Printable View
[QUOTE=Kayo4;5374833]Who's going to TOFFT with Jessica?[/QUOTE]Wow. I'll toftt but I can only do it Thursday. I'll report then but if anyone else sees her please let me know before I regret it LOL. Has anyone used this agency before? It's new to me. Thanks!
[QUOTE=Eponymously;5376959]Cheers to both of you for the great resources. There's definitely a few here I wasn't aware of.
Anyone have any experience with this org? Disregarding the pics, they have some premium pricing relative to their competitors and even k-girls. Might be a brilliant marketing tactic because it's way more intriguing than if they were closer to standard, LOL.[/QUOTE]I was able to dig this other place from googling that c-org #. Don't know if this is BB or not.
[URL]https://www.yesemingyuan.com[/URL]
[QUOTE=TheDudeSter;5377493]Wow. I'll toftt but I can only do it Thursday. I'll report then but if anyone else sees (Jessica) please let me know before I regret it LOL. Has anyone used this agency before? It's new to me. Thanks![/QUOTE]Word on the street is Jessica = Viki. Judging by historical patterns of contributors to this thread, a legit new bb girl rarely goes undetected. This is particularly true for non upcharge girls.
Sorry to hear that happened. I had that happen to me a few years back. Showed up to a date with a popular white girl back in the day and the blop on her mouth was apparent. She was aware and immediately busted out the it happened in a fight. Anyone who has been in a fight could tell the difference and that wasn't it. Whatever it was it was not looking good. Thankfully I had just walked in and sat on the bed for a minute or two. I just walked away and gave her a Jackson just to avoid a possible daddy showing up for more. Wasn't going to risk it. Be well guy. Hope it was nothing.
[QUOTE=ImYours;5374961]Uh, yeah. What a fucking trip.
F: 5. 5 - maybe a little higher if she did her makeup better. She's def mid 40's.
B: 6 - higher if you like them thicker. Big ol' titties, curvy, a little pooch. Taller. Not in great shape but yeah.
A: 2 - This is where shit got weird. I just showered before I came, then she asked me to shower again, I told her I just showered, but she insisted I shower. OK, no problem. I get in the shower, she says "shower". Leaves the bathroom, Starts talking to herself or whatever and goes in and out of the room a couple times in the maybe 1 minute I was in the shower. That was just be beginning.
S: 2 - I didn't opt for BB or greek with her, wanted to feel her out. No kissing, no hug from the start, that strange ass shower, an OK BBBJ. Then, I tried to kiss her a little and she tells me SHE HAS A FUCKING SORE ON HER LIP, which is why she didn't want to kiss, but. She gave me a BBBJ. Yeah, I'm done. Jr wasn't going to get up after that. To be fair, the BBBJ was ok.
E: 3 - but I didn't have much time to really converse after she told me "sick" and pointed at her mouth. Told me medicine and tomorrow will be fine. I don't know what it was, I'm not speculating as I am not an STD test nor a doctor. A semi-open wound is something that should stop everyone. This was completely in poor form, I informed the booker whom was apologetic but what a waste of time and money, and maybe even more.
In and out in less than 15 minutes, and an obvious no repeat for me, dawg.[/QUOTE]
Reached out to M but Chanel was the only one available and it wasn't until closing time it seems. Had to go for option 2, 3, 4 ,5 LOL. Landed on. 2nd visit to Mistress X. Visit was good. Don't think she remembered me because she had to ask if I had seen her before which this time I said yes and she smiled and said she would love me like last time. I don't know what some of you are doing but she was ultra sensitive to touch. Still had a good time.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5377442]My sentiment exactly! Maybe Chanel can pose in Playboy special edition for BLIND people only. Chanel is a decent looking over age MILF, nothing More and nothing Less.[/QUOTE]How many K-girls have a better and more perfectly proportioned body? I would love to hear that list. The only two great bodies like that were Nina and Mini from M and they were tony spinners which took them out of the model body category. Remember we're talking bodies here.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5377566]Word on the street is Jessica = Viki. Judging by historical patterns of contributors to this thread, a legit new bb girl rarely goes undetected. This is particularly true for non upcharge girls.[/QUOTE]Really? I was concerned the booker did not screen me. I also got a text from M within an hour. Makes sense. Is this based off TER or the inner circle? Thanks!
