Printable View
Confirmed. When I met her some days back, she said Sunday would be her last day. But these things change all the time. Good luck.
[QUOTE=SDPewPew;7176087]I've been away from this hobby for over a year because met a fine girl. But I would certainly come back for Haven. Saw her when she was up in LA around 2023. She was a hard no on BB back then, can someone confirm if she's open to BB now?
If so, I'm back boys.[/QUOTE]
Luna: Other but then the obvious P.S. Around the eyes, pictures are real (black top kneeling and white lingerie are the best representation).
Very cute face, perfect natural C / D breasts, and a banging body.
She immediately recognized me, which is always a good thing (but it took me a while to remember her. Great sensual BBBJ (Just how I like it), finished CIP in MISH. Definite Repeat worthy.
She said last time in San Diego was 3 years ago (and we only had 2 K-Girl agencies then). English not great, but good enough.
SR Programs.
30 min 280 Open Option included.
60 min 300 Open Option 40.
2nd round 40.
Just checked the website looks like they updated the program damn no more msog on the house.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;7176129]Confirmed. When I met her some days back, she said Sunday would be her last day. But these things change all the time. Good luck.[/QUOTE]She is no longer there.
[QUOTE=TugSpinosa;7176843]SR Programs.
30 min 280 Open Option included.
60 min 300 Open Option 40.
2nd round 40.
Just checked the website looks like they updated the program damn no more msog on the house.[/QUOTE]
Kylie is currently offered at this rate, labeled "SR". For bb, consider it 280 hh / 340 hr. It is very competitive, considering SKP Get9 SAG starts many girls at 280 / 340. Allie and Luna are 280 / 320. Compare this to OC girls who are 300-350 base rate making them 400-450 bb. 17% to 32% more for the hr rate. Or worse, some LA girls are testing 400 base which makes them 500 bb or 47% more. Msog upcharge is the standard at every single agency now.
Of course, for GFE the "SR" rate is very competitive at 280 / 300. there is still the 260 / 300 rate for GFE only girls. The reason for these pricing options is everywhere else, girls are expecting them. Not to mention girls tend to make more money at a slightly lower rate because most people are budget conscious.
[QUOTE=Stl Danish;7176035]Has anyone tried this, or seen Luna alone? Spill the beans if so![/QUOTE]
Luna is petite, body over face, good tits and ass, 30s, in good shape. Great view of her big round ass on her knees.
Haven and Daniel are gone, hope they come back in the future. See rosters for info on Allie and Krissy, reviews on Ginza and Nara. There are some new girls too.
Pics are her. Early to mid 20's. GND cute face, banging body, flat stomach, no Bush, minimal English, multi-orgasmic asf, loves a good pounding, loud to the point I was half-expecting a knock on the door, cheerful demeanor. No video option or BB, which is unusual for j-girls from Japan. But yes to the j-tax LOL.
Both girls at FEC right now (the other being Nara) are using real and recent pics and are both are solid options. Well done to the booker and / or boss.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;7179114]Pics are her. Early to mid 20's. GND cute face, banging body, flat stomach, no Bush, minimal English, multi-orgasmic asf, loves a good pounding, loud to the point I was half-expecting a knock on the door, cheerful demeanor. No video option or BB, which is unusual for j-girls from Japan. But yes to the j-tax LOL.
Both girls at FEC right now (the other being Nara) are using real and recent pics and are both are solid options. Well done to the booker and / or boss.[/QUOTE]
Agreed, both girls are good looking. Kima is petite, cute, good looking overall. Nara is good looking head to toe, nice face nice ass, I'd say about 30. She reminds me of Winter but a bit younger. Very mellow, looks over service. Both girls are based on their ad photo, it gives the general idea even though I wouldn’t rely on them too much. Nara is a bit closer match especially the bed ones. Nara is A-tier looks which is rare, right in-between half-Thai Emily and Allie.
A-Tier: Emily SC, Nara, Allie, Winter, Hanni, Bona.
You are generally choosing between looks and service so if you need more service you'll need a service queen MILF.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;7179114]Pics are her. Early to mid 20's. GND cute face, banging body, flat stomach, no Bush, minimal English, multi-orgasmic asf, loves a good pounding, loud to the point I was half-expecting a knock on the door, cheerful demeanor. No video option or BB, which is unusual for j-girls from Japan. But yes to the j-tax LOL.
Both girls at FEC right now (the other being Nara) are using real and recent pics and are both are solid options. Well done to the booker and / or boss.[/QUOTE]Right on. . Kind of reminded me an another Japanese girl Rina / runa. I also wanted to add that her tits were perky too. I think natural. It's nice when they are natural and perky. She sure felt like she could handle a much larger cock as well. I thought she was a little buttery but she gets cuter. Very wet. She got me really fast too. And was so nice to let me try to pop again. FEC CAKDoll always comes through. Her BBBJ was really nice and wet too. She even had that Japanese walk. The little creepy baby steps kind.
