My experience on AMP in California
As for AMPs, the women working there usually are not young and know exactly what is going on. They go from CA to NY and back to Asia then back to the US again. Girls who have been recruited by sex traffickers are never allowed to leave. They will look thin, drugged, sleep deprived and like they have been crying for days. If you see that, walk away and make a few calls. This is not about helping the police. It is about helping someone who can't help themselves.
I was a regular to a Korean MP for 3 years when I was in California. I used to give the girls good tips and chat with them about their family, personal life and age. I even tried to make friend with them by mentioning I am single and looking for a wife from them.
None of them are forced to come to USA as result of sex trafficking. Korean girls can come to USA as tourists any time with easy-approval tourist visa. Recently, Korea has made a treaty with USA to mutually waive tourist visa for a short visit for a month to two.
It is hard for those Korean girls to find a job in their own country due to their lack of college degree. There is a tradition to come to sell themselves (body) to help their mothers, mostly widow or abandoned by the fathers. It is a respected behave for doing that in Korea. Most of the Korean Girls live in LA Korean town and back forth to SFO, NY, Tampa and other big cities. One of the girls I met actually came to USA to study accounting in San Diego US college. But she supports her own college by selling her body in MP. It is not a very shameful business in Korean girls because it is a "BUSINESS". They have many rules for this type of business. I still remember, the mamasan told me on the second day of new year after I told her that I called them on New Year's day for a message."Nobody works on the first day of a year in this business".
Xx
It can't be enforced if it is true
[quote=michael caffey; 1143520]if memory serves me correctly, during the clinton administration sex tourism was made a crime for americans by executive order. it was touted as being necessarry to fight the exploitation of the **** (by american standards) in foreign countries. but in usual overreactive, kneejerk fashion, the actual order blanket covers all sex tourism.
i have never heard of it being enforced, but you still may wish to be careful. [/quote]no president can enact criminal law thru executive order. the constitution gives the power to make law solely to the congress. it would be a breach of separation of powers. he could have enacted some travel ban restrictions, to a point, to certain locations involving **** issues. that may be why its never been enforced if it is in fact true.
"Probably she likes fishing?"
There are just so many things wrong with that post, I don't know where to start. Bottom line, if you don't know when to RUN from the smell emanating from her crotch, this board won't help you.
[QUOTE=Jrbigfish;1144423]She is a good provider, no drama, and good on her word. The only bad thing is the shrimp smell. Probably she likes fishing.[/QUOTE]
Time for a civics lesson.
[quote=truthseaker;1143574]no president can enact criminal law thru executive order. the constitution gives the power to make law solely to the congress. it would be a breach of separation of powers. he could have enacted some travel ban restrictions, to a point, to certain locations involving **** issues. that may be why its never been enforced if it is in fact true.[/quote]an executive order has the effect of law unless countermanded by legislation passed by congress, provided it is in furtherance of existing law or constitutionally within article ii powers. that is not my belief or opinion. that is what the scotus ruled (youngstown vs. sawyer. 343 us 579 (1952).
and there are plenty of laws any order would be furthering.
[url]http://prostitution.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceid=000119[/url]
you'll notice that there is plenty of law concerning adults, as "sex trafficking" and "slavery" are illegal under u.s. law, which has been extended beyond our boarders more and more over the last 30 years.
so again, i meerly caution people to be careful in their conduct and discussions; not that they cease. nor should you mistake this for supporting the current federal government position.
Yes michael you do need a civics lesson
[QUOTE=Michael Caffey; 1144918]An Executive Order has the effect of law unless countermanded by legislation passed by Congress, provided it is in furtherance of existing law or constitutionally within Article II powers. That is not my belief or opinion. That is what the SCOTUS ruled (Youngstown vs. Sawyer. 343 US 579 (1952).
And there are plenty of laws any order would be furthering.
[url]http://prostitution.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000119[/url]
You'll notice that there is plenty of law concerning adults, as "sex trafficking" and "slavery" are illegal under USA law, which has been extended beyond our boarders more and more over the last 30 years.
So AGAIN, I meerly caution people to be careful in their conduct and discussions; not that they cease. Nor should you mistake this for supporting the current federal government position. [/QUOTE]The SCOTUS decision you cite involves how far the Executive Order powers of the President are in seizing private property in a time of a National Emergency. In that case President Truman ordered the nations steel mills seized for several reasons and cited his authority under Executive Order. The Supreme Court rebuked his stance and seizure of the steel mills under Executive Order and within minutes of the decision, Truman ordered Commerce Secretary Charles Sawyer to return the steel mills to their owners.
