BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=DrSummer;3387583]I can certainly understand your position on providers using fake pictures in their ads. But, I have somewhat different view on that. Yes, it would be great that every provider uses real recent photos in ads so that there is no ambiguity on who you are going to see. But this hobby is not that straightforward, and expecting 100% moral honesty from providers (as well as from clients) is not realistic. There are two main reasons why providers use fake, altered or old photos in ads. First reason, they want to hide their look because the clients would not be attracted to them (weight, age, race whatever it is). So, they use fake pictures to lure you to them expecting that you fall into the trap and go ahead with visit. It is "bait and switch" and downright deceptive, so I have no sympathy for them. I walk away with out any guilt. But some providers use fake pictures to hide their identity regardless of their look. I understand they don't want the whole world to see what they are doing. These girls are human beings like you and I, they have friends, parents, sometimes even husbands and children. I have no problem if a provider uses photos just resembling them (as long as they are not incriminating another girl) or alter the photos to hide identity as long as she looks closer to the ad leads us to. The particular provider we are discussing here actually texts her real picture before the appointment, so that you can actually make the decision to see her or not. I think she is smart in that she in exposing her identity only to the clients who are interested in seeing her rather than publishing her real pictures for everyone to see.

In addition, there is no guarantee that a girl who uses real pictures would be a great performer either. I have met girls who used fake (but closely resembling) or altered pictures, but turned out to be great experience. In reality, most of the time I have hard time figuring out when I see a provider actually she used her real pictures or not (except in obvious bait and switch situation). Sometimes (although rare) some girls look better in person than in photos. Based on the ad you expect to see some type of girl, if you are happy with what you see, it actually is a moot point whether she used real pictures or not.

The other worry for me of girls who use real pictures especially showing clear face is that it gives me the feeling she doesn't care of identifying herself, may be she already got caught, and nothing to loose. Most likely she is a high volume provider. She is not concerned about being discreet and could be careless with our information too.

Anyway, my point is that if you are so black and white about not seen girls who do not use real pictures, you would be missing out some great providers. I know I would have. Just my two cents.

Stay Safe.

Dr. S.[/QUOTE]I see what your saying and I still don't agree. I have seen many providers that use fake pics and I will never respect it. The main reason is because she obviously doesn't take this seriously. Many girls that look great in real life but use fake pics do not plan to be around long. So they use fake pics, so they don't ruin their normal life. And when I go out to meet a girl. I like to be able to go back if I like her And meet a couple of her friends. Girls that use fake pics like selena aren't going to be here for long because they plan on moving on. I still have utr girls from 2009 because I stayed true to this belief.

Hello gentlemen, I went and saw Taylor, a young spinner, staying in the Greystone area of Columbia. Her pictures were real / recent, and her description was fairly accurate. She's had at least one kid, but had minimal baby damage. She was responsive through text but would not answer the phone throughout our communication. She offered a fair rate, which was less than Selena for the HHR / HR, but not as good of a value.

Anyway, she opened the door, and I was pleasantly surprised that her BP ad was accurate. She led me upstairs and did a quick LE check. We quickly got started as it was early in the morning. I suspect she was tired and the experience reflected it. Anyway, definitely not a GFE provider. Everything was covered, no kissing on the mouth, and also no greek. She gave me a quick, unenthusiastic CBJ and was ready for mish. She was still really tight for a girl who I suspect had been working earlier in the day. Next, we switched to K9, and then with her legs on my shoulders. Unfortunately, she didn't prefer that position, so we switched back to mish. Then, I caught her checking the clock, so I went ahead and finished.

Afterwards, I went to flush the used material and her toilet didn't work. That's when I saw the other used material, which made her start laughing. I put my clothes on and left. As I was walking back to the car, I saw a young, black male looking out the window and talking on the phone. Maybe it was coincidence, but I got the feeling that he was her "other" and was talking to her.

Overall, I suspect that the early morning effected her performance, so I suspect that your experience may be better. At best, I would characterize her as a YMMV-type of provider. Overall, she's young and immature, but didn't seem to be strung out on meth like so many others in Columbia. For the money, I would just visit Selena, as she's a much better provider. FWIW, Taylor did tell me that she'll only be here for a week, before she returns to CA. If you want a little variety, she might be a decent option.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/newww-fl%CE%B1%CF%89l%D1%94%D1%95%D1%95-%D0%B2%D1%94%CE%B1%CF%85%D1%82%D1%83-%CF%83%D0%B8-%CF%85%D1%82%D1%83-%CF%81%CF%85re-%CF%81l-%CE%B1%CE%B4%CF%85r/17568973[/URL]

[QUOTE=BlueEyes76;3387516]Read the reviews on her from other members and set up an appointment. Texted and worked out the details. Told her it would take 25 minutes to get to her. Drove through traffic to the destination only to get crickets. She didn't answer the phone or text. Looked at BackPage and seen she had a new ad up.

