KAngels Discussion

Of course, I didn't read it! I just didn't like you from the first sentence.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5943109]You clearly didn't read my post. I'm going to respond back in the Rants and Raves since I have a feeling it might get nuked here.[/QUOTE]

Flower looks great, perfect small tits! Unfortunately, I can't visit her this Friday, hopefully her photos are accurate!

I have been fighting low quality in LA for 3+ years cause I worried LA might become like Seatle now after the LOEG and then SESTA-FOSTA. My goal is to achieve indisputable Kquality in LA. I want truly hot young girls that people can't complain about LOL.

They were not mentioned in my HYA threads. None of those girls would be able to compete in LA. I figured some readers could decide who to see from my summary of those girls.

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5940381]We have much higher standards than SoCal, FYI. In our viewpoint, Jelly, Eye, Rose, Chanel, they are all low quality. We're famous for having high standards in terms of girls' appearance.[/QUOTE]

I am the regular client you suggested. I have been like that since day one.

Some Kgirls told me there are good and bad clients everywhere. People also said LA customers were bad but I didn't give up on them. I also believe we can bring quality Kgirls when they can make good money with more clean and respectful clients. Sharing intel about girls help a lot so that was why I tried to share some intel in Seattle too.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5942289]...If you guys want quality kgirls to start coming back to Seattle, then just be regular clients. No Captain Save-a-Ho's, stop trying to show off, stop trying to be their boyfriends, etc. Just be normal.[/QUOTE]

I am curious what you think about Flower and Diana too. I don't think Flower uses real pics but there are some resemblance in body and face. She's actually about A cup, looks young and decent GND, but also YMMV kinda like Lollipop Eye (I). I had good time with her. Never got into our HYA thread though.

IIRC, these are Flower old reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/eye-3104866866-352288](click here)[/URL], [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/aiyou-2133209456-354331](click here)[/URL].

I saw Diana years ago in LA. I would say she was high quality before but not sure what you guys think about her now. She was also YMMV back then.

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5943474]Flower looks great, perfect small tits! Unfortunately, I can't visit her this Friday, hopefully her photos are accurate![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5942682]They also say San Jose & LA area fuckers are pussy destroyers. Usually, they consider the whole West Coast is fucked-up area. But, the low quality NK-girls love BBFS+msog pussy destroyers! The problem is, we have much more high standards Korean pussy lovers! They are usually quiet and don't participate in this discussion board, but they read and analyze the reviews of new girls to verify if they are pretty enough to spend their time and money. All the high class pretty girls love PNW, but those fucked-up girls spread bad rumors about us simply because they only had fucked-up guys in our area.[/QUOTE]You're explanation for the drought of quality kgirls are because of rumors that NK girls (which BTW, most of them are Yanbian, not NK) spread?

What I find ironic is that somehow you guys have misguidedly attributed BBFS to NK girls (which is incorrect BTW), but really, a good number of the girls that were long-termers here prior to the TRB raid did BBFS with clients. Not really sure why all of a sudden you guys are attributing BBFS to NK girls. It was probably about 3 years ago that kgirl agencies in SoCal started actively promoting BBFS upcharges on their websites.

Go to NYC and research about the difference between North Korean and South Korean working girls, I found majority of SK-girls prefer CFS only, and they say in unison that the West Cost market has been defiled by the NK-BBFS-girls. Just tell me which NK-girl in the states that doesn't do BBFS. None. On other hand, there're too many SK-girls express their horrible feeling that they have to work among the NK-BBFS-girls. On top of everything, there're increasing numbers of NK-BBFS-girls that allow mediterranean; I feel nauseous!

FYI, the wave of BBFS among K-girl community restarted when Sam-the-motgerfucking-angel was released and returned to this field, that was about three years ago, and we saw increasing numbers of NK-BBFS-girls at the same time.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;5943789]You're explanation for the drought of quality kgirls are because of rumors that NK girls (which BTW, most of them are Yanbian, not NK) spread?

