Printable View
[QUOTE=Horny As Hell;1571372]Not trying to nitpick here and I'm "assuming" the both of you meant VICIOUS (as in mean, depraved, immoral etc) and NOT "viscous" (which means resistant to flow, sticky, thick adhesive etc) as I wouldn't want to think that someone is laughing at another monger over a simple spelling / typing mistake. We all know what was meant to be conveyed![/QUOTE]I took it to mean wet, sticky criminals, it made sense to me in that context, LOL.
I know in the past there has been nothing but bad reports. They are constantly posting on BP and new girls have apparently been hired. Has anyone gone or willing to TOFTT?
[QUOTE=Choir Boy;1570667]The reach of PVD's finest seems to be of limited scope. I went to Simple Pleasures in Central Falls a couple of weeks ago, and my hostess had no idea anything was going on in the next town.[/QUOTE]Be advised that SP is primarily an American operation, so it is within reason that your hostess may not have known about PVD happenings. I'm sure the owner of that establishment is aware. Among the vast numbers of AMPs all over the northeast and beyond, I would be willing to wager there are few who aren't aware, and many in the area are most likely at least a bit nervous.
[QUOTE=Caseyb7; 1571159]Hi,
The Board is very helpful keeping me updated on the current bad times and developments associted with them.
My question is if someone out there might know with some credibility what, if any, linkage the Providence LE campaign has to any other, perhaps national, effort by whatever authority?
When this started I read some Connecticut area posts including my favorite from New Haven when I used to live in the area. They suggested then that it was closed related to the current pressures. Also, I remember the sad Waterbury CT story that never recovered. So the member references here are understood.
Different posters have vetted different scenarios. Cleanup prior to election time, the MA man who was victimized by an unprovoked spa worker assault, etc. But my hope would be that if this were just local grandstanding, it may recover with time. Whereas if this is some national coordinated LE agency program the odds might be less so of recovery.
So, any fact-based insights to help assess the situation would be appreciated.
Many thanks.[/QUOTE]It is all speculation, everyone has an opinion or theory, but fact-based insights will be hard to come by. IMHO.
[QUOTE=Horny As Hell;1571372]Not trying to nitpick here and I'm "assuming" the both of you meant VICIOUS (as in mean, depraved, immoral etc) and NOT "viscous" (which means resistant to flow, sticky, thick adhesive etc) as I wouldn't want to think that someone is laughing at another monger over a simple spelling / typing mistake. We all know what was meant to be conveyed![/QUOTE]I wasn't laughing at the author, but at the typo / autocorrect that produced a funny result. No offense to the author was intended or, I feel sure, taken. Just an opportunity to lighten up during a difficult time for our little club here. Most of us type on our phones in parked cars or maybe furtively at laptops, and the typos happen. This one made me smile. I knew what he meant, and I liked what came out. Just wanted to share a laugh.
So settle down ya viscous monger!
[QUOTE=Tommy Anonymus; 1571864]I wasn't laughing at the author, but at the typo / autocorrect that produced a funny result. No offense to the author was intended or, I feel sure, taken. Just an opportunity to lighten up during a difficult time for our little club here. Most of us type on our phones in parked cars or maybe furtively at laptops, and the typos happen. This one made me smile. I knew what he meant, and I liked what came out. Just wanted to share a laugh.
So settle down ya viscous monger![/QUOTE]LMAO. No I didn't take offense at all, thought it was funny myself. These F'ing phones love to fuck with you with the autocorrect feature it just happened to be a somewhat funny correction. In some regards they could be considered viscous criminals too. .
Muff
[QUOTE=RLargess;1571491]I know in the past there has been nothing but bad reports. They are constantly posting on BP and new girls have apparently been hired. Has anyone gone or willing to TOFTT?[/QUOTE]I thought Tansmart was a TS type place. Not table shower but the other TS. Transgender, Transexual, Transvestite. Damn I can never figure out what the differences are with those terms? Maybe someone can enlighten me. Or on second thought don't bother. Not my thing!
Muffy
[QUOTE=MuffyTheDiver; 1572042]I thought Tansmart was a TS type place. Not table shower but the other TS. Transgender, Transexual, Transvestite. Damn I can never figure out what the differences are with those terms? Maybe someone can enlighten me. Or on second thought don't bother. Not my thing!
Muffy[/QUOTE]According to Tansmart's BP posts there are two TS, but now I believe there's 3 or 4 females there. My initial question is, why so many? I've been looking to TOFTT, but Warren's quite a drive.
[QUOTE=Tp1701;1572170]According to Tansmart's BP posts there are two TS, but now I believe there's 3 or 4 females there. My initial question is, why so many? I've been looking to TOFTT, but Warren's quite a drive.[/QUOTE]Have things become this desperate so soon that mongers are giving serious thought to trying a place with bad reviews and trans-whatever-ed providers?
There are a number of posts on the N Haven Connecticut forum that their long standing and excellent provider has reopened.
While my experience is now 2 years old, while I lived there it was an excellent provider.
Very customer oriented with a large and rotating staff such that if you like variety it was the norm.
Management was customer oriented as well and time watching as not an issue.
Star is about 2 minutes off the highway exit and behind a DD.
Quite a drive from Providence, however others have talked about NYC options such that this is closer.
So, if interested, a quick review of the N Haven CT forum might be worthwhile.
[QUOTE=SMS 54;1572351]Have things become this desperate so soon that mongers are giving serious thought to trying a place with bad reviews and trans-whatever-ed providers?[/QUOTE]I have seen nothing but bad reviews on this place.
And their latest ad with the new girls looks as though they are only available as a 4 hand deal.
[QUOTE=SMS 54;1572351]Have things become this desperate so soon that mongers are giving serious thought to trying a place with bad reviews and trans-whatever-ed providers?[/QUOTE]Let me clarify: I did not mean to see the TS, I meant the legitimate females. I don't recall reading bad reviews here, but I will double check.
[QUOTE=Legend Man; 1572552]I have seen nothing but bad reviews on this place.
And their latest ad with the new girls looks as though they are only available as a 4 hand deal.[/QUOTE]To edit my post, I see other ads were they are available as a 2 hand deal
[QUOTE=Tp1701;1572589]Let me clarify: I did not mean to see the TS, I meant the legitimate females. I don't recall reading bad reviews here, but I will double check.[/QUOTE]Tp Pretty sure the bad reviews I have seen were on the TS, the 2 new girls I haven't see any reviews
[QUOTE=Legend Man;1572662]Tp Pretty sure the bad reviews I have seen were on the TS, the 2 new girls I haven't see any reviews[/QUOTE]I know there was one report of nothing with Yosefa, but she's been MIA recently. There was another report from April that said no extras but didn't give a name.