Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

[QUOTE=Glockman;3217872]Like you, I fail to see how there are some mongers who don't like pictures of vaginas. But I know that a few exist. However, I don't normally post photos of close ups of them. I prefer to post what I call "tastefully explicit" shots. They are now a part of my routine photo shoot. I make sure the lady is comfortable with posting this shot ahead of time. I have only been turned down once in the last few years. I questioned Houston extensively about it because I was unsure that she would do it. She said she was familiar with my photography and was ready to do anything I asked. I find that almost all ladies are kind of turned on by showing off what they have. I don't know if these shots qualify as "giners", but I like the lady to look like she is either totally in control or that she is oblivious to the camera. Below are some examples. I dislike the photos where the lady is very uncomfortable or looks like she would rather be anywhere else. I don't want that shot. Now if I could just talk Silky into coming to Memphis, I'm sure that 99% of the Cincinnati Mongers would enjoy seeing her doing this shot. What do you say Silky? I'll bet you have a beautiful one![/QUOTE]They are beautiful, Post more man.

[QUOTE=GolfGuy;3218030]I don't register my number with Facebook either. Yes, if you stalk their page she will show up as a possible friend. But if you call or text her, AND she hard her number associated with her Facebook account then yes, she's going to show up on the people you may know feed. You never even have to go to her Facebook page for this to happen, I never did. I only texted them. It's because they have their number linked to their Facebook accounts[/QUOTE]I remember until last Nov, many of the backpage posting phone numbers will hit the actual facebook account but that has come down almost none now a days. I am able to cross check may be one phone number against FB account every week if lucky so it is getting hard to validate them. Anyone noticing this trend?

Wondering everyone smarten up or backpage is giving anyone any warning?

[QUOTE=Glockman;3217872]Like you, I fail to see how there are some mongers who don't like pictures of vaginas. But I know that a few exist. However, I don't normally post photos of close ups of them. I prefer to post what I call "tastefully explicit" shots. They are now a part of my routine photo shoot. I make sure the lady is comfortable with posting this shot ahead of time. I have only been turned down once in the last few years. I questioned Houston extensively about it because I was unsure that she would do it. She said she was familiar with my photography and was ready to do anything I asked. I find that almost all ladies are kind of turned on by showing off what they have. I don't know if these shots qualify as "giners", but I like the lady to look like she is either totally in control or that she is oblivious to the camera. Below are some examples. I dislike the photos where the lady is very uncomfortable or looks like she would rather be anywhere else. I don't want that shot. Now if I could just talk Silky into coming to Memphis, I'm sure that 99% of the Cincinnati Mongers would enjoy seeing her doing this shot. What do you say Silky? I'll bet you have a beautiful one![/QUOTE]I believe I am the author of the "Anti-Giner Photo Thread" and it is not that I am totally against them, it is more the quality, tone and texture of the photo. If the pussy is a creative and integral part of the photo I am for it. But if its presense in the picture is for shock value or "just because it's a pussy" I am against it. The vagina is a very fickle photo subject. Some look like tacos, some look like luscious lips and some look like sexy "camel toes. " But they are those that look like sliced pastrami or pickled slugs.

My post was written after I had opened up a BP ad to find a video of a woman masturbating in extreme close-up. I was embarrassed and totally not turned on, which caused me to wonder if it and pictures like it actually caused hobbyists to call.

In hindsight I guess the answer is, "someone must thinks so, otherwise the 'hos woudint be a doing that and making bank. ".

[QUOTE=BTBear;3218784]I believe I am the author of the "Anti-Giner Photo Thread" and it is not that I am totally against them, it is more the quality, tone and texture of the photo. If the pussy is a creative and integral part of the photo I am for it. But if its presense in the picture is for shock value or "just because it's a pussy" I am against it. The vagina is a very fickle photo subject. Some look like tacos, some look like luscious lips and some look like sexy "camel toes. " But they are those that look like sliced pastrami or pickled slugs.

My post was written after I had opened up a BP ad to find a video of a woman masturbating in extreme close-up. I was embarrassed and totally not turned on, which caused me to wonder if it and pictures like it actually caused hobbyists to call.

In hindsight I guess the answer is, "someone must thinks so, otherwise the 'hos woudint be a doing that and making bank. ".[/QUOTE]I am one of those guys who don't like a photos of just vagina. I like images that show more. I like to see what's around the vagina, shapely legs, the round but not too big rump, the abs, the well trimmped landing strip starting at just the top of her cleft, the whole package. Anyway, aside from during DATY, I'll be looking at other parts such as the face, the breasts, the neck, or the small of her back. I am not a gynecologist so I don't need that close of a look at them.

The overall presentation is the difference between a passport photo and a portrait, and that makes all the difference to me when judging a photo.

[QUOTE=BTBear;3218784]
In hindsight I guess the answer is, "someone must thinks so, otherwise the 'hos woudint be a doing that and making bank. ".[/QUOTE]If they were making bank they wouldn't be doing that.

[QUOTE=BTBear;3218784]I believe I am the author of the "Anti-Giner Photo Thread" and it is not that I am totally against them, it is more the quality, tone and texture of the photo. If the pussy is a creative and integral part of the photo I am for it. But if its presense in the picture is for shock value or "just because it's a pussy" I am against it. The vagina is a very fickle photo subject. Some look like tacos, some look like luscious lips and some look like sexy "camel toes. " But they are those that look like sliced pastrami or pickled slugs.

My post was written after I had opened up a BP ad to find a video of a woman masturbating in extreme close-up. I was embarrassed and totally not turned on, which caused me to wonder if it and pictures like it actually caused hobbyists to call.

