Great unbiased answer and much appreciated
[QUOTE=Grain56;5195289]As far as "fresh" track marks I don't think so, it would depend on who told you that whether it may be credible or not. There are a hand full of monikers on here that have sour-grapes-syndrome towards her so I would look for additional confirmation from posters with genuine integrity and maybe someone that actually saw her and gave her a positive (or other) review to see if they saw anything. For example, if it's someone reports she ghosted them then says she has new track marks, how would they know? If it is someone that has posted a review that they actually saw her, there might be more credibility. There are even some people that may send PMs to warn you, again I'd look for more verification. One provider a while back was accused of having the heebie-geebies by someone and I got a couple PMs and I later actually saw medical paperwork from the provider that said no. Later in my age of wisdom, I learned that the PM'ing person used to try to pimp her out like he owned her and provided her candy, he was angry she ditched him. She has some old scars from her haunted past and maybe that's what is being referenced.
I saw Tiff a few weeks ago and looked her over from head to toe (I assure you) and I didn't see squat as far as new danger signs. I do know that she takes other meds that would suggest she isn't using H. She even showed me where she keeps her meds each week when she gets it. With that said, the tide can change daily and there are other meds that can be injected so I am not saying yes or no today. I am saying based on when I saw her, I would say no.
I am not saying this to create a debate or backlash, I am saying it based totally on my LAST personal visit with her. It also should be noted that she does have some acne scars on her face, so that might explain some of the makeup. LOL. Again, not to create debate. One man's opinion and I'm not looking to defend or add to what I just reported.
Grain 56.[/QUOTE]Thanks for your transparency and in depth knowledge / analysis / hypotheses of the situation.
Trying to figure this out
The ad says Kitty Kat but the pic is not the must avoid Kitty Kat that we know. I checkout the ad and it's loaded with pics of SW Barbie, what appears to be Alex Lynn, some other SW looking chic I don't recognize and a cute girl in a pink hoodie. I'd like to meet the pink hoodie chic but this ad looks shady. Any info?
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/9047010699[/URL]
It looks Barbie, Brooke kissing Barbie, Hollie, a pretty face with pink hoodie
[QUOTE=BlackRam;5195662]The ad says Kitty Kat but the pic is not the must avoid Kitty Kat that we know. I checkout the ad and it's loaded with pics of SW Barbie, what appears to be Alex Lynn, some other SW looking chic I don't recognize and a cute girl in a pink hoodie. I'd like to meet the pink hoodie chic but this ad looks shady. Any info?
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/image_list/9047010699[/URL][/QUOTE]SW: Barbie, Brooke, Hollie, and other two or three girls.
I was thinking something similar the other day
[QUOTE=Grain56;5195289]
One provider a while back was accused of having the heebie-geebies by someone and I got a couple PMs and I later actually saw medical paperwork from the provider that said no. Later in my age of wisdom, I learned that the PM'ing person used to try to pimp her out like he owned her and provided her candy, he was angry she ditched him.
Grain 56.[/QUOTE]I was wondering if guys would leave a negative review for a provider on the board to lessen his "competition" and make it easier or less expensive to schedule a date.
If so, that's pretty shady.