent, and the somehow you took it as a reference to you, ****Guy82.

Now, why don't you two just kiss and makeup for this little misunderstanding? This is a board for lovers, not fighters.

[QUOTE=CrissyLynn2015;3224455]Which means where are the le going to going to go to look now? Some ladies I honestly believe don't deserve to be on this site. Us ladies maintain a certain look and outlook for our guys. I'd hate to see a bunch of new faces to be honest.[/QUOTE]LE is not isolated to just one site. I am certain they are trolling everywhere and everything. I just meant good for this site. More traffic is always good for a website. Of course more traffic can come with problems like, "oh shit" I need more storage; or "oh shit" I need more router ([I]yea, kinda like cowbell but in tech speak[/I]), etc.

And I totally agree with your statement regarding some ladies don't deserve to be on this site. I've already seen the upcharging-what-you-see-is-not-what-you-get-dancing-girl ad's here, eew! But I guess one must take the good with the bad.

As for new faces, one would think that is a good thing. In otherwords, if it were not for the churn, the well would eventually dry up. With gentry becoming disinterested, finding a new ATF or in general just moving on to something else in their life, a supply of new faces seems to be a good thing.

Besides, though it may come with a bit of comfort, sitting on an old face can get a little boring, right? I'm thinking sliding and gliding around on a new comely face would be appealing for some ladies. Purely speculation on my parts ([I]puns intended[/I]). Imho, I fancy myself as a new face you might like to see. But alas, I am old-face-supply :)

Your point is well taken, there's a little bit of good [I]and[/I] bad with this new found traffic.

TGM

My rant had nothing to do with what BMCOV said, my rant was strictly towards the Clown who grouped me into the "BOZO" comment he made. No need for me and BMCOV to kiss and make up when he did nothing wrong towards me.

[QUOTE=DNut;3226414]Moving this from the Backpage forum because it is largely argumentative.







I am not going to take sides on this, but I do have an opinion. But that I will just keep to myself. However, I will address the question, ""Nobody said the text was recent. ". Actually, BMCOV did.

Posted yesterday, at 23:01 BST (Board Standard Time).

"Have also been. ". That's the present perfect tense, meaning currently ongoing. "She responded the other day", meaning it was recent, 2-3 days ago, unless you want to claim you texted her in October, and she only responded 3 months later.

Regardless of whether what Bmcov said is true or accurate, the straight facts are that he said it was recent, and the somehow you took it as a reference to you, ****Guy82.

Now, why don't you two just kiss and makeup for this little misunderstanding? This is a board for lovers, not fighters.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=****Guy82;3226435]My rant had nothing to do with what BMCOV said, my rant was strictly towards the Clown who grouped me into the "BOZO" comment he made. No need for me and BMCOV to kiss and make up when he did nothing wrong towards me.[/QUOTE]Obviously I pressed your buttons, I apologize for a slip of the tongue with the "BOZO" comment. I should have said "fellow mongers". I apologize, however, if you check the forums, you are not the only one asking about her, actually there are quite a few inquiries. So, maybe before you get all huffy as I was not singling anyone in particular, just stating an observation, thus, again I apogize for ruffing your feathers, 'twas not my intentions. Peace and I agree with DNut, these forums are for lovers. Stay safe and utr.

KT.

This is Krystal from Monday. A thirty something very elegant lady. She spits, but hey no one is prefect.

[QUOTE=TheGenteelMan;3226416]LE is not isolated to just one site. I am certain they are trolling everywhere and everything. I just meant good for this site. More traffic is always good for a website. Of course more traffic can come with problems like, "oh shit" I need more storage; or "oh shit" I need more router ([I]yea, kinda like cowbell but in tech speak[/I]), etc.

And I totally agree with your statement regarding some ladies don't deserve to be on this site. I've already seen the upcharging-what-you-see-is-not-what-you-get-dancing-girl ad's here, eew! But I guess one must take the good with the bad.

As for new faces, one would think that is a good thing. In otherwords, if it were not for the churn, the well would eventually dry up. With gentry becoming disinterested, finding a new ATF or in general just moving on to something else in their life, a supply of new faces seems to be a good thing.

Besides, though it may come with a bit of comfort, sitting on an old face can get a little boring, right? I'm thinking sliding and gliding around on a new comely face would be appealing for some ladies. Purely speculation on my parts ([I]puns intended[/I]). Imho, I fancy myself as a new face you might like to see. But alas, I am old-face-supply :)

Your point is well taken, there's a little bit of good [I]and[/I] bad with this new found traffic.

TGM[/QUOTE]And as would be expected, the number of TGTBT fakes, spammers and scammers will increase for sure!

JMHO.

CFG.

[QUOTE=FireNice49;3225495]I can not believe that the BP shutdown was not on this evenings news. I guess they are on take also.[/QUOTE]All the girls are now posting on the women for men section. Yep they really stopped it. LOL.

[QUOTE=Mbgbe696;3227229]All the girls are now posting on the women for men section. Yep they really stopped it. LOL.[/QUOTE]I really don't understand all this hoopla about the public showering praise on LE.

With BP now gone our tax dollars will fund 3 X as many of them to sit at their desk munching on donuts while looking at a myriad of "naughty" websites. They will be collecting fat pensions and full medical benefits while they "work hard" fighting crime .... but they know that for every BP they shut down 10 more sites will pop up to replace it. Stupid is as stupid does!

Seems like a big waste of our tax money .... but I guess some harmless mongering is more dangerous than murderers and pedos and drug dealers roaming the streets.