Printable View
[QUOTE=NObserver;5378667]The booker sent me this flickr link yesterday afternoon and I didn't open it until I got home from an outing.
It was locked a few minutes after I was done asking the booker for intel.
Anyway, Allie is at the top of page. Booker claims she will be back on Monday, June 7; 300/60, just like before she left.
Cona is off again.[/QUOTE]Booker told me Cona is on vacation til July.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5378371]If her body is a "7" which is average then there are no great bodies in Kgirl land. Find me a better one. Average body? You got to be kidding. Her body happens to be great and it's always YMMV but that being said you must not have found any bodies better than 7.[/QUOTE]I think Rabbit has a body that's better than 7. Of all the K-girls I've seen, I haven't seen a better body than Rabbit.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5378366]Password protected.[/QUOTE]She must be getting too much business.
[QUOTE=Member#2210;5379035]I think Rabbit has a body that's better than 7. Of all the K-girls I've seen, I haven't seen a better body than Rabbit.[/QUOTE]I'm sure she does. There are a fair share of good bodies out there. Rabbit is the other Chanel and not the one we've been talking about.
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5378538]Betraying my own preferences, memory, sensibilities, YMMV, Old-Timers, Yadda-D-Dadda! List comprised of girls I either actually saw, or contemplated seeing again. Placement possibly affected by how the session went down!
1. Niya.
2. Allie.
3. Moni.
4 Love.
5. Hazel.
6. Sophia.
7. MistressX.
8. Pepsi.
9. Viki.
10. Dahee.
Honorable mention, but I never tried to see her again:
Hana.[/QUOTE]This just affirms YMMV when it comes to looks and bodies. Everyone has their tastes. There are some on that list who I have seen who I wouldn't consider particular good bodies. Not that they are bad but just not good / great bodies for me. Some are too fat or too skinny or just plain. One on the list IMHO should be near the top so it just goes to show you how one's tastes are his own and not to be argued or rejected.
[QUOTE=Atrr1;5379051]She must be getting too much business.[/QUOTE]It could originally linked incorrectly. Ask M for the new site, it's not password protected. At least for now.
[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5378778]I'm trying to book Cami and went to [URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/product/cami/[/URL] but cannot find the phone number for some reason. Am I crazy or should I be looking somewhere else?[/QUOTE]Look just above the "LA Models" heading. It's been like that for a while and can easily be missed.
That line from the Rolling Stones has always had a place on discussion boards. For years whenever I see posts dishing out any negativity towards any of the girls, especially a girl whose reviews, reputation and busy schedule would negate what's been written, it typically comes from someone who is disgruntled because he didn't get what he wanted, expected or demanded. I've been close enough to some of the girls and bookers to know when it's happening and why it's happening. What they don't know is all the bookers know what is being said and then they wonder why some don't respond to their calls and texts. If you don't get what you want doesn't mean we all didn't. Is it us or is it you? You make the call.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5378070]Funny enough, it appears she's back with M.[/QUOTE]I've seen her 11 times when was she with sfg.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5378583]M. Chanel, Viki.
Sunny.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Min.
Pink Angels. Sarah.
Sexy Angels. Sophia, Hanna.
SFK. Megan, Viki.
PKL Saki, Pink, Eunji.
Sesang.
Angelsinwla.
KGLA. Saki, Pink, Eunji.[/QUOTE]Just curious if anyone knows why I see these posts hours later.
Been wanting to see her in hopes she closely resembles the pics. Booked for tomorrow. Mistress X is nice but just not who I wanted yesterday. Hopefully it goes well.
[QUOTE=NooGooGee81;5379108]Just curious if anyone knows why I see these posts hours later.[/QUOTE]Sometimes they are late getting them up.
New BB girl at SAG but this booker is notorious with their photos.
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/lily[/URL]
I would slide her in at #7 and move the other girls down.