What I find ironic is that somehow you guys have misguidedly attributed BBFS to NK girls (which is incorrect BTW), but really, a good number of the girls that were long-termers here prior to the TRB raid did BBFS with clients. Not really sure why all of a sudden you guys are attributing BBFS to NK girls. It was probably about 3 years ago that kgirl agencies in SoCal started actively promoting BBFS upcharges on their websites.[/QUOTE]

While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.

Hey Aussie,

How would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks!

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]While the simps argue with the cucks in this thread... has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? This thread's starting to read like a Korean soap opera.

Just bang them then come here and tell us whether you think we'd also want to bang them.[/QUOTE]I actually picked up some good intels from the k-soap here.

But you are right. We do need more reviews. Too many simps and pussies went to see the girls and don't report back. Many of them just come here to leech the intel.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944065]has anyone got any *actual* visits to report? [/QUOTE]Saw Rose. I found her attractive, except well, kinda droopy breasts. She's really soft all around though, but doesn't look chubby.

But great attitude. Playful and joking. Pretty much on script with most of the other K girls. But with a smile and giggles.

Would probably explore other options next time, but if scheduling limited options I wouldn't mind seeing her again.

Saw Emma. She was hot. All kinda hot looking.

Quiet, reserved, almost shy. Skipped a few parts of the script, and had a very unique technique of not bobbing her head but just licking while applying suction, different, not really better.

And while she was almost too reserved to tell me what to do, she still very much wanted to be in charge until she first mounted me. Was great watching her cute little ass bouncing up and down when she spun around.

A little smaller than the standard kgirl bolt ons, but still some enhancement. Slim, cute, young'ish looking, at least to me.

As the hour went on she loosened up and even made a few jokes that left us both laughing. Didn't seem to be much of a language issue, still hesitant to initiate a conversation but shared some interesting observations of the US.

Did see her again. Several times. Really liked her more than others I'd met. (of course, YMMV.).

(both from Kangels).

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5944116]Hey Islander,

Just calm down and breath, we will report the 'actual visits' soon, especially, more girls are coming! You just need to seat back and watch K-dramas and enjoy those low quality 'Thai Non-Kgirl Asian Providers'. Oh, how would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks,

Fucking Sam.[/QUOTE]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5944116]Hey Islander,

Just calm down and breath, we will report the 'actual visits' soon, especially, more girls are coming! You just need to seat back and watch K-dramas and enjoy those low quality 'Thai Non-Kgirl Asian Providers'. Oh, how would you rate Diana? Did you have "actual visit" to her?

Thanks,

Fucking Sam.[/QUOTE]You're a trip, bro. Do you even live in Seattle? I have trouble understanding your motivation to post here. Maybe just to keep the spirit of Honestone alive.

To answer your question, I have no idea if the current Diana is actually the same Diana who visited previously. But if it is, yes I have seen her and got excellent service.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5944894]You're a trip, bro. Do you even live in Seattle? I have trouble understanding your motivation to post here. Maybe just to keep the spirit of Honestone alive.

To answer your question, I have no idea if the current Diana is actually the same Diana who visited previously. But if it is, yes I have seen her and got excellent service.[/QUOTE]Hey Aussie,

Thanks for your honest response! I am a Washingtonian, I just hate simps and the bait-and-switch agencies! However, I love hot Korean girls, I mean "really" hot and sexy ones! I don't know why but I have this anger, probably due to Sam-the-angel ruined the quiet but nice K-girl community when he returned to Bellevue! What the hell, just enjoy yourself, and share some good info, man!

By the chance, is Diana pretty (if she's the one you saw)?

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]Appreciated, I saw Ivy few years ago, and I agree with you.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]I really miss Jo's perky breast and sexy legs! But dfk with her wasn't impressive. She had bad breath.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]I disagree that Diana and Ivy are the same person. I got confirmation from the booker about Angel and Jo. I've seen Ivy several times and seen Diana a lot when they were here. Diana is one of my favorites but I didn't have great chemistry with Ivy.

The person you described sounds like Ivy to me. Ivy was very willing to please and does rim when asked.

Diana, to me, has a prettier face, tighter box and has better boobs. Diana gives great service when she wants to but there are times it seems very transactional and service seems lackluster. She hasn't been here for over 6 months so I don't know if she's changed. I plan to see her Thursday or Friday. I'll report back.

