Massage Parlor Reports

Of course, they should have kept quiet. What could they be charged with if the cops didn't catch anyone in the act of breaking the law? Even if they had already been able to get a client to admit to receiving extra services, that doesn't imply that everyone who gets a massage there gets extras. Just say you got a straight massage and nothing else. Who's to say different? Just my. 02 worth.

[QUOTE=Dan Wesson; 1121019]Acccording to the article:

"The customers, according to Norton, were open and honest with the questioning officers, realizing that there was no denying what services the establishment really offered. All three described similar experiences at the parlor, which consisted of an hour-long massage that concluded with the massage therapist performing a sexual act.

In return for their police cooperation, the customers are able to walk away, but their names are included in the report filed against the establishment."

Think these guys should have kept quiet? What charges could they have faced? [/QUOTE]

Gentlemen,

Three things struck me about this incident:

1. OK, so they were running an unlicensed massage establishment in a building where a licensed masseuse also had her studio. WTF were the folks at Gemstone thinking? Did they really have that much blind faith in the lady upstairs to believe that she wouldn't look for a way to kill off the competition?

2. Interesting that the PD alleged that two of the fellows they questioned are registered sex offenders. Was this true, do you think? Methinks it ain't necessarily so. Perhaps they are making this up on the theory that it's useful to suggest that anyone who would go to a "happy" MP is by definition, a perv.

3. As for the quote about the "legitimate" therapist in the building: "One of the complaints against the establishment, according to police, came from a legitimate masseuse who runs a business from the top floor of the building. She said that Gemstone Massage, which is located in the basement, gets a lot more business than she does and only seems to take male customers." Now that she has eliminated the {allegedly} Happy place downstairs, does she truly believe that all of Gemstone's former customers will seek her out? That her own business will pick up? Note and a biz development hint to complainer: Answer is,"Not likely, dearie." And if you want to attract more male customers.... well, you know what you need to do!

Kindest Regards,

BA

[QUOTE=Santa66;1121403]Of course, they should have kept quiet. What could they be charged with if the cops didn't catch anyone in the act of breaking the law? Even if they had already been able to get a client to admit to receiving extra services, that doesn't imply that everyone who gets a massage there gets extras. Just say you got a straight massage and nothing else. Who's to say different? Just my. 02 worth.[/QUOTE]I tried looking the law up and there is no law about getting a massage, so the cops don't have anything on you. Just admit you got a massage period. Unless they have video proof they have nothing. It is your word against the girl, only if they speak english.

It could be that there were men going to the legit masseuse seeking extras. That would make me unhappy, if I were operating a legit place.

Anybody that opens up a rub & tug place in a residential neighborhood is asking for trouble.

I recall a similar place I visited off Porter Sq. Some years ago. Not Asian, but all-American. I remember thinking as I walked up to the house that I'm certain the neighbors saw male customers coming & going and the place wouldn't last long. Sure enough, it did not. Too bad, because I got one hell of a massage, along with a very happy ending.

[QUOTE=Boston Ampfan; 1121482]Gentlemen,

Three things struck me about this incident:

1. OK, so they were running an unlicensed massage establishment in a building where a licensed masseuse also had her studio. WTF were the folks at Gemstone thinking? Did they really have that much blind faith in the lady upstairs to believe that she wouldn't look for a way to kill off the competition?

2. Interesting that the PD alleged that two of the fellows they questioned are registered sex offenders. Was this true, do you think? Methinks it ain't necessarily so. Perhaps they are making this up on the theory that it's useful to suggest that anyone who would go to a "happy" MP is by definition, a perv.

3. As for the quote about the "legitimate" therapist in the building: "One of the complaints against the establishment, according to police, came from a legitimate masseuse who runs a business from the top floor of the building. She said that Gemstone Massage, which is located in the basement, gets a lot more business than she does and only seems to take male customers." Now that she has eliminated the {allegedly} Happy place downstairs, does she truly believe that all of Gemstone's former customers will seek her out? That her own business will pick up? Note and a biz development hint to complainer: Answer is,"Not likely, dearie." And if you want to attract more male customers. Well, you know what you need to do!

Kindest Regards,

BA[/QUOTE]

If you feel the conversation may lead you to testify against yourself, the best way is to shut your mouth up. If they don't let you go, find a lawyer. Your strength is not to give them any information, not the other way.

I am thinking I would have gone with the "just got massage" comment and then asked if I was being charged with anything. If not, I would take my leave. I have to believe they stopped more customers, but the others probably had no priors on which the cops could squeeze the customers.

This case kinda stinks with respect to rights on several levels and I would hope the only charge they can stick is the unlicensed massage parlor.

[QUOTE=Pires24; 1117858]Looks like they changed there name to forever young. Anymore info people? Same ownership? Same girls? They do have the same number thou.

Thanks[/QUOTE]I was there today, I got Coco I think, not sure. The " body work " (they don't like it when we say massage) done by this provider was poor, not very polite but not rude, that came later when I asked what was the other girls name after she finished, no extras. Not even an accidental rub, not sensual in any way, she just squeezed a lot.