Extremely disappointing to drive that far and not get a reply at all. I read on the other site that she has done this before. So be careful with your time.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/new-upscale-beauty-clean-safe-and-discreet-fun-limited-time-only-call-now/16740513[/URL][/QUOTE]I had a guy who emailed me about another provider that I recimmended her to and something similar happened and I felt bad about it because it was off my recommendation and he trusted my word. I will say if you don't get crickets you will enjoy your time if you are looking for a simple non GFE quick visi. Multiple pops are not on the table so QV is what I would recommend. That is a horrible drive to make clear to the north east to get crickets upon contacting when arrived so I understand your frustration. She is actually intelligent and articulate so if I were you I would contact her and let her know your situation to see if she could work with you and make it up to you. She approaches this like a professional and a career so naturally any small business would want to make a situation right for a customer if it was not the customer's fault a bad business transaction took place. She seems to only text so I would just text her if I were you and let her know the frustration with that entire incident and then see what she says. Things like this though are why it is very hard for me to recommend with full confidence any lady I have seen as it makes me feel bad when someone goes to see a lady off my direct recommendation and something similar to this happens. If the appointment happens, she is worth it solely based upon on of Columbia's few drug free ladies and you will be able to tell she has more than an 8th grade education which is a breath of fresh air for this shit town. I just wish the crickets thing wouldn't happen as that's now twice I can confirm.

[QUOTE=KeenObserver;3387655]Link is dead. Who was it?[/QUOTE]Her ads don't stay up very long at all. She's a white female with a picture of her legs at the beach. I will try find her on another page.

The 40+yo old Jade. I am coming to cola this afternoon because I read her two TERs. Very positive. Any suggestions?

[QUOTE=Murphy69;3387968]I had a guy who emailed me about another provider that I recimmended her to and something similar happened and I felt bad about it because it was off my recommendation and he trusted my word. I will say if you don't get crickets you will enjoy your time if you are looking for a simple non GFE quick visi. Multiple pops are not on the table so QV is what I would recommend. That is a horrible drive to make clear to the north east to get crickets upon contacting when arrived so I understand your frustration. She is actually intelligent and articulate so if I were you I would contact her and let her know your situation to see if she could work with you and make it up to you. She approaches this like a professional and a career so naturally any small business would want to make a situation right for a customer if it was not the customer's fault a bad business transaction took place. She seems to only text so I would just text her if I were you and let her know the frustration with that entire incident and then see what she says. Things like this though are why it is very hard for me to recommend with full confidence any lady I have seen as it makes me feel bad when someone goes to see a lady off my direct recommendation and something similar to this happens. If the appointment happens, she is worth it solely based upon on of Columbia's few drug free ladies and you will be able to tell she has more than an 8th grade education which is a breath of fresh air for this shit town. I just wish the crickets thing wouldn't happen as that's now twice I can confirm.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't feel bad about it Murphy, you cannot control what these girls do. I just wanted to let people know about the crickets just in case they were driving a distance to see her.

I really appreciate the reviews you and others do for this site.

Here is her current BP add while it lasts. Stay away. It was not good. AL.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/la8-nite-erotic-massage-or-early-birdie-with-baby-blue-eyez/16957678[/URL]

[QUOTE=DrSummer;3387583]I can certainly understand your position on providers using fake pictures in their ads. But, I have somewhat different view on that. Yes, it would be great that every provider uses real recent photos in ads so that there is no ambiguity on who you are going to see. But this hobby is not that straightforward, and expecting 100% moral honesty from providers (as well as from clients) is not realistic. There are two main reasons why providers use fake, altered or old photos in ads. First reason, they want to hide their look because the clients would not be attracted to them (weight, age, race whatever it is). So, they use fake pictures to lure you to them expecting that you fall into the trap and go ahead with visit. It is "bait and switch" and downright deceptive, so I have no sympathy for them. I walk away with out any guilt. But some providers use fake pictures to hide their identity regardless of their look. I understand they don't want the whole world to see what they are doing. These girls are human beings like you and I, they have friends, parents, sometimes even husbands and children. I have no problem if a provider uses photos just resembling them (as long as they are not incriminating another girl) or alter the photos to hide identity as long as she looks closer to the ad leads us to. The particular provider we are discussing here actually texts her real picture before the appointment, so that you can actually make the decision to see her or not. I think she is smart in that she in exposing her identity only to the clients who are interested in seeing her rather than publishing her real pictures for everyone to see.