The decision has had a broad impact. It represented a check on the most extreme claims of executive power.
In effect the decision stated the President had no power to act except in those cases expressly or implicitly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress.
Congress not the President enacts law. Maybe you might want to reread the case law you cite and try reading Justice Blacks writings on the case, who wrote the for the majority of the justices in the case.
Furthermore in recent years the case you cited was used the basis for another decision limiting Presidential Executive Orders where Quoting Youngstown Sheet & Tube, Chief Justice John Roberts concluded,"The president's authority to act, as with the exercise of any governmental power, 'must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. '"
Unless you are referring to foreign policy matters and other areas that the constitution give specific powers to the office of the President, the President has NO authority to enact law.
Thanks for the attempted civics lesson but I prefer mine based on facts not flawed opinion. Read the case you cited. It does not even remotely support your beliefs, it actually states the opposite.
Business or Prostitution?
[url]http://www.lvrj.com/news/reid-urges-nevada-to-outlaw-prostitution-116672729.html[/url]
Thanks for the Civics Lesson
[QUOTE=TruthSeaker; 1144947]The SCOTUS decision you cite involves how far the Executive Order powers of the President are in seizing private property in a time of a National Emergency. In that case President Truman ordered the nations steel mills seized for several reasons and cited his authority under Executive Order. The Supreme Court rebuked his stance and seizure of the steel mills under Executive Order and within minutes of the decision, Truman ordered Commerce Secretary Charles Sawyer to return the steel mills to their owners.
The decision has had a broad impact. It represented a check on the most extreme claims of executive power.
In effect the decision stated the President had no power to act except in those cases expressly or implicitly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress.
Congress not the President enacts law. Maybe you might want to reread the case law you cite and try reading Justice Blacks writings on the case, who wrote the for the majority of the justices in the case.
Furthermore in recent years the case you cited was used the basis for another decision limiting Presidential Executive Orders where Quoting Youngstown Sheet & Tube, Chief Justice John Roberts concluded,"The president's authority to act, as with the exercise of any governmental power, 'must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself. '"
Unless you are referring to foreign policy matters and other areas that the constitution give specific powers to the office of the President, the President has NO authority to enact law.
Thanks for the attempted civics lesson but I prefer mine based on facts not flawed opinion. Read the case you cited. It does not even remotely support your beliefs, it actually states the opposite. [/QUOTE]Thanks for the Civics lesson, I was stoned through most of it in high school BUT lets not loose site of whats really important SEX-DRUGS-and-ROCKnROLL!
Whats the closest place to Florida that someone can go to enjoy some sex, drugs (just weed) and rocknroll without fear of being aressted or robbed. Like a Sandles but with girls, Amsterdam is just toooo far to go. Any sugestions?
Jethrow. You need a new handle
[QUOTE=Jethrow1;1147659]It fits into my bag of toys (just). Drove her nuts and it was the first time alone with her, later she said she wasn't sure I wasn't going to chop her up but added to the whole scenario of being bound.[/QUOTE]How about Cassanova? You rock J!
It's my Turn for Help. (Motels)
Cheap motels on east side, ucf area, etc.
Along 50, ?
This should be nominated for the Best of craigslist
Please let us know next time you post this ad so we can flag it for the best of CL.
I am a little more discreet in my approach but that is a great ad.
[QUOTE=Jethrow1; 1148287]A few are asking to see my post and it got pulled from craigslist so here goes.
" Ladies imagine this if you will"
I am a white male 55 yrs. Old. 220# and my dick is broken.
Yes broken.
So imagine a man who is an expert at oral and digital sex and derives his pleasure from touching and holding your body and making you happy.
Most me post on here for oral and show their cock pic, I ask why.
All I can promise you is that you will leave a large wet spot on the bed when we are finished.
I start with a long slow sensual massage relaxing every part of your body while building the desire to be touched in more intimate places.
When you are completely relaxed I will move to the more sensual areas of your body.
If you squirt all the better, or if you would like to learn how, I'm a good teacher.
So lets get started.
I prefer to play days.
Starting 2 round this week with one, one is flaky and the other has been sick but anxious for hers. [/QUOTE]
