Printable View
[QUOTE=DNut;7023325]Pretty sure there are reports saying that she was Eden's sister, or Eden's daughter. Or something like that. Either way, she's asking for a deposit. You know what the board consensus is regarding deposits.[/QUOTE]Completely missed that part of the ad. Thanks for the heads up.
I tried to connect with her in early July. She agreed to waive the deposit but wouldn't budge off of the 5 pricetag. I see she is now doing 0. 5 hr for 4, so if you ever wanted proof that we can control the prices its right there.
Reviewing old posts, I still don't think we have a verified encounter with her so someone may have to TOFTT.
[QUOTE=UpTheReds;7023989]Completely missed that part of the ad. Thanks for the heads up.[/QUOTE]
Not getting out to play much these days, but I did have the opportunity to see both of these wonderful ladies this week (separate visits). If you like beautiful, mature, sensual women who are into the session as much as you are, then I highly recommend both of these ladies. Had great conversation with both ladies and left very satisfied after both visits. They are based out of Houston, but Britt indicated she may be touring through Cincinnati again in November. Setup was simple with both through P411.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/mariahsweet[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/brittessex[/URL]
[QUOTE=BlueJacks60;7070654]Not getting out to play much these days, but I did have the opportunity to see both of these wonderful ladies this week (separate visits). If you like beautiful, mature, sensual women who are into the session as much as you are, then I highly recommend both of these ladies. Had great conversation with both ladies and left very satisfied after both visits. They are based out of Houston, but Britt indicated she may be touring through Cincinnati again in November. Setup was simple with both through P411.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/mariahsweet[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/brittessex[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Mariah Sweet, who admits to being 58, is actually a few years older than *me*. (I guess I should be grateful for that.).
She reminds me of Rue McClanahan on 'The Golden Girls', my grandmother's favorite sitcom in the 1980's. That's not exactly an erotic trigger for me, but to each his own.
What I would say in her favor is that she is *appropriately priced for her age* at $350.
I hate to see you guys who like grandmother-aged women pay $500 and up. I think a lot of these older escorts take advantage of the almost exclusively older men who see them. (And I'm assuming you're at least in your late 60's, if you're drawn to a provider that old.).
At least half of all hobbyists will immediately disqualify a provider that old. You guys who *do* prefer women in that age range should be getting favorable pricing. (Britt Essex, the 53-year-old, is overpriced at $500, IMO.).
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;7072340]Mariah Sweet, who admits to being 58, is actually a few years older than *me*. (I guess I should be grateful for that.).
What I would say in her favor is that she is *appropriately priced for her age* at $350.
At least half of all hobbyists will immediately disqualify a provider that old. You guys who *do* prefer women in that age range should be getting favorable pricing. (Britt Essex, the 53-year-old, is overpriced at $500, IMO.).[/QUOTE]Todd,
You and I usually agree on most things but now I must object. I am able to find women under 30 and HWP for 300 and under. I am not judging anyone who prefers an in-shape grannie over some of the toxic whales that inhabit the local boards. However, lets not kid ourselves, unless it is a fetish, she does not begin to approach good value until well under 250.
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;7072419]Todd,
You and I usually agree on most things but now I must object. I am able to find women under 30 and HWP for 300 and under. I am not judging anyone who prefers an in-shape grannie over some of the toxic whales that inhabit the local boards. However, lets not kid ourselves, unless it is a fetish, she does not begin to approach good value until well under 250.
BAM.[/QUOTE]To those with a granny fetish, is it the sex, or the butterscotch candy she gives you afterwards? Just kidding guys. To each his own. Who you choose to fuck has absolutely no bearing on my life, and therefore, is none of my business.
But it [I]is[/I] the candy, right?
[QUOTE=BamBam;7072419]Todd,
You and I usually agree on most things but now I must object. I am able to find women under 30 and HWP for 300 and under. I am not judging anyone who prefers an in-shape grannie over some of the toxic whales that inhabit the local boards. However, lets not kid ourselves, unless it is a fetish, she does not begin to approach good value until well under 250.
BAM.[/QUOTE]I was speaking in terms of the currently inflated market. Bam is right, though: no provider over the age of 40 should be charging north of 250.