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5378538]Betraying my own preferences, memory, sensibilities, YMMV, Old-Timers, Yadda-D-Dadda! List comprised of girls I either actually saw, or contemplated seeing again. Placement possibly affected by how the session went down!
1. Niya.
2. Allie.
3. Moni.
4 Love.
5. Hazel.
6. Sophia.
7. MistressX.
8. Pepsi.
9. Viki.
10. Dahee.
Honorable mention, but I never tried to see her again:
Hana.[/QUOTE]
Hi, Anyone has information about Love or Mia at losangelesasian or CandyGirl?
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;5379318]New BB girl at SAG but this booker is notorious with their photos.
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/lily[/URL][/QUOTE]That she's advertised as 110 lbs suggests another 10-20 lbs irl.
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5379339]I would slide her in at #7 and move the other girls down.[/QUOTE]This man likes them thick hahaha. Can't hate, we all have our preferences.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5379611]This man likes them thick hahaha. Can't hate, we all have our preferences.[/QUOTE]Absolutely. YMMV as always.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5379072]That line from the Rolling Stones has always had a place on discussion boards. For years whenever I see posts dishing out any negativity towards any of the girls, especially a girl whose reviews, reputation and busy schedule would negate what's been written, it typically comes from someone who is disgruntled because he didn't get what he wanted, expected or demanded. I've been close enough to some of the girls and bookers to know when it's happening and why it's happening. What they don't know is all the bookers know what is being said and then they wonder why some don't respond to their calls and texts. If you don't get what you want doesn't mean we all didn't. Is it us or is it you? You make the call.[/QUOTE]Good post. Too many times I hear "was not worth the hype" if 100 plus men love a girl and you don't, that's your issue. YMMV with any girl. Some girls are just damned and jaded but a handful who will love her. That's fine too, YMMV in that case again. I give credit when it's due. For example, "I left happy, great service but not my type" In those cases I had fun, she just was not my style. Prob will not repeat but I do recommend for most.
Any intel on this girl Envy? I've seen her working in Dallas where my CF usually works. I know Dallas girls tend to be a bit jaded so as they are mostly seeing 30 min turns and all CFS. Seems like she offers BBFS up charge here. Looks a little older but will see if any intel worth it. I don't Dallas name but she def was there.
Molly in downtown was a big girl. I remember seeing in in San Mateo at Viola as Sophia late 2019 early 2020. Was wearing a school girl outfit just like her Sophia pics. I will try to dig them up. Bigger than Jool Gina for sure. I still went with it because I don’t walk out but one of the biggest I had been with. Heard she maybe lost some weight but gained it back. We'll see. She has been all over the US lately. Was in Vegas and then East coast and now back to Cali.
Update OG Sophia pics attached. Was wider than pics depict. Has the oval shape tits I do not like.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5379072]That line from the Rolling Stones has always had a place on discussion boards. For years whenever I see posts dishing out any negativity towards any of the girls, especially a girl whose reviews, reputation and busy schedule would negate what's been written, it typically comes from someone who is disgruntled because he didn't get what he wanted, expected or demanded. I've been close enough to some of the girls and bookers to know when it's happening and why it's happening. What they don't know is all the bookers know what is being said and then they wonder why some don't respond to their calls and texts. If you don't get what you want doesn't mean we all didn't. Is it us or is it you? You make the call.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ghost626;5379082]I've seen her 11 times when was she with sfg.[/QUOTE]I always preferred Viki over Allie there. Allie was too over the top and little fake compared to Viki. She didn't have as much face work done when she was in Bay Area as Nicole at GSC. She was ok there not as popular. Good service but the competition was heavy at that org then. The "I want to have your baby thing" is funny. Hear guys mention her social media. Yes she likes being out and about and doesn't seem to hide it. Good for her, she maybe has many sugar daddies I would assume. Not a one man to hold me down kind of gal.
[QUOTE=NooGooGee81;5379108]Just curious if anyone knows why I see these posts hours later.[/QUOTE]It could be that he's under moderation for whatever reason. Take a look at the FAQ under membership types for more info.
