Anastasia aka or formerly known as Natasha
The pics are her and she is really super cute in person (thick but in a nice way). But it is definitely a YMMV type of proposition.
Reviews run the gamut of just a massage to to total GFE depending on her mood. That said, if you book an hour and she goes GFE on you it's because she's trying to get you out of the door in 15 minutes. Don't expect to stick around any longer than that.
Her massage is okay. I repeated a couple of times but I'm not an in and out in 20 minutes kind of guy.
[QUOTE=Trev6272;3284620]I also met up with the tatted blonde her recently. She just moved to the Warwick area. Still moving in. Only went for the QV which was nice, but a little uninspired. Not GFE, but she is hot.
Saw this post too. Found her fb page and she seems legit. Can't find any reviews though. Anyone have any info?
[URL]http://rhodeisland.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/gourgeous-anastasia-sweet-and-exotic/6536713[/URL][/QUOTE]
Run, don't walk, to see Luna
Following up on my post about Luna, I saw her earlier today and MisterChop911 nailed it. She is a delight. Young, friendly, eager, talented, professional, clean. She's newer to this and wants to do it right. So if you want a. 4 BJ look elsewhere. I did 1. 6 for the hh and was so very glad I did.
[URL]http://rhodeisland.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/let-me-be-your-girlfriend-luna-luxe/6618854[/URL]
Here's a more complete picture:
I arrived at Luna's place and she texted me the unit number when I got there. (If the address seems familiar, she is acquainted with another well-liked provider who used to work in the area and used that space. It's not an agency or anything, she's just using her friend's space.) There is a small parking lot, but I actually parked on the street just up from it, and she said she appreciated that, though I'm sure the lot would be fine, too. I came up, knocked lightly, and she was wearing the same little black set in some of the pictures in her post, which she said she did intentionally to show it's really her. Once the door was closed she gave me a great DFK, and I only had to stop so I could put down the coffees I brought. (She takes hers iced black if you want to be a gentleman like me, haha.).
After a little chat and a look around (I was just glancing, but she said I could look anywhere I wanted) we moved into the bedroom, which was dimly lit and had candles burning. The bed was clean (just like Luna) and freshly made. She had lube, condoms and a couple of paper towels set at the ready for herself. I started to undress and she crawled over the bed to me and grabbed me through my boxers while asking if I was LE, haha. She is very cautious but also playful, and I appreciated it.
From there we dove into plenty of great roll-around fun from DFK and lots of excellent body contact to a stellar BBBJ, covered FS, and a little DATY. (I don't often go for DATY but after the intense FS I wanted to taste the results of our efforts. She was very clean and tasted great.) After all that, back to a BBBJCIM -- she either swallowed, or managed to hold onto all of it until she wiped her mouth clean after, but either way she didn't miss a beat or leave any mess. (Why guys care what happens after they're done with it is beyond me.).
We laid together a bit after and chatted about her goals with all this. She says she's digging out of some student debt, and enjoys this. She wants to be a low-volume, upscale offering, and as far as I'm concerned she's definitely got the attitude, skills and looks for it.
Anyone hot over 30 around Newport?
Anyone know of high end ladies over 30+? Around Newport. Safe place? Happy to share my ATF in that area.
Agree to Disagree? Why Can't Both Ratings be Right?
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;3286938]But to me, a 2/10 suggests someone who is physically repulsive to look at. Like, we're almost in physical deformity territory. Kelli is not repulsive. She may be older, and a bit on the heavy side, but she's not repulsive. Just an average looking older lady.[/QUOTE]Sometimes a scale is either-or, but I'm not sure "attractiveness" is one of them, so I think both perspectives are helpful, informationally speaking. If I see an ad showing a gal who looks like a possible BBW but she's rated 6/10, I assume that 1) for guys who are turned off by anyone except for thin chicks or spinners, that other gal. The 6 out of 10 - is going to be repulsive. For guys who like 'them thick, she might be a 7 or 8 out of 10. To me, there's no such thing as an objective scale when it comes to appearance, and anyway, aren't we really talking about physical appeal? That's also a subjective call, but it's not a rating that can be broken down into parts, such as "pug-ugly face" or "fat rolls that reach her mankles. ".
That's why we add the words to explain the rating, and also include traits like "attitude" and "sexiness," isn't it? There are two ladies in my area, both of them are, "objectively," definitely unattractive, but I would rate one of them 2/10 and the other one 5/10. If you saw them both in a supermarket, you wouldn't give either of them a second look. You'd spend more time looking at the the ketchup than you would either of these ladies. But if you saw the first one undressed, yeah, you'd take in the fact that she was about to offer you a BBBJ, and if you saw the other one naked, you'd think. Based on the way she carries herself. That if she were just a little bit cute she'd fall into the "hottie" category.
Anyway, one man's meat is another man's poison. If one of you guys rates a lady an 8/10 or a 9/10 or a 10/10, I take notice; if you rate her 0/10 (is that possible?) or 1/10, I look over your report to find out how much of that is due to a rip-off or bad attitude. Ratings of 2/10,3/10, and 4/10 I take to mean the lady is not, in most eyes, attractive at all. . . But that some mongers might find her decent-looking, even if just barely. Ratings of 5/10,6/10, and 7/10 mean. To me. That's she's the kind of gal I'd pick up in a bar if I were a little drunk, and that depending on donation and attitude, she might be worth spending time with.
That's just my 2 cents.
Adobe.
