Printable View
Mackensie Park.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8eebca91-f31b-4856-9417-d2ac96dc1afa[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
Jessika_94.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/261802b3-92e3-445b-9577-a77e7a47fc54[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
301 KittyK.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/82edcce0-bbbf-425e-b964-a48564985ea5[/URL]
DTF for $250.5'5, 120 lbs, 24 years old, obvious pro.
[QUOTE=AdcFellow;4565222]Mackensie Park.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8eebca91-f31b-4856-9417-d2ac96dc1afa[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
Jessika_94.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/261802b3-92e3-445b-9577-a77e7a47fc54[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
301 KittyK.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/82edcce0-bbbf-425e-b964-a48564985ea5[/URL]
DTF for $250.5'5, 120 lbs, 24 years old, obvious pro.[/QUOTE]I banged 301 KittyK on Friday. Got her down to $200 everything bare but anal and couldn't CIP. She's an energizer bunny, she can fuck and fuck and fuck. She squirts too if that's your thing. Her ass is absurd, it's a shame she won't let you stick your dick in it.
Scammer. Wants money upfront before meet.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/a3f70bf7-ae0c-4018-9752-36abdae936a8[/URL]
[QUOTE=Dimples572;4564775]I did a search but came up empty. Has anyone seen this little dime piece? I'm guessing she's got some serious GPS going on but thought I'd check to see if there was a scouting report on her already.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/cff37c51-4eb5-4b90-b845-81a7bd2a981b[/URL][/QUOTE]Texted with her quite a bit and vetted her via IG. She's real and super cute but a terrible conversationalist, awful at getting back to you and seems to never actually make a plan to meet. She gave me her availability but would never commit and then would disappear for days despite a pretty generous monetary offer.
So I messaged her, she finally responded with:
Hi there, I'm good. School in the US is expensive. So, I'm looking for a generous sugar daddy. If you are serious about meeting me, show me. Spoil me and I'll spoil you.
CashApp: $PrincessErica19.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/14da780a-a6ce-41fc-9b74-eba453647bb9[/URL]
Yeah, nope. Responded with. This is the work of scammers who take your money and run. Sorry, Bye. Profile is only a day old and some of the pics are not of the original profile pic.
[QUOTE=AdcFellow;4565222]Mackensie Park.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8eebca91-f31b-4856-9417-d2ac96dc1afa[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
Jessika_94.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/261802b3-92e3-445b-9577-a77e7a47fc54[/URL]
Agreed to $300 ppm. Did not show up for date. Just disappeared.
301 KittyK.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/82edcce0-bbbf-425e-b964-a48564985ea5[/URL]
DTF for $250.5'5, 120 lbs, 24 years old, obvious pro.[/QUOTE]Chatted with 301 KittyK, pretty much the same thing. Have gone for the plunge yet.
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4565542]So I messaged her, she finally responded with:
Hi there, I'm good. School in the US is expensive. So, I'm looking for a generous sugar daddy. If you are serious about meeting me, show me. Spoil me and I'll spoil you.
CashApp: $PrincessErica19.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/14da780a-a6ce-41fc-9b74-eba453647bb9[/URL]
Yeah, nope. Responded with. This is the work of scammers who take your money and run. Sorry, Bye. Profile is only a day old and some of the pics are not of the original profile pic.[/QUOTE]Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.
It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.
[QUOTE=ChrisCarr;4565657]Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.
It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.[/QUOTE]I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.
I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4565698]I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.
I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.[/QUOTE]
if they're asking for money up front to prove you're legit etc.
If you scroll down to the 3rd from the bottom of the offense list, there is reason that says seeking online only relationship...that is if you use the app. On the website click on appropriate conduct and seeking online only relationship is there.
Sometimes when you push back on that they’ll block you first so you’re outta luck. That what happens with this one.
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4565698]I do report profiles for "reportable offenses", but SA's categories are escort / soliciting, underage, fake / scam, criminal activity, profile content, inappropriate conduct.
I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.[/QUOTE]SA Policy states that online only relationships are not allowed. As for Cd / trans, the profile asks for sex not gender. A man in a dress is a man, I am not seeking a man, so the profile content is not appropriate.
Setup a meeting about a week in advance, seemed dtf. Meanwhile, she wanted to chat online via an app that allows recording. When I didn't go along, she went silent and blocked me.
Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.
Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78df64-b8f8-45b0-bb85-700ced1bef7d[/URL]
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4565698]I don't think SA considers online-only, trans / cd's as violations of their current policy.[/QUOTE]I can't stand the trannies on seeking or any of the other dating sites. There are freak show services that cater to that, why do they need to intrude on normal sites where maybe 1% is looking for that. It's particularly annoying because I inevitably end up matching with a few of them since my technique is all about volume and speed of initial contacts. I don't bother to report, as some services like Bumble will actually ban you for that. But anytime I match with one and realize it I suggest we make a snuff film and then block them.
[QUOTE=KevinCalormis;4565973]Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.
Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78df64-b8f8-45b0-bb85-700ced1bef7d[/URL][/QUOTE]Told her it was an interesting profile. Are you hoping to save us heathens from damnation.
[QUOTE=Sometimes123;4565945]Setup a meeting about a week in advance, seemed dtf. Meanwhile, she wanted to chat online via an app that allows recording. When I didn't go along, she went silent and blocked me.[/QUOTE]Since the numbers were stripped on the forum and I can't provide link due to being blocked, her username starts with Jodie and ends with one one seven.
[QUOTE=ChrisCarr;4565657]Just a question, do any of you report obvious scammers? I do, and I report online-only and trans / cd's too. I think I've racked up 30 well-constructed reports and dozens more have been submitted without any evidence. In those cases I figure once a handful of users report a profile then the monkeys at seeking get around to checking said profile.
It is really pointless at the end of the day, but I'm banking on the idea that if I'm a user that is behaving responsibly that any revenge-reports f4 om girls will be looked at with credulity towards my efforts to make the site legitimate and safer for users.[/QUOTE]Reporting is a waste of time, if any action is taken they have a new profile up before the old one is down. As far as trans / CDs if there is no interest then they fade from the site very fast. If you have the time to report do it here on the appropriate thread. When a girls profile or by line is online only or only selling pic, videos then the site is fully aware and should automatically reject her profile. If it plainly says that again waste of time contacting them but never fails some monger tries to talk them into meeting resulting in getting butt hurt when they get rejected.
Some random person from the other side of the country starts messaging you like you're going to fly them out even though there is an abundance of women here. The most annoying is when they're msging from outside of the country.
Anyone seeing this happen? Seems like it comes it waves.
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4566239]Some random person from the other side of the country starts messaging you like you're going to fly them out even though there is an abundance of women here. The most annoying is when they're msging from outside of the country.
Anyone seeing this happen? Seems like it comes it waves.[/QUOTE]I have not joined SeegingArrangement because of the fixed cost, but I have used What'sYourPrice. Almost every morning I get two or three offers for meeting, and the requests come from foreign countries: Canada, the Philippines. Who in their right mind would fly to the Philippines for a first meeting?
I can only conclude that the website is generating these requests to maintain your attention.
[QUOTE=KevinCalormis;4565973]Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.
Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78df64-b8f8-45b0-bb85-700ced1bef7d[/URL][/QUOTE]I want to read you did bffs and CIP with this one by next week.
[QUOTE=Mazvid;4566457]I want to read you did bffs and CIP with this one by next week.[/QUOTE]I know my bible, "Be fruitful and multiply!
[QUOTE=KevinCalormis;4565973]Nice bible verse in her profile: "The body, however, is not meant for sexual immorality but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. " Corinthians 6:13.
Something tells me we have a different definition of fun. Seriously I have no clue what some of these girls are thinking.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/3e78df64-b8f8-45b0-bb85-700ced1bef7d[/URL][/QUOTE]I used to screen out girls that wanted "platonic" until I met a few girls that had that in their profiles but turned out to be freaks. Now it's become more confusing for me.
[QUOTE=WillOckham;4566274]I have not joined SeegingArrangement because of the fixed cost, but I have used What'sYourPrice. Almost every morning I get two or three offers for meeting, and the requests come from foreign countries: Canada, the Philippines. Who in their right mind would fly to the Philippines for a first meeting?
I can only conclude that the website is generating these requests to maintain your attention.[/QUOTE]If you went to the Phillipines, you wouldn't need this, or any other site. Just about any girl there can be had for about $100 for the night. If you go to any bar or club, they are full of girls that are looking to score with a tourist for money and $100 is a lot of money. That's what some of the professional jobs pay for a week.