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;5379318]New BB girl at SAG but this booker is notorious with their photos.
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/lily[/URL][/QUOTE]Would someone please photoshop her nipples back on her.
[QUOTE=Canon88;5378475]I've read all the posts debating on the model qualities of all of these girls. The true fact is. No, you're not going to get true model quality. No, it's not subjective at all. Everyone here on this forum looks at plenty of girls and watches porn, and I think we can all agree what a model should look like.
If you want model quality. You're going to have to donate for much more than is typically being donated to the girls on this forum. I'm talking at minimum $5. And it goes up from there to in the k's. I've done it and it's a completely different level. Is it worth it? Maybe 2-3 times per year depending on your budget. You should all try it at least once to compare. But you'll probably be disappointed because the service levels are completely different. But you've got a 5' 10" specimen that's 70% legs underneath (or on top) of you which is pretty awesome to look at.[/QUOTE]Yes- I have coughed up $800 for Hungarian model in 2010 in UK and $2000 for FHM model in 2006-it was experiences that are hard to forget and I spend boat load on junior in UK in 2006 but lets just say that I won't shell that kind of cash in USA.
One girl that was truly model material was Charlie aka Aida Love. Of course, she could not tie the shoe of Chanel from "M" because Chanel is the BOMB (LOL) but Charlie was kind of cold fish. I saw her 3-4 times and first three sessions were great and last session was shit.
[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/loveaida[/URL]
I would say I like what I get. A hot face and body combo for three bill BBFS would be amazing, but is not realistic. I'll settle for an average face with a hot bod. A lot times the perception of "good bodies" are cases of addition by subtraction: not fat, not skinny, not wrinkled, not homely, etc, etc. I don't view K Agency BB scene as "the girls are so hot that I'm going to to blurp when they touch me". I see it more of a case of "if the girl has enough of what I find attractive, and we work together, I can get what I seek". In these instances: average face + above average body + "do the nasty" = Hot! I think it's the same on the girls end. If I wasn't "splashing out", they wouldn't give me the time of day (or at least any pussy), nor should they. But the funds and good hygiene seem to make me at least tolerable.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5378357]Yes, and when all comparisons to beauty are based on kgirls without recognizing the reality of real beauty, esp. The standards of the native countries, one is just an ignorant fanboy who has tunnel vision for their own preferences. In Korea, these women are just average looking.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5379629]Good post. Too many times I hear "was not worth the hype" if 100 plus men love a girl and you don't, that's your issue. YMMV with any girl. Some girls are just damned and jaded but a handful who will love her. That's fine too, YMMV in that case again. I give credit when it's due. For example, "I left happy, great service but not my type" In those cases I had fun, she just was not my style. Prob will not repeat but I do recommend for most.[/QUOTE]Exactly how I thought about Jessica at Kbliss net.
By the photos, I would swear that I was going to see an all-time favorite, top 10 Elsa of vegasasian. But walked in and face was different. Maybe 50% match to photos. Just look up photos for Viki that's who said she was "Jessica" although she seemed to forget what name to say.
She was incredible service, nice perky nips but soooo skinny. About 5'1" and the listed 85 lbs is probably correct! I prefer sfk Lina, Rika, MistressX, Cona, Heri style. The 85-100 lbs. Ladies I'll leave for the horndogs ot there that love them super thin.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5379650]I always preferred Viki over Allie there. Allie was too over the top and little fake compared to Viki. She didn't have as much face work done when she was in Bay Area as Nicole at GSC. She was ok there not as popular. Good service but the competition was heavy at that org then. The "I want to have your baby thing" is funny. Hear guys mention her social media. Yes she likes being out and about and doesn't seem to hide it. Good for her, she maybe has many sugar daddies I would assume. Not a one man to hold me down kind of gal.[/QUOTE]I look too young to be her sugar daddy and probably know that I won't spoil her with gifts. Some of these Kgirl I'm fucking raw is about 10-15 years older than me. I thought Allie was in her late 30's and min in her late 20's. I saw pink again on Tuesday, no way she in her 20's. Has to be mid 30's or late 30's. Hana is might be younger than me by 3-4 years.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5379668]Yes- I have coughed up $800 for Hungarian model in 2010 in UK and $2000 for FHM model in 2006-it was experiences that are hard to forget and I spend boat load on junior in UK in 2006 but lets just say that I won't shell that kind of cash in USA.
