Printable View
[QUOTE=SquidKing78;6600494]You know, all the "deepstate" stuff some get into. Thankfully STDs don't spread like Covid. Too bad there's no vaccine for the clap either. If Bill Gates made one, I'd take it!
Had it twice. Once from Thailand. And once from a provider in Seattle. But I don't BB too often. And this is over. Around 20 years.[/QUOTE]Thank you but I'm waiting for the gentleman that originally posted to respond with his feedback.
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6599986]I have inseminated hundreds junkies. But I will no longer knowingly see junkies. Keep in mind that I NEVER use condoms, and I go for sex, not just blow jobs. I never intend to use condoms for anything, I havn't for the last 20 years or so. Point #5 below particularly applies to heroin addicts. HOWEVER, meth addicts and crack addicts also, when they reach a certain stage of physiological function degradation, are also considerably more likely to acquire and transmit diseases of all different kinds. I posted professional references for this before, and I'm not going to dig those up now, as its time-consuming. But you can find the relevant information yourself, just google.
Here's my cliff notes about junkies:
1. They are often being tracked by thugs with badges. Therefore, you might be, too.
2. They are usually associated with thugs without badges, many of whom are violent and dangerous.
3. Their bodies are often ravaged by the effects of addiction, and so, they look shitty.
4. Their performance is usually substandard because all they care about is their next fix.
5. They are immunocompromised because of their hard drug use, and therefore more likely to transmit unwanted infections, including STIs and numerous other diseases.
There are of course exceptions to these generalizations, and there are various degrees and stages of addiction. Nevertheless, I, and I'm sure many others, wish to avoid junkies because of the above problems. Therefore, I, and many others, would VERY much appreciate a mention of the hoes' junkie status, when you review them here.[/QUOTE]Kenzie is off my 'to do again list'.
[QUOTE=Zippy69;6600390]I have no problem sharing on an anonymous board. No biggie. I've not had an STD before. Also never did a junkie that I know of.[/QUOTE]Your experience also, therefore, supports the predicted correlation between knowingly avoiding junkies and avoiding STDs. Predicted, of course, by the well-known ability of the drugs discussed, to induce an immunocompromised state in junkies, which, by definition, makes it easier for them to acquire diseases, and thus, more likely to transmit them.
It is, of course, damned hard, these days, to avoid having sex with junkies in this "hobby", since the vast majority of prostitutes these days are junkies, yes?
(Oh, oh! I hope I did not open yet another can of worms with that last statement! But I'll let somebody else supply the data on what percentage of prostitutes are junkies!).
Whatever the percentage is, I think all of us agree, just from our experiences, that the percentage of hoes that are hard drug addicts today, is quite large! Thus, reporting a hoe's junkie status in reviews would be a GOOD thing, yes? To help us all avoid diseases. Because junkies are literally walking Petri dishes!
Now, please don't get me wrong! I'm not saying that you will never get a disease if you only bareback non-junkies! I AM saying that it's less likely. The risk is REDUCED, BUT NOT ELIMINATED!
[QUOTE=PoorOldMan;6600293]Athena76 posted a few days ago on TNA.[/QUOTE]Thanks for that update! Does anyone know how fat she is these days? I did not get the impression that she was a junkie when I raw-dogged her ass and pussy back in 2016. But I wasn't screening them much for that, in those days. Does anyone know how she looks now, compared to my 7 year old pictures of her, in my post #1615, here:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?22289-BBFS-Bareback-in-Portland&p=4260348&viewfull=1[/URL]#post4260348.
Been wondering the same, I haven't been able to see her since we made a video beginning of the pandemic, and then I must have an outdated#, as I can't get ahold of her to even see if new pics would be recent, or if anyone has an actual recent pic, since she def never liked to send new ones, and as she def acts like a junkie. Ghosting, lying and the such, I've never seen proof of use.
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6601238]Thanks for that update! Does anyone know how fat she is these days? I did not get the impression that she was a junkie when I raw-dogged her ass and pussy back in 2016. But I wasn't screening them much for that, in those days. Does anyone know how she looks now, compared to my 7 year old pictures of her, in my post #1615, here:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?22289-BBFS-Bareback-in-Portland&p=4260348&viewfull=1[/URL]#post4260348.[/QUOTE]
[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2647979-%26%23128166%3B-Qv-special%26%23128166%3B[/URL]
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;6601104]Your experience also, therefore, supports the predicted correlation between knowingly avoiding junkies and avoiding STDs. Predicted, of course, by the well-known ability of the drugs discussed, to induce an immunocompromised state in junkies, which, by definition, makes it easier for them to acquire diseases, and thus, more likely to transmit them.