Some say that you can get just about anything here with the right girl, I guess I got the one that does not do any extras of any kind.

I would love some info about the girls that work there (Tina, Coco & Amy) I asked who was working and the woman on the phone gave me those names. If anyone is familiar with this girls please let me know.

I am still curious to know about the other girl that was there but I was so disappointed that when I walked by her on the hallway I only said Hi. I should have ask her name and and next time set up an appointment with her, she was very sweet, cute and attractive.

I found it amusing that the Narcotics officer for Stoneham PD and the Southern Middlesex Regional Drug Task Force took down these 2 Chinese masseuses, who were then released on $40 bail.

[QUOTE=Dan Wesson; 1121671]I am thinking I would have gone with the "just got massage" comment and then asked if I was being charged with anything. If not, I would take my leave. I have to believe they stopped more customers, but the others probably had no priors on which the cops could squeeze the customers.

This case kinda stinks with respect to rights on several levels and I would hope the only charge they can stick is the unlicensed massage parlor.[/QUOTE]I agree. Why would anyone say anything but "I got a massage". There is absolutely nothing illegal about getting a massage. And unless the police actually sprung a trap with an undercover operation. They have nothing. Know your rights. And say nothing but the obvious truth."I got a massage. If you're not charging me for something, adios!"

[QUOTE=SMS 54;1121834]I found it amusing that the Narcotics officer for Stoneham PD and the Southern Middlesex Regional Drug Task Force took down these 2 Chinese masseuses, who were then released on $40 bail.[/QUOTE]More public employees doing what they do best. Putting the taxpayers' dollars to work!

[QUOTE=Dan Wesson; 1121671]I am thinking I would have gone with the "just got massage" comment and then asked if I was being charged with anything. If not, I would take my leave. I have to believe they stopped more customers, but the others probably had no priors on which the cops could squeeze the customers.

This case kinda stinks with respect to rights on several levels and I would hope the only charge they can stick is the unlicensed massage parlor. [/QUOTE]Please, fellow mongers, invest the time, reap the dividends:

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik&feature=related[/url]

I promise it will be worth your while. Once you're done with that video, go down the right hand column and check out a few more, then ask yourself what your answer would be.

Haven't been around much lately but as some may remember I'm a firm believer that if you find a bad provider, you need to report it. If you don't your an accomplice in their subsequent victims. With this in mind, I offer the following:

Stay away from [url]http://boston.craigslist.org/sob/thp/2160441571.html.[/url] Surprise! The pics are fake. The $30 special went up to $40 / hh. I got a quick 5 minute half hearted back rub for 5 mins, then the flip. The hard negotiating started with $1. 2 for a "special" BJ. She wanted $50 for he, I said no. She wanted $40, I said if I can roam, she said no. We settled on nothing until she offered he with no touching for $30.

Did the deed while talking on the phone with other mongers. Gents, don't bother.

Remember, report the bad ones! She got three calls while I was there. Some one knew she was a ripoff before I got there. If you have any winners in the Quincy area, PM me.

I've seen ads for a new one just off the Lynnway but haven't seen any reports.

Anyone here toftt?

[QUOTE=Fiberglass; 1122512]I've seen ads for a new one just off the Lynnway but haven't seen any reports.

It has been reviewed at least 3 times. My review is below. But YMMV. Someone else reported "no hint of extras." And a third said he was draped throughout and was told no when he asked for HE. It may depend on the girl or the circumstances.

Quote Originally Posted by Yello Tail View Post.

Out of my way, but I TOFTT. Cute provider. Paid 80. Seemed to be two women working. Took me to a room to undress, then to sauna to wait until she finished up with her customer. About 10 minutes later. TS was good, but not RI standards. Could get better on second visit. Korean style massage (similar to the place in Revere). Full roaming OTC during the massage. Some teasing. Could improve on second visit. Flip, massage upper thighs and stomach. I placed her hand on my sore spot. She didn't flinch but said she might get fired. I won't tell. Nice finish. Again full roaming OTC, but wouldn't allow anything else. Tipped 40. She didn't count it, thanked me with a big smile. Come again. And tell your friends. Not a clock watcher. Got there at 3:35 left at 5:30.

Someone else said:
I was there once, when they first open, nice looking 2 providers but no hint of extras, so got to try again, hopefully for the other one, who looked a little cuter and made strong eye contact and smile with me when I left.

So been a while but have gone to 1 Spa in RI lately. Great place. Great girls. Light massage with teasing before the flip and was rock hard minutes after the flip. Let the girl do her stuff and did several positions. Felt awesome. CBJ and FS. Total damage was $$200.

Also ventured back up to Need Message. Saw my girl there. She give one of the best massages and is worth it just for the massage. Got the Deep Tissue (wink wink) massage for 90 minutes. She speaks good english with no interpreter this time. She really gets into the massage and took it all in. Had a great time. Great wipe down at end with hot towel. $80 for massage and usual tip for great service.