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5377240]Her body? Yes. Did I say Playmate of the month? No.[/QUOTE]Her body in Playboy? Last I saw, Playboy doesn't publish untoned, MILFs, who don't show their face. Anyone who believes even Chanel's body is worthy of Playboy has no concept of what models look like. That's right, someone thought Hana was model material.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5377656]How many K-girls have a better and more perfectly proportioned body? I would love to hear that list. The only two great bodies like that were Nina and Mini from M and they were tony spinners which took them out of the model body category. Remember we're talking bodies here.[/QUOTE]Moli has one of the most incredible bodies and she was pretty tall too. But not sure if you is currently available.
I had an abysmal experience with her as well. I thought she was higher than a 5. 5 in looks and don't care to think about her age. I thought she as cute in her own way and a bit chunky but it looked good on her. So I'd say a point higher.
But everything else was on point as I'm yours. I did pay ahead for both BB / G and got it, and a CIA, but her attitude was bad, I tried kissing and she jerked her head with a "f $$k no" move. She wore this stringy black thing over her tits to keep me from touching them (similar to girls piercing them). I paid for an hour; I was buzzed in the door at exactly two minutes after the hour, and I was sitting back in my car at the thirty minute mark. So 28 minutes. This includes walking there / back, and two showers. Showers were all about her and making sure I was clean but there was zero pleasantness or anything that even suggested a personality other than her grunting the few words she knew at me. On the bed she sucked me for a minute and it was apparent she wanted me to move on, I tried to get her to do BLS and she used her fingers, and when I asked for a 69 she didn't understand and got into Mish, so I was well, let me play down there and she curtly said "gentle! She didn't even want to get on top. I asked for doggy and she assumed we were doing her butt so she lubed it and stuck it in. I'm slightly less than average and it's clear she's been doing this for a while- and she was acting like it was painful and I'm too big. I then did a CIA and she was a little pissed at me for that. She never once touched me other than to blow me. I laid there after the deed and just wanted out and split.
This was a booker on Hx and I think I saw them last in 2019 when I got a grandma- like a 60 year old- and I never went back.
[QUOTE=ImYours;5374961]Uh, yeah. What a fucking trip.
F: 5. 5 - maybe a little higher if she did her makeup better. She's def mid 40's.
B: 6 - higher if you like them thicker. Big ol' titties, curvy, a little pooch. Taller. Not in great shape but yeah.
A: 2 - This is where shit got weird. I just showered before I came, then she asked me to shower again, I told her I just showered, but she insisted I shower. OK, no problem. I get in the shower, she says "shower". Leaves the bathroom, Starts talking to herself or whatever and goes in and out of the room a couple times in the maybe 1 minute I was in the shower. That was just be beginning.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Fatonius;5377769]Moli has one of the most incredible bodies and she was pretty tall too. But not sure if you is currently available.[/QUOTE]Who is Moli with?
[QUOTE=Charley1004;5376325]Sharing is caring. Most of these have started listing bb girls (at least once in a blue moon).[/QUOTE]Great list, definitely going to save this for easy access for later. Much appreciated.
[QUOTE=Fatonius;5377769]Moli has one of the most incredible bodies and she was pretty tall too. But not sure if you is currently available.[/QUOTE]I know Moli very well and as great as her body is it's not proportionally as perfect as Chanel and her doesn't compare. Chanel is round and firm with no droop. Like a 20 something girl.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5377743]Her body in Playboy? Last I saw, Playboy doesn't publish untoned, MILFs, who don't show their face. Anyone who believes even Chanel's body is worthy of Playboy has no concept of what models look like. That's right, someone thought Hana was model material.[/QUOTE]No room for MILFs in Playboy? If you think Chanel isn't toned then you haven't seen her. Do you really think your perception of reality is everyone's? Who made you the arbiter of body perfection? You still haven't named a better body.
[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5377881]Who is Moli with?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.foxylists.com/moli[/URL]
Her TER profile hasn't had a review in over a year.
Returning Monday June 7 with M in WLA.
[QUOTE=TheDudeSter;5377732]Really? I was concerned the booker did not screen me. I also got a text from M within an hour. Makes sense. Is this based off TER or the inner circle? Thanks![/QUOTE]It's been mentioned recently here.
1. Niya.
I had not dealt with that org for a while and had not thought about the upcharge. She was worth it, but it's hard to feel good about the price.
2. Love.
She's small, but voluptuous. I saw her twice during this period.
3. MistressX.
She's a great back-up plan and value.
4. Pink.
Hanna level work ethic. I'm just not into this Ara-esque body shape. And that's also true for:
5. Chanel.
She checked all the boxes, including tight, but I was not into her face.
[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5377881]Who is Moli with?[/QUOTE]Last time I think she was independent and not with an agency.