[QUOTE=Mike77;4566579]I used to screen out girls that wanted "platonic" until I met a few girls that had that in their profiles but turned out to be freaks. Now it's become more confusing for me.[/QUOTE]If they're outed that gives them some plausible deniability.
[QUOTE=Mike77;4566579]I used to screen out girls that wanted "platonic" until I met a few girls that had that in their profiles but turned out to be freaks. Now it's become more confusing for me.[/QUOTE]I've found several girls now that use the platonic tag that are open to a non-platonic relationship. I've been given several reasons why girls use the platonic tag:
- They are open to intimacy, but have a boyfriend / husband that knows they Sugar Date and don't want them to think they are sleeping with other men (but they do).
- They want to be able to claim they are only platonic if found out by friends, family, colleagues or LEO.
- They use it to screen out guys that are only looking for sex, but are open to sex if the attraction and chemistry is there.
- They are looking for intimate dates, but are open to platonic if that is what a guy prefers (don't know how often that happens! LOL).
- They are open to some form of intimacy, but not PIV.
- They are not open to any forms of intimacy and one a completely non-sexual relationship.
I've gotten to the point that when I see platonic in their profile, I will simply ask if they are open to intimacy if their is genuine attraction and chemistry. More than half say yes.
Agreed. I've made it a point to correspond with girls who initially say "platonic only", but who have a vibe (either in profile or messages) that they look for some kind of "connection". A lot of girls use the term "platonic" as a shield against overly aggressive SDs (which, after hearing stories, I can totally understand). For me, the bowl is not unlike "regular" dating. It's all about chemistry, connection, and seduction. A lot of girls aren't opposed to being seduced, it just takes a bit more effort. Which for me is all part of the fun. Be good to your SB, and she will be good to you.
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4567024]I've found several girls now that use the platonic tag that are open to a non-platonic relationship. I've been given several reasons why girls use the platonic tag:
- They are open to intimacy, but have a boyfriend / husband that knows they Sugar Date and don't want them to think they are sleeping with other men (but they do).
- They want to be able to claim they are only platonic if found out by friends, family, colleagues or LEO.
- They use it to screen out guys that are only looking for sex, but are open to sex if the attraction and chemistry is there.
- They are looking for intimate dates, but are open to platonic if that is what a guy prefers (don't know how often that happens! LOL).
- They are open to some form of intimacy, but not PIV.
- They are not open to any forms of intimacy and one a completely non-sexual relationship.
I've gotten to the point that when I see platonic in their profile, I will simply ask if they are open to intimacy if their is genuine attraction and chemistry. More than half say yes.[/QUOTE]
I generally ignore the foreign ones. But if they are close by I always ask them what interests them in my profile. Especially when they haven't viewed me yet. Had one claimed she just moved to the area (my exact town) and then asked me to buy pics. Told her IRL only and willing to meet for coffee, she blocked.
For the record, her profile still says Rhode Island.
[QUOTE=Jsidd;4566239]Some random person from the other side of the country starts messaging you like you're going to fly them out even though there is an abundance of women here. The most annoying is when they're msging from outside of the country.
Anyone seeing this happen? Seems like it comes it waves.[/QUOTE]
This one is literally ripping mongers off but, I'm sure if she's asking for this much, someone is paying.
There are two cute girls from Morocco that seem to be friends. Supposedly 19 year old college girls.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49814e6a-d570-42be-9830-e67486e23153[/URL]
And.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/91ab10a1-da91-4787-9f6b-22454e1f21a4[/URL]
Can anyone share Intel?
Thanks.
So, after a quick message saying hi, she replies with, "hey if you want to talk, cash app me". Smh. Do guys actually do this?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/beaca89c-290a-49e6-9e48-a3f83d995b82[/URL]
[QUOTE=Sometimes123;4567727]So, after a quick message saying hi, she replies with, "hey if you want to talk, cash app me". Smh. Do guys actually do this?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/beaca89c-290a-49e6-9e48-a3f83d995b82[/URL][/QUOTE]I wish I could post all the ones I've blocked that did this. Next time I will post before blocking.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/437cf93a-d758-431d-8922-7ad78fd6f1ca[/URL]
Claimed to be DTF for $200 but flaked day of. Anyone have luck would love to hear every detail. LOL.