In addition, there is no guarantee that a girl who uses real pictures would be a great performer either. I have met girls who used fake (but closely resembling) or altered pictures, but turned out to be great experience. In reality, most of the time I have hard time figuring out when I see a provider actually she used her real pictures or not (except in obvious bait and switch situation). Sometimes (although rare) some girls look better in person than in photos. Based on the ad you expect to see some type of girl, if you are happy with what you see, it actually is a moot point whether she used real pictures or not.

The other worry for me of girls who use real pictures especially showing clear face is that it gives me the feeling she doesn't care of identifying herself, may be she already got caught, and nothing to loose. Most likely she is a high volume provider. She is not concerned about being discreet and could be careless with our information too.

Anyway, my point is that if you are so black and white about not seen girls who do not use real pictures, you would be missing out some great providers. I know I would have. Just my two cents.

Stay Safe.

Dr. S.[/QUOTE]I agree with Dr. Summer, bait-and-switch girls are no bueno, but some girls use fake pics to keep their identities private. The problem is knowing who to actually choose if you don't want to chance toftt. That is why review sites are so helpful.

A couple years ago when I was big-ballin' in this hobby I used to toftt quite often. Mostly went with girls who I thought were using real pics even if it did not show their face, but occasionally I would go with an ad I knew was fake. When I have disposable cash I kind of like the adventure and adrenaline rush. At that time there were a group of girls driving down from the Charlotte area. They used obviously fake pictures, but the pictures closely resembled the girls. I met two of them. One was absolutely fantastic and one was very mechanical. Both were gorgeous but did not want their faces all over the internet.

I would also caution the members about seeing providers that show their faces in ads if they are staying at nicer, family-friendly hotels. Do you all remember the highly tattooed girl named Vivian who briefly provided around last summer? She used actual pics, face and all, in her ads. Well a hotel employee recognized her from BP and called the cops to roust her from the hotel. Made for a very uncomfortable situation when they barged into the room while she was with a client. She stopped providing soon after that.

[QUOTE=Allen;3388145]Here is her current BP add while it lasts. Stay away. It was not good. AL.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/la8-nite-erotic-massage-or-early-birdie-with-baby-blue-eyez/16957678[/URL][/QUOTE]I chatted with this chic she told me she was homeless but wanted to set a meet. Girl told multiple lies you can just look at her pics and tell something is wrong with this chic. I would like to hear more about your experience with her. I passed on her ass.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/petite-slim-beauty-jasmine/17640873[/URL]

Becareful with this chic I chatted with her but couldn't verify who she is. Be very careful.

[QUOTE=BlueEyes76;3387516]Read the reviews on her from other members and set up an appointment. Texted and worked out the details. Told her it would take 25 minutes to get to her. Drove through traffic to the destination only to get crickets. She didn't answer the phone or text. Looked at BackPage and seen she had a new ad up.

Extremely disappointing to drive that far and not get a reply at all. I read on the other site that she has done this before. So be careful with your time.

[URL]http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/new-upscale-beauty-clean-safe-and-discreet-fun-limited-time-only-call-now/16740513[/URL][/QUOTE]Had the exact same experience a week ago with her. No apology, just stopped responding to texts.

[QUOTE=GeorgeKostanza;3388867]Had the exact same experience a week ago with her. No apology, just stopped responding to texts.[/QUOTE]The very first time I tried to see her this happened to me as well. I did give her another chance a couple of weeks later and have been very pleased with her service.

I have not had any trouble with contacting her since. I do notice that when she is over on the Blue Cross Blue Shield side of town the responses are much slower and I have suggested that she find a location with better WiFi service as when she is over on the Dutch square side of town this does not appear to be an issue.

Hopefully she will and this will solve this issue.

Sorry some of you have had trouble but based on the great service I have gotten since the first try, I still strongly recommend her but as always YMMV.

She still around?

[QUOTE=GayBatman;3389272]She still around?[/QUOTE]Part of her site is still up with a number listed and email addy. But have been told she has some drug issues.