[QUOTE=Gbrand;7176410]Luna: Other but then the obvious P.S. Around the eyes, pictures are real (black top kneeling and white lingerie are the best representation).
Very cute face, perfect natural C / D breasts, and a banging body.
She immediately recognized me, which is always a good thing (but it took me a while to remember her. Great sensual BBBJ (Just how I like it), finished CIP in MISH. Definite Repeat worthy.
She said last time in San Diego was 3 years ago (and we only had 2 K-Girl agencies then). English not great, but good enough.[/QUOTE]She sounds confused at best. She was popular in WLA 5 years ago. Luna TER: 347600.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;7179114]Pics are her. Early to mid 20's. GND cute face, banging body, flat stomach, no Bush, minimal English, multi-orgasmic asf, loves a good pounding, loud to the point I was half-expecting a knock on the door, cheerful demeanor. No video option or BB, which is unusual for j-girls from Japan. But yes to the j-tax LOL.
Both girls at FEC right now (the other being Nara) are using real and recent pics and are both are solid options. Well done to the booker and / or boss.[/QUOTE]That sucks on the no video option. Looks like I'll be waiting a bit longer for the next j girl.
Does anybody here ever request CBJ instead of BBBJ? Would kgirl providers be willing to do it?
Who is Emily SC? Do you have a link to her page or agency?.
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7179131]Agreed, both girls are good looking. Kima is petite, cute, good looking overall. Nara is good looking head to toe, nice face nice ass, I'd say about 30. She reminds me of Winter but a bit younger. Very mellow, looks over service. Both girls are based on their ad photo, it gives the general idea even though I wouldnt rely on them too much. Nara is a bit closer match especially the bed ones. Nara is A-tier looks which is rare, right in-between half-Thai Emily and Allie.
A-Tier: Emily SC, Nara, Allie, Winter, Hanni, Bona.
You are generally choosing between looks and service so if you need more service you'll need a service queen MILF.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=FingerLicking;7182378]Does anybody here ever request CBJ instead of BBBJ? Would kgirl providers be willing to do it?[/QUOTE]Yes they will do CBJ if that is your preference.
[QUOTE=FingerLicking;7182378]Does anybody here ever request CBJ instead of BBBJ? Would kgirl providers be willing to do it?[/QUOTE]I always go covered. Never been an issue.
[QUOTE=Maverick3212;7182385]Who is Emily SC? Do you have a link to her page or agency?.[/QUOTE]
Emily SC (SweetCandies) worked at the thai org Sandra99 but hasn't been around for a year. She was half-Thai half-Chinese, you can see her photos here:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=7163996&highlight=emily#post7163996[/URL] Emily SC
S99 currently has Yuri and Alice. They tend to have more realistic photos, make sure you scroll through all ad photos since there is sometimes a mix. Last I checked, they were 200 hh and 300 hr, located slightly south of the usual locations.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Sandra99[/URL]
Naturally, if I have a ranked list of girls who worked SD in the past, almost all of them won't be here at this time. But it let's people who recognize the other girls to have some context. I placed Nara between Emily and Allie, it's just my opinion of course. Allie is still here. This list is "looks only" since it's pretty straightforward for me, whereas service is going to be very ymmv to rate. Wait long enough and one of the girls will surely turn up:
S-Tier: Jira, Isabella
A-Tier: Emily SC, Nara, Allie, Winter, Maiko, Misha, Hanni, Bona, Drea.
B-Tier: Kiko, Swan, June, Haven, Sammy, Priva, Sai, Izumi K
Excluded are OC-only girls. I prefer young, cute, and skinny. If a guy prefers mature, sexy, and thick, then my list won't make any sense of course. So I just try to describe each girl when she shows up on a roster. I also am a "looks first" guy. Most guys are "service first" and will not care so much about a "looks only" ranking list like above. They will be happier with older MILFs who tend to provide good service. Service can be very subjective and ymmv, every guy wants something different.
An important reminder Admin has a sticky that only Senior members with 50 posts may post in any SD Asian thread. For a longer list, I compare Boner with my list and it's an 80% match:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?32586-Kgirls-ranking-and-recommendation&p=7162661&viewfull=1#post7162661[/URL] Boner vs my list
[QUOTE=FingerLicking;7182378]Does anybody here ever request CBJ instead of BBBJ? Would kgirl providers be willing to do it?[/QUOTE]
Certainly some people do. Kgirls definitely will. In fact, CBJ used to be the norm long ago. No different than asking a bbfs girl to go covered, of course they will. That's especially common.