Intrusive K house / agency screening? No way.
[QUOTE=Menos;4562811]When you say invasive, you mean I can pretty much assume your persona level of info or they want to call and verified my place of work type of information.[/QUOTE]There is no way that I am giving up real info to meet people with aliases. No way. Why give anyone so much leverage?
Those who have have way better stories than mine, and I salute you, but willingly giving away info like that seems too risky in a sport with already a lot of risk.
I salute you all.
Add DS to the list of selective responders
[QUOTE=Kinoko34;4562212]There are no alternatives. Even with references, they'll want quite a lot of info out of you before you're in, all the k-agencies do. There are quite a lot of mixed feeling on this board about how invasive their screening process is.
And just to make things worse, it all depends on the mood of the booker if they even want to consider your attempt to apply. I've gotten in with AG, HT, but ClubP has never replied to any of my messages.[/QUOTE]Not sure why agencies (or some independents) just flat out ignore clients / business. When valid references are provided and then patiently waiting several weeks with not ONE reply back? It's their loss, I guess. I've never owned a business nor majoring in that field. But I'm pretty certain that's not a very feasible, effective way of running it. *shrugs* Guess I'll keep sticking with AG.