Speaking of which: I hate to harp on this subject. But as a group, we really need to raise our expectations. There have been a string of posts recently pushing providers in their 50's. Mariah Sweet is 58. This is getting ridiculous, frankly.
I think some of this is related to the poor condition of the market. There aren't a lot of under-30 hotties to choose from now, compared to the Golden Age of 2011 to 2018.
However, there also seems to be a faction that actively fetishizes grandma-aged women.
As Wielic recently wrote, in the Escort Classified Ads thread:
"Give me some wrinkles, sagging and stretch marks; that's a woman fit for a man. The rest are girls, and the boys can have them all. ".
Guys, if preferring wrinkles and sagging is the mark of being a man, I will gladly remain a "boy", now well into my 50's.
I'm not shaming the men who prefer old ladies (there is no other way to put it, with the ages of some of these women.) But this is not the *norm*.
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;7072784]Give me some wrinkles, sagging and stretch marks; that's a woman fit for a man. The rest are girls, and the boys can have them all. ".[/QUOTE]That is a woman fit for a man, a man who is in his 80's.
[QUOTE=Ginzo666;7072859]That is a woman fit for a man, a man who is in his 80's.[/QUOTE]Hey! I am getting close to resembling that remark!
BAM.
[QUOTE=BamBam;7073796]Hey! I am getting close to resembling that remark!
BAM.[/QUOTE]It sounds like you're almost old enough for the US Senate, but not quite old enough. Come back when you're as old as Diane Feinstein or Strom Thurmond.
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/9411103.htm?cat=1[/URL]
Anyone see her while she was in town?
Has anyone had any experiences with this one (good or bad)?
[URL]https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/4976265.htm?cat=1[/URL]
So much for inflation going down! She's now up to $1,000.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/tiataylor[/URL]
To add some context: she debuted at $400 in 2021.
The problem is this: When you look at the Tryst listings for Cincinnati, it's filled with overweight and / or older women, many of whom are charging $600. So of course Tia thinks: "Why *shouldn't* I charge $1,000?" (Tia, unlike most of the women on Tryst, is young, fit, and conventionally attractive.).
Perhaps I was spoiled during the "$200 coed days" of 2011 to 2017!
More generally, though: there is nothing to be done about demand, in aggregate. There will always be a certain percentage of guys for whom getting laid is *so* important, that they'll pay almost anything.
This is a supply problem. We won't see any relief on the pricing / selection until we get another flood of good-looking young women into the market.
Until then, I, for one, am holding onto my money. In 2016 I spent 5 figures on escorts / sugarbabies. This year I've spent: $300, with less than two months to go.
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;7107374]So much for inflation going down! She's now up to $1,000.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/tiataylor[/URL]
To add some context: she debuted at $400 in 2021.
The problem is this: When you look at the Tryst listings for Cincinnati, it's filled with overweight and / or older women, many of whom are charging $600. So of course Tia thinks: "Why *shouldn't* I charge $1,000?" (Tia, unlike most of the women on Tryst, is young, fit, and conventionally attractive.).
Perhaps I was spoiled during the "$200 coed days" of 2011 to 2017!
More generally, though: there is nothing to be done about demand, in aggregate. There will always be a certain percentage of guys for whom getting laid is *so* important, that they'll pay almost anything.
This is a supply problem. We won't see any relief on the pricing / selection until we get another flood of good-looking young women into the market.
Until then, I, for one, am holding onto my money. In 2016 I spent 5 figures on escorts / sugarbabies. This year I've spent: $300, with less than two months to go.[/QUOTE]I recently checked out Tryst too, and I was surprised by the prices. I don't know Tia, but she caught my attention, so I checked out her profile and website. She's really beautiful and has a great body compared to some of the other girls on Tryst. But yeah, the prices there are definitely high!
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;7107374]
More generally, though: there is nothing to be done about demand, in aggregate. There will always be a certain percentage of guys for whom getting laid is *so* important, that they'll pay almost anything.
This is a supply problem. We won't see any relief on the pricing / selection until we get another flood of good-looking young women into the market.
Until then, I, for one, am holding onto my money. In 2016 I spent 5 figures on escorts / sugarbabies. This year I've spent: $300, with less than two months to go.[/QUOTE]Might as well book a flight out of CVG and go somewhere that gets you better value and quality. Good on you for keeping the line.