One girl that was truly model material was Charlie aka Aida Love. Of course, she could not tie the shoe of Chanel from "M" because Chanel is the BOMB (LOL) but Charlie was kind of cold fish. I saw her 3-4 times and first three sessions were great and last session was shit.
[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/loveaida[/URL][/QUOTE]Personality is a good part of how we see beauty. The word shit says it all. Would I rather be with a "model material" with a shit personality or maybe a little less that gives me the satisfaction I'm looking for. That was a rhetorical question. Once again beauty is in the eye of the beholder. YMMV. Complaints and naysayers are from those who don't get what they wanted or expected.
[URL]http://myalbum.com/album/d8s2n6mKTKEW[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jack926;5379668]Yes- I have coughed up $800 for Hungarian model in 2010 in UK and $2000 for FHM model in 2006-it was experiences that are hard to forget and I spend boat load on junior in UK in 2006 but lets just say that I won't shell that kind of cash in USA.
One girl that was truly model material was Charlie aka Aida Love. Of course, she could not tie the shoe of Chanel from "M" because Chanel is the BOMB (LOL) but Charlie was kind of cold fish. I saw her 3-4 times and first three sessions were great and last session was shit.
[URL]https://www.foxylists.com/loveaida[/URL][/QUOTE]Does she allow BBFS?
[QUOTE=SnowMaus;5379398]Hi, Anyone has information about Love or Mia at losangelesasian or CandyGirl?[/QUOTE]I saw Love back in December. She is about 5"1' and the pics are accurate. It's her but with P.S. She is not as skinny as the pics but not fat at all, at least back then. I loved her natural tits and I think I reviewed her back then. There are other reviews on her. I would fall back on her if Kimi was not available back then. I preferred Kimi because she reminded me of a girl I hooked up with back in college LOL. I would still recommend Love, specially if you love titties.
On a separate note. Does anyone know what happened to Kimi? I realize she is not posted anywhere anymore and I never got her number. I was distracted by Hana and Pink LOL. Could Mia be Kimi? Since Love used to do duos with Kimi. Thanks!
[QUOTE=Humyiy;5379734]Exactly how I thought about Jessica at Kbliss net.
By the photos, I would swear that I was going to see an all-time favorite, top 10 Elsa of vegasasian. But walked in and face was different. Maybe 50% match to photos. Just look up photos for Viki that's who said she was "Jessica" although she seemed to forget what name to say.
She was incredible service, nice perky nips but soooo skinny. About 5'1" and the listed 85 lbs is probably correct! I prefer sfk Lina, Rika, MistressX, Cona, Heri style. The 85-100 lbs. Ladies I'll leave for the horndogs ot there that love them super thin.[/QUOTE]Damn. I precooked Jessica today out of curiosity. Should've listened to the warnings. Oh well. I've never seen Viki but she has been extensively reviewed. Thanks for the heads up!
[QUOTE=GardenBae;5378701]Does anyone know where she went? I checked all 33 of my k-agency websites and I didn't see her. Gone home?[/QUOTE]She's gone for good. I have her number and been texting every so often.
Not a huge loss IMO. She's high energy, genuinely young (25) but no CIP really takes the joy out of BBFS for me.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]
[QUOTE=RocketManP;5380472]What a crock of shit.
Lets face it, many people's job here (I won't point fingers but we all know who they are. And if you don't know, ask me) is to promote girls. And any semblance of negativity they and other lackeys here try to "negate". Because their goal is to give business to these girls. Not to provide truthful and accurate information. Not worry about other mongers well-being and awareness or money, but to make $ so business thrives and other pussy comes in.