[QUOTE=HughJerkman;4568317]I wish I could post all the ones I've blocked that did this. Next time I will post before blocking.[/QUOTE]She wanted 250 for just dinner dates to start. After not agreeing she came back with I'll keep discussing arrangements if you send 20. It's been a lot of back and forth, doubt the pic is real.
[QUOTE=SuckeredByaSB;4567703]There are two cute girls from Morocco that seem to be friends. Supposedly 19 year old college girls.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49814e6a-d570-42be-9830-e67486e23153[/URL]
And.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/91ab10a1-da91-4787-9f6b-22454e1f21a4[/URL]
Can anyone share Intel?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]Her response. Someone who wants a non-sexual friendship is my ideal person.
[QUOTE=EasyeOne;4568498]Her response. Someone who wants a non-sexual friendship is my ideal person.[/QUOTE]Had spoken to Moroccangal for a bit on SA, and she tried to match me on [URL]Whatsyourprice.com[/URL] Didn't bother with the second site since we found eachother on SA. She's hard to talk to, best to avoid. Can never manage to hear from her ever, regardless of what you offer.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49814e6a-d570-42be-9830-e67486e23153[/URL]
[QUOTE=SuckeredByaSB;4567703]There are two cute girls from Morocco that seem to be friends. Supposedly 19 year old college girls.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/49814e6a-d570-42be-9830-e67486e23153[/URL]
And.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/91ab10a1-da91-4787-9f6b-22454e1f21a4[/URL]
Can anyone share Intel?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]It looks like the first girl (153) is in the second girl's (1 a4) picture. They almost look like sisters.
I can't believe that this one is real. WAY too good to be true. Anyone spoken with her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0d142ac7-880a-0caf-f546-aae16dc7e9b3[/URL]
[QUOTE=EasyeOne;4568498]Her response. Someone who wants a non-sexual friendship is my ideal person.[/QUOTE]She claims to be DTF for a lower allowance. Everything but Greek. Also agree she is very slow to respond and probably not worth the hassle.
Right now I have two very solid 25/26 year olds in my rotation. I don't like going too young but I know others prefer the 19 year olds.
[QUOTE=SamTam;4568858]I can't believe that this one is real. WAY too good to be true. Anyone spoken with her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0d142ac7-880a-0caf-f546-aae16dc7e9b3[/URL][/QUOTE]She seems to be offering a lot for "no financial benefits whatsoever" So why has she been on the board for over 4 years? There must be something wrong.
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4567024]I've found several girls now that use the platonic tag that are open to a non-platonic relationship. I've been given several reasons why girls use the platonic tag:
- They are open to intimacy, but have a boyfriend / husband that knows they Sugar Date and don't want them to think they are sleeping with other men (but they do).
- They want to be able to claim they are only platonic if found out by friends, family, colleagues or LEO.
- They use it to screen out guys that are only looking for sex, but are open to sex if the attraction and chemistry is there.
- They are looking for intimate dates, but are open to platonic if that is what a guy prefers (don't know how often that happens! LOL).
- They are open to some form of intimacy, but not PIV.
- They are not open to any forms of intimacy and one a completely non-sexual relationship.
I've gotten to the point that when I see platonic in their profile, I will simply ask if they are open to intimacy if their is genuine attraction and chemistry. More than half say yes.[/QUOTE]On my next iteration of seeking I think I'll go looking for profiles that are explicitly seeking platonic. I'm thinking that there may be value in having lunch and paying $50 to pick the brain of the demographic I'm looking to bang on. I explain.
Being in touch with a 19 yr old coed and treating her well could lead to other great things, but just knowing what her cohort are up to and interested in can justify the meager price. An example of being in touch with the kids has been snapchat. Fuck snapchat, the 'news' articles are trash and are a likely source for all the dumb ideas the youth cater to lately. The whole thing is stupid, but having an account has definitely opened up communication opportunities that have led to success. Since the pics are only visible for a short while I find that girls are way more comfortable sending nudes and other pics.
Same with instagram. Just having an account gets your foot in the door. Instagram and snapchat is also full of providers and is a great source for provider / sugarbaby verification.
[QUOTE=SamTam;4568858]I can't believe that this one is real. WAY too good to be true. Anyone spoken with her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/0d142ac7-880a-0caf-f546-aae16dc7e9b3[/URL][/QUOTE]Google search "AsianKristyDC" (in quotes) and you will see the same picture on a couple sites indicating she is trans.