[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;5377743] Her body in Playboy? Last I saw, Playboy doesn't publish untoned, MILFs, who don't show their face. Anyone who believes even Chanel's body is worthy of Playboy has no concept of what models look like. That's right, someone thought Hana was model material.[/QUOTE]LOL. She is not that much of MILF. She is actually decent looking, decent body but far from being a model category and no matter how hard you want to claim that she is model material, it just does not fly. In all honesty, her body is "7" and her face is a "6" but she can fuck you to coma and she is one cum hungry woman. So give her a chance and go fill her up as she strives to be the best.
[QUOTE=Ghost626;5372263]From Allie December social media post, I think She has Sugar daddy now. I saw Chanel yesterday, Decent BBBJ, sweet rimming but I'm not feeling her looks so One and done for me. I need Ara back![/QUOTE]Funny enough, it appears she's back with M.
[URL]https://www.flickr.com/photos/188141235@N06/sets/72157714028762203/[/URL]
[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5378023]1. Niya.
I had not dealt with that org for a while and had not thought about the upcharge. She was worth it, but it's hard to feel good about the price.
2. Love.
She's small, but voluptuous. I saw her twice during this period.
3. MistressX.
She's a great back-up plan and value.
4. Pink.
Hanna level work ethic. I'm just not into this Ara-esque body shape. And that's also true for:
5. Chanel.
She checked all the boxes, including tight, but I was not into her face.[/QUOTE]Post above, it is 100% spot on.
And in regard to #5 nominee, What? She is a model Material. LOL.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5377982]No room for MILFs in Playboy? If you think Chanel isn't toned then you haven't seen her. Do you really think your perception of reality is everyone's? Who made you the arbiter of body perfection? You still haven't named a better body.[/QUOTE]From CA-kdoll mentioning Vivian, Jazmine, Cami. Then add Ena, Linda (Currently at OC), Scarlett (OC), Venus (My Kupcake), Ravi, Allison (Northern CA), Flynn (OC) and that is just top of my head. Chanel is body will be worst body among all those nominee.
Also Vivian is really athletic and swim suit type-toned abs, nice shoulder line and toned and feminine arms and legs.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5378060]LOL. She is not that much of MILF. She is actually decent looking, decent body but far from being a model category and no matter how hard you want to claim that she is model material, it just does not fly. In all honesty, her body is "7" and her face is a "6" but she can fuck you to coma and she is one cum hungry woman. So give her a chance and go fill her up as she strives to be the best.[/QUOTE]Yes, and when all comparisons to beauty are based on kgirls without recognizing the reality of real beauty, esp. The standards of the native countries, one is just an ignorant fanboy who has tunnel vision for their own preferences. In Korea, these women are just average looking.
[QUOTE=BobLove;5378086[URL]https://www.flickr.com/photos/188141235@N06/sets/72157714028762203/[/URL][/QUOTE]Password protected.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5378060]LOL. She is not that much of MILF. She is actually decent looking, decent body but far from being a model category and no matter how hard you want to claim that she is model material, it just does not fly. In all honesty, her body is "7" and her face is a "6" but she can fuck you to coma and she is one cum hungry woman. So give her a chance and go fill her up as she strives to be the best.[/QUOTE]If her body is a "7" which is average then there are no great bodies in Kgirl land. Find me a better one. Average body? You got to be kidding. Her body happens to be great and it's always YMMV but that being said you must not have found any bodies better than 7.
I've read all the posts debating on the model qualities of all of these girls. The true fact is. No, you're not going to get true model quality. No, it's not subjective at all. Everyone here on this forum looks at plenty of girls and watches porn, and I think we can all agree what a model should look like.
If you want model quality. You're going to have to donate for much more than is typically being donated to the girls on this forum. I'm talking at minimum $5. And it goes up from there to in the k's. I've done it and it's a completely different level. Is it worth it? Maybe 2-3 times per year depending on your budget. You should all try it at least once to compare. But you'll probably be disappointed because the service levels are completely different. But you've got a 5' 10" specimen that's 70% legs underneath (or on top) of you which is pretty awesome to look at.
Betraying my own preferences, memory, sensibilities, YMMV, Old-Timers, Yadda-D-Dadda! List comprised of girls I either actually saw, or contemplated seeing again. Placement possibly affected by how the session went down!
1. Niya.
2. Allie.
3. Moni.
4 Love.
5. Hazel.
6. Sophia.
7. MistressX.
8. Pepsi.
9. Viki.
10. Dahee.
Honorable mention, but I never tried to see her again:
Hana.
M. Chanel, Viki.
Sunny.