This is why when a new girl gets a negative review, dozens of damage control clowns jump out of the bushes with the "rebuttal" reviews.
No matter how truthful or correct a review or experience is, certain people will always defend girls and will try to make girls better than they are. They will attempt to discredit the mongers by saying it was their fault, trying to suppress information and shift blame. Here are some of the most commont trick in the org lackey books:
1. say the guy was too rough.
2. say the guy wanted to force something.
3. the guy is out for revenge.
Blame the guy, basically, so others are not scared off. This is so pathetic and anti-monger, it's ostenisbly disgusting.
Bookers already do it by threatening to BL people who write negative reviews in public. Fucking cowards. Along with trying to hush every negative experience via money or threats.
If orgs / bookers cared about customers, theyd focus on making the product better, not the perception of product in peoples eyes and word of mouth.
Don't believe me? You want to see some people's posts after some truthful negative experiences are posted? The ones who scramble the fastest to try and 'counter' are the ones who care about girls more than they ever about monger brothers.
These same people that frame all their posts about girls in such a way that makes the girls ALWAYS look better than they really are. Their purpose is to ADVERTISE, not provide TRUTHFUL or HELPFUL feedback.
This is not the purpose of this forum, I'm pretty sure. You see, it is always mongers fault, and never the girls fault in their framed and carefully constructed posts.
Of course these people are going to get mad when someone puts up a truthful, negative review. These truthful shares of information are taking money or future promise of pussy off these peoples plate. GOOD. Bad product should be getting bad reviews. And advertisers who care about business only should fuck off.
Eat a fat dick with a. Ids on the tip if you are willing to lie to fellow mongers in exchange for pussy / money.[/QUOTE]Well said!
[blue][Forum Complaint deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]The general posting sections of the Forum are not the place to voice your personal complaints about the Forum's rules or operating procedures. In the future, please send any complaints about the Forum to me personally by email or PM, or post them in the Comment on Forum Rules section. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
[QUOTE=Canon88;5378475]I've read all the posts debating on the model qualities of all of these girls. The true fact is. No, you're not going to get true model quality. No, it's not subjective at all. Everyone here on this forum looks at plenty of girls and watches porn, and I think we can all agree what a model should look like.
If you want model quality. You're going to have to donate for much more than is typically being donated to the girls on this forum...[/QUOTE]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).
He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.
Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.
[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5380702]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).
He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.
Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.[/QUOTE]I'm planning to go to Phuket in July when the quarantine is lifted. Sick of these dead fish LA porkchops.
[QUOTE=Stgermaine;5380394]She's gone for good. I have her number and been texting every so often.
Not a huge loss IMO. She's high energy, genuinely young (25) but no CIP really takes the joy out of BBFS for me.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the update.
[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5380702]Or head to South East Asia. The quantity and price is mind bogglingly good. There is absolutely someone for every taste and style. As for porn references, the equivalent (or better) of Ember Snow or Clara Trinity can be found (had) for somewhere between $50 and $200 per night. You can scrounge around and find providers for $20 a night, but quality will suffer. I was offered a BBBJ by a nasty old crone for $1. Maybe she just wanted the protein (no thanks).
He rate is pretty much set by each provider, and that is all over the place, with a max for "Miss Universe" level talent for about $200 a night. It's absolutely heaven on earth, if you like actual 20 something spinners (who don't have GPS). And not just a 50 minute session, but a night (and more, if you want to go a round or two, in the morning). They leave when you ask them to, or sometime before lunch, if you provide breakfast.
Model quality is out there, but just more expensive in the US. For the price of a few sessions in LA, you can spend a week in Manila or Bangkok, with a never ending stream of entertainment.[/QUOTE]So when you're referencing se Asia, you're taking about Manila and Bangkok, or somewhere else? Asking for a friend.