[QUOTE=Partington;5944858]Angel's alt is Jo. Diana's alt is Ivy.

Diana / Ivy looks about 35-37, not the best body, clearly has had a kid, loose pussy, but she does rimming. If facial beauty is your biggest thing, Diana isn't as hot as Angel / Jo.[/QUOTE]Both of them used to be with KAngels last year. Jo is now an independent provider, but anyone has info about Angel? Liked her a lot.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=TheJoker1;5945331]I disagree that Diana and Ivy are the same person. I got confirmation from the booker about Angel and Jo. I've seen Ivy several times and seen Diana a lot when they were here. Diana is one of my favorites but I didn't have great chemistry with Ivy.

The person you described sounds like Ivy to me. Ivy was very willing to please and does rim when asked.

Diana, to me, has a prettier face, tighter box and has better boobs. Diana gives great service when she wants to but there are times it seems very transactional and service seems lackluster. She hasn't been here for over 6 months so I don't know if she's changed. I plan to see her Thursday or Friday. I'll report back.[/QUOTE]I hope you are right, I don't want to go fucking mad again. But who knows? Kangels has been practising bait-and-switch tactic without shame.

[blue][Racial Epithet(s) Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited in accordance with the Forum's Zero Tolerance policy regarding reports containing [u]racial epithets[/u].

Please be advised that Forum Members who succeed in having three or more of their reports deleted for personal attacks, racial epithets or other derogatory comments, will be banned under the Forum's Serial Antagonist Policy.[/blue]

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5946673]NYC K-girls are young, pretty, slender, sexy, and tight! Some of our favorite NK-BBFS-girls are active here also, but I am passing them for now, I don't have enough time to see those BBFS girls. I highly recommend NYC for the true K-GFE-Escort-Experience! Tonight, I am going to this street in Manhattan where 20 some K-Spas with full of top class GFE K-girls! I will be a walk-in customer and will face-cancel until I get the perfect beauty![/QUOTE]Dang it, many K-Spas here require screening and appointment!

Rose. English is barely there. Glamor shots, but still happy with what I saw. Skinny with a nice little tush and nicely enhanced chest. Had a lot of fun with her and will repeat while she's here.

BellaDD. Probably one of the cutest I've seen in a while. Photos were very close to her appearance. Very pleasant demeanor and flirty. I would visit again if she came back.

JaimeDD. Rounder face and a little bit thicker than her pictures. Tastefully aggressive BBBJ. Would probably try others before returning.

[QUOTE=WonkaMyWilly;5947110]Rose. English is barely there. Glamor shots, but still happy with what I saw. Skinny with a nice little tush and nicely enhanced chest. Had a lot of fun with her and will repeat while she's here.

BellaDD. Probably one of the cutest I've seen in a while. Photos were very close to her appearance. Very pleasant demeanor and flirty. I would visit again if she came back.

JaimeDD. Rounder face and a little bit thicker than her pictures. Tastefully aggressive BBBJ. Would probably try others before returning.[/QUOTE]Thanks, WMW. I might check out Rose based on your recommendation.

[QUOTE=SamReturns;5946673]NYC K-girls are young, pretty, slender, sexy, and tight! Some of our favorite NK-BBFS-girls are active here also, but I am passing them for now, I don't have enough time to see those BBFS girls. I highly recommend NYC for the true K-GFE-Escort-Experience! Tonight, I am going to this street in Manhattan where 20 some K-Spas with full of top class GFE K-girls! I will be a walk-in customer and will face-cancel until I get the perfect beauty![/QUOTE]I consider myself pretty familiar with the Manhattan Asian hobby scene and I have no idea where this street is. What are the cross-streets?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5947390]I consider myself pretty familiar with the Manhattan Asian hobby scene and I have no idea where this street is. What are the cross-streets?[/QUOTE]There isn't.