It is, of course, damned hard, these days, to avoid having sex with junkies in this "hobby", since the vast majority of prostitutes these days are junkies, yes?
(Oh, oh! I hope I did not open yet another can of worms with that last statement! But I'll let somebody else supply the data on what percentage of prostitutes are junkies!).
Whatever the percentage is, I think all of us agree, just from our experiences, that the percentage of hoes that are hard drug addicts today, is quite large! Thus, reporting a hoe's junkie status in reviews would be a GOOD thing, yes? To help us all avoid diseases. Because junkies are literally walking Petri dishes!
Now, please don't get me wrong! I'm not saying that you will never get a disease if you only bareback non-junkies! I AM saying that it's less likely. The risk is REDUCED, BUT NOT ELIMINATED![/QUOTE]Percentage that are junkies? I think it depends on the type of ladies and experience you're looking for and how much you're willing to spend. The cheaper they are asking the more likely they are a junkie. The more expensive the less likely. There are young, hyper fit, borderline famous OF ladies out there that charge 2500 an hour. They're probably not shooting up meth on a sidewalk on the side.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/oregon/portland/154001987[/URL]
Set up an appointment well in advance. Got to the address, radio silence. Definitely never seeing her.
[QUOTE=BloodRage;6602359][URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/oregon/portland/154001987[/URL]
Set up an appointment well in advance. Got to the address, radio silence. Definitely never seeing her.[/QUOTE]Besides your time. I think I hit that for 70 qv not a clock watcher cip no upsell.
[QUOTE=Organiz;6602236][URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2647979-%26%23128166%3B-Qv-special%26%23128166%3B[/URL][/QUOTE]That new hoe in Salem 'brookev' confirmed via text bbfscip +50. So 150 qv bbfscip. But a buddy just sent me some pics of her. Her bodytype looks more or less like that of katiekisses. Dunno if she legit tho? And salem is a long drive. I wanna fuck jeanierivers raw, saw her name here but dunno if its ymmv/upcharge?
[QUOTE=BookOfMorty;6602255]Percentage that are junkies? I think it depends on the type of ladies and experience you're looking for and how much you're willing to spend. The cheaper they are asking the more likely they are a junkie. The more expensive the less likely. There are young, hyper fit, borderline famous OF ladies out there that charge 2500 an hour. They're probably not shooting up meth on a sidewalk on the side.[/QUOTE]The most expensive hoe I ever raw dogged EVER cost me 600 + the price of the room plus dinner so over 800 total. She was a very well known hoe on the east coast 20 years ago. Even though BBFS, she was one of my worst experiences ever. Total dead fish, no pun intended. She was an opiate addict and died of an overdose. I will not post her pictures, let her RIP. She was hot. But a total waste of time and money. All she was interested in was her next fix. On the other hand, I've had some hundred dollar hoes and some for 100 to 200 who were not junkies, and some of those are among my very best ever.
[QUOTE=Organiz;6602376]That new hoe in Salem 'brookev' confirmed via text bbfscip +50. So 150 qv bbfscip. But a buddy just sent me some pics of her. Her bodytype looks more or less like that of katiekisses. Dunno if she legit tho? And salem is a long drive. I wanna fuck jeanierivers raw, saw her name here but dunno if its ymmv/upcharge?[/QUOTE]Not worth it.
[QUOTE=PdxLuvBB;6603341]Not worth it.[/QUOTE]How so? Outdated pic? Fat? Bad BO? Dfe- dead fish experience?
[QUOTE=MarcSpencer;6568576]Honeybby95 xoxxx sounds to me that she may belong here, but not sure. Anyone seen her? I am planning to meet her. She put an add today on the other GPS board. Looks pretty! The reviews say she is not a clock watcher. Other than that, not really much useful info, but I am getting that vibe.
[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?533062-Honeybby95xoxxx[/URL][/QUOTE]Did you ever meet her? I'm intrigued.
[QUOTE=Samadams17;6603732]Did you ever meet her? I'm intrigued.[/QUOTE]I did not get an opportunity to meet her yet.