Newtopasian. LA Sera, Min.
Pink Angels. Sarah.
Sexy Angels. Sophia, Hanna.
SFK. Megan, Viki.
PKL Saki, Pink, Eunji.
Sesang.
Angelsinwla.
KGLA. Saki, Pink, Eunji.
[QUOTE=BobLove;5378086][URL]https://www.flickr.com/photos/188141235@N06/sets/72157714028762203/[/URL][/QUOTE]The booker sent me this flickr link yesterday afternoon and I didn't open it until I got home from an outing.
It was locked a few minutes after I was done asking the booker for intel.
Anyway, Allie is at the top of page. Booker claims she will be back on Monday, June 7; 300/60, just like before she left.
Cona is off again.
Does anyone know where she went? I checked all 33 of my k-agency websites and I didn't see her. Gone home?
I'm trying to book Cami and went to [URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/product/cami/[/URL] but cannot find the phone number for some reason. Am I crazy or should I be looking somewhere else?
[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5378778]I'm trying to book Cami and went to [URL]https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/product/cami/[/URL] but cannot find the phone number for some reason. Am I crazy or should I be looking somewhere else?[/QUOTE]You're not crazy. They deleted the number from their site. In situations like this, I recommend heading over to [B][URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchReviews.asp]TER Advanced Search[/URL][/B] and look for Name: Cami, City: Los Angeles, Ethnicity: Asian.
Result: [B][URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/cami-2139059909-303713]Cami[/URL][/B].
Gotcha thank you! Usually if they remove their number does that mean they are not accepting new people?
Edit: just got a text back saying "not here". So unsure if that number doesn't work anymore or if Cami is taking a break
[QUOTE=GG1234;5378800]You're not crazy. They deleted the number from their site. In situations like this, I recommend heading over to [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchReviews.asp]TER Advanced Search[/URL] and look for Name: Cami, City: Los Angeles, Ethnicity: Asian.
Result: [B][URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/cami-2139059909-303713]Cami[/URL][/B].[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jack926;5378331]From CA-kdoll mentioning Vivian, Jazmine, Cami. Then add Ena, Linda (Currently at OC), Scarlett (OC), Venus (My Kupcake), Ravi, Allison (Northern CA), Flynn (OC) and that is just top of my head. Chanel is body will be worst body among all those nominee.
Also Vivian is really athletic and swim suit type-toned abs, nice shoulder line and toned and feminine arms and legs.[/QUOTE]To you maybe but are you the arbiter of good looks and good bodies? I've said it so many times that looks are always YMMV. I've seen some on your list and while they have good bodies I wouldn't rate them any higher than Chanel. If they are that good are they all 10's to you? I know some who you listed and if you'll notice they have their share of 7's as well. I guess that puts them in the same category as Chanel who, by the way has her share of 8's and 9's. I guess your view of beauty isn't the universal one. It's always in the eye of the beholder. YMMV.
[QUOTE=HotManGuy;5378803]Gotcha thank you! Usually if they remove their number does that mean they are not accepting new people?
Edit: just got a text back saying "not here". So unsure if that number doesn't work anymore or if Cami is taking a break[/QUOTE]I just saw Cami last week so she's probably not on a break considering she's on the website.
[QUOTE=GG1234;5378800]You're not crazy. They deleted the number from their site.[/QUOTE]It's just small and easy to overlook. Click "home" and scroll down to "LA Models" and look closely.
[QUOTE=NObserver;5378667]The booker sent me this flickr link yesterday afternoon and I didn't open it until I got home from an outing.
It was locked a few minutes after I was done asking the booker for intel.
Anyway, Allie is at the top of page. Booker claims she will be back on Monday, June 7; 300/60, just like before she left.
Cona is off again.[/QUOTE]Cona and Allie will be alternating time in one room and Viki is in the other with Chanel using it part time until further notice.
[QUOTE=Eponymously;5376959]Cheers to both of you for the great resources. There's definitely a few here I wasn't aware of.
Anyone have any experience with this org? Disregarding the pics, they have some premium pricing relative to their competitors and even k-girls. Might be a brilliant marketing tactic because it's way more intriguing than if they were closer to standard, LOL.[/QUOTE]I used to go to Miya before going to korea. Girls are maybe 70 80% of the pics. The price was increased from 260 to 280/300; I did not try the high price tag one yet, so I do not know how it is. Kind of standard, 1 shower with or without BJ, sometime shower alone. After shower, some massage in the back. After the fun time, most of the time I have to take the shower again alone. There is no girls that kicked me out early. There is no BB or G.