[QUOTE=Ashun;5947438]Unfortunately, Flushing has now been taken over by Chinese and has a lot less Korean presence. You'll find a lot more Chinese mamasan standing outside trying to coerce you for a massage.[/QUOTE]That's what I figured, but last night I found several K-girls working at the Chinese owned spas. If you and Aussie are familiar with this area, you guys should know this already, right? By the way, it was my purpose of visiting NYC to verify the rumor about top quality K-girls working under Chinese owners. I confirmed it's partially true, but those K-girls at C-Spas in NYC weren't that pretty. And for me, Manhattan is just one huge street. I am a Washingtonian, and speaking in truth, I don't consider myself familiar with NYC. If I exaggerated too much last night, my apology, I was excited. , but, I have been telling the truth to some of you that I don't have inside intel, I just analyze and discern what I hear, read, and see, and I sometimes do crazy things like what I am doing right now. Staying here until tomorrow, and report again.

I might return to Bellevue in next week to see Flower. I found this from Reddit; maybe Flower isn't that pretty, but still attractive:

Has anyone seen her yet? Am thinking of going in for a visit soon. Besides the flaming, actually labeled troll, stalker dude with no life any feedback or reviews would be welcome.

Thanks in advanced.

[QUOTE=TheJoker1;5945331]I disagree that Diana and Ivy are the same person. I got confirmation from the booker about Angel and Jo. I've seen Ivy several times and seen Diana a lot when they were here. Diana is one of my favorites but I didn't have great chemistry with Ivy.

The person you described sounds like Ivy to me. Ivy was very willing to please and does rim when asked.

Diana, to me, has a prettier face, tighter box and has better boobs. Diana gives great service when she wants to but there are times it seems very transactional and service seems lackluster. She hasn't been here for over 6 months so I don't know if she's changed. I plan to see her Thursday or Friday. I'll report back.[/QUOTE]I saw Diana today and she's the same Diana I've seen before. No weight gain and still has an amazing body. She look kinda tired, maybe because I was her first appointment. Overall she provided good service. I say good because comparing to some other girls her services aren't as good but I really enjoy my time with her.

Met at the door wearing some small black thing.

Initial attitude was a pretty casual, do this, do that. Take a shower. So what if were both naked.

Bathroom was out through the main room, which I've seen several complaints about. (don't really care personally.).

Flower was short (like every other "K" girl, except that one. When that tall one coming back? And young, and thin.

Her face was sort of plain, OK, nothing wrong, but far from striking. Had some Korean fashion eye makeup that didn't do much for me. Hair had a lighter tint, kinda blondish but probably more brunette (likely dyed), and was a couple inches past her shoulders, not crazy long like some of the other girls have had.

Body was small and lovely, with cute little natural B cups. Maybe a couple extra pounds around the waste (at most, two). Not particularly athletic or hard body, just short, slim, and young, just what I wanted (well, that and a tall one to take turns with.).

Finished showering and back in the room she was became very accommodating, possibly even genuinely enjoying herself (maybe? She maybe was going to start one of the standard routines but as soon as I deviated from that she just went along with what I wanted. At least within standard boundaries (no fingers inside, nothing in the but).

She was up for round two, but that's not something I've been able to complete inside an hour in a while.

Started chatting about this and that, languages, travelling, etc. And got her laughing pretty hard a few times. Her English seems OK, at least her pronunciation is very good and she's easy to understand.

Not very sensual. But I really enjoyed it. Planning on getting back to see her again before she leaves.

Few comrades reported Flower is too plain, not attractive.

Carina looks great, her photos are very attractive! Especially, I like her legs, if they are true! I'm pretty much sure that she'll be fully booked in the first several days, if not several weeks. I did not research about her reviews, I like her photos.

Photos are important, if they are real. Even if they are extremely photoshopped, I at least visit once if I like the photos. However, bait-and-switch hoax must be eradicated from K-girl community!

Any intel on Peach at lolli and Mina at KA? Peach kinda looks like Peach3 from LA, some mixed reviews on service there but if it's her it sounds like her body's amazing.

Saw Rose and agree with previous reports regarding her good looks and service; very sweet and in good spirits, but definitely limited on her English. I feel like her pictures are pretty accurate after discounting the glamour.

Went past the main room to the side room; can see what people have been complaining about, but I figure you're brought in when you won't bump into anyone. Someone was showering in the main room and the door was closed when I arrived, but no one was there when I left.