In hindsight I guess the answer is, "someone must thinks so, otherwise the 'hos woudint be a doing that and making bank. ".[/QUOTE]This is as close up photo of a giner that I have posted within the last few years. I still find this one shot to be quite erotic. I think that it is the well manicured nails and the position of her hand that makes it different. BTW, the vagina belongs to Satin, a lovely latina lady.

[QUOTE=Glockman;3217872]Like you, I fail to see how there are some mongers who don't like pictures of vaginas. But I know that a few exist. However, I don't normally post photos of close ups of them. I prefer to post what I call "tastefully explicit" shots. They are now a part of my routine photo shoot. I make sure the lady is comfortable with posting this shot ahead of time. I have only been turned down once in the last few years. I questioned Houston extensively about it because I was unsure that she would do it. She said she was familiar with my photography and was ready to do anything I asked. I find that almost all ladies are kind of turned on by showing off what they have. I don't know if these shots qualify as "giners", but I like the lady to look like she is either totally in control or that she is oblivious to the camera. Below are some examples. I dislike the photos where the lady is very uncomfortable or looks like she would rather be anywhere else. I don't want that shot. Now if I could just talk Silky into coming to Memphis, I'm sure that 99% of the Cincinnati Mongers would enjoy seeing her doing this shot. What do you say Silky? I'll bet you have a beautiful one![/QUOTE]Maybe if the girls were good looking. Just my opinion but these are not.

All the talk about pictures of vaginas reminded me of an "Everybody loves Raymond" episode where Marie did an abstract sculpture that looked like a giant vagina. She had no idea and eventually decided to give it to charity. Then a nun showed up to get it for their charity auction. Definitely in my top 20 tv episodes. BTW it was kind of pretty.

Hey Glockman, I really do need to schedule a trip to Memphis.

[QUOTE=Glockman;3219263]This is as close up photo of a giner that I have posted within the last few years. I still find this one shot to be quite erotic. I think that it is the well manicured nails and the position of her hand that makes it different. BTW, the vagina belongs to Satin, a lovely latina lady.[/QUOTE]There are definite differences in vaginal pics. What you have submitted falls onto the list of "Tasteful Pussy Pics. " Your are completely correct about the manicured nails and the position of the hand that makes it different. The earlier mention of the "Everybody Loves Raymond" episode reminded me of the photography work of Robert Maplethorpe. His portrait work for Rolling Stone and other publications was exquisite, but his erotic flower photos which consisted of macro shots of the folds and center stems were often compared shots of vaginas. They are sexy and true erotica, not trashy and lewd.

I guess the bottom line of this whole discussion is that pictures of vaginas can be exciting and erotic or they can be disgusting and a complete turn-off. It is totally dependent on A.) The shape, form and color of the vagina, B.) The ability of the photographer and C.) The taste and likes / dislikes of the person looking at the pics.

As a photographer I find that getting that "Great Gash" photo is something like seeing a unicorn. Very elusive, but beautiful when seen.

Dear Mongers,

Today I lost a very close and dear friend to me, Brooke. She has I guess decided to go solo. I am still in shock. Its a new year and with that ultimately comes with change. I know nothing lasts forever but it doesn't make the pain any easier. I am not sure what even happened as everything was fine yesterday. She is a wonderful woman and I will dearly miss her. But as I heard once in a movie Alright Alright Alright. One things about these escorts is that they change but I stay the same.

EE.

I'm a fan of erotic shots that are tasteful and well done. I've submitted two that I've recently done and with a little enhancement on almost any free phone app you can get some tasteful and erotic images.

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;3216021]I personally don't mind ladies that have pics up of their vaginas. I like the different looks whether the vagina is bald hairy large labias, big clits, clits that stand out camel toes its endless. And if I see a lady that advertises her giner I'm thinking she is more open sensual and confident in herself and her body which should make our session better. JMHO. HL29.[/QUOTE]I stated my view on vagina pictures, and it's these ladies ads they're paying their money, and whatever photos they put up should be up to them. I know we all have a thought or vision that we would like to see in the ads but what one person might find distasteful others will find erotic. If the pictures in the ad don't do it for you move on, it's a fact one girl can't get all the money that's why so many women post on the Internet so the girl rubs her pussy and makes it squirt the ones that don't like it certainly looked at it once so she accomplished what she wanted people looked at her ad its up to you if you want to pull the trigger. HL29.

Fat lips nice button clit begging to be eaten and tongue fucked or butterfly flicked. Fucking one is great but going down on a hot woman in "SERIOUS NEED" is awesome watching her eyes roll back her back arch and her ass coming off the bed while her hands grab your head an that pussy face fucks you to death until she explodes. Did I mention "I love to eat pussy? LOL".

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;3219733]I stated my view on vagina pictures, and it's these ladies ads they're paying their money, and whatever photos they put up should be up to them. I know we all have a thought or vision that we would like to see in the ads but what one person might find distasteful others will find erotic. If the pictures in the ad don't do it for you move on, it's a fact one girl can't get all the money that's why so many women post on the Internet so the girl rubs her pussy and makes it squirt the ones that don't like it certainly looked at it once so she accomplished what she wanted people looked at her ad its up to you if you want to pull the trigger. HL29.[/QUOTE]I don't want to throw everyone off the saddle, but I think it may come down to ownership. I've had a lot of pussies in my time (not just the rental variety) and I've loved them all. When they are mine, I just don't care what they look like, because you know. Mine.

Innies, outies, butterflies, zippers, all mine. When it's [B]MY[/B] pussy, I loved them all. When they don't belong to me is when I get picky.

Just sayin.

[QUOTE=Hooter12;3219389]Maybe if the girls were good looking. Just my opinion but these are not.[/QUOTE]Well, I'm obviously not as fortunate as you. I have to settle on bottom of the barrel, butt ugly women. That's as good as I can do. 🖕.