There's two different Chanel
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5377982]No room for MILFs in Playboy? If you think Chanel isn't toned then you haven't seen her. Do you really think your perception of reality is everyone's? Who made you the arbiter of body perfection? You still haven't named a better body.[/QUOTE]Perhaps there is some confusion because there are two chanels. I seen both, one with Candygirl and one with M. Had great time with both, but they are very different.
Chanel (Candygirl) MILF, curvy body, has the breast enhancement or reduction scars from bottom of nipples to bottom of breast DD, loved the session.
Chanel (M) maybe late 20's early 30's slim figure, gorgeous face, full enhanced C's no scaring, very girlfriend session. Fantastic time.
Recent Eunji Reviews / Comments
In regards to the latest reviews of Eunji, including my own, I'm of the mindset the latest negatives are due to her being burnt out. Like I commented earlier, the attitude she had was from someone that was just done with the situation. For those that saw her early on and had amazing experiences were lucky to enjoy her at her potential best. Likely due to those glowing reviews, it hyped her up for many, and with the ravenous need for newer talent, made her appointments blow up. Not many ladies can deal with the onslaught of back to back to back to back visits and maintain a healthy attitude throughout. The Hanas or Pinkys that shine even with the high demand are the rare gems that make the hobby fun. You also have to include that there are those mongers that are just ruining it with their negative, trying to secretly film, or have demanding attitudes. And yes, it is common and accepted that YMMV will always be a thing but that still doesn't negate the fact that her potential state of mind have led to an increase of similar reports where she is either disinterested or trying to rush them out. Like someone commented, it's not fun to throwaway money in any arena. So, we have to encourage more honest reviews, whether good or bad, and not take them as an assault on us personally if someone didn't enjoy a lady that we did. More honest reviews only helps our fellow hobbyist enjoy their hard earned money on ladies that are worth it. Viva la Pinky, Hana (I need to finally see her stop it you guys are killing the rest of us) and Viki.
It literally couldn't be easier
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5382811]Agreed. So the question we should ask is how can dishonest / shill reviews be discouraged, and yet not come off as being argumentative or attacking and ultimately censored?[/QUOTE][blue]You never, ever need to question if a post is dishonest, all you ever need to do is report it and if we agree we will take care of it. Quoting and commenting their posts make them more effective because in the back of guys minds they will remember that now they have seen multiple reviews of good service. It doesn't matter that the "second review" was you quoting the first, when it comes to sex guys remember the good news.
1. Report the post.
2. Click the members name.
3. Click add to ignore list.
4. Move on.
A2[/blue]
Be the change you wish to see
If we want more honest reviews, write more honest reviews ourselves. Share your good and bad experience with bookers too. Let your voice be heard.
If you disagree with a post or a poster, simply state your experience or what you know.
I don't see a problem in SD / OC / LA Kgirl threads on this site because of dishonest / shill reviews. Someone just need to post about 2 or 3 Kgirls and I will know his style.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5382811]Agreed. So the question we should ask is how can dishonest / shill reviews be discouraged, and yet not come off as being argumentative or attacking and ultimately censored?[/QUOTE]