Asked Rose if she wanted to join me when she asked about showering; thought she either misunderstood or didn't want to at first, but she did after a minute in there and gave a nice preview before the main event.

Main event was sensual -- prepped each other, lots of DFK, and quite a bit of body contact during various positions. She definitely has a nice face and body and I can't imagine the other girls would've been much better. Probably wish she was a tad more assertive, but at least I wouldn't classify her as very submissive either. Fully willing to try various mixed positions and I may have tired her a little when she got me close, but she was sweet about it. She seems to like to grind more than bounce though and she finished me by hand while kissing (mouth end).

Showered afterwards to clean up -- she gave me mouth wash then which was nice as I wasn't expecting it and think that's the first time I've ever gotten it at the end but not beginning.

Tried making small talk afterwards and asked if everyone else was treating her nicely, and she gave a quick no, so that's unfortunate. Not really the best of answers if you're hoping for more like her to come, though she was upbeat and dressing up as I left. Complimented her on the dress and she gave a little happy dance.

Kissed goodbye. Pretty content for first K girl and would probably see her again.

By the way, the scheduler basically just ignored all the references / suggestions I gave for screening and wanted me to do it his way, LOL.

[QUOTE=Leo85;5945368]Both of them used to be with KAngels last year. Jo is now an independent provider, but anyone has info about Angel? Liked her a lot.[/QUOTE]Do you have a link for Jo or her contact. Feel free to PM me. Thanks.

Hey why'all. I just moved back to this wonderful State, and I'm trying to find some Kgirl agencies. So far I could only find Kangels?? I found two other "agencies" but seems their website is down? So I assume they don't exist anymore? One was lollipop girls or whatever the other was Saphiregirls?? Idk only so much Google will show when trying to search for this kind of stuff LOL. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

[QUOTE=Anger;5953384]Hey why'all. I just moved back to this wonderful State, and I'm trying to find some Kgirl agencies. So far I could only find Kangels?? I found two other "agencies" but seems their website is down? So I assume they don't exist anymore? One was lollipop girls or whatever the other was Saphiregirls?? Idk only so much Google will show when trying to search for this kind of stuff LOL. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks![/QUOTE]Lollipopgirls. Us is legit and is up and running. Their girls are generally better than kangels. Most pics are not of the real girl or photoshopped of them 10 years ago. Sapphiregirl and lollipopgirls is the same owner. There are some independents girls out there who are not Kgirls but last time I saw one of those. Celine2 cute, she turned out to be a ladyboy.

There are also C-orgs. They are generally older girls in their 40's. Once a while they have a young one. You can find them on bedpage or eros.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5953590]Lollipopgirls. Us is legit and is up and running. Their girls are generally better than kangels. Most pics are not of the real girl or photoshopped of them 10 years ago. Sapphiregirl and lollipopgirls is the same owner. There are some independents girls out there who are not Kgirls but last time I saw one of those. Celine2 cute, she turned out to be a ladyboy.

There are also C-orgs. They are generally older girls in their 40's. Once a while they have a young one. You can find them on bedpage or eros.[/QUOTE][URL]https://seattlekoreangirls.com/[/URL]

Do the lollpop girls offer PSE?

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5953783][URL]https://seattlekoreangirls.com/[/URL]

Do the lollpop girls offer PSE?[/QUOTE]If they sense that you are safe then yes in most cases.

Saw Flower over the weekend based on Meorme's earlier review. So glad I did. Young, cute, natural b-cups. More of a FWB vibe than a k-girl script, but I rolled with it and had a lot of fun. No problem getting a second round in, and got the full hour.

Decided to book Mina without any intel since I was bored. She matches the pics on the site minus the normal P.S. I figured since they have group shots with her and Bibi on the site they probably wouldn't try and pull 2 x B&S, haha. Her current hair matches the pics and she wore the same hair ribbon and choker too. Breasts are small but cute, the quoted 32 B seems accurate. Not much in the English department. Was a nice GFE experience, tons of kissing, dfk, lot of kissing / breathing / nibbling around the ear which I enjoyed. Not much in the way of a shower preview, but I enjoyed myself throughout because of the overall GFE vibe and she stayed vocal / in to it throughout. If you like her look then I don't think you'll be disappointed.