The Asian crapshoot just got even weirder
I had a really tough week so I decided to seek out some stress relief. Not surprisingly, most of my calls went unanswered. (Why do providers post ads and then refuse to take phone calls from those who wish to do business with them? But I digress.) One provider texted back an hour after I called and her rates were reasonable, but she had no history and her photos looked TGTBT so I passed. Once again I turned to one of the Asian crapshoot ads, again for someone who advertised to be in her 30's. It was a different ad than the one which led to last week's disaster.
The provider, or her handler, texted the same extended-stay hotel as last week's visit. It's a fairly large place so I didn't think anything of it. I got there and she texted the room number. It looked familiar, but I've visited other providers, including non-Asian ones, at this same place. I got to the room and the provider opened the door. Lo and behold, it was the exact same provider I saw last week! She seemed happy that I returned, but I doubt she was happy when I bolted.
To summarize, the provider associated with this ad:
[URL]http://nova.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/beauty-sexy-asian-757-648-9240-special-b2b-nuru-massage/26453433[/URL]
Is the same provider as the one associated with the ad I answered last week. That ad, by the way, is still running:
[URL]http://nova.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/frist-day-fair-oaks-mall-are-asian-nuru/26459905[/URL]
In both cases the pics are fake, even more so with the "Judy" ad than the "Suri" ad.
I'm out some time, some gas, and a blue pill, but at least I saved my money.
Which one? Brianna, Sarah or Hazel?
[QUOTE=BaconBread;3250275]Had a good time with her about a year ago. She's the girl in the pics, very nice looking. No complaints, but is non-GFE and fully priced for the level of performance. Probably won't repeat.[/QUOTE]Which girl were did you visit?
This was defintely the bad and the ugly
[QUOTE=HappyGuy2;3250566]Thanks for sharing the reality. Great ads! . just not the goods promised I guess. Handler is creative marketier I guess.
Good move turning and leaving. The fakers have to learn somehow. We need more posts that tell the good, the bad and the ugly.
Beware,
HG2.[/QUOTE]Except for a handful of the Chinese MILF ads, I've yet to come across a single ad in the Asian crapshoot which carried actual photos of the providers. Then again, the same can be said for plenty of non-Asian ads as well. I also don't know why they promise a massage, especially a body-to-body massage, when the provider in question doesn't even provide the most basic of body rubs. At least she didn't when I saw her the week before.
There was plenty of bad and ugly in this instance, but the only good is that I had the presence of mind to leave. One has to wonder how many more walkouts advertisers must endure before they finally practice truth in advertising. Or is that asking too much from providers of such services?
LinkedIn or Facebook as verification
[QUOTE=HiNMitey;3247386]How about ones who want to be Facebook of LinkedIn friends?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Miketastic69;3253961]That is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of. I don't have either FB or LI. If I did, I would probably never have anyone from the hobbying world as a friend or link. I have looked up companies on linkedin and in my search I have seen massage providers show up. I did not see any escorts.[/QUOTE]I must've missed this one.
Let's see now: A provider who requires screening wants to be a Facebook or LinkedIn friend, and someone thinks [U]that[/U] is a good idea? Or even a halfway decent idea? Geez, why not just post on one's Facebook page that one is a monger?
Miketastic has the absolutely correct sentiment: "FN crazy". [B]Any[/B]thing that would connect your mongering activities to your true identity is just asking for trouble on [B]SO[/B] many levels. If one is willing to use one's Facebook or LinkedIn account for verification, then that partly defeats the notion of using "burner" phones for mongering purposes. I understand that providers want to lower their exposure to unnecessary risks, but that shouldn't come at the expense of the customer. Just as a monger doesn't get into this hobby without a foreknowledge of the situation, so too a provider should not.
This notion of references works both ways. Would a provider feel comfortable providing references, including personal info, to mongers? I can sympathize with a provider not wanting to be stuck out on a limb but, if they feel the business is too risky without requiring references and verification of the sort that entail personal information from the customer, they are probably in the wrong business or the wrong environment. I refuse to play that game. Period.